Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-46730: Fix refleak and tighten NULL checks #31389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2022

Conversation

tiran
Copy link
Member

@tiran tiran commented Feb 17, 2022

PyType_GetQualName returns a new reference.

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes christian@python.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue46730

``PyType_GetQualName`` returns a new reference.

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <christian@python.org>
@sweeneyde
Copy link
Member

sweeneyde commented Feb 17, 2022

I'll try to be more cautious about ref-leaks in the future. Thanks for catching this!

@markshannon markshannon marked this pull request as ready for review Feb 17, 2022
@markshannon markshannon added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Feb 17, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Feb 17, 2022

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @markshannon for commit a22802e 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the "🔨 test-with-buildbots" label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Feb 17, 2022
@sweeneyde sweeneyde merged commit 9e06d03 into python:main Feb 17, 2022
75 of 78 checks passed
@tiran
Copy link
Member Author

tiran commented Feb 17, 2022

@sweeneyde The buildbots have not finished verifying this PR yet. Next time please wait until all buildbots are successful.

@sweeneyde
Copy link
Member

sweeneyde commented Feb 17, 2022

Ah, my apologies, I was just looking at the refleak bots. I will wait next time. Thank you for the help!

@Alex-Blade
Copy link
Contributor

Alex-Blade commented Feb 18, 2022

Oh, apologies, should have checked that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants