Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.8] bpo-13826: Clarify Popen constructor example (GH-18438) #18445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 10, 2020

Clarifies that the use of shlex.split is more instructive than
normative, and provides a simpler example.

https://bugs.python.org/issue13826
(cherry picked from commit 95d024d)

Co-authored-by: Tim D. Smith github@tim-smith.us

https://bugs.python.org/issue13826

Automerge-Triggered-By: @gvanrossum

Clarifies that the use of `shlex.split` is more instructive than
normative, and provides a simpler example.

https://bugs.python.org/issue13826
(cherry picked from commit 95d024d)

Co-authored-by: Tim D. Smith <github@tim-smith.us>
@gvanrossum gvanrossum added the 🤖 automerge PR will be merged once it's been approved and all CI passed label Feb 10, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Feb 10, 2020

@tdsmith: Status check is done, and it's a success .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit e6690f6 into python:3.8 Feb 10, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-95d024d-3.8 branch Feb 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir 🤖 automerge PR will be merged once it's been approved and all CI passed skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants