Abstract
This research explores applying deep learning models to forecast the progress of the Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP), a vital initiative aimed at the holistic development of rural areas in India. The study focuses on two key performance indicators: the number of facilitators registered and the number of Sabha scheduled, using data collected from the GPDP website spanning from September 1st, 2020, to June 2nd, 2024. The dataset covers five states: Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh. Comprehensive preprocessing steps, including hourly interpolation, differencing, time series decomposition, and scaling, were employed to ensure high-quality data for model training. We applied a range of deep learning models, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), Gated Recurrent Units, and several hybrid models. The models were evaluated based on Root Mean Squared Error, Mean Absolute Error, Mean Squared Error, and the coefficient of determination (R2). The study identified the RNN model as the best performer, achieving the highest average Friedman ranking across all metrics and states. Furthermore, we extended our forecast to May 28th, 2025, using the RNN model, providing valuable projections for the GPDP's future progress. The findings of this research offer critical insights for policymakers and administrators, enabling data-driven decision-making to enhance the planning and implementation of rural development initiatives. This study not only highlights the efficacy of deep learning models in time series forecasting but also contributes to the sustained success and improvement of the GPDP.


































Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The Data will be provided upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Available with the authors.
References
Sheenam K. (2020). “Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI’s) in India: A Historical Perspective,” International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, vol. 8, no. 2.
Tiwari, N. (2014). Panchayati Raj Institutions as tool for empowerment at grassroots. Journal of Politics and Governance, 3(4), 5–13.
Ghosh, D., Sarkar, N., Choudhary, G., Bhattacharya, D., Ahmad, I., Roy, P. Developing Gram Panchayats in a Backward District: A Scoping Study on Gaya, Bihar.
Jain, A., Zamir, A. R., Savarese, S., & Saxena, A. (2016). Structural-rnn: Deep learning on spatio-temporal graphs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 5308–5317.
St-Aubin, P., & Agard, B. (2022). Precision and reliability of forecasts performance metrics. Forecasting, 4(4), 882–903.
Gutierrez, N., & Wiesinger-Widi, M. (2016). “AUGURY: A time series based application for the analysis and forecasting of system and network performance metrics. In: 2016 18th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC), IEEE, pp. 351–358.
Datta, P. K. (2019). Exploring the dynamics of deliberative democracy in rural India: Lessons from the working of Gram Sabhas in India and Gram Sansads in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 65(1), 117–135.
Siddhartha, D. (2007). “Panchayati Raj: Grassroots Democracy,” Orissa Review.
Rehaan, B. Reforms Made by Lord Ripon When he Came to India in 1880, https://www.shareyouressays.com/knowledge/reforms-made-by-lord-ripon-when-he-came-to-india-in-1880/105263.
Palanithurai, G. (2005). Process and performance of gram panchayat women and Dalit presidents. Concept Publishing Company.
Huang, W., Li, Y., & Huang, Y. (2020). Deep hybrid neural network and improved differential neuroevolution for chaotic time series prediction. IEEE Access, 8, 159552–159565.
Qiu, Y., Yang, H.-Y., Lu, S., & Chen, W. (2020). A novel hybrid model based on recurrent neural networks for stock market timing. Soft Computing, 24, 15273–15290.
Mandal, A. (2011). Gram sabha—A conceptual exploration. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 57(2), 209–222.
Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., & Namin, A. S. (2019). The performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in forecasting time series. In: 2019 IEEE International conference on big data (Big Data), IEEE, pp. 3285–3292.
Hameed, Z., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2020). Sentiment classification using a single-layered BiLSTM model. IEEE Access, 8, 73992–74001.
Muhammad, A. U., Li, X., & Feng, J. (2019). Using LSTM GRU and hybrid models for streamflow forecasting. In: Machine Learning and Intelligent Communications: 4th International Conference, MLICOM 2019, Nanjing, China, August 24–25, 2019, Proceedings 4, Springer, pp. 510–524.
Khan, M., Wang, H., Riaz, A., Elfatyany, A., & Karim, S. (2021). Bidirectional LSTM-RNN-based hybrid deep learning frameworks for univariate time series classification. Journal of Supercomputing, 77, 7021–7045.
Wang, C., Liu, Z., Wei, H., Chen, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). Hybrid deep learning model for short-term wind speed forecasting based on time series decomposition and gated recurrent unit. Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 1(4), 308–321.
Lin, T., Guo, T., & Aberer, K. (2017). Hybrid neural networks for learning the trend in time series. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp. 2273–2279.
Arslan, S. (2022). A hybrid forecasting model using LSTM and Prophet for energy consumption with decomposition of time series data. PeerJ Computer Science, 8, e1001.
Islam, M. S., & Hossain, E. (2021). Foreign exchange currency rate prediction using a GRU-LSTM hybrid network. Soft Computing Letters, 3, 100009.
Khan, M., Wang, H., Ngueilbaye, A., & Elfatyany, A. (2023). End-to-end multivariate time series classification via hybrid deep learning architectures. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 27(2), 177–191.
Wang, W. & Lu, Y. (2018) Analysis of the mean absolute error (MAE) and the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing rounding model. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, IOP Publishing, p. 012049.
Hodson, T. O. (2022). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2022, 1–10.
Ash, A., & Shwartz, M. (1999). R2: A useful measure of model performance when predicting a dichotomous outcome. Statistics in Medicine, 18(4), 375–384.
Ghrib, Z., Jaziri, R. & Romdhane, R. (2020). Hybrid approach for anomaly detection in time series data. In: 2020 international joint conference on neural networks (ijcnn), IEEE, pp. 1–7.
García, S., Fernández, A., Luengo, J., & Herrera, F. (2010). Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: Experimental analysis of power. Information Sciences, 180(10), 2044–2064.
Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (1993). Relative power of the Wilcoxon test, the Friedman test, and repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1993.9943832
Funding
The authors declare that this study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Equal Contributions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Singh, S.K., Utkarsh, K. et al. AI-driven forecasting of rural development in India: a deep learning case study on the gram panchayat development plan. J Comput Soc Sc 9, 8 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00440-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00440-5

