When a theist asks "where do you get your morality from?" to a liberal, they generally never concede that whatever ethic they subscribe to is cladistically derived from Western Christianity. They believe they derived it themselves, uninfluenced, except by "pure logic."
I point this out to Liberals all the time, at which point they generally admit that this is necessarily the case, but that they have "evolved" past Christianity (or, are "more Christian" than Christianity). This is when customized meme-Jesuses appear in discourse.
When they're upset by ppo calling America / The West a "Christian nation/civilization" they are upset because they don't say "MORE than a Christian nation." Christianity has been surpassed they say, God is dead, God is but the dream of good governance which we can now fulfill etc
The Enlightenment is merely a renegade form of Christian thinking- in which the Logos becomes, not a revelatory miracle, but a routine faculty of the mind. It corresponds to the era of Western Literary "realism" - in which "real life" ostensibly unmediated by the divine, is art.
This is of course nonsense, as every work of literary "realism" is shaped by the imagination (not by "pure reason") & is structured mythologically. Anna Karenina is a "realist" novel, but it is molded by Christian symbolism.
Reporting "just the facts" is never a complete possibility, as it assumes that we can enter a discourse immune from the "superstitious logic" of the human imagination- that this faculty can be silenced, letting "pure reason" sing in its absence. Nonsense.
Christians "sound dumb" to liberals, as they "talk like children" by deploying a symbolic discourse as opposed to one based on abstract "realist" philisophotheologies in which cosmogonies of "reason," "utility," "the public," etc- are deployed in a "realist" narrative/mythology.
Whenever they are caught in the web of their enlightenment kabbalah, they gesture toward the supremacy of the "complexity" of their rhetoric, as if their admission of being lost is synonymous with being found.
I remember what it was like to be on the opposite side, as an edgelord teenage atheist. I considered the realms of "mythology" & the realms of "real thinking" to be separate. When I no longer believed that to be the case, I began to realize how wrong I had been.
It actually genuinely amazes me how profound some of the "dumbest sounding" Christian points are in this light- their simplicity seems "too simple" until one recognizes how much there is to unpack hermenuticallly before the point can be properly understood.
William Blake went after the Deists as hard as he did (as Hamann & Jacobi did Spinozists, who are proto-deists really)- because they were encroaching on more fundamental grounds, on Imagination itself, by denying the conditions of metaphorical discourse in favor of "pure reason."
To say "Jesus is Man & God" is to speak in poetic, metaphorical/analogical terms- just as the "3=1" of the Trinity is beyond rational accounting (shoo thomists). Deism & Unitarian "rational monotheism" are the real roots of liberal theology.
Their short sightedness is based on the very grounds of their discussion- language, which is nothing BUT layers of analogy. This is why Wittgenstein & the linguistic turn marks the exhaustion of enlightenment thinking (he read his hamann...)
Even the psychological turn of Western thinking is a return to mythology & symbolism, informed by studies like Frazer's Golden Bough. Freudianism, Jungianism, Lacannianism et al- are based upon intepretations of mythology, not from "pure reason."
I think we are actually in a potentially good position looking forward when it comes to this issue. The problem is the lack of education in these fields (though people hunger for it! So many pop-culture mythological hermeneutical essays are youtube hits).
The Human Imagination is not an endlessly complex unknowable phenomenon which must be considered always as "subconscious" or "hiding." There is such a thing as Revelation. We knew this once & we'll know it again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Prominent outstanding member of rural community" is code for like the Police Chief who fucks kids etc. The upstanding School Principal who fucks kids. The Town Priest who, you guessed it...
The "Prominent Outstanding Members of Rural Communities" -- Freemasons, Elks, Knights of Columbus, Rotarians-- the black coffee breakfasters at the sales convention in the Motel 6 off the highway. All that can be imagined of the Epstein Elite is a routine occurrence amongst these "Prominent Outstanding Rural Community Members."
My town had a population of 2.6k people. It was zoned for agriculture. People rode their horses past my house regularly in suitable weather. The "Prominent Outstanding Members of the Community" whose ancestors had streets named after them for centuries-- these people were always doing weird shit.
This only happens in suburban & small town america-- if you live in a city with kids, nobody is surveilling you like this & you are actually more free from 'societal surveillance'-- everyone who romanticizes "rural small towns" doesn't know it's surveillance hell, everyone knows everyone & watches everyone & it never ends.
This is due to the insufferable boredom of rural life in tandem with the ubiquitous adoption of social media (before, this would just be a phone tree of church gossip, now it's a local Facebook group). It's the worst part of rural/small town life. The anonymity of city life is more life-affirming.
One of the ironies of life I learned when I finally got to move to the city-- I suddenly felt freer to do whatever I wanted. If someone got mad, they evaporated into the crowd across the street. They wouldn't immediately contact their cousin who tells their mom who is in your mom's book club etc.
About that time to remember the peak of indie rock music
I love Modest Mouse-- but people are still reluctant to admit that this is their magnum opus, not a departure or a compromise but a fulfillment of everything they'd ever worked toward. Johnny MARR on an indie arena rock epic about THE SINKING SHIP OF AMERICAN EMPIRE?
Give me forced health till I wish death on myself
Give me forced health till I wish death on myself
Ah ha ha! Ah ha! Ah ha! Ah ah! Ahaaah!
Well we all stumbled round tangled up in the cords
From our phones, VCRs and our worldly woes
Ah ha ha, march on, march on, march on, march on
Well, march on!
Melville writing lucidly about class relations in America compared to the British who he are calling “Epsteinites” in their relation to Nell Gwyn the young mistress of Charles II. He also notes how america’s crypto-aristocracy will prove more enduring than the British peerage which is itself artificial etc
You can see how against contemporary sensibility Melville was at this point of his career— this was a scandalous paragraph! He’s calling the British peerage a whorehouse compared to the cryptoaristocracy of America.
In America he says all that is decay & corrosive & death is a symbol of Life’s renewal! That is the more profound irony— the “decay of western civilization” is itself what powers the nascent American Empire! It is the drive to the primitive, to the barbaric, from which America lives
It’s funny how Jiang’s authority is always presented as him being Chinese but he’s actually a Canadian. All his research is primarily in english language literature which he studied at Yale. This is pretty much the world concluded by the corpus of anglophone literature.
Jiang is an “american” style gnostic hermeticist who found out about all this stuff by reading American literature. His inspiration is Isaac Asimov. Now, I disagree with his cosmology here, but I respect the work.
He thinks the way that western intelligence thinks— CIA guys are like this, he doesn’t really need to be a Fed to accurately inhabit the cosmos of the Fed. Remember, the CIA was an extension of Ivy League English Lit departments lol
From the dawn of civilization, going back to hunter gatherers, men have always been participants in raising children. It is only with the advent of the Industrial Revolution & the extraction of increasing surplus labor from men that they disappear from the household.
It is only with the development of matriarchal order that men are exiled from child rearing. In this sense, men are enclosed from their role in the family & become the private property of lords & chieftains-- they are made to serve interests outside of their home, because "the women are taking care of it" -- you are now free to labor for another man rather than for your own kids. That's what you think of as "patriarchy" ironically.
Yeah it's so much more manly to go to work & make money for your boss than to be the King of your Castle all day lol.