Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update actively supported type-checkers list in readme #9472

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 6, 2023

Conversation

Avasam
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@Avasam Avasam commented Jan 6, 2023

  • Added pyright mention in readme (since typeshed actively supports it and works with it)
  • Add links to help navigate away readers looking for type-checkers
  • Add missing code-block

- Added pyright mention in readme
- Add links to help navigate away readers looking for type-checkers
- Add missing code-block
@Avasam
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

Avasam commented Jan 6, 2023

Found it a bit weird pyright wasn't mentioned given its popularity and how actively it is used in typeshed.

Copy link
Collaborator

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This wording probably predates pyright's existence entirely.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Avasam added a commit to Avasam/stub_uploader that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Avasam and others added 2 commits January 6, 2023 16:41
Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja merged commit e584337 into python:main Jan 6, 2023
1 check passed
@Avasam Avasam deleted the pyright-readme branch January 6, 2023 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants