First There Is a Mountain

map of here

“Before I had studied Ch’an [Zen] for thirty years, I saw mountains as mountains, and rivers as rivers. When I arrived at a more intimate knowledge, I came to the point where I saw that mountains are not mountains, and rivers are not rivers. But now that I have got its very substance I am at rest. For it’s just that I see mountains once again as mountains, and rivers once again as rivers.”

~Qingyuan Weixin

The typical way almost every human being goes about life is by first latching onto some arbitrary concept about identity and the nature of our appearance here (whether derived from a conditioned interpretation on experience and perception, or from various second-hand sources, such as religious dogmas or social conventions). Then we construct a personal belief system out of it, in turn bolstering that belief structure with the stamp of emotional conviction. We proceed to base our ensuing behaviors and relationships on such notions, clinging to them as a raft in the sea of chaos that this world often seems to be.

In reality, all manifestation is conceptual. The most popular concepts we tend to cling to are related to the existence of a personal self, other persons/selves, and some sort of Cosmic Self/God. One’s own personhood, that of other beings, and even that of God are seen as fixed and solid entities in and of themselves. Once convicted of these concepts, it is very rare to question or investigate them to find out if they are actually true. It is generally too disturbing to go against the flow of cultural and consensus belief systems, because to do so plunges one into doubt, uncertainty, and even potential ostracism from the local herd.

The mountains must be mountains, and the rivers must be rivers.

Misty Mountain

For those who do make the effort to inspect these prevalent concepts that tend to rule and define the usual individual, they may come to recognize their inherent emptiness. That is, these so-called selves or Self are not the names we apply to them, but rather are mental fabrications, made up of other elements that are also empty of any inherent existence. As such, they are inevitably seen to be mere conditional and conditioned fantasies of interpretation on perception.

It doesn’t mean that the subjects and objects of perception don’t exist, but simply that the beliefs, names, and labels that we superimpose on our sensory contacts are no more than conceptual designations. Moreover, the stress and dissatisfaction in our lives is primarily due to this habit of clinging to fixed beliefs about the nature of appearances, including our own.

As it is, the mountains are not really mountains, nor are the rivers actually rivers.

not mountains

Even in such recognition, however, there still persists the tendency to linger in the realm of conceptuality by attaching to a subsequent belief in the non-existence of one’s own selfhood, other living beings/selves, or a Universal Supreme Being-type Self. For those who would realize true liberation, however, the only resort is to see through and surrender any and all positions, letting go of every conceptual obscuration that separates one from the reality of “what is”.

Labels such as “self” or “non-self” are no longer really applicable. They are artificial superimpositions on our own true nature, and the true nature of all phenomena. That’s all part of the business of knowing, of certainty, and so the wise close down that shop in exchange for the limitless freedom, spontaneity, and spaciousness of the Unknown.

Having recognized the provisional nature of all concepts, we can play with them or discard them, as circumstances and conditions may warrant. The key is refraining from attachment, or fixation, on any idea or mental creation. In that way, everything can present itself as fresh and new — as it is — unencumbered by our projections and conditioned notions.

Mountains are indeed mountains, and rivers are rivers.

supermoon

“The realization of the Buddhist patriarchs is perfectly realized real form. Real form is all dharmas. All dharmas are forms as they are, natures as they are, body as it is, the mind as it is, the world as it is, clouds and rain as they are, walking, standing, sitting, and lying down, as they are; sorrow and joy, movement and stillness, as they are; a staff and a whisk, as they are; a twirling flower and a smiling face, as they are. . . the constancy of pines and the integrity of bamboos, as they are.”

~Dogen Zenji

path 9

Posted in Consciousness, Enlightenment, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

What Am I?

emptiness

“If you think, ‘I breathe’, the ‘I’ is extra. There is no you to say ‘I’. What we call ‘I’ is just a swinging door which moves when we inhale and when we exhale. It just moves; that is all. When your mind is pure and calm enough to follow this movement, there is nothing: no ‘I’, no world, no mind nor body; just a swinging door.”

–Shunryu Suzuki

What is Real? This is the same as asking “What am I?” The problem is, when the question is posed, most of us invariably resort to our intellect. However, we are always going to be frustrated by taking that approach, because we cannot use mind to grasp that which is prior to it. Indeed, any kind of knowledge which we believe we can access can only be in consciousness, but consciousness can have no knowledge of that which exists prior to its own appearance.

In fact, any notion that we can employ the intellect to ascertain the Real is a mistaken assumption, though the whole thrust of western philosophy, for example, is dedicated to just such an enterprise. Take for example the French philosopher Rene Descartes, and his famous proposition: “Je pense, donc je suis.” This was translated into Latin as “Cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore I am.” While the proposition seeks to show the process whereby one can know the existence of “I,” already from the start it is presupposing that existence with the words, “I think.” In fact, there is no concrete entity that can be discovered beyond the activity of “thinking.” No matter where one looks, something called “I” cannot be found.

Indeed, no matter how much intellectual knowledge one may acquire, if the primary illusion of “I” is not seen through, our own true nature will remain a mystery to us. Nor is there anything one can point to and say “that is self”. It is not the body, not thinking, not emotions or sense-impressions. Whatever happens in consciousness (such as the appearance of an “I”) is purely an imaginary figment, a mental fabrication, like a mirage. Similarly, nothing that we can see, think, remember, or know is real. Rather, it is pure illusion, generated as a projection of mind.

When the energy stream of thoughts, emotions, memories, perceptions, and sensations is carefully inspected as it arises and ceases, the sense of personal continuity we take to be “me” can be recognized as a stream of empty impressions about a “me”, but with no actual entity present beyond the conceptual designation “me”. Such recognition will interrupt the chronic self-projection, even to the point in which the fabricated illusion collapses.

When all illusions are forsaken, what’s left? We are. What is that? Words can’t go there. Imagination can’t go there. Nevertheless, it is closer than our breath. If we wish to recognize it, however, we will first need to relinquish our hapless fascination with the nearly ceaseless neural parade of thought energy, be still, and pay attention, inquiring at the root of mind itself. What is granting reality to this moment? What is aware right now? What knows the immediate experience of reading these words? What is not changing, even though everything changes? What am I?

No doubt, the human intellect is a marvelous gift, a magical tool that can carve a functional order out of the apparent chaos of the phenomenal world, and if properly applied, can even bring us to the threshold of realization, but in order to pass through that “gateless gate”, something else must happen, something beyond the intellect’s capacity or domain. Indeed, at a certain critical juncture in the process of liberation, reliance on the intellect alone can pose an impediment to the direct breakthrough insight into our true nature and condition.

There is a famous Zen koan which asks: “What is your original face, before your parents were born?” If we rely on the verbal mind for answers, we will merely be indulging in conceptual speculation. The Zen Master will laugh at our fumbling attempts and summarily dismiss us. We need to go beyond the intellect’s logic, beyond all conceptual designations and mental fabrications, all interpretations and fantasies of the imagination, in order to discover or awaken to that which is prior to the mind’s arrival.

The “I” of the past is merely memory, a fabricated illusion of personal continuity. The “I” of the present is impossible to grasp, though the attempt to do so can be quite illuminating. The “I” that will be in the future is a mental projection, spawned from hope and fear.

Indeed, there is no “I” but the one right here, but since “right here” happens to be no place in particular, this “I” cannot be said to be particularly anywhere. Truly, there is no “right here” — “right here” being nothing but a transient location in the imaginary geography of interpretive perception.

In this direct recognition, the “I” does indeed “cast off the illusion of I”, yet remains as “I”, all the same. As Ramana Maharshi notes, this apparent paradox is not a contradiction to the Realized, and so seekers strive for the ideal of “Realization”. Ironically, this glorious effort at some special attainment just happens to be the real contradiction — there being no one, no “person”, who is actually realized.

What an interesting predicament for all the would-be Buddhas and spiritual super heroes – the no-thing melts into the Nothing! In other words, nothing happens, no substantial self was ever implicated, only awareness persists, unchanged and unchanging.

Indeed, wanting to achieve “Realization” is rather like wanting to be present at one’s own funeral, given that true realization marks the end of the “person” — the true death that sages and mystics throughout the ages refer to in their testimonies of treading the “spiritual path”. Nevertheless, how can something that never had any true existence, die? That is a big part of the humorousness of the whole game – the search — and why we tend to laugh out loud when the obvious becomes . . . well, obvious!

From the very no-beginning, there was nothing that needed to be eliminated. That whole strategy is part of the misdirection that the pseudo-spiritual preachers and religious con men have burdened us with through the ages. The only thing that needs to be transformed is our mental rigidity based on fixed beliefs, and our emotional contraction at the heart.

In point of fact, without the self-sense, we would not even be able to function in this world, much less truly awaken to our original nature and condition. However, we need not take this working concept of “I” as our actual forwarding address. That’s the mistake most everyone makes, and why we are always stumbling around so befuddled, like sleep-walkers reaching out for some satisfaction that is forever eluding us in our restless dreaming.

As Nisargadatta Maharaj notes: “Understand this state of affairs; the concept ‘I Am’ comes spontaneously and goes spontaneously. Amazingly, when it appears, it is accepted as real. All subsequent misconceptions arise from that feeling of reality in the ‘I Amness’. Why am I totally free? Because I have understood the unreality of that ‘I Am’.”

In the movies, for example, there is a something known as “persistence of vision” in which separate, still images flashing at 24 frames per second create the sense of continuous motion. This is a fitting analogy for the experience of a continuous self. We experience the rapid succession of events and then fabricate a continuous “doer” to account for it. However, when we identify with the experience of a continuous doer, such that we take it to be who and what we are, we establish the basis for confusion and subsequent suffering.

All suffering we experience can be traced back to this attachment to the experience of a continuous “me”. “I like what is happening to me and I want to hold on to this experience” or “I don’t like what is happening to me and I want to change it” are two sides of the same coin of attachment to the illusion of a seemingly enduring person.

We can instead recognize this “I” — the so-called “ego” — more as a nifty navigational tool, or conscious activity, that enables us to discriminate here in the objective realm in which we live and relate. For example, it helps us to stop on red and go on green, and a whole lot of other useful stuff in-between.

As long as the personality is recognized as a kind of prop, with no inherent substantiality beyond what we grant it in our playful creativity, then there need be no problem. It’s only when we become fixated on it, misperceiving it to be our true identity, that we suffer its frailty and impermanence, and become trapped in vicious cycles of craving and aversion which only serve to reinforce our sense of separation from life and love.

Although the full reality is far beyond human comprehension, in rather simplistic terms, all of the sentient beings in the multiverse who take themselves to be separate consciousnesses only believe that to be the case because Source – the fundamental basis of all that is — has playfully chosen to have a kind of “amnesia” about those aspects of its own mind, in a manner not unlike the way we dream up all sorts of characters at night and believe them to be separate entities, while in reality they are merely our own mental projections.

Thus, true awakening from the dream is nothing other than the direct recognition that there never was or could be a permanently separate, substantial, and independent individual, or “person”. Those mystics who claim that there is only God are referring to this very fact.

To realize that we ourselves are expressions of the Supreme Source is not so much an affirmation of some transcendental self-identity, but rather entails the recognition that we are literally energetic shards of Source Consciousness acting out the roles, or pretense, of being separate and independent individuals.

Just so, any notion that we as humans might entertain of the sense “I Am” is necessarily limited and bound by the parameters of our temporary incarnation into the denser vibratory frequencies of this current psycho-physical realm. However, it is precisely as and through these humble vehicles that Source Itself becomes cognizant of and enjoys the Play of Consciousness in this sphere of manifestation. Why else dream it into existence?

Each one of us, as unique dream characters in the holographic “Mind of God”, are here acting as the lens, the angle of vision, for Source. It enjoys all points of view without judgment, but with the same unconditional love that is shone on the universal totality, which consists of nothing but the dream-like mirroring reflections of Its own inconceivable Being. Likewise, all experience — just as it arises, endures, and dissolves in every moment — is itself recognized as inherently perfect, and simultaneously perfectly empty.

As it is, there are infinite realms of experience that serve as the playground of Source, and hence any sense of “I” will be endlessly modified in its evolution towards complete self-awareness as “That”, of which at last there is no other. By sincerely and thoroughly inquiring into who and what “I” am, the process is set in motion that will eventually take us beyond all of our conditioned beliefs and second-hand concepts and opinions, ultimately revealing our true nature directly, beyond all doubt or speculation, as Reality Itself.

 “That which makes you think you are human is not human. It is but a dimensionless point of consciousness, a conscious nothing; all you can say about yourself is: ‘I am’. You are pure being, awareness, bliss. To realize that is the end of all seeking. You come to it when you see all you think yourself to be as mere imagination and stand aloof in pure awareness of the transient as transient, imaginary as imaginary, unreal as unreal.”


~Nisargadatta Maharaj

moon heart

See also:

Not Me

Posted in Consciousness, Enlightenment, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

Fate or Free Will

free will

Are we ruled by some predetermined destiny, or are we endowed with the capacity for the exercise of free will? This question has been the source of ceaseless debate among philosophers, religious pundits, and expounders of every persuasion through the ages, and convincing arguments have been made by believers in both camps, as well as those who have thoughtfully proposed some sort of middle way.

Rather than merely re-hashing positions that have already been staked out at length by better minds and more articulate voices than mine, I would simply like to suggest that the crux of the whole issue invariably depends upon one’s level of awareness, or interpretation on perception, which is in turn conditioned by factors such as belief and experience, but more often than not, by second-hand information.

In brief, depending one’s angle of vision, it may appear that we as human individuals are “programmed” prior to our first breath, and that everything that is to happen to us is indeed pre-determined. I will refrain from speculation at this time on the mechanics of such programming — whether it is performed by us ourselves, or in collusion with some “life-between-life” guides, or even by some higher powers who are directing our “soul” evolution.

From another (and perhaps more pragmatic) point of view, it may appear that we do indeed have the power to make changes in the quality of our life, whether in positive or negative ways, and so can indeed transcend our apparent fate by the application of will. This viewpoint can lead to a circular argument, however, since it could be noted that this supposed power is itself pre-determined, or “down-loaded” into the entity like software into an operating system in order to fulfill a destiny.

In and of themselves, both views (and/or some variation of the two) are provisionally true, but all such views are nothing more than conceptual designations, mental constructs, and moreover, are based on the assumed reality of a substantial and enduring “person”. However, the presumption of such a reality is not borne out by thorough deeper inquiry, and that is the salient point of this brief consideration. Indeed, the more we investigate, “To whom does fate or free will apply?”, the more we will discover that the so-called “person” is nothing but a bundle of dependently arising thoughts, sensations, memories, and perceptions, all strung together on an imaginary clothes-line called “I”, and in fact no such independent and enduring person has ever really existed, except in the realm of narrative fiction. That is, the persistent sense we have of some individual person (“me”) is based on a story – a fiction which is comprised of all that we may yet take ourselves to be in our ignorance, or amnesia.

Upon awakening, we realize that both destiny and free will ultimately do not apply. How could they? After all, if there is no concrete and independent person, then there is no place for the concepts themselves to land. Nevertheless, as long as consciousness appears to individuate itself in the form of these human vehicles, there appear to be two truths that constitute our experience of this psycho-physical realm — the relative and the absolute.

On the absolute level, with the liberating recognition that there is no substantial and enduring person, opposing notions of fate and free will are de facto rendered moot. However, since we (as shards of Source Energy) are currently enjoying the illusion of incarnating in an objective world, and within the sphere of our everyday relations here, we certainly can act “as if” we have the power to direct our human hosts towards better behavior and an increasingly more conscious and loving response to life. Conversely, we can refrain from taking responsibility, thereby allowing the “animal” to have its way, with the consequent violence and selfishness that is characteristic of the species when left to its own uncontrolled nature.

The relative, or objective world of duality, is a crucible of blended energies, and a very powerful environment for learning and growth experiences. It has often been described as a “stage” on which anything can happen, including negative events. What matters for us is how we react to our experiences. When we “choose” to react as victims, for example, we tend to reinforce a particular energetic vibration — a negative one. However, we can also turn that negative into a positive, and acknowledge whatever lesson it has to teach. In every experience there is a lesson available, an opportunity to refine our relationship with the world, even if we do not immediately see it. Such choices help to determine what sort of access we will have to the higher frequencies of light vibration.

Consider also that, if life were preordained, it would negate the very reason for incarnating in this realm in the first place. If everything was already scripted, there would be no adventure of confronting the unknown and hence growing in self-awareness. Furthermore, there would be nothing new to bring back to our soul group, enabling the further evolution and expansion of the whole through the addition of fresh experiences.

Consequently, perhaps all we can really say in this regard is that things happen the way they do because the universe is as it is, filled with infinite potential, and we in these human forms are here sampling a tiny fraction of the universal possibilities, as the eyes and hands and feet of Source.

In manifestation then, there appears to be choice and/or choicelessness, depending upon one’s relative level of awareness, though the reality of the matter is not ultimately a subject that the human intellect can definitively apprehend, given the limited frequency at which it operates, along with the accompanying amnesia which characterizes our 3-D experience.

Just so, the main source of confusion on the subject is the amnesia with which most of us live in this dense realm, which temporarily blinds us to the bigger picture of existence. The purpose of this amnesia is to create a more impactful experience of the human adventure with which we have temporarily identified. I have addressed this issue in more depth elsewhere, but in regard to the theme of this essay, I am suggesting that there is a difference between human animal response and soul-level response. That is, the human persona is very much limited to predictable behaviors and responses to mundane stimuli, whereas the soul-level response pertains to life-changing decisions that determine the direction of manifestation. For example, issues of morality and conscience might be regarded as soul-influenced matters.

Certainly, much more can be said in this regard, but suffice it to say that the inadequacy of scientific materialism, which posits that consciousness is merely a brain phenomenon, is that there is only a focus on the physical — the body-mind-self complex — which is actually a very small part of the “whole self”. Of course, without the benefit of insight derived from expanded consciousness, it is understandable how conclusions about the mechanical nature of choice are reached. For further elaboration on the amnesia factor, see here

In any case, as the great sage Ramana Maharshi noted: “Find out to whom free will or destiny matters. Find out where they come from, and abide in their source. If you do this, both of them are transcended. That is the only purpose of discussing these questions. To whom do these questions arise? Find out and be at peace.”

FreeWill

Posted in Consciousness, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , | 22 Comments

War and Peace

“You fight others all the time for your survival as a separate body-mind, a particular name and form. To live you must destroy. From the moment you were conceived you started a war with your environment – a merciless war of mutual extermination, until death sets you free.”

~Sri Nisargadatta

By virtue of merely being born into this realm, we are told by the preachers that we have inherited various sinful and undesirable qualities as part of the total human package – nasty companions riding along on our shoulders, disturbing our peace, and poisoning our experience. Perhaps they come in the form of negative traits and tendencies carried over from our poor performances and failings in previous lives, as some religious stories would have it. Then again, maybe they arise as the result of an “Original Sin” caused by a regrettable decision made long ago by the progenitors of the human species, as other religions hypothesize. In any case, we are told that we are stuck with this primordial calamity, a spiritual infection that resembles a kind of malignant software program that in turn needs to be purged from the system if we are to have any chance of lasting peace.

Certainly, we had better “do something” to rid ourselves of this apparent affliction! We are encouraged by the authorities on sin and karma to embark on some sort of purification process or pursuit of redemption in order to attain the peace which is inherently lacking. Thus begins the endless internal conflict where the mind is divided against itself in a war zone of its own making, featuring opposing camps of light and dark, good and evil, grasping and aversion, and the ensuing elaboration of an all-encompassing struggle in life and relationships.

This never-ending battle manifests as the felt sense of chronic discomfort and dis-ease, self-doubt, neurotic ambivalence, and for many, the more clinical psycho-pathologies. To these, all sorts of methods, schemes, and life-long strategies are systematically prescribed by the priests and doctors as remedies against the projected nemesis. In fact, the preachers have been kept in perennial business by promising via all manner of propaganda that their cult or scheme is the best one for the job of pacifying the mind and heart, even to the point of waging physical war with other cults over which one is superior in producing peace (regardless of how ironic that might seem to an outside observer).

So, how does the conception of this disease become reified in our psyche? From where does the dissatisfaction stem? Upon sincere and thorough investigation, we can recognize that it arises from ignorance – ignorance of our true nature and condition. To begin to understand the root of this ignorance, we need look no further than our own mind, since this misunderstanding is nothing but a state of consciousness. When we stop and break it down, we can observe that there appears to be a steady stream of thoughts which we take to be ours, apparently infected with all manner of bugs and bothersome critters, so that we can never truly and deeply rest. In the course of our cognitive development, we become so habituated to this state of chronic disturbance that we never even question it. We just assume that it is the “normal” condition of being human – “normal neurosis”, in psychological parlance.

To complicate the matter, we tend to imagine that we are independent entities, separate from the world of myriad sentient beings around us. In our struggle to acquire and maintain what we believe we need to survive and flourish , we engage in a perpetual state of competition and conflict with these perceived “others”. Of course, such a paradigm of virtual war precludes the experience of any true compassion. Moreover, such a state of precarious consciousness is reflected back to us in all our relations, because everyone is under the spell of a similar delusion. Ignorance is self-reinforcing, rendering us all suspicious of each other. We walk the earth — a threatened, restless “stranger in a strange land” – alienated not only from others, but also from ourselves. It’s a literal nightmare, a horrible dream!

The wise, rather than merely accepting and even fueling this fabricated struggle, will instead turn attention around and trace back to the beginning of the conflict itself, eventually recognizing through inquiry and consequent insight that whatever appears is mind, and that mind itself is essentially a shadow. Attempts to catch it and control it are futile. That’s just shadows chasing shadows. One can’t control or eliminate a shadow by running after it and trying to grasp and manipulate it. As the great Adept Milarepa noted: “When you run after your thoughts, you are like a dog chasing a stick. Every time a stick is thrown, you run after it. Instead, be like a lion who, rather than chasing after the stick, turns to face the thrower. One only throws a stick at a lion once.”

There is a famous line in the New Testament (1 Corinthians 13: 12-13) that reads: “For now we see through a glass, darkly . . .” Indeed, whatever is seen, felt, thought, imagined, or remembered is not really so. Upon thorough inspection, we can see that it all amounts to mere fantasies of interpretation on perception. Furthermore, we can recognize that the conflict itself is essentially our own creation — stress and suffering we’ve been perpetrating on ourselves, based on second-hand beliefs and dysfunctional programs we have been incorporating into our system since we were children.

By earnestly investigating its smoke parade and inquiring into the nature of this conditioned and conflicted mind, we can notice that attention becomes quiet, supple, and fresh when freed from any fixation on the mind’s streaming contents. If we persist in that attitude of “non-dwelling” – grasping at no provisional identity based on the sense of separation and opposition — we can let go and relax into the ensuing dynamic stillness.

Sitting, standing, walking, lying down – we stay with this stillness, refraining from attaching to whatever arises in mind,  surrendering any effort to manipulate thought forms. Even if demons or angels appear, discard them. Let go, let go, let go. Ultimately, surrender even the one who would surrender, the apparent witness of mind. As the Taoist sage Lao Tsu noted, “To a mind that is still, the whole world surrenders.”

Persisting in this practice, we can recognize something that is, after all, rather obvious. That is, regardless of any effort or non-effort, there is not a single thought that we can hold on to. Thoughts automatically become self-liberated. As Nyoshul Khenpo writes in his “Letter in Praise of Emptiness”, “In this there is not a thing to be removed, nor anything that needs to be added. It is merely the immaculate looking naturally at itself.”

One thought arises, and then before the next thought arises, there is an empty space. That empty space is the native natural state — fully, nakedly revealed. The thinking mind is absent in that space. All we need do is simply relax into that, remaining free of all focus in that transparent, sky-like spaciousness. The practice then is just returning to that unfabricated aware space as often as possible, even in the midst of activities, rather than chasing after and being run around by thought forms. It’s brilliantly clear, awake, and “knowing” without the need of thinking, because it is always between two thought events.

The sense of self — the feeling “me” — is a thought event, a mental construct, that appears in the space of awake awareness like a cloud appears in the empty sky and vanishes in the next moment. It’s just another thought. It is not ours, not who we are. We are the awake-ness that knows itself as itself. Resting in the spaciousness of one’s own primordial state, we can recognize that the same energy which was manifesting as thoughts, feelings, memories, and sensations now appears as the pure delight of our own innocent nature.

In the course of this natural ease of being, we may notice that we are not even really “located” in any fixed space, whether between or somewhere beyond thoughts. Rather, everything appearing is recognized as our own omnidirectional display, the display of a holographic projection of mind, expressing itself as the immense vastness of the celestial heavens, as well as the humble weed flowering between the sidewalk cracks. Spirit manifests subject and objects to infinity, while remaining unidentified with and un-implicated by either. Timeless, motionless, inconceivable.

Awareness and experience are not two — there is no distance between them. Each moment, however it manifests, is the perfect form of our self-expression. There is no right or wrong, better or worse, higher or lower form. All forms are recognized as the quicksilver shine of the light behind the veil of mind – luminous and transparent. That is the “second birth” — spirit baptism. This clear radiance will illuminate and clarify all, including the empty nature of both self and phenomena. In the process, loving kindness and compassion are also realized to be inseparable from emptiness.

For those who might imagine that this realization leaves one floating in some cloud of spiritual bliss, oblivious to the mundane world of pain and suffering, nothing could be further from the actual reality. Rather than leaving one standing aloof and detached, it brings the whole spectrum of experience vividly to life, as if one had been sleepwalking, and is now fully awake. Moreover, in such brilliant clarity, a genuine empathy for all of life arises naturally, because the illusion of separation has been directly seen through and dissolved. At such point, loving one’s neighbor as oneself is simply the right thing to do, because one realizes that the appearance of separation is a hoax we may have once fallen for, but in light of this recognition, it becomes utterly clear that our neighbor literally is our self. Now, living a life of simple integrity, while refusing to indulge the poisons of greed, envy, hatred, and ignorance, is joyfully embraced as the natural way we were meant to live and express our true nature.

At last, even emptiness and fullness are revealed to be mere conceptual designations by the light which shines beyond both. When this light is joined with one’s living experience and “embodied” in conscious relationship to all, then life becomes spontaneous and actually very simple. Somehow, this heart has found its way back to itself – not as some independent “I” — but as That which lives me. The war with oneself is ended. Shanti, Shanti Om.

“Let go of what has passed.
Let go of what may come.
Let go of what is happening now.
Don’t try to figure anything out.
Don’t try to make anything happen.
Relax, right now, and rest.”
~Tilopa

let go

See also:

The Silence Behind the Mind and True Transformation

Posted in Consciousness, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , | 16 Comments

Points of View

 “The most fatal illusion is the settled point of view. Since life is growth and motion, a fixed point of view kills anybody who has one.”

~Brooks Atkinson

To study the world is to study ourselves. When we begin to sincerely study ourselves, what we usually discover is that this involves a challenging process of working with our embedded viewpoints. Indeed, the closer we look in the mirror, the more we must acknowledge that we’ve mostly been “running on automatic”, moving through our life in a kind of sleepwalking trance. That is, once we begin to investigate what we truly are all about, what we invariably find is a bundle of accumulated viewpoints, attitudes, opinions, assumptions, interpretations on perceptions, memories, sensations, and conceptual designations which we have unquestioningly assumed amounts to our actual identity.

Throughout most of our lives, hasn’t it been much easier to “just go along” with what we’ve been told by our parents, teachers, and clergy, and later by our bosses, politicians, and main stream media propaganda, than to dare question the reality of it? Certainly, we may have found ourselves wondering occasionally if this or that piece of the general picture is really true, but the vast majority of us have not seriously questioned the fundamentals of the “story”.

As a rule, we have been thoroughly conditioned to accept the consensus program and description of reality, and short of some life crisis, we are rarely motivated to question the overall “party line”. In fact, it’s a bit scary to do so, because we are typically herd animals by design, and so questioning the commonly accepted propaganda regarding the nature of existence and our place in it can threaten our basic sense of security. Most of us would rather not “go there”. Furthermore, we have been trained to suspect those who do, socially ostracizing the more vociferous among the doubters, relegating them to the “fringe” category fit for ridicule, or else turning them into entertainers, safely separated from us by the stage we place them on to perform for us as comedians or celebrity “artistes”.

Moreover, it is not uncommon to hear complaints from those who may have inadvertently gotten a glimpse of another dimension to this reality (whether spiritual, political, or personal), wishing that they had never seen “behind the curtain”, because now no matter how hard they try, they simply can’t go back to the safe and secure view which they had enjoyed prior to the freak interruption in their regularly scheduled dreaming. Hence, we often hear the well-worn phrase, “Ignorance is bliss.”

