{"version":"https:\/\/jsonfeed.org\/version\/1","title":"Superrr Blog","description":"","home_page_url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en","feed_url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/feed.json","items":[{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/how-to-plan-a-regenerative-feminist-tech-dinner","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/how-to-plan-a-regenerative-feminist-tech-dinner","title":"How to plan a Regenerative Feminist Tech Dinner","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Coming to you from <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/pauli-sprang\">Pauli<\/a>, our community and events manager, and <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/larissa-rodiga\">Larissa<\/a>, our design and communication lead.<\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Last week, we shared a recap of our<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/the-regenerative-feminist-tech-dinner\" title=\"\"> recently co-hosted Regenerative Feminist Tech Dinner<\/a>.\u00a0Today, we want to open up about our process, thoughts, and aspirations. Let\u2019s take a closer look at the format of this evening, the relationships we want to enable with it, and how we went about it.<\/p><p>We hosted the dinner during<a href=\"\" title=\"\"> re:publica<\/a>, as a lot of wonderful people who work on similar topics from different backgrounds and perspectives come together in Berlin that week. <a href=\"\" title=\"\">As my colleague Zara wrote<\/a>, \u201cFor us [here at SUPERRR], a big part of working towards better and more feminist futures involves working across silos and spaces, building bridges and inviting people with different perspectives to deepen our understanding of the topics we, and those in our networks, work on.\u201d So this moment was a great opportunity to connect people who brought perspectives from different local contexts but all work to resist and re-imagine exploitative tech infrastructures in their own ways.<\/p><p><strong>But what does it actually take to build those bridges? How can we best support people in getting beyond the small talk and into deeper, more meaningful conversations? And why does any of that even matter?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>The Plan<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>We were aware that especially for people who have traveled from far to attend an immense conference such as re:publica, energy levels and social batteries might be running low.\u00a0So instead of planning a regular networking event \u2013 which so often is more draining then regenerative \u2013 we came up with the idea of hosting this Regenerative Tech Dinner. While we wanted to speak with our guests about regenerative feminist technologies, one\u00a0main intention was to not just talk about regeneration in a purely cognitive way, but to transform the dinner itself into a space that is regenerative for body and spirits of our guests.<\/p><p>How does one go about creating a space that enables us all to embody glimpses of the futures we are dreaming of?<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>THE INGREDIENTS<\/h2>\n      <h3><p><strong>Food<\/strong>.<\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>One ancient regenerative technology, so to speak, is <strong>sharing food<\/strong>: coming together to break bread\u00a0can break down social barriers, the aromas activate our senses, and the nourishment supports our nervous systems to settle into a state of relaxation, which allows for more open social engagement.\u00a0<\/p><p>Speaking of regeneration, it was important for us to think about the wider ecosystems we are part of as consumers: remembering the planet, animals, and all the people who are visibly and\u00a0 invisibly involved in producing the ingredients of our dinner.\u00a0So it felt particularly nourishing that the food was prepared with seasonal and vegetarian ingredients, and with a lot of care by Tracey Harker and her team (among them her mother), who welcomed us at her newly opened restaurant <a href=\"\" title=\"\">BOMA<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><figure>\n  <img alt=\"\" height=\"801\" src=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/media\/eb052386e1-1780992221\/signal-2026-05-20-132031_005-2-1200x.jpg\" width=\"1200\">\n  \n<\/figure>\n      <h3><p><strong>Welcome people as they are.<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Another aspiration for us was to make each of our guests feel welcome exactly the way they are. While this might sound simple, it\u2019s an ideal that is not easy to reach in the context we move in. Especially in professional settings, most of us have learned that our exhaustion, grief, and vulnerability are not welcome, and that we have to mask them in order to be allowed to join, or to stay. Many of us embody protection and guarding strategies so well because we depend on them for navigating every day life in environments that are the opposite of welcoming to certain bodies, identities, and behaviors \u2013 so we can\u2019t simply switch to an internal state of feeling unconditionally welcome\u00a0when most of our lives we were taught that we\u2019re not.\u00a0<\/p><p>That\u2019s why we made sure to put a special focus on this in the language we used in the original invitations, when greeting out guests individually when they arrived, and\u00a0the welcoming words we shared at the start of the evening.\u00a0But it takes more than words: As hosts, we play an important role in inviting vulnerability by example and by creating an infrastructure of care.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3><p><strong>Hearing and Meeting needs.<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>For example, making people feel welcome also includes asking about their accessibility and dietary needs and being ready to put in the effort to make those needs met. For us, that looked like offering vegan, allergy-friendly, and non-alcoholic options \u2013 and putting them on the menu by default. We also brought an audio system to the space, so that speakers could use microphones and make it easier for others at the opposite end of the room, to hear what was happening.<\/p><p>We were also intentionally giving people orientation about the program and space so they can care for themselves how and when they need to \u2013 and had an awareness policy and code of conduct in place for when they needed support.<\/p>\n<\/div><figure>\n  <img alt=\"\" height=\"801\" src=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/media\/6e26d26d64-1780062490\/femtechdinner2-1200x.jpg\" width=\"1200\">\n  \n<\/figure>\n      <h3>Offer guidance without pressure.<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>We designed the program in a way that guests could let themselves be taken by the hand: they had to make as few decisions as possible, while always having the freedom to choose what is right for them.<\/p><p>We\u00a0assigned seating places, which took away the mental load of having to choose whom to sit next to among a group of people you don\u2019t know \u2013 noting that one of the main goals of the dinner was to bring together people who might not know many, or any, other people in the room. Days before the dinner we shared a conversation prompt with our guests, inviting them to bring an object that would portray their answer. More conversation prompts decorated our table in forms of colorful origami paper flowers \u2013 an invitation to unfold their way to moments of connection and conversation. Those prompts invited them to \u201cbreak the ice\u201d,\u00a0 enter different levels of connection, and have an overall easier time sharing conversations. We hoped that offering this kind of guidance took some kind of stress away that can often be experienced in more standard networking events.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3><p><strong>Attention to Details: Event Design and Materials<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>The biggest learning for us was (again) that what seems like small details makes a big difference: showing that we care through handwritten notes for each guest, little gift boxes with meaningful content that extended the theme of regeneration to our relationship with plants, printed out menu cards so people knew what to expect, beautifully designed invitations, or taking the time to think about meaningful prompts and then fold them into origami flowers.<\/p><p>Especially in a time where \u201chuman-made\u201d has become rare through the rise of AI generated everything, we wanted to put as much care and thought as possible into the materials supporting the evening. Designing with intention plays a huge part in SUPERRRs strategy, so a generic goodie bag and printed seat tags just wouldn\u2019t cut it. Every gift, every note had to carry a purpose:<\/p><p>Guests found a small cardboard box with their name handwritten on it, placed on a plate. That way, the gift already served as a place card \u2013 two birds with one stone! We wanted to gift our guests something that will make them feel appreciated, remind them of the topic of this dinner, and offer regeneration for themselves, but also the planet. Scented body oil with lavender \u2013 a plant kin that has a soothing effect on our nervous systems \u2013 and seed bombs to plant native flowers is what we settled on \u2013 and so our office turned into an apothecary for one afternoon, and also smelled lovely for the rest of the week. Everybody wins.<\/p><p>Printed menu cards not only support the decor, but also serve another important purpose of the evening. Imagine this: You arrive at a networking event. You have never been at the restaurant, you don\u2019t know anyone. You\u2019re already in your head thinking about how to act, what to say, what to do with your hands. And for some people, not knowing what will be served is just another stressor. On the theme of making this event a calming and regenerative space, we wanted to make it as easy as possible for people to get the answers they needed, so they would have space for the big questions of the evening \u2013 \u00a0easily solved with menu cards.<\/p><p>We already talked about the why of conversation prompts. The how went hand in hand with our intention of putting effort and a human touch into everything. We printed the prompts on origami paper and spent a good amount of time folding lotus flowers. Therefore not only the answering of the prompt broke the ice, but also trying to unfold it, which was trickier than we expected!<\/p><p>All these details underline the care with which we approached the time our guests were investing in returnand made this a truly beautiful evening.<\/p>\n<\/div><figure>\n  <img alt=\"the table of the dinner, plating with menu cards, candles in the middle, gift boxes on the plates, origami flowers spread\" height=\"1600\" src=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/media\/5643796c9c-1780992276\/femtechdinner-1200x.jpg\" width=\"1200\">\n  \n<\/figure>\n      <h3><p><strong>Funding, of course.