Skip to main content
Log in

Hannan Quinn Quantum Grasshopper Optimization and Attention Deep Intelligent Train Status Prediction

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Providing accurate and timely traffic information such as arriving time of train plays a significant part in intelligent train status prediction. Maximum-speed train status forecast is a significant topic as far as railway dispatching. In this paper proposes a novel train status prediction method based on the Hannan Quinn Quantum Grasshopper Optimized Attention Deep Learning (HQQGO-ADL) method introduced for accurate train status prediction. The proposed HQQGO-ADL is designed with three different processes namely preprocessing, feature selection, and prediction. This method can well capture the influence of discrete and continuous features in addition to spatiotemporal characteristics, therefore modeling train status prediction. At first, Mid-hinge Inter-Quartile Interpolation is utilized to perform preprocessing for eradicating or discarding the outliers with less train status identification time. Second, HannanQuinn Quantum Grasshopper Optimization is employed to capture the influence of discrete and continuous features on spatiotemporal characteristics, therefore modeling train status prediction. Besides, the maximum log likelihood discrete feature fine tuned to obtain continuous features. Finally, the Attention Deep Neural Train Status Prediction model is utilized for improved latency train status prediction. The overall analysis of HQQGO-ADL has better performance of higher train status prediction accuracy by 32% and lower train status prediction time, overhead, and error rate by 32%, 32%, and 27%as compared to existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Algorithm 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Algorithm 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Algorithm 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 7
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 8
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 9
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will available on the request.

References

  1. Chondrodima E, Georgiou H, Pelekis N, Theodoridis Y (2022) Particle swarm optimization and RBF neural networks for public transport arrival time prediction using GTFS data. Int J Inf Manag Data Insights, Elsevier [Particle Swarm Optimization using Non Symmetric Fuzzy Means (PSO-NSFM)]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100086

  2. Tran VT, Tsai WH. Acoustic-based train arrival detection using convolutional neural networks with attention. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3185224

  3. Huang P, Wen C, Fu L, Peng Q, Li Z (2020) A hybrid model to improve the train running time prediction ability duringhigh-speed railway disruptions. Saf Sci, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104510

  4. Staino A, Suwalka A, Mitra P, Basu B (2022) Real–time detection and recognition of railway traffic signals using deep learning. J Big Data Analytics Transp, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-022-00054-7

  5. Liu Y, Gao M, Zong H, Wang X, Li J (2022) Real-time object detection for the running train based on the improved YOLO V4 neural network. J Adv Transp, Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4377953

  6. Radhakrishnan N, Kandeepan S, Yu X, Baldini G (2021) Performance analysis of long short-term memory-based markovian spectrum prediction. Access IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3125725

  7. Bi J, Zhang X, Yuan H, Zhang J, Zhou M (2021) A hybrid prediction method for realistic Network Traffic with temporal Convolutional Network and LSTM. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2021.3077537

  8. Wan X, Liu H, Xu H, Zhang X (2022) Network traffic prediction based on LST Mand Transfer Learning. Access IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199372

  9. Zhang D, Xu Y, Peng Y, Du C, Wang N, Tang M, Lu L, Liu J (2023) An interpretable station delay prediction model based on graph community neural network and time-series fuzzy decision tree. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 31(2):421–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2022.3181453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poschmann P, Weinke M, Straube F (2023) Predicting estimated arrival times in logistics using machine learning. Predictive Analytics, IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch160

  11. Lapamonpinyo P, Derrible S, Corman F (2022) Real-time passenger train delay prediction using machine learning: A case study with Amtrak passenger train routes. IEEE Open J Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJITS.2022.3194879

  12. Sayed SA, Abdel-Hamid Y, Hefny HA (2023) Artificial intelligence–based traffic flowprediction: a comprehensive review. J Electr Syst Inf Technol, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-023-00081-6

  13. Zafar N, Ul Haq I (2020) Traffic congestion prediction based on estimated time of arrival. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238200

  14. Ulak MB, Yazici AM, Zhang Y (2020) Analyzing network-wide patterns of rail transit delays using Bayesian network learning. Transp Res Part C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102749

  15. Laifa H, Khcherif R, Ghezala HB (2022) Predicting trains delays using a two-level machine learning approach. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010898300003116

  16. Minbashi N, Sipilä H, Palmqvist C-W, Bohlin M, Kordnejad B (2023) Machine learning-assisted macro simulation for yard arrival prediction. J Rail Transp Plann Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100368

  17. Arshad M, Ahmed M (2019) Prediction of train delay in indian railways through machine learning techniques. Int J Comput Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i2.405411

  18. Wu J, Du B, Wu Q, Shen J, Zhou L, Cai C, Zhai Y, Wei W, Zhou Q (2021) A hybrid LSTM-CPS approach for long-term prediction of train delays in multivariate time series. Future Transp, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp1030042

  19. Wang X, Jiang B, Ding SX, Lu N, Li Y (2022) Extended relevance vector machine-based remaining useful life prediction for DC-link capacitor in high-speed train. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3035796

  20. Huang P, Wen C, Fu L, Peng Q, Tang Y (2020) A deep learning approach for multi-attribute data: a study of train delay prediction in railway systems. Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.053

  21. Malli T, Balaprakash P, Rask E, Macfarlane J (2020) Graph-partitioning-based diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network for large-scale traffic forecasting. Transp Res Record. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120930010

  22. Cao K (2022) A machine learning-based approach to railway logistics transport path optimization. Math Probl Eng, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1691215

  23. Huang P, Wen C, Fu L, Lessan J, Jiang C, Peng Q, Xu X (2020) Modeling train operation as sequences: a study of delay prediction with operation and weather data. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102022

  24. Cerreto F, Nielsen BF, Nielsen OA, Harrod SS (2018) Application of data clustering to railway delay pattern recognition. J Adv Transp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6164534

  25. Oneto L, Buselli I, Lulli A, Canepa R, Petralli S, Anguita D (2019) A dynamic, interpretable, and robust hybrid data analytics system for train movements in large-scale railway networks. Int J Data Sci Analytics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-018-00171-z

  26. Nair R, Hoang TL, Laumanns M, Chen B, Cogill R, Szabó J, Walter T (2019) An ensemble prediction model for train delays. Transp Res Part E: Logistics Transp Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.026

  27. Kothai G, Poovammal E, Dhiman G, Ramana K, Sharma A, AlZain MA, Gaba GS, Masud M (2021) A new hybrid deep learning algorithm for prediction of wide traffic congestion in smart cities. Wirel Commun Mob Comput, Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5583874

  28. Zhang D, Xu Y, Peng Y, Zhang Y, Wu D, Wang H, Liu J, Mohammed S, Calvi A (2022) Prediction of train station delay based on multiattention graph convolution network. J Adv Transp Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7580267

  29. Li ZC, Wen C, Hu R, Xu C, Huang P, Jiang X (2020) Near-Term train delay prediction in the Dutch railways network. Int J Rail Transp. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2020.1843194

  30. Wang H (2022) Two-stage a train delay prediction method based on data smoothing and multimodel fusion using asymmetry features in urban rail systems. Wirel Commun Mob Comput, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5188105

  31. Tiong KY, Ma Z, Palmqvist C-W (2023) A review of data-driven approaches to predict train delays. Transp Res Part C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104027

  32. Martínez-Llop PG, Bobi JD, Ortega MO ( 2023) Time consideration in machine learning models for train comfort predictionusing LSTM networks. J Rail Transp Plann Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106303

  33. Balster A, Hansen O, Friedrich H, Ludwig A (2020) An ETA prediction model for intermodal transport networks based on machine learning. Bus Inform Syst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00653-0

  34. Kammoun A, Slama R, Tabia H, Ouni T, Abid M (2022) Generative Adversarial Networks for face generation: A survey. In: ACM Computing Surveys. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/1122445.1122456

  35. Wang J, Mantas-Nakhai R, Yu J (2023) Statistical learning for train delays and influence of winter climate and atmospheric icing. J Rail Transp Plann Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2023.100388

  36. Zhang Y, Zhong Q, Yin Y, Peng Q (2020) A fast approach for reoptimization of railway train platforming in case of train delays. J Adv Transp Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5609524

  37. Liu Q, Wang S, Li Z, Li L, Zhang J, Wen C (2022) Prediction of high–speed train delay propagation based on causaltext information. Railw Eng Sci, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-022-00286-x

  38. Shi R, Xu X, Li J, Li Y (2021) Prediction and analysis of train arrival delay based on XGBoost and Bayesian optimization. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107538

  39. Kong X, Zhang T (2020) Improved generalized predictive control for high-speed train network systems based on EMD-AQPSO-LS-SVM time delay prediction model. Math Probl Eng, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6913579

  40. Sihui L, Meng L, Wang Y, Li X (2020) A discrete-space train movement model for a high-speed train under temporary speed restriction. Math Probl Eng, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5386406

  41. Liang H, Zhao H, Wang S, Zhang Y (2020) LTE-U based train to train communication system in CBTC: System design and reliability analysis. , Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8893631

  42. Kratochvílová M, Podroužek J, Apeltauer J, Vukušič I, Plášek O (2020) Train type identification at S&C. J Adv Transp, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8849734

  43. Heil J, Hoffmann K, Buscher U (2019) Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications. Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.016

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rajesh Kumar Dhanaraj or Santosh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

We, the authors declare that we have no competing interests that might be perceived as influencing the results or interpretation of our manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A., Dhanaraj, R.K., Kumar, S. et al. Hannan Quinn Quantum Grasshopper Optimization and Attention Deep Intelligent Train Status Prediction. Multimed Tools Appl 84, 29689–29714 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20122-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20122-0

Keywords