Skip to main content
Log in

Video and image quality improvement using an enhanced optimized dehazing technique

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The detrimental effects of atmospheric haze frequently plague outdoor imagery. This phenomenon arises from the scattering of light by minute particles within the ambient environment surrounding the scene to be imaged. Haze engenders an overall whitening of the image, leading to diminished contrast. To address these issues and enhance the quality of hazy images and videos, an enhanced dehazing technique is proposed. The proposed technique includes image enhancement before the optimal dehazing process. The enhancement stage entails the implementation of both homomorphic processing and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), serving to control the image dynamic range, while concurrently heightening the image contrast. The culminating stage encompasses an optimized dehazing technique, adept at expunging haze-induced artifacts from images. The homomorphic processing and CLAHE, applied in the pre-processing step, establish a foundation for the subsequent dehazing procedure. This proposed methodology is systematically applied to a gamut of visual outputs, including visible videos, Near-Infrared (NIR) frames, and authentic hazy images. Comparative evaluations of the proposed technique, homomorphic-processing-based enhanced dehazing, and standalone dehazing techniques is undertaken on different video types encompassing five frames. It is evident that the proposed technique, synergizing the homomorphic processing, CLAHE, and dehazing, outperforms alternative strategies. Furthermore, the proposed technique is subjected to a comparative study with various existing dehazing techniques over real hazy images. The assessment depends on Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), correlation, and entropy metrics. The results underscore the efficacy of the proposed technique, particularly in terms of spectral entropy enhancement of dehazed frames. For both visible and NIR frames, the percentages of enhancement by the proposed technique are 17.66% and 118.48%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 7
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 8
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 9
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Ayoub A, Naeem EA, El-Shafai W, Sultan EA, Zahran O, Abd El-Samie FE, EL-Rabaie ES (2022) Video quality enhancement using recursive deep residual learning network. Signal, Image and Video Processing 17(1):257–265 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02228-w

  2. Ayoub A, Naeem EA, El-Shafai W, Sultan EA, Zahran O, Abd El-Samie FE, EL-Rabaie ES, (2023) Video quality enhancement using dual transmission map dehazing. Multimed Tools Appl 83(7):20289–20306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayoub A, Naeem EA, El-Shafai W, Sultan EA, Zahran O, Abd El-Samie FE, EL-Rabaie ES, (2023) Video quality enhancement using different enhancement and dehazing techniques. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 14(12):16607–16635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai B, Xu X, Jia K, Qing C, Tao D (2016) Dehazenet: An end-to-end system for single image haze removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(11):5187–5198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Li B, Peng X, Wang Z, Xu J, Feng D (2017) AOD Net: All-in-One dehazing network. In: the IEEE international conference on computer vision. Glasgow UK, vol 1, No 4, pp 4770–4778

  6. Bonneel N, Tompkin J, Sunkavalli K, Sun D, Paris S, Pfister H (2015) Blind video temporal consistency. ACM Trans Graph 34(6):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakaridis C, Dai D, Van Gool L (2018) Semantic foggy scene understanding with synthetic data. Int J Comput Vis 12(6):973–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen C, Do MN, Wang J (2016) Robust image and video dehazing with visual artifact suppression via gradient residual minimization. Lect Notes Comput Sci 9906(LNCS):576–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_36

  9. Berman D, Treibitz T, Avidan S (2016) Non-local image dehazing. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, p 1674–1682

  10. Du Y, Li X (2018) Recursive deep residual learning for single image dehazing. In: IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (CVPRW). https://github.com/yixindu1573/Recursive-Deep-Residual-Learning-for-Single-Image-Dehazing-DRL/tree/master/testData. Accessed 20 Dec 2023

  11. McCartney EJ (1976) Optics of the atmosphere: scattering by molecules and particles. New York, John Wiley Sons, Inc, 4, p 21

  12. Engin D, Genç A, Kemal Ekenel H (2018) Cycle-Dehaze: Enhanced Cyclegan for Single Image Dehazing. In: proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 825–833

  13. Biagetti G, Crippa P, Orcioni S, Turchetti C (2017) Homomorphic Deconvolution for MUAP Estimation from Surface EMG Signals. IEEE J Biomed Health Informa 21(2):328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meng G, Wang Y, Duan J, Xiang S, Pan C (2013) Efficient image dehazing with boundary constraint and contextual regularization. IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis, pp 617–624

  15. Koschmieder H (1924) Theorie der horizontalen sichtweite. Beitrage Zur Physik der Freien Atmos, pp 33–53

  16. Zhang H, Patel VM (2018) Densely connected pyramid dehazing network. In: conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 3194–3203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04411

  17. Kim I, Min HK (2017) Dehazing using non-local regularization with iso depth neighbor-_elds. Proc Conf Comput Vis Theory Appl, pp 77–88

  18. Tarel J, Hautière N (2009) Fast visibility restoration from a single color or gray level image. In: Proc IEEE ICCV, pp 2201–2208