<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Putting in all this care was only possible because we were coming from a well-resourced place: we had the big privilege of having funding for this Feminist Tech Dinner (a big thank you again to Heinrich B\u00f6ll Foundation!) which made it so much easier to invest the time and material that went into this infrastructure.<\/p><p>We\u2019re grateful for that support, and for the people who showed up: we all see, far too often, that care work is structurally underpaid and undervalued. For us at SUPERRR, we believe it is a center piece to strengthen our movements and to co-create the futures we are dreaming of. It was our pleasure to be able to do that work from a place of abundance rather than scarcity.<\/p><p>Let\u2019s be careful with each other so we can be dangerous together!<\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/pauli-sprang\">\t\t\t\t\tPauli Sprang\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/larissa-rodiga\">\t\t\t\t\tLarissa Rodiga\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-06-09T00:00:00+02:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T11:40:41+02:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/the-regenerative-feminist-tech-dinner","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/the-regenerative-feminist-tech-dinner","title":"The Regenerative Feminist Tech Dinner","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Last week, together with collaborators at <a href=\"http:\/\/thegreenwebfoundation.org\/\" title=\"http:\/\/thegreenwebfoundation.org\/\">Green Web Foundation<\/a>, we co-hosted a <strong>Regenerative Feminist Tech Dinner<\/strong>, an intimate event format designed to bring people from different spaces, communities and sectors together for an evening of deep and nourishing conversations.<\/p><p>Here at SUPERRR, we believe strongly that there\u2019s nothing inevitable about the current extractive ways that tech is being developed; and that we have more agency than perhaps billionaires and those in power would like us to realise, to change those futures.<\/p><p>For us, a big part of working towards better and more feminist futures involves working across siloes and spaces, building bridges and inviting people with different perspectives to deepen our understanding of the topics we, and those in our networks, work on. That\u2019s a big part of the motivation for us to host Feminist Tech Dinners. We\u2019ve found over and over again that sharing food together and bringing a level of intentionality and care to the space opens up the possibility for deeper conversations than we find at regular networking events.<\/p><p>In preparation for the dinner, we asked all invitees to consider this question:<\/p>\n<\/div><blockquote class=\"quote\">\n  Where have you experienced glimpses of a more just and life-affirming relationship with technology\u2014and how might those moments guide us in resisting extractive systems and building alternatives together?\n  <cite>\n    \n  <\/cite>\n<\/blockquote><div class=\"text\">\n    <p>With the theme of <strong>regeneration<\/strong> at the centre, we talked about a wide range of topics. Data centres were a central topic, and how they represent exploitation in the physical and digital realm, taking up huge amounts of land and resources. They lay the groundwork for a very specific type of future in which compute power, unlimited growth, monopolies and stock markets play a huge role.<\/p><p>At the same time, the lack of nuance in the language we use around these topics also came up: as we and many others have written about before, \u2018AI\u2019 has come to mean a lot of very different things, and there\u2019s currently no agreed-upon definition. The same is true of data centres \u2013 are we talking about a small room with a single server, or a massive set of buildings hosting thousands of servers, requiring extensive cooling infrastructure? Without specificity and agreed-upon definitions, it becomes almost impossible to know that we\u2019re talking about the same problem, let alone move towards solving it. The question was raised whether this might be an intentional strategy to obscure the actual structures of power in place.<\/p><p>Our dependence upon tech infrastructure coming from deeply problematic sources came up, too: Elon Musk\u2019s Starlink, a system for providing satellite internet, provides internet coverage in areas where governments have intentionally cut terrestrial internet coverage, allowing for communication to the outside world. For some, this is extremely life-affirming: it is absolutely essential, and yet the extremely undemocratic ways in which those satellites are governed and managed (as well as the fascist roots of the owner) remain present.<\/p><p>In some ways, this was almost typical of many of the discussions we had: there\u2019s no binary yes\/no, good\/bad, but instead a desire to acknowledge complexity and move through it to find better routes forward, while knowing that compromises will need to be made. That\u2019s true in the way we use tech today on so many levels: from the exploitative conditions behind lithium or cobalt mining, and the horrendous environmental impacts of creating consumer electronics, to the acknowledgment that for some, AI does provide extremely useful functions.<\/p><p>The level of investment that is being poured into some of these infrastructures \u2013 whether that be satellite internet or the incredible level of data centre infrastructure that is being built right now \u2013\u00a0 is almost beyond comprehension at this point. It begged the question for some: what\u2019s the role of financial systems and capital in all of this? Often, digital rights work focuses on the end result (the data centres themselves; the satellites; Internet access), which is effectively the downstream impact of decisions made at a much higher level. Might there be more space for advocacy or pushback with those who are deciding on how companies are valued, the level of tolerable risk for infrastructure investments, or more?<\/p><p>We were lucky to be joined by activists and organisers from a variety of different countries and communities who highlighted the importance of South-South solidarity and sharing of ideas, particularly given the global nature of many of these issues. Sharing approaches between groups and contexts gave some participants the opportunity to try out ideas from different contexts, and the inspiration for how to adapt these approaches to their contexts.<\/p><p>Despite the evening being titled the \u2018Regenerative Feminist Tech Dinner\u2019, it became quickly clear (as ever!) that technology was not at the centre of our discussions. Perhaps one exception to that was with a musing on the actual role of tech in all this. Given the feeling of <a href=\"https:\/\/nymag.com\/intelligencer\/article\/booing-commencement-speakers-over-ai-is-almost-a-trend.html\" title=\"https:\/\/nymag.com\/intelligencer\/article\/booing-commencement-speakers-over-ai-is-almost-a-trend.html\">anti-tech backlash that we\u2019re hearing and seeing on so many levels<\/a> \u2013\u00a0 what, if any, is the role of technologists in helping us rebuild what comes next? Acknowledging the joy that digital technologies once brought to many of us, and a general feeling of having lost that joy\u2013\u00a0 what might be needed to reconcile, recreate or simply acknowledge that those feelings have significantly changed? To reclaim that joy elsewhere, or to redesign and reshape our relationship with technologies to find the fun again?<\/p><p>We left the space with lots of food for thought, and with our hearts, minds and stomachs extremely nourished.<\/p><p>We\u2019re grateful for support from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.boell.de\/en\" title=\"https:\/\/www.boell.de\/en\">Heinrich B\u00f6ll Stiftung<\/a> for the Feminist Tech Dinner, and to Tracey Harker and the team at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bomaberlin.de\/\" title=\"https:\/\/www.bomaberlin.de\/\">BOMA<\/a> for providing such a beautiful space and dinner for our group. Here\u2019s to many more dinners in the future!\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div><figure>\n  <img alt=\"\" height=\"801\" src=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/media\/6836f771ab-1780062490\/femtechdinner-1200x.jpg\" width=\"1200\">\n  \n<\/figure>\n\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/zara-rahman\">\t\t\t\t\tZara Rahman\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-06-02T00:00:00+02:00","date_modified":"2026-06-02T11:36:12+02:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/das-ki-macht-mythen-missverstandnisse-starterpaket","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/das-ki-macht-mythen-missverstandnisse-starterpaket","title":"Das \"KI: Macht, Mythen, Missverst\u00e4ndnisse\" Starterpaket","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>In unseren Diskussionen \u00fcber KI-Mythen im Fr\u00fchjahr 2026 kamen viele Quellen zur Sprache. Diese thematisch sortierte Liste beinhaltet die wichtigsten, informativsten und interessantesten Inhalte, sortiert nach Themen, auf deutsch und englisch:<\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"code\">\n    <p><br><\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3>Blogposts zur Reihe<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/de\/blog\/ai-myths\" target=\"_blank\">KI-Mythen: Was steckt dahinter?<\/a><\/p><\/li><li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/de\/blog\/ki-macht-mythen-missverstandnisse-unsere-erkenntnisse\" target=\"_blank\">KI: Macht, Mythen, Missverst\u00e4ndnisse: Unsere Erkenntnisse<\/a><\/p><\/li><li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/de\/blog\/ai-myths-learnings\" target=\"_blank\">Mehr Mythen: Unsere KI-Reihe in Berliner Bibliotheken<\/a><\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"code\">\n    <p><br><\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3>Grundlagen<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p><strong>Automatisierung und Arbeit:<\/strong> Schon vor dem KI-Hype der letzten Jahre erschien das Buch <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kulturbuchtipps.de\/archives\/1418\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cArbeitsfrei: Eine Entdeckungsreise zu den Maschinen, die uns ersetzen\u201d<\/a> von Constanze Kurz und Frank Rieger. Am Beispiel, wie heute Brot hergestellt wird, sprechen sie \u00fcber die zunehmende Automatisierung, und wie sie sich auf die Gesellschaft und die Arbeitswelt auswirkt.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Was ist alles KI?<\/strong>\u00a0F\u00fcr die Bundeszentrale f\u00fcr politische Bildung erkl\u00e4rt Philipp Ladwig, was es mit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bpb.de\/lernen\/bewegtbild-und-politische-bildung\/555997\/was-ist-ki-und-welche-formen-von-ki-gibt-es\/\" title=\"https:\/\/www.bpb.de\/lernen\/bewegtbild-und-politische-bildung\/555997\/was-ist-ki-und-welche-formen-von-ki-gibt-es\/\">verschiedenen Formen von KI<\/a> auf sich hat.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Kann KI das alles wirklich?<\/strong> Auf englisch und im Detail schreibt unsere Expertin Frederike Kaltheuner in ihrem Buch \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/meatspacepress.com\/fake-ai\/\" title=\"https:\/\/meatspacepress.com\/fake-ai\/\">Fake AI<\/a>\u201d \u00fcber Pseudowissenschaft und Hype auf dem Markt der KI-Produkte.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Die KI-Verordnung der EU:<\/strong>\u00a0\u00dcber den derzeitigen Stand der KI-Gesetzgebung schreibt Sebastian Meineck auf <a href=\"https:\/\/netzpolitik.org\/2025\/regeln-fuer-chatgpt-so-will-die-eu-die-ki-verordnung-umsetzen\/\" title=\"https:\/\/netzpolitik.org\/2025\/regeln-fuer-chatgpt-so-will-die-eu-die-ki-verordnung-umsetzen\/\">netzpolitik.org<\/a>.<\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"code\">\n    <p><br><\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"text\">\n    \n<\/div>      <h3>Hype oder Hitze? Was KI und Klima verbindet.<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p>\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.boell.de\/de\/2021\/06\/02\/kuenstliche-intelligenz-und-klimawandel\" title=\"https:\/\/www.boell.de\/de\/2021\/06\/02\/kuenstliche-intelligenz-und-klimawandel\">K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz und Klimawandel<\/a>\u201d beleuchten Lynn Kaack, Priya Donti, Emma Strubell und David Rolnick in einem Papier der Heinrich-B\u00f6ll-Stiftung.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Hannah Smith und Chris Adams erkl\u00e4ren, wie wir den <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thegreenwebfoundation.org\/publications\/report-ai-environmental-impact\/\" title=\"https:\/\/www.thegreenwebfoundation.org\/publications\/report-ai-environmental-impact\/\">Klima-Fu\u00dfabdruck von KI<\/a> beeinflussen k\u00f6nnen, und wo die Grenzen individuellen Handelns sind.<\/p><\/li><li><p>AlgorithmWatch fragt, woher die <a href=\"https:\/\/algorithmwatch.org\/de\/explainer-ki-energieverbrauch\/\" title=\"https:\/\/algorithmwatch.org\/de\/explainer-ki-energieverbrauch\/\">ganze Energie f\u00fcr KI-Rechenzentren<\/a> kommen soll.<\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div>      <h3>Keine Magie: Die unsichtbare Arbeit hinter KI<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p>F\u00fcr Deutschlandfunk erkl\u00e4rt <a href=\"https:\/\/www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de\/ki-menschliche-arbeit-ausbeutung-kommentar-100.html\" title=\"https:\/\/www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de\/ki-menschliche-arbeit-ausbeutung-kommentar-100.html\">Julia Kloiber<\/a>, was an \u201cKI\u201d alles menschliche Arbeit ist, und unter welchen Umst\u00e4nden Datenarbeiter:innen zum Erfolg der KI-Industrie beitragen.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Eva Wolfangel \u00fcber die <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zeit.de\/digital\/2026-03\/rentahuman-ki-menschen-bezahlen-bluff-medien\" title=\"https:\/\/www.zeit.de\/digital\/2026-03\/rentahuman-ki-menschen-bezahlen-bluff-medien\">Geschichte<\/a>, dass KI-Agenten inzwischen Menschen f\u00fcr Zuarbeiten anstellen statt umgekehrt (Paywall).<\/p><\/li><li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/superrr-explained-data-work\" target=\"_blank\">SUPERRR explained: Data Work<\/a>. Unser Blogpost, der Data Work zackig erkl\u00e4rt. (ENG)<\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div>      <h3>KI f\u00fcr das Gute? Gesundheit und KI<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p>Unser Experte Manuel Hofmann gibt auf <a href=\"https:\/\/netzpolitik.org\/2026\/digitalisierungsstrategie-wie-kuenstliche-intelligenz-unser-gesundheitswesen-veraendern-soll-und-welche-fragen-das-aufwirft\/\" title=\"https:\/\/netzpolitik.org\/2026\/digitalisierungsstrategie-wie-kuenstliche-intelligenz-unser-gesundheitswesen-veraendern-soll-und-welche-fragen-das-aufwirft\/\">netzpolitik.org<\/a> ein Update zu K\u00fcnstlicher Intelligenz im deutschen Gesundheitswesen und zeigt im <a href=\"https:\/\/magazin.hiv\/magazin\/ki-gesundheit-digitalisierung-longevity\/\" title=\"https:\/\/magazin.hiv\/magazin\/ki-gesundheit-digitalisierung-longevity\/\">hiv.magazin der deutschen Aidshilfe<\/a> den Zusammenhang des Langlebigkeitstraums mit KI auf.<\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div>      <h3>KI und Gesellschaft<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p>Wir von SUPERRR nutzen kaum KI, und nur f\u00fcr wenige Zwecke \u2013 hier sind unsere Gr\u00fcnde: <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/de\/blog\/ki-und-das-unwahrscheinliche\">https:\/\/superrr.net\/de\/blog\/ki-und-das-unwahrscheinliche<\/a>\u00a0<\/p><\/li><li><p>Bereits 2020 befassten sich f\u00fcr den netzpolitisch-feministischen Verein netzforma*\u00a0mehrere Autor:innen mit der These: <a href=\"https:\/\/netzforma.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020_wenn-ki-dann-feministisch_netzforma.pdf\" title=\"https:\/\/netzforma.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020_wenn-ki-dann-feministisch_netzforma.pdf\">Wenn KI, dann feministisch<\/a>. Eine neue Ausgabe ist in Arbeit!<\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"code\">\n    <p><br><\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3>Zum Nachh\u00f6ren und -sehen:<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <ul><li><p>Eine ZDF-Reportage begleitet Menschen, die <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdf.de\/video\/reportagen\/37-grad-104\/37-befreundet-mit-einer-ki-100\" title=\"https:\/\/www.zdf.de\/video\/reportagen\/37-grad-104\/37-befreundet-mit-einer-ki-100\">Beziehungen mit Chatbots<\/a> f\u00fchren.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Im Podcast \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/frauen-technik.podigee.io\/\" title=\"https:\/\/frauen-technik.podigee.io\/\">They Talk Tech<\/a>\u201d diskutieren die Journalistinnen Svea Eckert und Eva Wolfangel aktuelle Technikthemen, darunter auch Agentische KI, das sogenannte Vibe Coding oder KI als \u00dcberwachungstechnik.<\/p><\/li><li><p>In einer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.arte.tv\/de\/videos\/122187-000-A\/ki-der-tod-des-internets\/\" title=\"https:\/\/www.arte.tv\/de\/videos\/122187-000-A\/ki-der-tod-des-internets\/\">Arte-Doku<\/a> geht Mario Sixtus der Frage nach, was KI mit dem Internet, wie wir es kannten, alles macht.<\/p><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"code\">\n    <p><br><\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3>F\u00fcr alle, die noch tiefer eintauchen wollen:<\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p><strong>PAPER:\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3442188.3445922\" target=\"_blank\">On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?<\/a>\u00a0Emily M. Bender et al (2021)<br><br><strong>BUCH: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.penguinrandomhouse.com\/books\/743569\/empire-of-ai-by-karen-hao\/\" target=\"_blank\">Empire of AI \u2013 Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's Open AI<\/a>\u00a0Karen Hao (2025) Rezension in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zeit.de\/kultur\/2025-06\/empire-of-ai-karen-hao-kuenstliche-intelligenz-technologie\" target=\"_blank\">Die Zeit<\/a>.<br><br><strong>BUCH:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27256515\" target=\"_blank\">Automating Inequality \u2013 How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor<\/a>. Virginia Eubanks (2018) St. Martin\u2019s Press.<br><br><strong>ARTIKEL:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/notmy.ai\/news\/oppressive-a-i-feminist-categories-to-understand-its-political-effects\/\" target=\"_blank\">Oppressive A.I.: Feminist Categories to Unterstand its Political Effect.<\/a> Paz Pe\u00f1a &amp; Joana Varon (2021)<br><br><strong>BUCH: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ruhabenjamin.com\/race-after-technology\" target=\"_blank\">Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code<\/a>. Ruha Benjamin (2019) Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.<br><br><strong>BUCH: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7551\/mitpress\/12255.001.0001\" target=\"_blank\">Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need.<\/a> Sasha Costanza-Chock (2020). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.\u00a0<\/p><p><strong>VORTRAG: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=3MDudbKSTJk\" target=\"_blank\">KI als Verst\u00e4rker bestehender Ungleichheiten. Digital Fight Club<\/a><br><br><strong>PAPER:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.project-syndicate.org\/magazine\/ai-for-social-good-false-promise-of-technosolutionism-by-abeba-birhane-2025-09\" target=\"_blank\">The False Promise of \u201cAI for Social Good\u201d<\/a> von Abeba Birhane (2025)<br>\u00a0<br><strong>ZINE:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/heyzine.com\/flip-book\/35bcce6a6a.html\" target=\"_blank\">AI-Z: A zine on resistance to GenAI<\/a> by Arda Awais (2025)<br><br><strong>BUCH:\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/zararah.net\/books\/\" target=\"_blank\">Machine Readable Me. The Hidden Ways Tech Shapes Our Identities.<\/a> Zara Rahman (2023)<br><br><strong>ARTIKEL:\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/69ZTn\" target=\"_blank\">Der gro\u00dfe Bluff mit der k\u00fcnstlichen Intelligenz.<\/a> S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung (2022)<br><br><strong>ARTIKEL: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/what-is-ai-slop-a-technologist-explains-this-new-and-largely-unwelcome-form-of-online-content-256554\" target=\"_blank\">What is AI slop? A technologist explains this new and largely unwelcome form of online content.<\/a>\u00a0Adam Nemeroff (2025)<br><br><strong>ARTIKEL: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/13621020903466399\" target=\"_blank\">Making design safe for citizens: A hidden history of humanitarian experimentation.<\/a>\u00a0Katja Lindskov Jacobsen (2010)<br><br><strong>REPORT: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.openmarketsinstitute.org\/publications\/report-stopping-big-tech-big-ai-roadmap\" target=\"_blank\">Stopping Big Tech from becoming Big AI.<\/a>\u00a0Max von Thun and Daniel A. Hanley (2024)<\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/elisa-lindinger\">\t\t\t\t\tElisa Lindinger\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/julia-kloiber\">\t\t\t\t\tJulia Kloiber\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-05-27T00:00:00+02:00","date_modified":"2026-05-27T11:36:05+02:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/ai-myths-learnings","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/ai-myths-learnings","title":"Myths and more: Our AI series in Berlin\u2019s libraries","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>\u2018It\u2019s not really about the technology, but about the social context\u2019 \u2013 said one expert during our series of events entitled \u2018AI: Power, Myths, Misconceptions\u2019. On eleven separate occasions over the past few months, we invited members of the public to join us at local libraries across Berlin to discuss: What does AI mean for our society?<\/p><p>Instead of one-way lectures, we opted for an open exchange and in-depth discussions where there were no bad questions. And in the end, it was us who learnt a great deal \u2013 above all, about how important it is to talk to one another.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>Not just a topic for experts<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>We often began by asking which participants were already familiar with the topic. Most of the time, only a few hands went up. But as soon as we got to the point of how AI and the discourse surrounding it were affecting us personally, everyone had something to say. It quickly became clear that we all have both a right and a need to get involved, because at some level, we\u2018re all aware of the sometimes fundamental changes that AI \u2013 whether as a digital tool or as a socio-technical narrative \u2013 brings with it. And sometimes, those experiences are at odds with each other.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>It\u2019s about much more than just tech<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Across all the events, we quickly moved from the technical basics to the big social and philosophical questions. Each session, the experts and participants steered the discussion in a different direction:<\/p><p>Sometimes, the discussions centred on fears and concerns: we talked about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dw.com\/en\/german-police-expands-use-of-palantir-surveillance-software\/a-73497117\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"report about palantir and german police\">surveillance technology and Palantir<\/a>, about <a href=\"https:\/\/sha.africauncensored.online\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"report by africa uncensored: hiding behind ai\">health data<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thegreenwebfoundation.org\/news\/report-exposes-big-techs-ai-climate-hoax-74-of-industrys-claims-about-ais-climate-benefits-are-unproven\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"report by the green web foundation on big tech's AI climate hoax\">impact on the climate<\/a>. We debated whether we (or who?) would live forever thanks to technology, whether that\u2018s even desirable and for whom; and what misanthropic ideologies lie behind such notions.<\/p><p>Sometimes we talked about the absurd: we heard stories from the day-to-day working lives of people who are forced at work to pretend they, themselves, are an AI. Participants reported that it\u2018s mandatory to use AI in their jobs \u2013 but no one could tell them exactly why or for what purpose. The use of AI is even becoming a criteria for positive evaluation: those who use a lot of AI are seen as doing a good job, whilst those who don\u2019t use it, have to explain themselves.<\/p><p>There was also enthusiasm and joy: older participants told us about their curiosity to try out and play with technology \u2013 an enthusiasm that not everyone in their circle of friends shared. And th excitement of seeing whole new worlds open up when texts can be translated at the touch of a button.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>What\u2019s really missing is dialogue<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>The myths we discussed were sometimes extreme; promises of global salvation (\u2018AI will solve the climate crisis!\u2019 \u2013 \u2018AI will detect and cure all diseases!\u2019) or harbingers of impending doom (\u2018AI will replace humans!\u2019 \u2013 \u2018Without AI, we\u2019ll be left behind!\u2019). As we picked these myths apart together, we kept coming back to important nuances, grey areas or dilemmas. And that\u2019s when things really got interesting.<\/p><p>Our guests were clear: it was precisely conversations with strangers who had different perspectives, transcending generational (and possibly even political) divides and differing levels of prior knowledge that were important, interesting, and perhaps even a little exciting. We heard again and again how rare opportunities for such exchanges are. To change that, we don\u2019t need more AI of any kind, but instead better supported local institutions like the libraries that opened their doors to us and our guests. Or as one participant put it: \u2018At last, I don't have to go to Mitte for an interesting event.\u2019<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>Many questions, few answers<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>In the end, one question always remained unanswered: is \u2018AI\u2019 more helpful or more harmful? Here, too, the conclusion was that discussions about what individual AI applications offer us, what risks they pose, and under what conditions we can or cannot justify their use are far more important than blanket statements such as \u2018AI is good\u2019 or \u2018AI is bad\u2019.<\/p><p>In Lichtenberg, we came to a noteworthy conclusion: the problem lies not in the technology itself, but in the lack of transparency surrounding it, and the lack of honesty in the narratives. After all, how can we assess the opportunities, costs and risks of AI applications if we are allowed to know so little about them?<\/p><p>And that is precisely why many so many of the sessions concluded by calling for responsibility to be returned to us, the people. We\u2018ve come to realise that AI is not a neutral problem-solver, but a powerful social narrative, and that the crucial question is not what is technically possible, but what we as a society want and choose to shape.\u00a0<\/p><p>\u2018There wasn\u2019t enough time to find answers,\u2019 one guest told us, \u2018we haven\u2019t even come up with all the questions yet.\u2019 That was one of the reasons why lively discussion continued on several occasions well after the official end of the session \u2013 outside the library, at the bus stop, on public transport \u2013 without us having to do a thing.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>The end \u2013 for now<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>The series of events entitled \u2018AI: Power, Myths, Misconceptions\u2019 was developed in collaboration with the Digital Zebra project run by Berlin\u2019s Public Libraries and the libraries in Pankow, Neuk\u00f6lln, Wedding, Kreuzberg, Lichtenberg and Spandau. It was made possible by librarians, many experts and even more participants. Thank you for being part of it!<\/p><p>We're actively fundraising to continue and expand this workstream \u2013 if you're interested, or can connect us with someone who is \u2013 get in touch!<\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/elisa-lindinger\">\t\t\t\t\tElisa Lindinger\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-05-07T00:00:00+02:00","date_modified":"2026-05-07T16:01:35+02:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/superrr-is-growing-welcome-maria","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/superrr-is-growing-welcome-maria","title":"SUPERRR is growing \u2013 welcome Maria!","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>We are very excited to announce a new addition to our team! \u2728 <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/maria-kopf\">Maria <\/a>has joined SUPERRR as Financial Manager!<\/p><p><strong>SUPERRR:<\/strong>\u00a0A good way to get to know someone is via their side projects and hobbies. What are some of your current side projects?<\/p><p><strong>Maria<\/strong>: Apart from my job at Superrr, I currently work as an advisor for international co-productions (film) and I am researching the history of women in motorcycle racing for a documentary project. It is a fascinating topic to study and great fun to get to know some of these trailblazers\u00a0 It is so interesting to listen to their stories and\u00a0 learn that the hurdles that have existed in that sport for decades are representative of other societal bourndaries. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.strath.ac.uk\/staff\/miyakeesperanzadr\/\">Esperanza Miyake<\/a> described some of it really well in her book \"The Gendered Motorcycle\".<\/p><p><strong>SUPERRR:<\/strong>\u00a0With SUPERRR\u00a0we are thinking a lot about the future(s). What is an object\/or application that does not yet exist \u2013 but something that you would like to have at your disposal in a preferable digital future? Something you would use every day and cannot imagine living without?\u00a0<\/p><p><strong>Maria<\/strong>:\u00a0I would love an app that visualizes the production and distribution chains of consumer goods, especially clothing. I would use it frequently, and I believe it could help reduce overconsumption by increasing awareness of the resources required to make what we buy.<\/p><p><strong>SUPERRR:<\/strong>\u00a0What is a small humble change you would like to see in the world? How can we work towards it?<\/p><p><strong>Maria:<\/strong>\u00a0I would be genuinely happy if there were more kindness in our everyday lives, because I deeply believe it can make such a meaningful difference. In the end, I think this is what truly matters\u2014among many other important things, of course.<\/p><p><strong>SUPERRR:<\/strong>\u00a0Things we should all read\/know about! Please share some of your favourite projects, texts, links, inspirations with us:<\/p><p><strong>Maria<\/strong>: The work of Korean artist <a href=\"https:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ayoung_Kim\">Ayoung Kim<\/a> has really blown me away lately. She creates video art that combines AI, VFX, and live-action filming. In her work \"<a href=\"https:\/\/www.momaps1.org\/en\/programs\/556-ayoung-kim\">Delivery Dancer<\/a>\" the world is populated seemingly solely by an army of imperiled delivery drivers in a platform economy. She poses questions about speculative futures as well as love and desire in late-stage capitalism, where aggression and debasement are the norm.<\/p><p><\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/maria-kopf\">\t\t\t\t\tMaria K\u00f6pf\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-04-21T00:00:00+02:00","date_modified":"2026-05-26T09:57:50+02:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/arbeitsbedingungen-von-data-labelern-fachgesprach-im-deutschen-bundestag","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/arbeitsbedingungen-von-data-labelern-fachgesprach-im-deutschen-bundestag","title":"SUPERRR im Deutschen Bundestag","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Am 15. April waren Joan Kinyua, Pr\u00e4sidentin der Data Labeler Association, Dr. Milagros Miceli, Researcher am Weizenbaum Institut und bei DAIR und Julia Kloiber, Mitgr\u00fcnderin von SUPERRR bei einem Fachgespr\u00e4ch im Deutschen Bundestag. Der Titel: Die Arbeitsbedingungen von Data Labelern.<\/p><p>Die Sitzung fand vor dem Ausschuss f\u00fcr Digitales und Staatsmodernisierung, sowie dem Ausschuss f\u00fcr Arbeit und Soziales statt. In diesem Blogpost ver\u00f6ffentlichen wir die Eingangsstatements der Expertinnen.<\/p><p>-----<\/p><p><strong>Statement Joan Kinyua:<\/strong><\/p><p>My name is Joan Kinyua. I live in Nairobi, Kenya. I am a university graduate, the president of the Data Labelers Association, and I am one of the humans behind AI. I am here representing over a 1000 data workers who are part of the Data Labelers Association.<\/p><p>For eight years, I worked as a data labeler, training the systems you interact with every day here in Germany. I entered this field with hope, dreaming of a future in tech. But that dream became a nightmare that left me with panic attacks and social anxiety.<\/p><p>My job was to teach AI how to see and understand the world. I labelled roads for self-driving cars \u2013 including the streets of Berlin \u2013 I tagged household items for robotic vacuum cleaners, and reviewed sensitive data like medical records, financial documents, photos of private apartments and even passports. At times, I was asked to upload images of my own child into these systems.<\/p><p>I worked long hours from my living room, on my own equipment, constantly waiting for tasks. On some days, I would spend as many as 20hrs per day working or on standby. For five hours of work, I could earn as little as two cents of a US Dollar. I had no contract, no health insurance, no social protection, and if a task was rejected by the client, I was often not paid at all.<\/p><p>Then the work became darker. I was asked to write graphic descriptions of violence, including against children, while raising a child of my own. I reviewed images of dead bodies. No one explained why. No one prepared me. Everything was hidden behind secrecy and non-disclosure agreements. The psychological toll stays with you. My working conditions violated my human right to a fair wage, a decent living, safe and healthy working conditions and reasonable limitation of working hours.<\/p><p>And I am not alone. Across this industry, workers are losing their health, their homes, their stability. Many develop post traumatic stress disorder. Many simply disappear from the system, replaced, without notice. That is how I lost my job. Two days before my daughter\u2019s first birthday, my account with the platform Remotasks was terminated without explanation. I was never paid what I was owed.<\/p><p>That moment changed everything. I decided to fight back. In February 2025, together with a group of workers I founded the Data Labelers Association. We are the largest worker-led organization of data workers.<\/p><p>I am here to remind you: You see AI, but you do not see us.<\/p><p>You do not see the mothers uploading images of their children for uncertain pay. You do not see the endless unpaid hours, the rejected tasks, the nights spent refreshing platforms in the hope of getting a task. You do not see educated young people treated as disposable.<\/p><p>But we are here. And we have demands:<\/p><p>We demand that you legislate enforceable labor standards for AI data work done in Germany and outsourced to countries like mine, that you mandate fair pay benchmarks, maximum exposure limits to harmful content, and employer-funded mental health support, with independent audits and penalties for non-compliance. Establish worker protection and accountability mechanisms. Create a national registry of AI employers, require transparency in outsourcing chains, guarantee the right to organize, and set up a grievance and redress system with legal backing and enforcement power.<\/p><p>I am here representing thousands of data workers like myself who demand that you, the members of the German parliament, take responsibility and enforce legislation that protects our human rights.<\/p><p>-----<\/p><p><strong>Statement Milagros Miceli<\/strong><\/p><p>Ich w\u00fcnschte, ich k\u00f6nnte sagen, dass mich etwas von dem, was Fr. Kinyua gerade geschildert hat, \u00fcberrascht. Doch als Forscherin, die seit fast einem Jahrzehnt Datenarbeit untersucht, muss ich leider festhalten: Niedrige L\u00f6hne, unbezahlte Arbeitszeit, Lohnraub, fehlende Sicherheit und psychische Belastungen sind kein Einzelfall, sondern ein konstantes Muster.<\/p><p>Ich spreche hierbei bewusst von Datenarbeit, einem Begriff, den ich vor einigen Jahren gepr\u00e4gt habe, um grunds\u00e4tzlich vier Aufgaben zu konzeptualisieren:<\/p><ul><li><p>Erstens die Trainingsdaten die gesammelt bzw. generiert werden.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Zweitens werden diese Daten klassifiziert und gelabelt. Zum Labeling geh\u00f6rt auch Content Moderation f\u00fcr Social Media.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Sp\u00e4ter, wenn die Modelle trainiert sind, validieren Datenarbeiter*innen algorithmische Outputs und korrigieren Fehler.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Und viertens: Wenn Systeme nicht funktionieren oder noch nicht existieren, werden Arbeiter*innen angewiesen, sich als KI auszugeben. Vor Kurzem haben wir die Geschichte eines Datenarbeiters ver\u00f6ffentlicht, dessen Aufgabe es war, sich als eine KI-Girlfriend auszugeben, w\u00e4hrend die Nutzer glaubten, mit einem Chatbot zu sprechen.<\/p><\/li><\/ul><p>Alle diese Aufgaben sind grundlegend f\u00fcr KI-Technologien. Eine Studie aus 2019 zeigt, dass Datenarbeit rund 80% der Arbeitsstunden in der Entwicklung von KI-Systemen ausmacht. Das hei\u00dft: ohne Datenarbeiter*innen gibt es keine KI.<\/p><p>Die Weltbank sch\u00e4tzt, dass weltweit zwischen 150 und 430 Millionen Menschen in der Datenarbeit t\u00e4tig sind. Ein erheblicher T eil davon arbeitet in Europa, viele davon auch hier in Deutschland. Es w\u00e4re daher ein Fehler, zu glauben, dass Fr. Kinyuas Schilderungen nur in weit entfernten und \u00e4rmeren<\/p><p>L\u00e4ndern auftreten. Viele Datenarbeiter*innen leben und arbeiten auch in St\u00e4dten wie Essen, Hamburg und hier in Berlin. 2024 habe ich im Europ\u00e4ischem Parlament eine Studie zur Datenarbeit in EU-L\u00e4ndern, inklusive Deutschlands, vorgestellt. Zwei Drittel der Befragten verf\u00fcgten \u00fcber einen h\u00f6heren Bildungsabschluss\u2013 vom Bachelor bis hin zur Promotion. Dieser Anteil steigt sowohl in Kenia als auch in Lateinamerika auf fast 80 %. D.h., Datenarbeiter*innen sind hochqualifiziert und treffen Entscheidungen, die die Funktionsweise von<\/p><p>KI direkt beeinflussen. Dennoch wird ihre T\u00e4tigkeit oft als gering qualifizierte Arbeit, als Nebenverdienst oder als \u00dcbergangsl\u00f6sung dargestellt. Diese Darstellung ist unzutreffend und erzeugt eine Sicht auf Datenarbeit, in der Prekarisierung gerechtfertigt wird.T ech-Unternehmen verdienen Milliarden auf dem R\u00fccken der Datenarbeiter*innen. Die Diskussion sollte sich darauf konzentrieren, wie sie durch Outsourcing-Strategien und Plattformisierung Arbeiter*innen prekarisieren und als austauschbar behandeln.<\/p><p>Lassen Sie mich das noch einmal ganz deutlich sagen: Es gibt keine KI ohne Datenarbeit. Wenn wir in Deutschland die Entwicklung von KI-T echnologien f\u00f6rdern m\u00f6chten, m\u00fcssen wir unbedingt bessere Bedingungen f\u00fcr Datenarbeiter*innen schaffen.<\/p><p>------<\/p><p><strong>Statement Julia Kloiber<\/strong><\/p><p>Ich zitiere: \u201eNoch toxischer als die Inhalte waren meine Arbeitsbedingungen. Mein Arbeitsalltag f\u00fchlte sich an wie ein soziales Experiment: ein Raum mit abgeklebten Fenstern und permanente \u00dcberwachung. Immer wieder h\u00f6rte ich von Menschen die Angst davor hatten, sich krank zu melden oder zum Arzt zu gehen. Ich bekam den Eindruck, dass hier gezielt Menschen in vulnerablen Lebenssituationen eingestellt wurden, weil sie sich nicht wehren k\u00f6nnen. Was ich sah ist eine Entmenschlichung der Arbeiterinnen. Wenn K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz die Zukunft ist, stehen uns sehr d\u00fcstere Zeiten bevor.\u201c das sind die Worte einer Datenarbeiterin \u00fcber ihren Job, hier in Deutschland. Sie war f\u00fcr ein Outsourcing-Unternehmen t\u00e4tig, dass gro\u00dfe Sprachmodelle f\u00fcr einen amerikanischen Social-Media-Konzern trainiert hat.<\/p><p>Die reichsten Unternehmen der Welt investieren hunderte Milliarden an Euro in K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz und lagern gleichzeitig wichtige Arbeit an Drittfirmen aus, statt f\u00fcr faire L\u00f6hne und gute Arbeitsbedingungen zu sorgen. Ein weitgehend unbekannter Sektor w\u00e4chst damit rasant: Sch\u00e4tzungen zufolge wird der Datenannotationsmarkt bis 2034 \u00fcber 10 Milliarden Dollar Umsatz erreichen.<\/p><p>Die KI-Tools die unter diesen Bedingungen entwickelt werden, nutzen viele von uns t\u00e4glich.\u00a0<\/p><p>Auch deutsche Unternehmen lassen Daten von Drittfirmen annotieren. Welche Firmen genau, das muss man m\u00fchsam recherchieren, denn der Sektor ist von Intransparenz gepr\u00e4gt.\u00a0<\/p><p>Um Menschenrechtsverletzungen und Ausbeutung zu unterbinden, m\u00fcssen die Lieferketten von digitalen Dienstleistungen offengelegt werden. <strong>Lieferkettengesetze<\/strong> m\u00fcssen wirksam durchgesetzt und d\u00fcrfen nicht abgeschw\u00e4cht werden. Bei der Umsetzung der Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive darf es keine keinen R\u00fcckschritt beim Schutz von Menschenrechten geben.<\/p><p>Nicht nur Arbeitsrechte werden verletzt, sondern auch der Datenschutz. Joan und ihre Kolleg:innen sehen t\u00e4glich Kontoausz\u00fcge, medizinische Unterlagen, Ausweise oder Fotos aus Privatwohnungen. Daten, die so niemals auf ihren Bildschirmen und in Trainingsdaten landen d\u00fcrften. Auch ihre eigenen Datenschutzrechte werden missachtet. Arbeiter:innen sollen private Fotos ihrer Kinder und Familien f\u00fcr das Training bereitstellen.\u00a0<\/p><p>Man muss nicht ins Ausland schauen, um Missst\u00e4nde zu finden. Vor drei Jahren habe ich in diesem Gremium \u00fcber die Arbeitsbedingungen in der Content Moderation gesprochen. Sie sind die Putzkr\u00e4fte unserer Demokratie. Schlecht bezahlt, gesundheitlich gef\u00e4hrdet und kaum anerkannt. Hier in Deutschland.\u00a0<\/p><p><strong>Sie fordern heute wie damals von der Politik:<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><p>Einen speziellen Gesundheitsschutz, wie wir ihn beispielsweise aus der Polizeiarbeit kennen. Darunter fallen Trauma-Pr\u00e4vention, Gef\u00e4hrdungsbeurteilung, Ruhezeiten und Pausen, und Expositionsbegrenzungen. Denn wer den digitalen Raum sch\u00fctzen soll, darf dabei nicht psychisch zugrunde gehen.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Die Arbeiter:innen fordern auch die Anerkennung als Ausbildungsberuf. Das st\u00e4rkt sowohl die Besch\u00e4ftigten als auch die Qualit\u00e4t der Arbeitsergebnisse.<\/p><\/li><\/ul><p>Abschlie\u00dfend m\u00f6chte ich sagen: Es ist ein wichtiges Zeichen, dass wir heute vor zwei Aussch\u00fcssen sprechen, die die Themen Digitales und Arbeit abdecken. Wie wir am Beispiel KI sehen, greift beides unmittelbar ineinander. Ich w\u00fcnsche mir, dass nicht nur hingeschaut, sondern auch gehandelt wird. Denn, und ich hoffe, das ist Konsens in diesem Gremium: <strong>Unsere digitale Zukunft darf nicht auf Ausbeutung fu\u00dfen.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>","date_published":"2026-04-16T00:00:00+02:00","date_modified":"2026-04-16T12:46:20+02:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/social-media-ban","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/social-media-ban","title":"See No Evil, Speak No Evil, Hear No Evil","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>\u201cPersonality deficits and problems in social behavior\u201d \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tagesschau.de\/inland\/gesellschaft\/merz-social-media-verbot-100.html\">this is what Chancellor Merz<\/a> claims is caused by excessive social media use among children. The SPD (Social Democratic Party of Germany) proposes comprehensive technical measures that, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dw.com\/de\/deutschland-social-media-kinder-australien-stefanie-hubig-karin-prien-eu-kommission-tiktok-instagram\/a-75989261\">according to Justice Minister Hubig<\/a>, will allow children to grow up \u201cwithout cyberbullying, constant comparison, or beauty ideals\u201d \u2013 with the implicit assumption that these problems are unique to the internet. Both politicians agree that a social media ban for children under 14 (or 16) would make many things better. Let\u2019s take a detailed look at the assumptions, facts, and contexts behind the ban debate.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>The Thesis: Children are Suffering<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uke.de\/allgemein\/presse\/pressemitteilungen\/detailseite_174656.html\">Studies clearly show that<\/a>, on average, children\u2019s mental health is worse today than before the pandemic. The authors of the study cite a state of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zeit.de\/familie\/2025-03\/jugendliche-psychische-gesundheit-dauerkrisen\">\u201cpermanent crisis\u201d<\/a> as the reason for this, caused by factors such as the climate crisis, social isolation due to school closures and curfews, pressure to perform at school, constant exposure to news about wars and more. The cost of living crisis, and subsequent lack of financial resources available to parents also have a major impact on children's health.\u00a0<\/p><p>Many structural causes contribute to the fact that, statistically speaking, children today are more likely to suffer from mental illness: financial poverty (almost <a href=\"https:\/\/www.unicef.de\/informieren\/aktuelles\/presse\/-\/unicef-bericht-zur-lage-der-kinder-in-deutschland-2025\/385504\">15% of children<\/a> in Germany and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/explore-local-statistics\/indicators\/children-in-relative-poverty\">21% of children in the UK<\/a> grow up in relative poverty), discrimination and inequality, global instability and a growing sense of powerlessness. It\u2019s no wonder they\u2019re struggling.\u00a0<\/p><p>In addition, while previous generations were often able to move around independently in public spaces even at a young age, the lives of children today are <a href=\"https:\/\/jugendvonheute.de\/trend-tracking-kids-2019-freizeitverhalten-der-kids-ist-immer-enger-getaktet\/\">heavily structured, controlled, and regulated by adults<\/a>. Their <a href=\"https:\/\/westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk\/download\/03175f2b7388716c0b78acce44b7af6cd907564d6b437038519cb3dc525ad27e\/3906556\/PSI_Finalreport_2015.pdf\">range of movement<\/a> has decreased dramatically in recent decades, and spaces where they can act independently and without supervision are becoming rare.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>The Supposed Cause: Online Social Networks<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Under these circumstances, it\u2019s hardly surprising that social media has become an important alternative space for children to cultivate friendships and find information and inspiration. And once there, they encounter sensationalist content as well as bad news from around the world. And the ranking algorithms of the big tech platforms give preference to such content because it increases the amount of time users spend on the platforms. More time, more advertising, more profit. Despite that, some of the information they see there is real, and important. Denying children access to information \u2013 especially information that will shape their future \u2013 is like putting a bandage over their eyes so they can't see the wound on their hand.<\/p><p>The scientific basis for how exactly social media use affects the psyche is thin, and evidence-based policy has long since given way to the perceived truths of public debate. Popular nonfiction books, most notably Jonathan Haidt's \u201cThe Anxious Generation\u201d portray social media use as <strong>the<\/strong> cause of the mental health crisis of an entire generation. <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC11554337\/\">Studies<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jpubhealth\/advance-article\/doi\/10.1093\/pubmed\/fdaf150\/8371934?login=false\">even more studies<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uni-wuerzburg.de\/aktuelles\/pressemitteilungen\/single\/news\/generation-angst-thesenpapier\/\">attempts by scientists<\/a> to explain that this exaggerated diagnosis is neither globally valid nor can the causal role of social media be proven, unfortunately receive significantly less attention.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/roomfordebate\/2015\/07\/16\/is-internet-addiction-a-health-threat-for-teenagers\/blame-society-not-the-screen-time\">Children themselves<\/a> want contact with friends, digital participation, and platforms that work better for them. The majority of children are against a ban; the older they get, the more they want to set the rules for how they use social media together with their parents. Fear and helplessness seem to lie primarily with the adults \u2013 perhaps it\u2019s parents, not children, who are the real \u201cAnxious Generation\u201d?\u00a0<\/p><p>But all these points are quickly ignored in discussions about social media bans: children's right to participation and support; <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/newco\/panicked-about-kids-addiction-to-tech-88b2c856bf1c\">their desire to discuss and negotiate rules with their parents as part of growing up<\/a>; and the fact that social media bans hide the real problems \u2013 global and social crises \u2013 instead of solving them.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>The Fallacy: a Social Media Ban Works<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>One phrase comes up often in this debate: \u201cWe have to do *something*.\u201d The desire is understandable, but a blanket ban is a knee-jerk reaction that doesn\u2019t address the real problems. A comparison: when there\u2019s a lot of traffic on a road, we don\u2019t lock children up at home for the foreseeable future. Instead, we make the roads safer with traffic lights, crossings and 30 km\/h speed limits \u2013 thus making it safer for everyone.<\/p><p>The EU had considered the equivalent of some digital crosswalks and speed limits with its data protection and platform regulations, but now it is backtracking as part of its <a href=\"https:\/\/ecfr.eu\/article\/thrown-under-the-omnibus-how-the-eus-digital-deregulation-fuels-us-coercion\/\">deregulation agenda<\/a>. Not to mention that we\u2019re letting major social networks off the hook by banning children from social media, instead of forcing them to change their practices.\u00a0<\/p><p>Much of what is described as harmful to children is actually harmful to us all. Why don't we allow ourselves to demand a digital world that doesn't just want to profit from us and our time? Perhaps because we\u2019re so caught up in the logic and inevitability of the big platforms that we can no longer even allow ourselves to imagine anything else. But this is not enough. It leaves politics lacking in vision and ultimately it is ineffective. It regulates and solidifies the status quo, instead of uplifting better alternatives.<\/p><p>A social media ban also means protecting children without offering them an alternative, all while we adults happily continue to indulge in surveillance capitalism right before their eyes. That simply can't work. A debate about child protection and children's rights online begins with listening: What kind of world do children and young people want today? And what role does technology play in it, if it were up to them?\u00a0<\/p><p>Listening to their answers, seeing problems in all their complexity, and talking about alternatives\u2014all of this is far more time-consuming than a ban. But it is the only way to give children what they themselves demand and what they are legally entitled to.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>Further perspectives:&nbsp;<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>What I\u2019ve written here focuses on the beliefs behind the debate for social media bans and what really lies behind them, but this is by no means the end of the story. Here are a few assessments from a technical, digital policy, children's rights, and social policy perspective:<\/p><ul><li><p>Morgan Briggs writes for <a href=\"https:\/\/internet.exchangepoint.tech\/best-interests-of-the-child-paradox-the-social-media-ban-debate-in-the-uk\/\">Internet Exchange on the social media ban debate in the UK.<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p><\/li><li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/d-64.org\/verbote-keine-loesung\/\">D64 explains<\/a> why the EUID wallet is not a good solution for age verification and why national social media bans conflict with EU law.<\/p><\/li><li><p>The German <a href=\"https:\/\/www.deutschlandfunk.de\/kinderschutzbund-spricht-sich-gegen-ein-social-media-verbot-fuer-unter-16-jaehrige-aus-102.html\">Child Protection Association<\/a> is against fixed age limits, and the German Social Welfare Association considers them \u201cdisrespectful to young people.\u201d\u00a0<\/p><\/li><li><p>According to the German <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stiftungbildung.org\/kinderrechte-wahren-medienkompetenz-staerken-teilhabe-ermoeglichen\/\">Education Foundation<\/a>, a ban \u201cdoes not do justice to the complex realities of digital environments and, in the long term, weakens the rights, resilience, and trust of young people.\u201d<\/p><\/li><li><p>390 security and privacy researchers from 30 countries <a href=\"https:\/\/csa-scientist-open-letter.org\/ageverif-Feb2026\">call for a moratorium<\/a> on age assurance checks.<\/p><\/li><li><p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dkhw.de\/informieren\/im-ueberblick\/aktuelles\/nachricht\/aus-aktuellem-anlass-unsere-haltung-zu-social-media-verboten\/\">German Children's Fund<\/a> provides constructive approaches for action and calls for \u201crealistic policy approaches that both hold platforms accountable and provide safe digital spaces for young people and strengthen their resilience.