At a certain point in the self-exploration, if we are sincere and persistent, we may arrive at the recognition that no viewpoint arising in the human mind is ultimate or lasting, and that there is no final truth that we can grasp as an object of consciousness. Rather, we may come to discover that what we had taken to be “objective reality” is actually an utterly subjective experience, and what we had previously thought of as “the world” is actually more like an indefinite psycho-physical realm without center or border.

As we delve even deeper, we may come to learn that there is nothing which exists outside of our consciousness – it is all a projection of mind. Everything appearing, including our own sense of self, is made of the same stuff as dreams. What appears to be external to us is really only known internally, as a play or modification of consciousness. However, when we turn attention around to look within, nobody can be found.

Additionally, although we certainly can and do know about all sorts of stuff, we do not really know what any single thing is –what it is. Consequently, whether we like it or not, and despite any comforting lies we might tell ourselves, we do live in a state of total insecurity — the Unknown. Despite our prodigious intellect, it turns out that our fundamental human condition is one of not knowing.

How we respond to living in the Unknown, and all that implies, will determine everything about how our life proceeds. Will we cower in despair, or will we shine? Will we love or will we fear? Will we cling to the evaporating safety of what we thought we knew, or throw ourselves completely into the vastness of our unbound, infinite nature, without trying to grasp or avoid, without trying to claim ground or establish some provisional self-image in need of protection and defense?

With some careful investigation, one thing we can observe is that, the more we get trapped in fixated views, the more we squeeze off the life force, crimping the flow, and so prevent true spontaneity. In other words, life stagnates when we attempt to assert and preserve some personal story that we reflexively employ to confirm our existence.

In terms of consciously assessing differing angles of vision, the wisest course may simply be to recognize that our own (as impressive and unassailable as it might seem to us) is just a temporary viewpoint. It is not who we are. We can observe instead that this viewpoint has arisen in our particular circumstance through an interdependent series of causes, and though we may dearly cherish it, it’s never going to amount to the absolute truth. It’s just a viewpoint, one among many we have formed, and certainly not the last. Indeed, if we are expecting to discover some final truth, we are likely to be disappointed, despite what the glib preachers with their borrowed and uninspected dogmas might claim.

For a very long time, I was convinced by the rumors passed off as truth that there must be some impervious and objectively-verifiable supreme and ultimate enlightenment that everyone must eventually arrive at, beyond which there is nothing further to realize. The fact that so many different sages and designated wise people all had differing descriptions of that state bothered me somewhat, but I attributed that to cultural disparities and terminology issues, with each one describing the same Absolute Reality from different angles of vision.

However, now I realize that all such propositions are merely human concepts, mental fabrications which we might momentarily grant some reality to, based on our own particular programming. What anyone happens to believe is solely based on subjective elements, which are derived through a process of conditioning factors coalescing in such a way as to produce a singular and seemingly authentic vision, but relevant to that pair of eyes only.

Consequently, I came to understand that we need not be drawn into any defensive emotional reactivity based on our conceptual investments, but can stand apart and see them for what they are – passing waves of non-binding thought energy that merely serve to modify consciousness. In that realization, the stress of trying to discover “THE TRUTH” evaporates. The whole search becomes moot. Paradoxically, rather than serving as a cause for dismay and anxiety, such a recognition is quite liberating. We can let go of the internal struggle, exhale, and relax.

In that regard, the great sage Nisargadatta Maharaj offered this clear assessment: “Once you realise that all comes from within, that the world in which you live has not been projected onto you but by you, your fear comes to an end. Without this realisation you identify yourself with the externals, like the body, mind, society, nation, humanity, even God or the Absolute. But these are all escapes from fear. It is only when you fully accept your responsibility for the little world in which you live and watch the process of its creation, preservation and destruction, that you may be free from your imaginary bondage.”

Based on this recognition, it can then be apperceived that any position we could possibly assert and attempt to defend is merely a “personal” position in mind — a conditioned and provisional viewpoint that arises in consciousness based on a play of causes and conditions. With that realization, we can train ourselves in our daily lives to recognize all of our viewpoints for what they are: transient mental formations.

Such capacity to deconstruct one’s views, once stabilized, can make a tremendous difference in how we live. When we don’t try to protect or justify our viewpoints, but instead recognize them as subjective fantasies of interpretation on perception – ultimately empty — a palpable freedom and natural spontaneity is revealed as our natural state. At last, there is the real possibility for tolerance, peace, and happiness to manifest in our lives and relationships, free of the demand that any of it make some sort of ultimate sense. None of it does, and yet, when left to itself, all of it is perfectly transparent as the open spaciousness of our own awake awareness. As it so happens, that itself is enough.

“All the various types of teachings and spiritual paths are related to the different capacities of understanding that different individuals have. There does not exist, from an absolute point of view, any teaching that is more perfect or effective than another. A teaching’s value lies solely in the inner awakening which an individual can arrive at through it. If a person benefits from a given teaching, for that person that teaching is the supreme path, because it is suited to his or her nature and capacities. There is no sense in trying to judge it as more or less elevated in relation to other paths to realization.”

~ Chögyal Namkhai Norbu

See also: https://theconsciousprocess.wordpress.com/2013/12/30/views/

There Is No Truth, Only Dreaming

Rhapsody on the Perfect Enjoyment of Delusion

Posted in Consciousness, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

Shaking Others Awake

“When you wake up from a dream, do you go about searching for the characters in that dream, to awaken them?”

~Ramana Maharshi

We often encounter passionate voices in the alternative media seeking through various means to “raise consciousness” and “shake people awake”. Contrary to the popular sentiment in that field however, not everyone is here, incarnating in this realm, to “awaken”. In fact, true Awakening has always been the provenance of the very few, who have chosen that steep route for their own evolutionary purposes. In any particular generation, out of the billions of human incarnations, only a handful thus embodied will awaken in the true sense — that is,  break through the dreamy amnesia that characterizes our temporary earthly state into the direct realization of our true nature and primordial (Divine) identity.

Rather, for most of us, the purpose in assuming these particular forms is more along the lines of finding out what the range of human experience entails, in much the same way we might immerse ourselves in a flight simulator to discover what flying is all about. Of course, if we knew it was just a simulation, we would not be able to get the full experience, and so we “forget” that it is just a virtual reality, in order to enjoy the full impact of living the animal existence that is human, for the brief duration of the bio-vehicle’s appearance.

Once we are fused with the human container that we are temporarily occupying, we accumulate memories and experiences of our time as humans, and use them as fuel for our ongoing self-discovery. One of the primary tools is “ego”, which allows us to explore all the nooks and crannies of the psyche to see what we are really made of. We use this ego (which is an activity, not an entity) to learn how to behave, how to do the right thing in each situation presented to us by virtue of our human experience, and also to learn the consequences of failure to do the right thing. In that respect, it serves a kind of navigational function in our quest for experience.

When we become entranced into identification with the activity, however, and imagine it to represent who and what we are, we turn the verb into a noun, an ambivalent noun which we must somehow deal with, or if we have been conditioned by certain spiritual propaganda, we might come to believe it is a noun which we must make every effort to eliminate, as if it was an evil mask which we had better remove before we scare off all of our relations.

In reality, if we see that idea for what it is — a mental fabrication, or fictional story which we have inadvertently granted a reality to — ego begins to lose its power to disturb us, and so reverts to its natural function as an integral part of human embodiment.

In any case, what most in the “alternative” field tend to believe constitutes “awakening” may involve seeing through the propaganda dished out by the arbiters of consensus reality and discovering the mechanisms by which this realm actually operates. For that, it might include peeling back the curtain on hidden government manipulations, on the war economies maintained by the Powers That Be, on media lies, on secret agendas of climate control and food and water poisoning, on alien contact, or on any or all of the various deceptions that constitute this world’s charades and fraudulence.

On the more positive side, it may involve becoming aware of alternative fuels and sustainability strategies, on the marriage of art and science in developing new programs dedicated to the evolutionary advancement of the species, or on any number of new (or ancient) techniques and methods that can be employed to make life more fulfilling and transformative, or serve us in recognizing our essential interdependence.

In any case, as compelling and provocative as those issues might be, or as hopeful and encouraging, they all still belong in the category of impermanence, and so fundamentally represent modifications of consciousness. Such modifications are endless, but of no lasting significance, any more than clouds in the sky. Real Awakening, on the other hand, is the direct recognition of That which does not change, and is not modified by events or circumstances that appear and disappear in and as consciousness. It reveals our original nature, prior to consciousness itself.

Just so, trying to get others to awaken (in the sense generally implied in the alternative arena) is more a matter of transfer of certain data, and any data transfer is dependent on both the transfer vehicle and the receptor. If the receptor has the capacity, it will receive, but remember, we are only talking about modifying consciousness, not getting to its root (which again is what real Awakening is all about).

In other words, when we discuss awakening others, what we are usually talking about is changing someone’s beliefs, but not undermining their whole belief structure altogether, revealing that the person they have taken themselves to be is nothing other than a conceptual designation, a fictitious story, empty of any solidity. Indeed, describing their home and true identity to an amnesiac really doesn’t accomplish much, due to their chronic memory blockage.

In any case, what right do we have to force our views on others? The notion of “shaking others awake” is actually a form of aggression. As a matter of fact, most folks who are led down the “rabbit hole” of conspiracy theories or urged into crusades for this or that cause are often better off left alone to fulfill their term here, focusing instead on just enjoying the human experience in whatever way their light leads them.