  19. Shin J, Kim M, Paik J, Lee S (2020) Radiance–reflectance combined optimization and structure-guided. IEEE Trans Multimed 22(1):30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He K, Sun J, Tang X (2011) Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(12):2341–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JH, Jang WD, Sim JY, Kim CS (2013) Optimized contrast enhancement for real-time image and video dehazing. J Vis Commun Image Represent 24(3):410–425. http://mcl.korea.ac.kr/projects/dehazing/videos/video_seq.zip. Accessed 20 Dec 2023

  22. Levin A, Lischinski D, Weiss Y (2008) A closed-form solution to natural image matting. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 30(2):228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Z, Tan P, Tan RT, Zou D, Zhou SZ, Cheong LF (2015) Simultaneous video defogging and stereo reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 4988–4997

  24. Dhana Lakshmi Bhavani M, Murugan R, Goe T (2022) An efficient dehazing method of single image using multi-scale fusion technique. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 14(7):9059–9071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saini M, Wang X, Atrey PK, Kankanhalli M (2012) Adaptive workload Equalization in multi-camera surveillance systems. IEEE Trans Multimed 14(3):555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fattal R (2014) Dehazing using color lines. ACM Trans Graph 34(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Feris RS (2011) Large-scale vehicle detection, indexing, and search in urban surveillance videos. IEEE Trans Multimed 14(1):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan RT (2008) Visibility in bad weather from a single image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 1–8

  29. Nayar SK, Narasimhan SG (1999) Vision in bad weather. IEEE IntConf Comput Vis (ICCV),  pp 820–827

  30. Aboshosha S, Zahran O, Dessouky MI, Abd El-Samie FE (2019) Resolution and quality enhancement of images using interpolation and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. Multimed Tools Appl 78(13):18751–18786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen H, Zhao ZQ, Zhang Y, Zhang Z (2023) Mutual information-driven triple interaction network for efficient image dehazing. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp 7–16

  32. Muhammad S, Imran M, Ullah A, Elbasi E (2021) A single image dehazing technique using the dual transmission maps strategy and gradient-domain guided image filtering. Digit Object Identifier. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Orcioni S, Paffi A, Camera F, Apollonio F, Liberti M (2018) Automatic decoding of input sinusoidal signal in a neuron model: High pass homomorphic filtering. Neurocomputing 292:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Orcioni S, Paffi A, Camera F, Apollonio F, Liberti M (2017) Automatic decoding of input sinusoidal signal in a neuron model: Improved SNR spectrum by low-pass homomorphic filtering. Neurocomputing 267:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Solbo S, Eltoft T (2020) Homomorphic wavelet-based statistical despeckling of SAR. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42(4):711–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Raikwar SC, Tapaswi S (2020) Lower bound on transmission using non-linear bounding function in single image dehazing. IEEE Trans Image Process 29(3):4832–4847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Nguyen T, Vien AG, Lee C (2022) Real-time image and video dehazing based on multiscale guided filtering. Multimed Tools Appl 81:36567–36584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Web N, Kaplan H (2023) Real-world image dehazing with improved joint enhancement and exposure fusion. J Vis Commun Image Represent 90:103720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.103720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ren W, Liu S, Zhang H, Pan J, Cao X, Yang MH (2016) Single image dehazing via multi-scale convolutional neural networks. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 154–169

  40. Liu Y, Li H, Wang M (2017) Single image dehazing via large sky region segmentation and multiscale opening dark channel model. IEEE Access 5:8890–8903. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2710305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yuan G, Li J, Hua Z (2021) Single-image rain removal using deep residual network. Sig Image Video Process 15(4):827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Song Y, He Z, Qian H, Du X (2020) Vision transformers for single image dehazing. IEEE Trans Image Process 3(2):1927–1941

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yu H, Zheng N, Zhou M, Huang J, Xiao Z, Zhao F (2022) Frequency and spatial dual guidance for image dehazing. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Cham Springer Nature Switzerland, pp 181–198

  44. Zhang J, Li L, Zhang Y, Yang G, Cao X, Sun J (2011) Video dehazing with spatial and temporal coherence. Vis Comput 27(6–8):749–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-011-0569-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu Z, Xiao B, Alrabeiah M, Wang K, Chen J (2019) Generic Model-Agnostic Convolutional Neural Network for Single Image Dehazing. arXiv:1810.02862v2 [cs.CV] 29

  46. Zhu Z, Wei H, Hu G, Li Y, Qi G, Mazur N (2021) A novel fast single image dehazing algorithm based on artificial multiexposure image fusion. IEEE Trans Inst Meas 70(7):1–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to all the institutions in the affiliation list for successfully performing this research work. The authors would like to thank Prince Sultan University for their support.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors equally contributed.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abeer Ayoub.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All authors contributed and accepted to submit the current work.

Consent to participate

All authors contributed and accepted to submit the current work.

Consent to publish

All authors accepted to submit and publish the submitted work.

Competing interests

The authors have neither relevant financial nor non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayoub, A., El-Shafai, W., El-Samie, F.E.A. et al. Video and image quality improvement using an enhanced optimized dehazing technique. Multimed Tools Appl 84, 22681–22699 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19263-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19263-z

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Walid El-Shafai