This is how terrified the Kremlin is of PROOF OF CONSPIRACY. They're using a Sputnik blogger, Angus Gallagher, who the BBC found (link: bbc.com/news/blogs-tre…) to be part of a Kremlin "misinformation machine," to spread lies about it.
1/ As we approach the release of PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, this Sputnik writer tied to the Kremlin "misinformation machine" has been furiously tweeting out bizarre conspiracy theories about me that would be hilarious if they weren't—as I said—part of a Kremlin misinformation campaign.
2/ RT—the Kremlin's multimedia organ—has been obsessed with me a *long* time, ever since I published PROOF OF COLLUSION. In the last year (I signed on to write PROOF OF COLLUSION a year ago) they've written about me at least 5 times. So I'm on their radar: rt.com/search?q=seth+…
3/ The hope—as ever—is to get purely fantastical misinformation into the conservative jetstream just as conservatives are realizing how damaging PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is to Trump. This is just the start. "Angus Gallagher" is as near to a bot as an feed can be without yet being one:
4/ But let's be clear: the nations most aligned against Qatar are the ones now blockading it—Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt, which are established in the book as the three primary actors in the "Red Sea Conspiracy." These nations are also known for having their own troll armies.
5/ The book discuss in detail the operations of THE LORD OF THE FLIES, the nickname (yes, really!) for the right-hand man of Trump and Kushner's friend MBS (who Trump calls "our man," and who himself claims he has Kushner "in his pocket"). THE LORD OF THE FLIES is called that...
6/ ...because he has a "digital army" of "virtual flies"—what we'd call trolls, bots, or trollbots in America, though there are also some actual human fanatics in the bunch—who spread propaganda for MBS, which propaganda is increasingly (and the book explains why) tied to Russia.
7/ Beginning a few weeks ago, I started to be followed by key figures—with large followings—in the Middle East. One new follower (who actually has far fewer followers than the others) is @Ams_qatar, who was CEO for the Qatar Investment Authority (discussed in detail in the book).
@Ams_qatar 8/ It's clear the book's content—which Qatar will be no happier about than Trump, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Hungary, the UAE, or Russia—has begun making the rounds in the Middle East. It was at that moment "Angus Gallagher" showed up spinning wild conspiracy theories.
@Ams_qatar 9/ But "Angus Gallagher" is likely just the start. THE LORD OF THE FLIES is still out there, and (as I said) Qatar won't like the book, either. Nor the Kremlin. Nor anyone who participated in the Red Sea Conspiracy to illegally aid Trump's election. Just wanted everyone to know.
@Ams_qatar 10/ There's certainly a chance the book comes out and these folks realize the truth—this is a story that can't be put back in its bottle, and making up insane conspiracy theories about a professor in New Hampshire won't cut the mustard. But if things get strange—now you know why.
@Ams_qatar PS/ Just for fun, here's *my* trollbot rating. If and when you see people going insane about me or PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, if you use the @BotSentinel extension on Chrome or Firefox I encourage you to look them up. 40% is about the *lowest* rating you'll see—most will be far higher.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS2/ Apropos of my references to the Saudis, Emiratis, and Egyptians here and in the book—three-fourths of what's called (with the Bahrainis) the "Saudi Quartet"—notice how quickly "Gallagher" turns to focusing on "America's Arab allies" when called out.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS3/ America's chief *Arab* ally in the Middle East has long been Qatar, inasmuch as we've located our largest base in the region there (which *deeply* angered Saudi Arabia). And now Saudi Arabia is *blockading* America's chief ally in the region—so of course they demonize Qatar.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS4/ That said, as I noted, Qatari officials won't like this book either. My point is that ex-SoS Rex Tillerson prevented MBS from a *ground invasion* of Qatar—the tiny nation our largest Middle East base is in!—and that intervention is what got him fired. theintercept.com/2018/08/01/rex…
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS5/ So if/when you see Saudi, Egyptian, Emirati, or Russin bloggers/trolls attacking me or PROOF OF CONSPIRACY—a book that significantly takes to task Russia, Israel, and Qatar, too—remember that the first three are *essentially making war on* our *top ally* in the Middle East.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel (NOTE: There was a time other nations might have been considered our "top ally" in the Middle East. Pre-MBS, a case could've been made for Saudi Arabia; pre-Sisi, a case could've been made for Egypt; obviously Jordan is a *major* ally; but we chose to put our *troops* in Qatar.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The torrent of lies coming from Karoline Leavitt right now is breathtaking
1 Iran has two navies; only one—the far smaller one—was destroyed
2 Half of Iran's launchers are intact
3 Iran held back its small air force—it wasn't destroyed
4 There's been no impact on Iran's nuclear capabilities
5 Only .3% of Iran's army was neutralized
6 The Strait is closed
7 There hasn't been regime change
8 U.S. casualties are over 800
9 There's no secret new 10-point Iranian peace plan, just the old one
10 Regular Iranian missile strikes continue
11 U.S. and Israeli interceptors arsenals are in a dire state
12 This war has wasted tens of billions
We're in Week 5 of Trump's 2-week non-war. If we give the non-war war 2-3 more weeks it'll wrap up "weeks" ahead of schedule. Trump destroyed 100% of the 1/3rd of Iran's Navy that's non-IRGC and 0.5% of Iran's Army—i.e. all of it. Its nuke program exists *and* doesn't. Questions?