However, if some are moved to try to “save the world”, let them – they’ll find out in their own time that the world itself is as unreal as the one who dreams of saving it. This is why the principle of non-interference universally applies — the “prime directive”. If we really wish to be of service in this matter, we might take Niu Tou Fa Jong’s words to heart when he wrote in his classic “Song of Mind”: “Don’t destroy the myths of common people; only teach the cessation of thoughts.”

Moreover, our efforts to awaken others to our notion of what reality is all about can often prove to be merely an additional impediment to both their as well as our true awakening. As the sage Siddharameshwar Maharaj noted: “What you are thinking of as ‘awake’ — some intense new passion for a worthy cause or a deep feeling of love for all existence — is actually the deepest of deep sleep, much deeper than a feeling of boredom or indifference. Yours is an intense association with the Illusion. The bored and the indifferent are on the verge of leaving the lure of the temptress Maya behind, no longer swayed by her shiny attractions. They are on the verge of waking.”

In any event, having gotten some inkling of what’s going on in this realm “behind the curtain”, most people would rather forget what they have seen. For those conditioned by the consensus descriptions of reality, discovering what’s really lurking behind the lies that they have been told can be deeply disturbing as well as disorienting. As Winston Churchill noted: “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.”

When it comes right down to it, it’s clear that humans are the least qualified to judge each other, mostly because we are operating with insufficient data. The best policy is to always turn the spotlight back on oneself, particularly when we think we see something lacking in others, or presume that we have some special knowledge which they should have. Again, Nisargadatta spoke wisely when he cautioned: “When you deceive yourself that you work for the good of all, it makes matters worse, for you should not be guided by your own ideas of what is good for others. A man who claims to know what is good for others, is dangerous.”

Remember, we are not here to fix samsara – that can’t be done. In fact, this realm itself is nothing more than a stage with ever-changing props, offering us an opportunity to discover what we are really made of. The best service we can offer others is to be a demonstration of what real awakening consists of, and for that, we ourselves need to not only awaken, but also to embody real awakening in our own behavior.

One of the principle lessons in Zen training is about letting go of the desire for some particular outcome. In other words, relinquishing all gaining ideas, all fantasies, hopes, and wishes for some special attainment. This principle is universally applicable. As long as we have in mind some desire to “defeat the evil systems of the Powers That Be”, for example, we will continue to be a slave to those very systems. On the other hand, if one wants to be free, they must stand without desire or fear, relinquishing all concepts of personal control.

There is a universal power at work, but we do not trust that, even though we are its very source. Such distrust is a grave mistake, and one that will cause us endless suffering. On the other hand, if we are able to recognize that we ourselves are being lived by that very power, and conversely, that it is our own expression, then the sense of separation, of frustration and dismay will evaporate, and paradoxically, that is when we will finally be eligible to be of some real service in our life and relations, as the impediments to genuine awakening fall away in the light of recognition.

not your job

 Q: I may remove my causes of sorrow, but others will be left to suffer.

 Nisargadatta Maharaj: To understand suffering, you must go beyond pain and pleasure. Your own desires and fears prevent you from understanding and thereby helping others. In reality there are no others, and by helping yourself you help everybody else. If you are serious about the sufferings of mankind, you must perfect the only means of help you have – yourself.

See Also:

The Game

Fighting the Powers That Be

Saving the World

Posted in Consciousness, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , | 17 Comments

How To Change

changes

“One of the most powerful teachings of the Buddhist tradition is that as long as you are wishing for things to change, they never will. As long as you’re wanting yourself to get better, you won’t. As long as you have an orientation toward the future, you can never just relax into what you already have or already are.”

~Pema Chodron

That which is not used becomes obsolete, whereas what is resisted is kept in the forefront of attention. Thus, the creative principle of change initially entails a thorough recognition and consequent discarding of old “tapes”, or storyline scripts, that we have used to assemble, reinforce, and perpetuate our sense of self, the one we have taken to be the central character — “me”. In other words, it involves identifying and then eliminating what doesn’t work, including our neurotic personal self-images that keep us fixated in dysfunctional relationships to life.

To illustrate with one example, I spent a part of my professional career conflicted about living and working in the world, rather than isolated in some “spiritual” community, where I imagined I would be able to make more “progress” towards liberation. It was this very story I kept telling myself that robbed the life I was actually involved in of any power to awaken me, since I was always projecting the real work to be “elsewhere”.

Of course, the more I reinforced my fixed idea, the more self-confirming it became. It was only when I was eventually able to recognize how I was seriously limiting myself by clinging to a narrow “either/or” position that I was finally able to discard the old presumptions and allow my present circumstance, whatever it might be, to serve as the fuel for real liberation.

Rather than waging a prolonged battle with this fictional entity we have created over the course of our lives, we can simply cease granting it any enduring and concrete reality by shifting our attention to awareness itself — in other words, shifting our attention to being aware of being aware, prior to the whole narrative and architecture of personhood, as well as the ensuing complication that artificial edifice implies.

This “house-cleaning” can be initiated by first developing the capacity for calm abidance in silence, where we can better inspect the subterranean elements of our psyche that have been driving behavior and affecting our relations without our conscious knowledge or consent. As we become more accustomed to calm, silent abidance, there is more possibility of open space between perception and reaction, and it is in that spaciousness that we are able to detach enough to begin to “see the forest through the trees”.

From the detached vantage point provided by such stillness, we can then delve into our original motives that led to the creation of our current circumstances. Without clarity here, any effort to make substantial life changes that we might undertake will be tainted by old uninspected and chaotic influences, which will in turn hamper our necessary clarity and integration, compounding our sense of frustration and inner division. The entire structure of our desires and their ramifications needs to be confronted, seen through, and released, to avoid the classic trap of “spiritual by-pass”.

We need to honestly and thoroughly inspect what it is that we have we been doing which is chronically sabotaging our core heart yearning. Once any conflicted programming is recognized and the “bugs” eliminated, we cease to fuel dysfunctional patterns. For that reason, all unconscious mental and emotional habits and their causal negative conditioning need to be brought into the light of day and revealed for the obstructions that they are. In this conscious process, “old tapes” naturally become obsolete when we cease investing in them. This is why the wise suggest that we “empty the teacup” before filling it again with the fresh tea of projected changes.

Once re-aligned with our heart’s true desire, we are ready to combine sincere intent with undivided attention. Solidifying this combination through persistent positive reinforcement is the key to success in terms of making skillful changes in our life and relations. It is an uncompromising yoga in that respect, which requires steady devotion in order to reap results. With the noisy onslaught of conflicting messages and the relentless bombardment of media-driven distractions that characterize today’s social environment, honing one-pointed concentration is more of a challenge now than ever, but what is the option?

Certainly, establishing relationships with those who will support our goals is a great help, and hence the Buddhist ideal of “sangha”, or community of truth lovers. Shared spiritual intimacy with good friends has real power to carry us through the ups and downs which we are bound to encounter. A qualified guide who has already traveled the path we wish to tread can also be helpful in terms of pointing out blind spots and potential dead ends.

Furthermore, wedding our refreshed and awake intent to the “Cosmic Will” can help to insure that our motives remain pure and on-track. Such “union” is no obscure mystery, but really a matter of aligning thought-energy with the order of the universe. This can be done by us “stepping out of the way”, so to speak, and letting ourselves be lived by Love. After all, what other force in the universe would have our best interests at heart more than Love?

Letting oneself be lived does not mean that we must rely on some higher power outside of ourselves, however. On the contrary, to let go and embrace the unknown is most intimate, since it involves relaxing into full acceptance of the Love that we already are, and always have been. It is an act of genuine humility, without which, no real transformation is possible. Such humility is the red carpet to “getting back into our right mind”, in other words, but is only genuine when it is based on the recognition that all methods, schemes, and escape plans one has employed are destined to fail, as long as one is basing them on the presumed reality of a permanent and substantial person, a “me”.

This genuine humility is not a matter of neurotic self-humiliation, nor does it consist of humbling oneself before some external divinity, as many of the man-made religions would have it. Rather, it entails the recognition that I do not really know what anything is. In fact, I exist in a total state of not knowing, this is my fundamental condition, and so ego-mind has no place to plant a flag and turn my efforts at change into just another vanity project. It’s what real freedom is all about, in that respect, since there is nothing there to manipulate or corrupt.

From that “place” of not knowing, we can see things as they are, without the superimposition of provisional knowledge, beliefs, or conditioned programs, and it is only when we are able to see clearly that we are capable of making the changes in our attitudes and behavior that truly serve us and our relations. Paradoxically, it is only by virtue of this clarified vision that we may ultimately come to the direct recognition that there is nothing and nobody to change. As Sri Nisargadatta points out:

“Nothing you do will change you, for you need no change. You may change your mind or your body, but it is always something external to you that has changed, not yourself. Why bother at all to change? Realize once for all that neither your body nor your mind, nor even your consciousness is yourself and stand alone in your true nature beyond consciousness and unconsciousness. No effort can take you there, only the clarity of understanding. Trace your misunderstandings and abandon them, that is all. There is nothing to seek and find, for there is nothing lost.”

Indeed, at this stage we can recognize that all of our fuss and bother, all of our self-concern and busy efforts to modify, please, and perfect ourselves, has been based on a case of mistaken identity. The direct recognition of the emptiness of the personal self is a great relief, liberating us from the endless “me-project” that has so occupied our life and infected our relations with its insistent demands for confirmation and feeding.

Freed from the heavy weight of the self-fixation, we need not worry about changing a person who, after all, is merely a bundle of thoughts and memories. Whatever is in need of change will happen spontaneously, without the superimposition of a make-believe doer to complicate life’s flowing functioning.

Indeed, it is only by seeing through and surrendering all of our previous identifications with the body-mind-self (as well as its need for validation, preservation, and enhancement) that we are finally available to be changed by the universal intelligence which is always manifesting as that very life and love from which we have never truly been divided.

