Skip to main content

A Quantitative Diagnostic Method Based on Bayesian Networks in Traditional Chinese Medicine

  • Conference paper
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4234))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2451 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is one of the most important complementary and alternative medicines. Due to the subjectivity and fuzziness of diagnosis in TCM, quantitative model or methods are needed to facilitate the popularization of TCM. In this article, a novel quantitative method for syndrome differentiation based on BNs is proposed. First the symptoms are selected by a novel mutual information based symptom selection algorithm (MISS) and then the mapping relationships between the selected symptoms and key elements are constructed. Finally, the corresponding syndromes are output by combining the key elements. The results show that the diagnostic model obtains relative reliable predictions of syndrome, and its average predictive accuracy rate reach 91.68%, which testifies that the method we proposed is feasible and effective and can be expected to be useful in the modernization of TCM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma, B.: Expert systems and knowledge bases in traditional Chinese medicine (In Chinese). Beijing Press, Beijing (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neapolitan, R.E.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Yager, R.R.: Fuzzy information engineering: A guide tour of applications, pp. 149–162. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, J., Hatzis, C., Hayashi, H., Krogel, M.-A., Morishita, S., Page, D., Sese, J.: KDD Cup 2001 report. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 2002, 3(2), 47–64 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X.W., Qu, H.B., Liu, P., Cheng, Y.Y.: A self-learning expert systems for diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine. Expert Systems with Applications 26, 557–566 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 50, 157–224 (1988)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Forman, G.: An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. JMLR 3, 1289–1306 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong, A.K.C., Chiu, D.K.Y.: Synthesizing statistical knowledge from incomplete mixed-mode data. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 9(6), 796–805 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mullin, M., Sukthankar, R.: Complete cross-validation for nearest neighbor classifiers. In: Proceedings of ICML, pp. 639–646 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu, W.F.: The establishment of united system of syndrome differentiation. Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine 4, 4–6 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, H., Wang, J. (2006). A Quantitative Diagnostic Method Based on Bayesian Networks in Traditional Chinese Medicine. In: King, I., Wang, J., Chan, LW., Wang, D. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11893295_20

Download citation

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics