Hire by Technology
SERVICES
Contents
Share this article
Key Takeaways
iOS development involves building native applications for Apple's iPhone and iPad using Swift, Xcode, and Apple's SDK.
As the second-largest mobile operating system globally and the dominant platform for higher-spending users in Western markets, iOS deserves serious attention from any business building a consumer-facing mobile product.
Apple Pay, Face ID biometric authentication, the Secure Enclave for cryptographic key storage, and a user base that consistently outspends Android users on in-app purchases and financial products all make iOS the platform where most fintech revenue concentrates.
Let’s look at everything you need to know about iOS development so you can get your product on the market as quickly as possible, without sacrificing compliance.
To do this, you need iOS developers who are familiar with the unique requirements of the heavily regulated environment.
Trio places pre-vetted engineers with experience in production fintech applications in 3–5 days.
iOS is Apple's mobile operating system, exclusive to iPhone and iPad.
It exists within Apple's broader platform ecosystem, alongside things like macOS (Mac computers), watchOS (Apple Watch), tvOS (Apple TV), and visionOS (Vision Pro).
It shares frameworks, programming languages, and developer tools across all of them.
This means that code written for iOS in SwiftUI can often target macOS, watchOS, and iPadOS with minimal additional work, which gives iOS a multi-platform reach that native Android development lacks.
The App Store serves as the primary distribution layer for iOS applications, with over 1.8 million apps available as of 2026.
Apple's review process is sometimes criticized for its friction, but this means that it functions as a quality signal that users associate with iOS apps, contributing to the higher average revenue per user that iOS consistently delivers compared to Android.
If you are weighing iOS versus Android as a development priority, then it is important to keep in mind that iOS commands approximately 57% of the US smartphone market and dominates among higher-income demographics.
On the other hand, Android leads globally by volume, but with dramatically lower average revenue per user.
Overall, most consumer fintech products in the US and Western Europe generate the majority of their revenue from iOS users.
iOS can be broken down into several technologies, each of which developers need to be familiar with.
As we have already mentioned, Swift is Apple's primary programming language for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS development.
Apple introduced it in 2014 to replace Objective-C, and it has been the dominant language for new iOS projects since around 2016.
Swift's design prioritises safety, with optional types that prevent null pointer exceptions, strong typing that catches errors at compile time rather than runtime, and the memory management model (ARC, Automatic Reference Counting), which eliminates an entire category of memory leak bugs that plagued Objective-C code.
In fintech applications, Swift's type safety and explicit handling of nil values matter more than in general consumer apps. A payment processing flow that can't compile when a required field is missing is safer than one that compiles fine but crashes at runtime.
While Swift is used in all newer apps these days, Objective-C hasn't disappeared.
From what we have seen, most iOS applications at major banks, insurance companies, and established fintech companies contain substantial Objective-C codebases, some running to millions of lines. Many of these aren't being rewritten from scratch.
If you are hiring an iOS developer to work on a legacy fintech codebase, they are probably going to encounter Objective-C, making the ability to read and modify it (while adding new features in Swift) a practical requirement for many financial services roles.
Xcode is Apple's integrated development environment for building applications across all Apple platforms.
It handles code editing, the iOS Simulator for testing without physical devices, Instruments for performance profiling, Interface Builder for visual UI design, and the build and submission pipeline to the App Store.
The iOS Simulator lets developers test applications on simulated iPhone and iPad devices without needing physical hardware.
It’s important to note that simulator testing has limits. Biometric authentication, NFC payments, and certain hardware-dependent features require a physical device. But it handles the majority of UI, networking, and data logic testing adequately.
The question of which UI framework to use (SwiftUI or UIKit) carries more nuance in 2026 than it did even two years ago, and the answer for fintech apps specifically differs from the general answer.
SwiftUI is Apple's declarative UI framework, introduced in 2019.
Essentially, you describe what the interface should look like, and SwiftUI figures out how to render and update it.
We’re seeing major increases in adoption among new projects. This is largely because the development speed for standard UI patterns is faster, the code is more concise, and cross-platform targeting (iOS, macOS, watchOS) requires less duplication.
For roughly 95% of modern applications, users perceive no meaningful performance difference from UIKit.
UIKit is the imperative framework that has powered iOS apps since 2008. You manually construct views, control their updates, and manage layout constraints.
While this is the older option, UIKit still powers approximately 80% of enterprise and legacy apps, including most banking and financial applications.
The stability is battle-tested, backward compatibility runs deeper, and the complex custom UI behaviours (pixel-perfect animations, highly customised table cells, intricate gesture recognisers) that consumer fintech apps sometimes require are better supported.
Most greenfield fintech products in 2026 use SwiftUI for new features while maintaining UIKit for older screens. A senior iOS developer joining a fintech team almost certainly needs both.
We have already mentioned some of the reasons why you may want to consider building your app on iOS, but it is worth considering in more detail, especially if you are considering only building one native app, not an additional Android application as well.
iOS users spend approximately twice as much on in-app purchases and digital products as Android users across comparable markets.
For fintech apps specifically, the skew is meaningful when it comes to things like subscription financial services, premium investment tools, and premium banking apps that will generate substantially higher average revenue per user on iOS.
If your product has any monetisation component, the iOS user base is the more valuable half of the market.
Native iOS development accesses Apple's SDK directly. These are the official frameworks for UI rendering, networking, cryptography, biometrics, and hardware.
The result is better performance than cross-platform solutions that interpose a JavaScript bridge or abstraction layer between application code and the native platform.
For most standard consumer apps, the performance difference between native iOS and React Native is imperceptible in daily use, but for fintech-specific cases like real-time price feeds, large transaction list rendering, biometric authentication flows, and cryptographic operations, it's a lot more important.
Apple's platform provides hardware-level security features that fintech applications can leverage directly:
While native iOS development is incredibly advantageous, it is far from the only option. You may want to consider an Android application instead, or perhaps utilize a cross-platform framework that allows you to scale to Android in the future.
Android and iOS serve different market segments, so most serious consumer products need both. Android accounts for roughly 43% of the US market and the majority of global smartphone users.
Turning your back on Android means accepting a ceiling on the addressable market.
In some of the fintech companies that we have worked with, the decision is to build iOS first to validate with the higher-spending user base, then expand to Android once the core product is proven.
React Native, Meta's cross-platform framework, uses JavaScript and React to build apps that run on both iOS and Android from a single codebase.
For many products, the development efficiency gains usually end up justifying the performance tradeoff.
The framework has also matured considerably in recent years. The New Architecture (default since version 0.76) eliminated the old asynchronous JavaScript bridge that caused most of the historical performance issues.
For fintech apps, the React Native question comes down to hardware access.
Payment flows, biometric authentication, and cryptographic operations are possible in React Native through native modules, but they require bridging to native code, either through existing libraries or custom implementations.
The financial apps that have bet on React Native, like Coinbase, NerdWallet, and Chime, have all managed to make it work at scale.
One viable strategy we recommend is to use React Native for most of the app, dropping to native Swift for the security-critical and performance-sensitive components.
Flutter, Google's cross-platform framework, uses the Dart language and renders its own UI rather than bridging to native components.
This gives it consistent rendering across iOS and Android, so your user interface looks identical on both platforms.
For fintech apps that depend on the familiar look and feel of native iOS controls to signal trust, this tradeoff deserves consideration.
However, you need to consider that Flutter's security ecosystem for fintech-specific requirements (Keychain access, Secure Enclave) requires third-party packages rather than first-party frameworks.
Mobile apps generally don't store data directly on-device for anything sensitive.
For example, financial data lives on your backend, with the device storing only session tokens, cached display data, and user preferences. However, database choices still matter for how local data gets handled.
For fintech iOS apps specifically:
The average US iOS developer salary runs $133,169/year as of May 2026 (Glassdoor), with the range sitting between $105,664 at the 25th percentile and $169,894 at the 75th percentile.
Top earners can exceed $210,000.
From what we have observed, senior iOS developers who specialise in fintech roles tend to earn in the upper range of this, because the combination of Swift fluency, SwiftUI/UIKit interoperability, and financial domain knowledge is genuinely scarce.
One way to minimize costs without sacrificing quality is to hire from LATAM.
LATAM nearshore rates:
| Seniority | US annual | LATAM annual | LATAM hourly |
| Junior (0–2 years) | $89,000–$110,000 | $28,000–$42,000 | ~$22–$38/hr |
| Mid-level (2–5 years) | $110,000–$145,000 | $45,000–$62,000 | ~$38–$55/hr |
| Senior (5+ years) | $145,000–$170,000 | $60,000–$85,000 | ~$52–$78/hr |
| Lead / specialised fintech | $170,000+ | $85,000–$110,000 | ~$75–$95/hr |
Technical requirements for any iOS role include:
For fintech specifically, the additional requirements that matter are:
For fintech-specific roles, add:
Publishing to the App Store isn't the end of the development lifecycle, since iOS requires ongoing investment for several specific reasons.
Apple releases new iOS versions annually, typically in September. Each release introduces new frameworks, deprecates old ones, and occasionally breaks existing behaviour.
This annual cycle means iOS maintenance is a continuous cost, not a one-time project.
The App Store review process also adds deployment time that web applications don't face.
While a critical bug fix in a web app deploys in minutes, an iOS fix requires building, submitting, and waiting for App Store review (typically one to three days for standard updates).
Your fintech teams should factor this into incident response planning. A payment bug in a native iOS app can't be fixed with a server-side config change alone.
Overall, initial development is only about 35% of the total cost of owning a mobile app, while ongoing maintenance, feature development, and compliance updates account for the remaining 65%.
For fintech apps specifically, we often see that proportion skew even further toward ongoing investment as regulatory requirements evolve, and the compliance posture requires continuous attention.
At Trio, we place pre-vetted iOS developers from LATAM with US and EU fintech companies.
Since our focus is exclusively on fintech, the iOS developers you hire through us arrive with the financial domain context, including Keychain storage, biometric authentication flows, and payment idempotency at the application layer.
Our staff augmentation model places engineers as embedded team members, so they join your sprints, your code review process, and your App Store submission workflow.
Since developers are already vetted, they can be placed in as little as 3–5 days at $40–$80/hr.
Expertise
Subscribe to our newsletter
Related
Content
Continue Reading