“You need not do anything,
remain sitting at your table and listen.
You need not even listen, just wait.
You need not even wait,
just learn to be quiet, still and solitary
and the world will freely offer itself to you unmasked.

It has no choice, it will roll in ecstasy at your feet.”

~Franz Kafka

Nondual Forum

Posted in Consciousness, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , | 19 Comments

Discipline of Silence

enjoy_the_silence-

“A quiet mind is all you need. All else will happen rightly, once your mind is quiet. As the sun on rising makes the world active, so does self-awareness effect changes in the mind. In the light of calm and steady self-awareness inner energies wake up and work miracles without effort on your part.”

~Sri Nisargadatta

Simply put, “ego-mind” is the activity of craving and aversion that gives rise to the sense of a separate self, which in turn demands one’s full attention in the form of caring, feeding, defending, and preserving. The process commences when perception is translated into an interior stream of interpretations, images, concepts, memories, beliefs, projections, judgments, narratives and commentaries, which mind then weaves into a vivid and perpetual story – the story of “me”.

In that fanciful narrative, the fictional character we typically imagine ourselves to be is taken as an actual independent and enduring person, entangled in dilemma, and relentlessly driven by attraction and fear to seek an elusive happiness through the exploitation of experience in this dreamy realm of transitory forms and appearances.

Should it pursue its ongoing adventures in the arena of “spiritual effort”, ego-mind will diligently follow all the rules, rites, and rituals, even congratulating itself on how well it’s doing transcending ego-mind.

ego mind

It will be right up there at the front line, earnestly battling itself via all manner of borrowed strategies and prescribed remedies – artifacts of the search — which in the end only serve to fatten it and prolong the internal struggle. The reason it is so successful in prolonging the charade is mostly due to the convincing nature of the illusion it weaves, starting with the assertion that we are the body — a separate subject seeking to survive and thrive in a world of “others”.

Furthermore, ego-mind can co-opt even our most profound realizations, taking the credit for how well it’s seeing through and “hacking” itself. In fact, the very movement and impulse to dispel delusion is prompted by delusion itself. Mind cannot be used to grasp mind.

In that regard, using the mind to look for reality is futile, because the mind that wants to free itself from all conditioning programs is itself a program, just as that which wants to eliminate the disease of the mind is itself a symptom of that very disease. That’s how it confirms its existence and survives so well — by ensuring that a perpetual state of war exists (not unlike certain governments).

The last thing it wants is to become obsolete through lack of attention. The last sound it ever wants to hear is the sound of silence. When the movement of attention falls into the inherent and prior silence of its own source, it is not interesting to the ego-mind, which thrives on the noise of conflict. Consequently, if one would be free, sages and shamans recommend cultivating the discipline of inner silence.

White-silence

“Whatever happens in consciousness is purely imaginary, a hallucination. Therefore keep in mind the knowledge that it is consciousness in which everything is happening. With that knowledge, be still, do not pursue any other thoughts which arise in consciousness.”

~Sri Nisargadatta

“The grand trick of those sorcerers of ancient times was to burden the flyers’ mind with discipline. Sorcerers found out that if they taxed the flyers’ mind with inner silence, the foreign installation would flee, and give any one of the practitioners involved in this maneuver the total certainty of the mind’s foreign origin. [It] comes back, I assure you, but not as strong; and a process begins in which the fleeing of the flyers’ mind becomes routine until one day it flees permanently.”

~Don Juan Matus, “The Active Side of Infinity”, by Carlos Castenada

The quotes above, though from two very different traditions and from opposite ends of the world, coincide in describing a prime vehicle of liberation – the Way of Silence — but it is not a path most will undertake, because of the tremendous discipline and subtlety involved. In the “Bhagavad Gita”, Krishna told Arjuna that, out of millions, only a few will aspire to the truth, and out of those who do, only a few will realize it.

Even given these slim odds, however, what is the alternative? To be a slave to our own outrageous thought theater? If one is earnest enough in their desire for freedom, we will do what it takes, even unto death. In fact, it’s precisely that death — the end of the search to confirm and validate ego-mind’s existence — that mystics and realizers throughout the centuries have spoken of as the price of admission to real freedom: dying to the restless mind of craving and aversion, and all the passing parade of vanities and self-positions to which we subject ourselves in our ignorance.

Question: “It is said that the Self is beyond the mind and yet the realisation is with the mind. The mind cannot think it. It cannot be thought of by the mind and the mind alone can realise it. How are these contradictions to be reconciled?”

Ramana Maharshi: “Self is realised with mrita manas (dead mind), that is, mind devoid of thoughts and turned inward. Then the mind sees its own source and becomes that.”

Silence

Nevertheless, to attempt to force attention into silence by an act of will is merely engaging in yet another variation on the theme of seeking, because willing and seeking are complementary. In this case, the exercise of the will equates with the idealism of seeking to have things be different than they are, even if that change is to a state of non-seeking. This is why Seng-T’san, Third Patriarch of Zen, wrote:

“When you try to stop activity to achieve peace, your very effort fills you with activity.”

Consequently, while an adept such as Ramana might advise, “Make no effort … your effort is the bondage….all that is required is to be still”, such instructions are almost impossible for ordinary untrained folk to carry out, for the simple reason that the sense of separate identity is a subconscious projection, and not readily accessible to the intellect’s willfulness or idealism.

The activity of separation is programmed into the very foundations of our delusion, in which consciousness is conditioned to assume the ego-mind’s cravings and aversions as its own, and so fixates on a resulting self-sense, in turn projecting that “me” story of desire and dissatisfaction into the mechanics of the search, and then re-affirming it in an endless loop.

Ironically, it is the vicious cycle of that very seeking which keeps the mind agitated and prolongs the delusion by reinforcing identification with the story over and over again, prompting efforts to change environments and circumstances, which only result in the mere modification of mind, rather than its liberation. This is why the great Dzogchen adept Longchenpa noted,

“In the meditation which is great natural self-perfection, there is no need of modifications and transformations: whatever arises is the Great Perfection. If you reside in the groundless state through detachment from mind you will accomplish, spontaneously and changelessly, the inconceivable sovereignty.”

thought bubbles

As long as other options born of craving and aversion appear inviting, silence will remain patiently in the background. It is what persists when thought has lost its magical ability to distract attention. Once that happens, attention may begin to rest in the space between thoughts. At first it may be for small moments, but these moments can be repeated many times, while the shift from distraction to clarity proceeds, and the awake spaciousness becomes more and more the present experience.

True silence is not an acquisition, a prized object to be gained after some long struggle. Rather, it is what is already true of us — our own native state — prior to the superimposition of the incessant internal narrative. It is our identification with that personal narrative, fueled by the alternating cycle of hope and fear, craving and aversion, which obscures our peace. Thus, we can see that silence is not an addition to consciousness — something new. Rather, it is the actual ground or basis of consciousness itself (“Dharmakaya”, in Buddhist parlance).

It is our own pristine knowingness, the natural space of awake awareness, in which all the various mental states and conditions appear and disappear. By simply being that which we already always are, without resort to any special scheme or strategy of transformation or modification, we simply relax and rest. When all else falls away, or becomes obsolete from lack of attention, this transparent stillness alone remains, this pure and simple silence.

By first recognizing, and then releasing, the chronic contraction which spawns mind’s neurotic activity, we can “fall into” the prior silence of our true nature, our natural “default position”. It is always a matter of clear seeing, or being aware of being aware, and then relaxing into this primordial nature: letting go, relinquishing the struggle, surrender.

lettinggo1

The clench at the heart is habitually being reinforced by clinging and attachment. Attachment to what? Attachment to the personal story of “me and mine”. That is the noisy narrative which so occupies our attention, like a constant parade of clouds which obscures the spaciousness of the blue sky. This is why we turn attention around to its root, or source, in silence.

By disengaging from that stream of thoughts, images, interpretations, memories, and projections which constitute “the story”, attention comes to rest in silence, and it is only in such silence, freed from all distractions, all mental and emotional obscurations, all futile seeking and stressful striving, that our true nature can reveal itself as the pure simplicity of open awake awareness that it is.

“The radiance of consciousness-bliss, in the form of one awareness shining equally within and without, is the supreme and blissful primal reality. Its form is silence and it is declared by Jnanis (Self-realised) to be the final and unobstructable state of true knowledge (jnana).”

~Ramana Maharshi

Colors of Silence

See also:

The Silence Behind the Mind and True Transformation

Posted in Consciousness, Enlightenment, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , , , , | 42 Comments

The Practice of Non-Dwelling

CloudFaceBuddha

“Just let things happen without making any response and keep your minds from dwelling on anything whatsoever; for they who can do this thereby enter nirvana.”

~Ta-chu Huihai, Zen Teaching of Instantaneous Awakening

It is an extremely rare one indeed who, upon hearing the truth, is immediately able to drop all their accumulated stories of preference and separation, grasping and aversion, “me and mine”, and fully open their eyes to the real. This is why the old masters, the ones who themselves have awakened and are moreover fit to serve as authentic guides, typically recommend certain preliminary practices that bring one’s whole being into such an available condition that they are then prepared and ready to make the leap beyond the confines of duality and awaken to their own true identity, nature, and condition.

These recommendations include attending to the healing and balancing of the “food” body, the mental body, and the emotional body, for starters. It is also understood that, unless one has gotten straight with “the basics” first, it would be ridiculous to presume that one is capable of fully engaging a practice which requires the pristine concentrative skill and self-mastery (and not just for an hour on a cushion, but 24/7) that a teacher such as Dogen Zenji prescribes:“Do not think of good and bad. Do not care about right and wrong. Stop the driving movement of mind, will, and consciousness. Cease intellectual consideration through images, thoughts, and reflections.”