Tonight Trump explained that Iran was an imminent threat to destroy Israel because it never came close to doing so in 47 years. He explained that this non-war war is technically his third non-war war with Iran, as he won the first one in early 2020 by not fighting it. Questions?
Iran is both 10 years away from developing a missile that can hit America and also would have done so 10 years in the *past* if Trump didn't kill a guy. We know Iran has had its regime decapitated because it has the same president today it had before the war started. Questions?
(1 of 2) This is inaccurate—and the truth is worse. She was already detained, and when Trump's pal heard that he contacted the White House to demanded she be deported so he'd get custody of their child. The White House complied.
I don't know what to call that, but it's criminal.
(2 of 2) But wait, it gets worse! The Trump pal demanding Trump execute a government action for his benefit has evidence on Trump's past sex crimes—which means that this situation reeks of both Bribery and Extortion.
The former is impeachable *and* criminal, the latter criminal.
MORE: Here's the full story. I know it means nothing to say this anymore, but just this one situation—as it apparently involves felonies, impeachable offenses, ripping a mother from her child, and the covering up of sex crimes—is a Watergate-level scandal. nytimes.com/2026/03/20/us/…
It looks like we have to go over this YET AGAIN for all the corporate media journalists in the back: Markwayne Mullin was selected by Trump—as are ALL Trump peons—on the basis of him having no scruples and being willing to do as he's told.
EVERYTHING he's saying today is a lie.
America has gone through this dance too many times to go through it again. Stephen Miller and others craft narratives for nominees to deliver to Congress if they think those nominations are uncertain. The narratives have nothing to do with what the nominees are tasked with doing.
They can play this game because they know that corporate media in this era has decided to act as a stenographer for whatever any liars say rather than providing any context or counterweight whatsoever.
Everything Mullin is saying is contrary to everything we know his boss plans.
I do think to myself, sometimes, as an agnostic, that if there weren't only a God but a highly engaged and attentive God as evangelicals believe, that God would have in some celestial way far beyond our understanding struck down this piece of shit harder than any human in history
There's a level of hypocrisy only humans notice, then there's a level of hypocrisy so galactically astounding I think the absence of celestial retribution in the face of it may be the strongest argument yet that God doesn't exist
I remain unsure, but this tries my doubt *sorely*
What people misunderstand about Donald Trump is that they think either he believed what he was saying in 2008 or that he believes what he is saying in 2026, when of course the reality is that he was lying both times and has never in his whole miserable life believed in *anything*
(🧵) BREAKING NEWS THREAD: Those who've been reading PROOF OF DEVILRY—the largest exposé of the Trump-Epstein Scandal—are cheering today. Congressional questioning confirms my reporting that one way Epstein helped interfere in the 2016 election was illegal campaign contributions.
1/ As PROOF OF DEVILRY reported, these payments were part of an effort—involving everyone from Michael Cohen to MBS (of Saudi Arabia) and Marc Kasowitz to David Pecker of the National Enquirer—to pay off Trump women. mediaite.com/media/news/bom…
2/ These criminals believed—correctly—that Trump couldn't be elected otherwise. The effort was domestic and international and constituted a criminal conspiracy involving election fraud, illegal donations, tax fraud and illegal foreign election interference. Trump was aware of it.