<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. https://www.livejournal.com/bots/ -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:lj="https://www.livejournal.com" xmlns:idx="urn:atom-extension:indexing" idx:index="no">
  <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:with_rainfall</id>
  <title>sing on: somewhere at some new moon</title>
  <subtitle>till human voices wake us, and we drown</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Mistrali</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://with-rainfall.livejournal.com/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://with-rainfall.livejournal.com/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2012-03-31T06:32:09Z</updated>
  <lj:journal userid="26501623" username="with_rainfall" type="personal"/>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="https://with-rainfall.livejournal.com/data/atom" title="sing on: somewhere at some new moon"/>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:with_rainfall:32332</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://with-rainfall.livejournal.com/32332.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://with-rainfall.livejournal.com/data/atom/?itemid=32332"/>
    <title>Attempt at found poetry</title>
    <published>2012-03-19T05:17:11Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-31T06:32:09Z</updated>
    <category term="poetry: found poetry"/>
    <category term="writing: i prefer this to yoga"/>
    <category term="smoking out the muses"/>
    <content type="html">Found poetry is a type of poetry where, instead of creating an original poem, you take a non-poetic source - like a newspaper article or a grammar guide or a non-fiction book - and then change the form and perhaps the content to make it into poetry, while still retaining the original meaning. It can also be taken from other poems, but I&amp;#39;m guessing that would involve individual lines or words rather than whole stanzas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An explanation can be found here: &lt;a href="http://verbatimpoetry.blogspot.com.au/p/about-verbatim.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://verbatimpoetry.blogspot.com.au/p/about-verbatim.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EDIT: And a better one here: &lt;a href="http://www.thewritersezine.com/t-zero/archives/2003-texts/2003-12-poetics.shtml" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thewritersezine.com/t-zero/archives/2003-texts/2003-12-poetics.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;-----&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have very mixed feelings about this genre. Yes, it is a legitimate genre, and yes, it does appear in the New York Times (albeit&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;the educational section for students)&amp;nbsp;as well as having its own poetry journal (link: &lt;a href="http://www.foundpoetryreview.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.foundpoetryreview.com/&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;On one hand I think it&amp;#39;s awesome to reinterpret something intended to be entirely non-poetic. But I just feel weird about taking s&lt;i&gt;omeone else&amp;#39;s article &lt;/i&gt;and breaking it up and calling that a poem without putting any effort in.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ETA: Poem removed because I realised I was restating the article, not reinterpreting it. :)&lt;a name='cutid1-end'&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