\u201d<\/p><\/li><\/ul><p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/cepa.org\/article\/social-media-bans-fail-to-protect-children\/\">Center for European Policy Analysis<\/a> explains why social media bans enforced with age verification systems make European platform alternatives almost impossible, thereby strengthening Big Tech.<\/p><p><\/p><p>This article was cross-posted with our friends at the <a href=\"https:\/\/internet.exchangepoint.tech\/\">Internet Exchange<\/a>. <\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/elisa-lindinger\">\t\t\t\t\tElisa Lindinger\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-03-04T00:00:00+01:00","date_modified":"2026-03-05T14:01:02+01:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/digitale-fairness-weiterdenken","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/digitale-fairness-weiterdenken","title":"Digitale Fairness weiterdenken","content_html":"      <h2><p><strong>Neue Impulse f\u00fcr Verbraucher:innen im digitalen Raum<\/strong><\/p><\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Ob <strong>Cookie-Banner, personalisierte Preise oder undurchsichtige Empfehlungen<\/strong>: Im digitalen Alltag begegnen uns st\u00e4ndig Praktiken, die unsere Entscheidungen lenken und unsere Selbstbestimmung einschr\u00e4nken. Was sich oft nur \u00e4rgerlich oder verwirrend anf\u00fchlt, ist kein Zufall, sondern Ausdruck eines gr\u00f6\u00dferen strukturellen Problems.<\/p><p>Digitale M\u00e4rkte geben sich neutral, effizient und f\u00fcr alle zug\u00e4nglich, doch wer genauer hinschaut, merkt schnell: <strong>Das Netz funktioniert nicht f\u00fcr alle gleich.<\/strong> Diskriminierende Profilbildung, manipulative Interfaces und intransparente Gesch\u00e4ftsmodelle verschieben Verantwortung systematisch auf Nutzer:innen und verst\u00e4rken bestehende Ungleichheiten.<br>\u00a0<br>Mit zwei Publikationen aus dem Forum Digitale Fairness &amp; Verbraucher:innenschutz machen wir genau diese Strukturen sichtbar und setzen ihnen eine klare Botschaft entgegen: <\/p><p><strong>Du bist nicht das Problem. Das System ist es.<\/strong> <\/p><p>Mit einem machtkritischen Blick auf die Herausforderungen des digitalen Verbraucher:innenschutzes zeigen wir, dass Fairness kein Nice-to-have ist, sondern eine Voraussetzung f\u00fcr ein digitales \u00d6kosystem, das alle Menschen gleichwertig sieht und sch\u00fctzt.<\/p>\n<\/div><figure>\n  <img alt=\"\" height=\"675\" src=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/media\/3d143b316a-1771418862\/zine-1200x.png\" width=\"1200\">\n  \n<\/figure>\n      <h3><p><strong>Ein Zine f\u00fcr den digitalen Alltag: Don\u2019t blame yourself \u2013 claim your rights<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Das <a href=\"https:\/\/heyzine.com\/flip-book\/7b37249b33.html\" target=\"_blank\">Mini-Zine \u201eDon\u2019t blame yourself \u2013 claim your rights\u201c<\/a> richtet sich an alle Menschen, die sich im digitalen Alltag \u00fcberfordert, manipuliert oder machtlos f\u00fchlen. Es erkl\u00e4rt, warum personalisierte Preise, Deceptive Patterns oder \u201ePay or OK\u201c-Modelle keine Einzelf\u00e4lle sind, sondern Teil eines Systems, das mit Daten und Ungleichheit arbeitet.<\/p><p>Statt individuelle Verantwortung in einem ungerechten System zu fordern, verschiebt das Zine den Fokus zur\u00fcck auf Strukturen: <strong>Plattformen sind nicht neutral, Design ist politisch, und echte Wahlfreiheit braucht faire Voraussetzungen.<\/strong> Gleichzeitig macht das Zine Mut, die eigenen Rechte ernst zu nehmen: auf <strong>Privatsph\u00e4re, Transparenz, Datenl\u00f6schung und Unterst\u00fctzung<\/strong>. Digitale Fairness verstehen wir als kollektive Aufgabe, nicht als pers\u00f6nliche Leistung.<\/p>\n<\/div><figure>\n  <img alt=\"Brosch&uuml;re Das netz das wir wollen, auf einem Tisch liegend\" height=\"800\" src=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/media\/77cacf947a-1771420125\/29-1200x.jpg\" width=\"1200\">\n  \n<\/figure>\n      <h3><p><strong>Politische Impulse: Das Netz, das wir wollen<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>W\u00e4hrend das Zine beim Alltagserleben ansetzt, richtet sich die <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/blog\/digitale-fairness-weiterdenken\/2106de8950-1771414929\/digifair_broschure_dasnetzdaswirwollen.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Brosch\u00fcre \u201eDas Netz, das wir wollen \u2013 6 Impulse f\u00fcr ein menschenzentriertes Internet\u201c<\/a> an <strong>Politik, Verwaltung und Zivilgesellschaft.<\/strong> Sie b\u00fcndelt zentrale Erkenntnisse aus dem Forum und \u00fcbersetzt sie in konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen.<\/p><p>Im Zentrum steht ein Perspektivwechsel: <strong>Verbraucher:innenschutz im Digitalen darf nicht bei Transparenz und Einwilligung stehen bleiben.<\/strong> Stattdessen braucht es Fairness by Design &amp; Default, ein Ende von Scheinwahlen wie \u201ePay or OK\u201c, klare Regeln gegen diskriminierende Profilbildung und ein Zusammendenken von Datenschutz, Antidiskriminierungsrecht und Verbraucher:innenschutz. Digitale Fairness verstehen wir hier explizit als Gesellschafts- und Gerechtigkeitsfrage und als Gestaltungsaufgabe f\u00fcr die Politik.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h3><p><strong>Kontext &amp; R\u00fcckblick: Digitale Fairness weiterdenken<\/strong><\/p><\/h3>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Beide Publikationen sind im Rahmen der <strong>Veranstaltung \u201eDas Netz, das wir wollen \u2013 Digitale Fairness weiterdenken\u201c<\/strong> Ende letzten Jahres ver\u00f6ffentlicht worden. Die Veranstaltung markierte einen wichtigen Zwischenstand im Projekt Forum Digitale Fairness &amp; Verbraucher:innenschutz und zugleich einen Moment des Innehaltens: Was haben wir gelernt, wo stehen wir, und wie geht es weiter?<\/p><p>Zum Auftakt ordnete <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/lisa-ama-schrade\" target=\"_blank\">Lisa Ama Schrade<\/a> (SUPERRR) die bisherige Projektarbeit ein und machte anhand eines alltagsnahen Beispiels deutlich, warum digitale Fairness eine strukturelle Frage ist: Gleiche Klicks, gleiche Plattformen, aber unterschiedliche Werbewelten, basierend auf algorithmischen Profilannahmen. Ein Beispiel daf\u00fcr, wie digitale Systeme Menschen bewerten, sortieren und unterschiedlich behandeln, oft ohne ihr Wissen und ohne echte Wahlm\u00f6glichkeiten.\u00a0<\/p><p>In der anschlie\u00dfenden Keynote zeigte <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hiig.de\/katharina-mosene\/\" target=\"_blank\">Katharina Mosene<\/a> (Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Medienforschung\u2502Hans-Bredow-Institut sowie das Humboldt-Institut f\u00fcr Internet und Gesellschaft), wie K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz bestehende Ungleichheiten und Diskriminierungen nicht nur abbilden, sondern verst\u00e4rken kann, wenn Fairness, Transparenz und Regulierung nicht von Anfang an mitgedacht werden. Diese Perspektive wurde im Panel weiter vertieft: Gemeinsam mit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/dr-ayten-%C3%B6ks%C3%BCz-789a2a10a\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Ayten \u00d6ks\u00fcz<\/a> (Verbraucherzentrale NRW e.V.) und <a href=\"https:\/\/algorithmwatch.org\/de\/team\/pia-sombetzki\/\" target=\"_blank\">Pia Sombetzki <\/a>(AlgorithmWatch), moderiert von <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/yolandarother\/\" target=\"_blank\">Yolanda Rother<\/a>, ging es darum, wie manipulative Designs, Profilbildung und intransparente Gesch\u00e4ftsmodelle Verantwortung systematisch auf Nutzer:innen abw\u00e4lzen, und welche politischen Hebel n\u00f6tig sind, um dem etwas entgegenzusetzen.<br><br>Die zentralen Fragen des Abends spiegeln sich direkt in Zine und Brosch\u00fcre wieder: <strong>Wie kann Verbraucher:innenschutz Machtasymmetrien adressieren, statt sie zu individualisieren? Wie schaffen wir digitale R\u00e4ume, die Menschen sch\u00fctzen, statt sie zu verwerten? Und was braucht es, damit Fairness im Digitalen nicht die Ausnahme bleibt, sondern zum Standard wird?<\/strong><\/p><p>Jetzt lesen, teilen, weiterdenken: Das <a href=\"https:\/\/heyzine.com\/flip-book\/7b37249b33.html\" target=\"_blank\">Zine \u201eDon\u2019t blame yourself \u2013 claim your rights\u201c<\/a> und die <a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/blog\/digitale-fairness-weiterdenken\/2106de8950-1771414929\/digifair_broschure_dasnetzdaswirwollen.pdf\">Brosch\u00fcre \u201eDas Netz, das wir wollen\u201c<\/a> laden dazu ein, digitale Fairness nicht nur zu fordern, sondern strukturell mitzudenken \u2013 im Alltag, im Design und in der Politik.<\/p><p>+++<\/p><p>DOWNLOADS:<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/heyzine.com\/flip-book\/7b37249b33.html\" target=\"_blank\">Zine \u201eDon\u2019t blame yourself \u2013 claim your rights\u201c (zum Durchbl\u00e4ttern auf heyzine,.com)<\/a><\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/blog\/digitale-fairness-weiterdenken\/4b59e0ab2c-1771414943\/digifair_zine.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Zine \u201eDon\u2019t blame yourself \u2013 claim your rights\u201c (PDF)<\/a><\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/media\/pages\/blog\/digitale-fairness-weiterdenken\/2106de8950-1771414929\/digifair_broschure_dasnetzdaswirwollen.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Brosch\u00fcre \u201eDas Netz, das wir wollen\u201c (PDF)<\/a><\/p><p>+++<\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/lisa-ama-schrade\">\t\t\t\t\tLisa Ama Schrade\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-02-25T00:00:00+01:00","date_modified":"2026-03-04T09:55:09+01:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/safety-online","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/safety-online","title":"What safety online means to us","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Is the Internet unsafe? And for whom do we need to make it safer?  <\/p><p>The answer is as complex as humanity itself, and it depends a lot on context. Who we are, which identities we hold, where we are in the physical world, what systems of oppression we are subject to \u2013 to name just a few factors. <\/p><p>For people who face oppression because of who they are or what they need, the internet has often provided vital connections and information. For example: The internet has long provided important spaces for queer communities to build connections outside of public scrutiny. For people living in places with restrictive reproductive rights, it can provide access to crucial information about health and reproduction (like how and where to get an abortion, for example.) <\/p><p>Bullying on social media, algorithmic discrimination and corporate or state surveillance of our digital communication all have their counterparts in the analogue world. Creating safer spaces is an ongoing issue online as much as offline \u2013 which means that looking for solutions only in the tech won\u2019t solve the problem.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>How do we make the internet safer?