Just as an athlete might have outstanding potential, but nevertheless must rigorously practice to fulfill that potential, so too are we all born with the innate capacity to realize our prior nature as powerful immortal spiritual beings of the highest order, but few are willing to undertake the preparations necessary to fashion a diamond-pointed arrow of consolidated attention and intention, which can then be summoned to pierce through mind’s habitual overlay of delusions that obscure who and what we truly are.

Among the various time-tested recommendations in this regard, I would offer that the practice of “non-dwelling” is one of the most effective. It is one practice that can transcend any conceptual ideology, sectarian dogma, or religious bias and directly reveal our fundamental innocence. In the Madhupindika Sutta, Buddha alluded to it when he said: “If, with regard to the cause whereby the perceptions and categories of complication assail a person, there is nothing there to relish, welcome, or remain fastened to, then that is the end of the obsessions of passion, the obsessions of resistance, the obsessions of views, the obsessions of uncertainty, the obsessions of conceit, the obsessions of passion for becoming, and the obsessions of ignorance.

Essentially, the practice of non-dwelling, or non-abiding, consists of a sustained refusal to grant reality to that which is not real, or to fixate attention on any of what changes, including one’s transient moods, hopes, desires, fears, memories, schemes, or regrets. In other words, it is refraining from clinging to any mental or emotional formations which would lead to the fabrication of a separate and enduring self-sense. In practice terms, it represents “non-meditation” in the sense of simply not indulging the urge to obscure effortless natural recognition (timeless awareness) with conceptual designations and fantasies of interpretation on perception.

Typically, we tend to blame external circumstances, people, and events for our sense of chronic dissatisfaction. However, a comprehensive investigation of the mechanism of our stress and suffering reveals that it is not external phenomena that are the source of our distress. Rather, it is our fixation on them that keeps us locked in a cycle of craving and aversion. Consequently, the natural remedy is to interrupt the chain of causation which leads to attachment, clinging, fixation.

The great sage Nisargadatta Maharaj pointed to it when he advised: “Refuse attention, let things come and go. Desires and thoughts are also things. Disregard them. Since immemorial time the dust of events was covering the clear mirror of your mind, so that only memories you could see. Brush off the dust before it has time to settle; this will lay bare the old layers until the true nature of your mind is discovered. It is all very simple and comparatively easy; be earnest and patient, that is all. Dispassion, detachment, freedom from desire and fear, from all self-concern, mere awareness — free from memory and expectation — this is the state of mind to which discovery can happen. After all, liberation is but the freedom to discover.”

The practice of non-dwelling cuts through the noise and reveals the potent silence of our own true nature. It is the antidote to hope and fear, grasping and avoidance. It is the essence of true compassion in action, because it frees attention from the self-obsession, rendering it available to life and relationship. It is the gift that never ceases giving. It depends on no religion or philosophy, answers to no messiah, master, or guru, and requires no initiation or special rituals or rites.

This practice, when applied with sincerity and consistency, gives the ego-mind (including the “spiritual” ego) no place to land. When starved for attention, the “me-story” begins to disintegrate, and what emerges in its place is free and clear attention, as well as our innate compassion and capacity for true recognition.

Again, Nisargadatta Maharaj put it succinctly when he suggested: “Leave your mind alone, that is all. Don’t go along with it. After all, there is no such thing as mind apart from thoughts which come and go obeying their own laws, not yours. They dominate you only because you are interested in them. It is exactly as Christ said ‘Resist not evil’. By resisting evil you merely strengthen it.”

In Zen practice, it is called “no-mind”, or non-abiding mind, which is the true spontaneous condition of one’s own mind when freed of all obscuration and distraction. In Tibetan Buddhist practice, the contemporary Dzogchen teacher Tsoknyi Rinpoche depicts true meditation as “not dwelling in any way whatsoever, and yet totally present throughout everything.” In a nutshell, it is simply self-existing awareness itself.

Another great Dzogchen teacher, Dudjom Rinpoche, put it like this: “Whatever thoughts arise, let them arise. Do not follow after them and do not suppress them. If you ask “In that case, what should I do?” Whatever objective phenomena arise, whatever appears, do not grasp phenomena’s appearing aspect as you rest in a fresh state, like a small child looking inside a temple. When all phenomena are left as they are, their appearance is not modified, their color does not change, and their brilliance does not diminish. If you do not spoil phenomena with clinging and grasping thoughts, appearances and awareness will nakedly manifest as empty and luminous wisdom. Simple recognition of thoughts as they arise breaks their flow. Release thoughts within that recognition. When you remain in that state, arising thoughts will all be liberated equally within awareness.”

In the Christian mystical tradition, John of the Cross shared a similar insight when he wrote, “Beyond human knowledge and understanding, in order to come to union with the wisdom of God, the soul has to proceed rather by unknowing than by knowing. When thy mind dwells upon anything, thou art ceasing to cast thyself upon the All. This perfection consists in voiding and stripping and purifying the soul of every desire. In order to be free and void to that end, (the soul) must in no wise lay hold upon that which it receives, either spiritually or sensually, within itself.”

Essential to the practice of non-dwelling is surrender. That is, all of one’s most cherished beliefs, ideals, and self-images must be released, until there is nothing left to let go of. At that point, insight or recognition into one’s true nature may become spontaneously evident. As the contemporary Theravandin teacher Ajahn Amaro wrote, “The practice of nonabiding is the process of emptying out both the objective and the subjective domains, truly seeing that both the object and subject are intrinsically empty. If we can see that both the subjective and objective are empty, if there’s no real ‘in here’ or ‘out there’, where could the feeling of I-ness and me-ness and my-ness locate itself?”

Nevertheless, even after one experiences a first revelatory awakening to the truth of emptiness, as life-changing as it may be, there usually must follow a substantial period of integration, while all the various “bodies” are brought into full alignment with the truth realized in the initial glimpse. Remarkable mental clarity and insight alone are still not fully indicative of real liberation, as long as the chronic emotionally reactive contraction has not been dealt with sufficiently enough to awaken the heart of unconditional compassion.

If the resulting insight that arises from perseverance in non-dwelling mind is to be truly worth anything, then genuine compassion and humility will shine through in one’s life, filtering into every nook and cranny of one’s being. For that light to manifest, sincere effort is necessary, or as Suzuki Roshi noted, “You are all perfect the way you are, and you could use a little improvement.” Such effort involves consciously creating a life of impeccable integrity, in which every trace of greed, envy, hatred, pride, ignorance, and emotional/sexual contraction is seen through and transcended, and all relations harmonized.

By spending a little time each day refraining from following our thoughts around like a slave, and instead just observe them arise and dissolve without attaching to any of them, we would soon come to the direct recognition that we are not the person we had assumed ourselves to be. We are not our thoughts, and in fact we are a total mystery — undefinable and inconceivable. In reality each experience has its own experiencer. The sense of some continuous identity which we habitually cling to is actually based on bits of thoughts and memory. Upon thorough inspection, no real person can be established.

Indeed, what can be noticed, in the course of sincere inspection, is that both thought and thinker are empty. Moreover, such recognition does not require extraordinary feats of concentrative effort. As the wise adept Tulku Urgyen recommended:

“When a thought moves, simply recognise the thinker. The thinking then dissolves. No matter what the thought is about, the thinking and the thinker are empty. A thought in itself is not made of any concrete substance; it is simply an empty thought movement. By recognising the empty essence in a thought, it vanishes like a bubble in water. That is how to deal with any particular present thought at hand. Once you know how to let the present thought dissolve, any subsequent thought can be dealt with in exactly the same way, as simply another present thought. But if we get involved in the thought, thinking of what is being thought of, and continue it, then there is no end.

It is our thinking that propels us or forces us into further samsaric existence. As long as we get caught up in our own thinking, samsara doesn’t stop. On the other hand, any thought is an empty thought, in that it has no concrete substance to it whatsoever. It is very easy to notice this, because the moment you recognise mind essence, the thought dissolves right there. The thought vanishes into your empty essence, into your basic nature which is emptiness. There is no remnant whatso¬ever. That is the only way to solve the problem. When recognising your essence, the thought is executed on the spot; it is totally obliterated.”

When we refrain from buying into the illusion of the personal package (due to the practices like non-dwelling), a more vivid and transparent reality spontaneously moves to the forefront, and if we allow it in, our relationships with each other and life itself will be dramatically changed. Our craziness will typically not yield much at first, but as it is consistently undermined by resort to direct recognition, it will gradually become obsolete, because we will have ceased to indulge it.

The good news is that this is all possible, people can and do awaken at the heart, and they do find liberation from the afflictive states of emotional contraction (in so far as such awakening is possible on a relatively low-level war planet such as this realm we are currently touring).

Does this constitute true “Enlightenment”? No, but it does represent a substantial deepening and clarification of vision, as well as an increasingly skillful embodiment of the conscious principle, thus enabling effective adaptation to successively more profound vibrational frequencies of Light.

“You don’t have to do anything with your mind, just let it naturally rest in it’s essential nature. Your own mind, unagitated, is reality. Meditate on this without distraction.

Know the Truth beyond all opposites. Thoughts are like bubbles that form and dissolve in clear water. Thoughts are not distinct from the absolute Reality, so relax, there is no need to be critical.

Whatever arises, whatever occurs, simply don’t cling to it, but immediately let it go. What you see, hear, and touch are your own mind. There is nothing but mind.

Mind transcends birth and death. The essence of mind is pure Consciousness that never leaves reality, even though it experiences the things of the senses. In the equanimity of the Absolute, there is nothing to renounce or attain.”

~Niguma

nobody

Further reading:

http://theconsciousprocess.wordpress…and-the-heart/

https://theconsciousprocess.wordpress.com/2014/10/12/true-meditation-recognizing-basic-sanity/

https://theconsciousprocess.wordpress.com/2013/06/18/to-do-something/

Posted in Consciousness, Enlightenment, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , , | 46 Comments

Deconstructing the Story

“O Architect! You are seen! You shall build no house again. All your rafters are broken. Your ridge pole is shattered.”

~Dhammapada

It’s a bit scary, and often even threatening, to begin the process of questioning one’s entrenched habit of conceptual self-definition. For most of us, it provides a kind of buffer between ourselves and the apparent chaos of the phenomenal world. Our cumulative personal story revolves around how we think of ourselves, and our identity based on such stories is all we are ever attempting to enhance, comfort, satisfy, and protect. Even such a well-regarded spiritual teacher as the Buddhist author, Pema Chodron, recently wrote: “In a book I read recently, the author talked about humans as transitional beings—beings who are neither fully caught nor fully free but are in the process of awakening. I find it helpful to think of myself this way.”

The truth is, she doesn’t really know who or what she is. Nobody does. However, we tend to adopt these pretenses in order to better navigate the objective world. Inevitably, we begin believing our stories, imagining that the personas we’ve assumed actually represent who we are. As a rule, we are unable to rest in our fundamental not-knowing. We become anxious, restless for an adventure in which we can immerse ourselves, as children do in games of make-believe. This whole realm, and even the so-called higher realms, are simply stages where we can perform in various roles for our entertainment and edification.

The only problem in all of this is when we suffer, based on the fate of the character with whom we have fused. We suffer because we have forgotten our essential immortal spirit nature while pretending to be this or that form exclusively. We suffer, in other words, due to our conceptual self-definitions. Instead of holding them lightly, we cling to them desperately and won’t let go, sometimes even after the death of the human body-mind vehicle. Of course, nothing is wasted, even our suffering, which can be transmuted into wisdom if we pay attention to the natural order of things — their transience and transparent emptiness.

What then are the mechanics of this construction? In chronic reaction to the perceived dilemma that characterizes “ordinary life”, the comparative mind becomes addicted to imagining various alternative scenarios and then projecting future outcomes, thus reinforcing its presumption of present unhappiness. In just going about our everyday business, such embedded strategies constitute a persistent pattern of avoidance, especially when the circumstances du jour appear to be challenging.

If we are perceptive, we may come to realize that these various challenges are actually gifts in the form of tests of recognition. They are graciously provided in order for us to discover how we will respond in numerous simulations. Will we continue indulging in escapist fantasies, or finally awaken to what is always standing right before us? In that way, they are both an invitation to recognize what we are habitually up to, as well as an opportunity to go beyond the patterned grooves of dreamy sleep-walking and complacency.

As we awaken from the conditioned daze of our amnesia, we can utilize these tests as a means of inquiry into that which we are always trying to run from and avoid. For example, why do we scare ourselves? What is the reactive mechanism within our psyche that is regularly superimposing stress on life, and infusing it with a felt quality of fearfulness and dissatisfaction?

Certainly, we can stop in the midst of our narrative and face ourselves at any moment. However, the implications of that stark possibility disturb us. Instead, we are attracted to and become enamored of all sorts of hopeful schemes, or else seek to linger in a nostalgia of pleasant memory states, with past and future vying for our anxious attention, and all the while resisting the simple act of resting — right here, right now.

Such “resting” requires a profound letting go of our fixations and cherished images, a deep and abiding surrender born of genuine humility. However, the fascination-free state is considered boring to the typical spiritual seeker, who is driven by uninspected motives to fill up emptiness with all sorts of toys and games. The last thing most seekers really want is to have their whole story revealed as compounded fiction, so instead they easily become enamored of blissful energetic states that may appear in meditation, for example, employing them to confirm their existence, rather than recognizing them as transient modifications of consciousness.

On the other hand, by virtue of the radical decision to truly stop in our tracks, discard our distractions of choice, and nakedly face ourselves, the whole theatrical melodrama of “my story” is seriously undermined. By refusing to grant any enduring reality to the passing thought parade generated by the self-fixation, the narrative itself will eventually run out of fuel and lose its seductive and compelling allure. The first act of compassion, in this case, is to take off the mask.

Of course, such a daunting prospect is the last one ego-mind would care to endure. After all, its very survival is totally dependent on the perpetuation of the “me-story”, an all-consuming project of effort and personal validation, and thus it will struggle mightily to maintain that illusion, at least until the futility of such efforts is made apparent by virtue of the grace of failure. As Sri Nisargadatta notes:

“Unless you make tremendous efforts, you will not be convinced that effort will take you nowhere. The self is so self-confident that unless it is totally discouraged it will not give up. Mere verbal conviction is not enough. Hard facts alone can show the absolute nothingness of the self-image.”

To fail completely involves the cumulative recognition that “you” can’t do it. Alert and persistent inspection, typically coupled with the mentorship of a qualified guide, will eventually reveal the utter futility of the ego-mind’s efforts to endure and triumph. The whole scheme, the compounded strategy, is hopeless! As it turns out, the one that would awaken in some glorious enlightenment story is the very one that is obstructing true realization, and it is only in the total frustration of the ego-mind’s ambition that the clear light of our native radiance is free at last to emerge.

Spiritual aspirants tend to expect some drama, perhaps some ethereal fireworks display in their crown chakra to herald their passage, not a boring sort of petering out of their ambition, leaving them with no glamorous flag to wave or shining persona to point at with the pride of accomplishment. The real process is not a matter of addition, but more of a humbling subtraction which is thorough and relentless, until nothing is left — no willfulness — and that is, paradoxically, everything.

The Western teacher Adyashanti describes the process well when he writes: “Asking, ‘What is the Truth?’ is a demolition project. Most of spirituality is a construction project. We’re ascending and ascending — ideas are ascending, kundalini energy is ascending, consciousness is ascending. It just keeps building, and a person feels, ‘I’m getting better and better.’

But enlightenment is a demolition project. It simply shows you that everything you have ever believed was true isn’t. Everything you take yourself to be, whatever your self-image is — good, bad, or indifferent — you’re not that. Whoever you think others are — good, bad, or indifferent — is not true. Whatever you think about God is wrong. You cannot have a true thought about God, so all of your thoughts about God tell you precisely and exactly what the divine is not. Whatever you think the world is tells you exactly and precisely what the world is not. Whatever you think about enlightenment is also precisely and exactly what it’s not.

Do you get the flavor of it? It’s a removal project. What does it remove? Everything. And unless it’s a removal of everything, it’s not ultimately liberating. If there is one thing or a single viewpoint that hasn’t been removed, then liberation hasn’t happened yet.”

When the mind moves, stories are spawned. Be before mind, and stories will take care of themselves. However, how many are able to drop off the mind and come to rest as the natural unqualified presence of awake awareness? Certainly not the mass of humanity, or even the mass of spiritual practitioners. Consequently, we need to be very discriminative with our story-making.

While immersed in the relative, objective sphere of time and space (as all of us are), there will be narratives, because that is how humans organize chaos. Even several levels above this vibrational frequency, there are still narratives, just more subtle.

The writer Jonathan Gottschall noted:  “We are, as a species, addicted to story. Even when the body goes to sleep, the mind stays up all night, telling itself stories.” The question is, to which narrative will we grant reality? Depending on our choice, so is the world created. The current world is the result of stories we have collectively fashioned, and so will be the world which comes next.

At its foundation, our typical story is built upon, and is designed to confirm, some sense of personal self and individual doer-ship. However, upon thorough investigation, it can be recognized that this sense of “self” derives from a misreading or misinterpretation of the causes and conditions of life and experience.

Afraid of death and the possibility of nonexistence, we desperately conceive of and then cling to a fictional narrative of permanence underlying the flux of experience and perception. Rather than recognize causes and conditions for what they are, we reify their obvious effects, granting these hypostatic entities a substantial and enduring facsimile of personhood.

The ensuing story of “me and mine” is representative of our deepest desires and fears – played out in the repetitive activity of grasping and avoidance, craving and aversion. However, by recognizing that all phenomena arise, thrive, and vanish dependent on perpetually changing causes and conditions, we can begin to see things as they actually are, beyond any imaginative stories of a concrete, independent, and enduring self and its dreamy entanglements.

The whole carefully constructed edifice of that ambitious house of cards begins to teeter when the ridge beam of “me”, the central character, becomes suspect. Perhaps, when we look closely, we find that the whole story was just a case of mistaken identity? Consciousness took form, but then came to believe that it was that form, to the exclusion of all else. From there, the whole chain of causation was elaborated, and it truly is a chain, binding us in fixed identification to a fabricated tale, a seemingly endless loop of hopeful idealism alternating with dissatisfaction and disappointment that we take to be our lot, and from which we have always been desperately seeking relief.

True relief, however, will only come when we cease investing in our dream-like personal story to the point that it becomes non-binding. By refusing to buy into escape plans, or even anyone in need of escape, we allow our prior nature to reveal itself. No longer chasing alternatives, we rest and become still. In that stillness, that silence, what we truly are — our primordial identity — is allowed to emerge from the background, and it is such an innocent simplicity, really, that we may wonder why we took so long to notice it, in all of its ordinary splendor.

“The very idea of going beyond the dream is illusory. Why go anywhere? Just realize that you are dreaming a dream you call the world, and stop looking for ways out. The dream is not your problem. Your problem is that you like one part of your dream and not another. Love all, or none of it, and stop complaining. When you have seen the dream as a dream, you have done all that need be done.”

Sri Nisargadatta

the conversation

Posted in Consciousness, Nonduality, Spiritual Practice | Tagged , , , | 19 Comments