Skip to content

feat(vitest): run typecheck during tests#4324

Merged
sheremet-va merged 11 commits intovitest-dev:mainfrom
sheremet-va:feat/typecheck-as-pool
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

feat(vitest): run typecheck during tests#4324
sheremet-va merged 11 commits intovitest-dev:mainfrom
sheremet-va:feat/typecheck-as-pool

Conversation

@sheremet-va
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sheremet-va sheremet-va commented Oct 17, 2023

Description

Closes #2299

Tests inside type files are now treated as regular tests. They are available in ctx.state and inside reporters. These tests are also displayed when running with --ui flag. If typecheck.include overlaps with test.include, then typecheck will have priority and the test WILL NOT actually run (only typechecking will be performed). If you want to have it both ways, use workspace feature.

It's also possible now to use poolMatchGlobs config option with typescript value.

This PR also adds --typecheck.only flag which will force Vitest to run only typecheck tests.

Also made sure typecheck tests in the UI can be distinguished with TS icon:

Screenshot 2023-10-17 at 14 04 01

Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. If the feature is substantial or introduces breaking changes without a discussion, PR might be closed.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Tests

  • Run the tests with pnpm test:ci.

Documentation

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs command.

Changesets

  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Run vitest typecheck together with normal test in one watch

1 participant