<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>As people need very different things from the internet, there is no single approach that works for all and every occasion. That is why taking an intersectional approach is key. We ask ourselves: who might be affected by suggested changes? <\/p><p>Mechanisms that ban children from accessing adult content have a tendency to also make it harder for them to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2025\/aug\/09\/uk-online-safety-act-internet-censorship-world-following-suit\" target=\"_blank\">access content on their bodily rights and self determination<\/a> \u2013 or they simply lead to intended or unintended overblocking of <a href=\"https:\/\/netzpolitik.org\/2026\/diskussionspapier-tech-unternehmen-sollen-legalen-extremismus-suchen\/\" target=\"_blank\">entirely legal content<\/a>. Which one is worse, which one is worth it? <\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>Feminism and Safety<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Intersectional thought and practice offers various concepts for creating spaces for communities. From<a href=\"https:\/\/feministnow.org\/launch-of-the-practical-guide-to-developing-and-managing-a-feminist-safe-space\/\" target=\"_blank\"> safe(r) spaces<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/collectivetoolsproject.org\/en\/theory\/brave-space\" target=\"_blank\">brave spaces<\/a> to <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/@elise.k.ahen\/safe-and-brave-spaces-dont-work-and-what-you-can-do-instead-f265aa339aff\" target=\"_blank\">accountable spaces<\/a>: There is no right way to shape our interactions with each other, but it is crucial that we do so with care, transparency and love. And maybe this is what we need: Different solutions to serve different needs instead of the \u201cglobal village\u201d one-size-fits-all solution. Context is queen!<\/p><p>In the current moment, we often fall into the trap of thinking about the internet just as social media platforms, when it is so much more than that. Our access to the internet doesn\u2018t have to be mediated just by social media platforms and Big Tech. And moving away from those platforms gives us more options to create safe pockets of the internet for ourselves.<\/p><p>For this Safer Internet Day, ask yourself: where do you feel safe online? What contributes to you feeling safe? How can you help create spaces where other people feel safe? This can take many different forms: stepping in online if you see someone being bullied. Writing Wikipedia articles to help create more accessible information for others. Be mindful what you communicate about the people around you, and on which platforms \u2013 a picture shared online is communication, too. Moving your social media accounts to the Fediverse, or contributing to community safety guidelines. <\/p><p>A Safer Internet needs one thing for sure: us.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>How our work ties into a creating a safer internet<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>We work on digital fairness! Digital markets claim to offer choice and convenience, but too often they rely on manipulation, opaque systems, and unequal power relations. From deceptive design and personalized pricing to constant tracking, many online services are built to extract consent and data rather than protect people. A fair internet means recognising that these harms are structural, not individual failures. It means strengthening consumer rights, transparency, and collective protections - so people don\u2019t have to navigate digital markets alone or blame themselves for systems designed against them.<\/p><p>Our work on digital violence shows how interconnected digital and physical spaces \u2013 and problems \u2013 are. AI-scandals like Grok show that digital technologies are increasingly used to harm, exploit, and control women, children, and marginalized communities. These harms are not just technical problems, but social ones rooted patriarchal systems of oppression. A safer internet means recognising digital violence, taking survivors seriously \u2013 also by translating their needs and experiences into policy \u2013 and strengthening preventative measures, education, and long-term support systems. We need holistic answers to growing problems like digital violence, without relying on technical fixes or punitive measures alone. <\/p><p>A safer internet must protect not only users, but also the data workers and content moderators who keep social media platforms and AI systems safe for everyone. This essential labor is often performed under harsh conditions and systematically rendered invisible. Building a truly safe internet requires strong labor standards, meaningful protections and recognition for the people whose work sustains digital ecosystems. Without safeguarding their rights and dignity, claims of online safety and ethical technology remain incomplete.<\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/zara-rahman\">\t\t\t\t\tZara Rahman\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/lisa-ama-schrade\">\t\t\t\t\tLisa Ama Schrade\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/julia-kloiber\">\t\t\t\t\tJulia Kloiber\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/elisa-lindinger\">\t\t\t\t\tElisa Lindinger\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/hannah-lichtenthaeler\">\t\t\t\t\tHannah Lichtenth\u00e4ler\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/larissa-rodiga\">\t\t\t\t\tLarissa Rodiga\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-02-20T00:00:00+01:00","date_modified":"2026-02-23T10:40:07+01:00"},{"id":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/child-rights","url":"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/blog\/child-rights","title":"Talking about children's rights online, but differently","content_html":"<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>Digital rights and children's rights: If we\u2019re to believe the debate taking place today, these two issues are irreconcilable. But we (and many others!) have been saying for a long time now that we do not have to choose between one or the other \u2013 and that, actually, we can only have both if they work together.<\/p><p>In 2022, we observed how children's rights and digital rights were being played off against each other on the political stage. The reason for this was so-called \u201cchat control,\u201d part of a larger EU legislative project \u201cto prevent and combat the sexual abuse of children.\u201d Plans for the law included searching digital communications for \u201cdepictions of abuse and grooming.\u201d Shortly afterwards, the idea of introducing online age verification was added. At the time, we addressed both <a href=\"https:\/\/feministtechpolicy.org\/en\/case-studies\/csa-regulation\/\" title=\"https:\/\/feministtechpolicy.org\/en\/case-studies\/csa-regulation\/\">chat control<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/feministtechpolicy.org\/en\/case-studies\/age-verification\/\" title=\"https:\/\/feministtechpolicy.org\/en\/case-studies\/age-verification\/\">age verification<\/a> from a feminist perspective.<\/p><p>Our conclusion at the time was that this debate urgently needs a feminist, empowering, nuanced, and informed perspective. All too often, adults talk about children instead of with them, and without genuine dialogue, adults cannot deliver solutions that meet children's needs.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>Technology is not the solution<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>In recent years, two major observations continue to shape our work with children online. First, we see the role of technology being greatly overestimated in so many areas of our lives, including in this case. This applies both in the extent to which digital technologies harm children (not denying actual harms; but rather, wanting those harms to be assessed for what they are); and also, to how helpful technology can be in mitigating the real harms. At SUPERRR, we focus on people rather than technology, and that also means focusing on social prevention work rather than half-baked technical barriers.<\/p><p>And secondly, it seems almost impossible to approach the issue in a balanced and nuanced way. Children have rights (as stated in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/instruments-mechanisms\/instruments\/convention-rights-child\" title=\"https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/instruments-mechanisms\/instruments\/convention-rights-child\">United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child<\/a>, even if Germany has still not enshrined them in its constitution). These rights include the right to protection, but also the right to participation and support. But here\u2019s the thing: the majority of proposed technical measures are aimed exclusively at protecting children, in a way which stands in the way of participation and support. We believe all their rights matter, and that it\u2019s possible to have both.<\/p>\n<\/div>      <h2>Bans are booming<\/h2>\n<div class=\"text\">\n    <p>In 2025, <a href=\"https:\/\/kinderschutzbund.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/AlterfeststellungPaper.pdf\" title=\"https:\/\/kinderschutzbund.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/AlterfeststellungPaper.pdf\">we worked with other organisations to constructively consider different methods of age verification<\/a>, such as those repeatedly called for in the context of chat monitoring. However, we stand by what we already stated in our 2023 analysis: \u201cSafe spaces for children and young people cannot not be created through the massive use of surveillance and control technologies, because care cannot be engineered.\u201d<\/p><p>We\u2019ll continue to work on this issue from an intersectional, feminist perspective \u2013 not least because the year began with calls for a social media ban for children (under 14 or even under 16) in Germany, the EU, and many countries around the world. Age verification procedures are a key prerequisite for such a ban\u2014in other words, mechanisms that actively exclude children. And public demands for a social media ban seem to ignore the fact that no country that has passed such a law has yet succeeded in implementing it in a suitable, let alone effective, manner. That is precisely why we will continue to take a close look and ask: what does such a ban really achieve, and what price do we (and our children) have to pay for it?<\/p><p>We are convinced that digital rights and children's rights go hand in hand. That is why we continue to advocate for better, fairer, and above all, accessible digital spaces. Blanket bans on access do not contribute to this.<\/p>\n<\/div>\t<div class=\"article__footer\">\n\t\t<div class=\"contributors\">Author(s):\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/superrr.net\/en\/about\/elisa-lindinger\">\t\t\t\t\tElisa Lindinger\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>","date_published":"2026-02-17T00:00:00+01:00","date_modified":"2026-02-23T17:36:21+01:00"}]}