Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-1635741: Fix possible refleaks in tupleobject.c #19018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 15, 2020

Conversation

shihai1991
Copy link
Member

@shihai1991 shihai1991 commented Mar 15, 2020

Copy link
Member

@pablogsal pablogsal left a comment

LGTM! Good catch :)

@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit c81609e into python:master Mar 15, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Mar 15, 2020

Thanks @shihai1991 for the PR, and @pablogsal for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8.
🐍🍒🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2020
(cherry picked from commit c81609e)

Co-authored-by: Hai Shi <shihai1992@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Mar 15, 2020

GH-19021 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Mar 15, 2020

GH-19022 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2020
(cherry picked from commit c81609e)

Co-authored-by: Hai Shi <shihai1992@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2020
(cherry picked from commit c81609e)

Co-authored-by: Hai Shi <shihai1992@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2020
(cherry picked from commit c81609e)

Co-authored-by: Hai Shi <shihai1992@gmail.com>
@shihai1991
Copy link
Member Author

shihai1991 commented Mar 16, 2020

Thanks, Pablo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants