As a follow up to our last blog entry – We’re ready for your close-up, Mr Forde – I wanted to take a closer look at one of the problems we recently encountered as part of the project.
It is important to note that the Crawford Art Gallery holds in its collection almost all known works by Samuel Forde and, as Shane has mentioned, we had the wonderful opportunity of viewing these on our recent visit there. Among these were, of course, his original sketches for Fall of the Rebel Angels (1828) which are beautifully executed on paper in pen and sepia ink. Leafing through them – with gloved hands! – we were struck by how these sketches not only shed light on how he prepared for his monumental canvas, but also on how Forde worked as an artist.
From what we can gather so far, Forde was a man of limited means and, throughout the last years of his short life, had to work as a drawing master by day to support himself as an artist. Viewing these sketches, however, really demonstrated to us just how economical Forde was (and had to be) with his materials. Looking at them, you can’t fail to notice there is little in the way of wasted space on any one page. Even in preparing the most ambitious work of his career (Fall), the artist elected to utilise his limited resources carefully. In fact, a number of these preparatory sketches accumulate and overlap not only across one side of a page but also on its reverse! While this in itself gave us a clear insight into both his method and means, we immediately saw that one group of such sketches presented us with a problem.
Our purpose in viewing these sketches was to select those which we felt most appropriate for any potential exhibition of Forde’s work in the future. Checking them off on our list as we moved from sketch to sketch we came upon two of the most arresting and important images. These depict the elaborately helmeted and crowned heads of what are in essence falling Angels, some of whom registering fear or distress in their expressions. The great humanity and pathos of these and the clear knowledge that they appear within the final Fall canvas (more on this to come!) made them certainties on our wish-list. The only problem was that they are sketched on the same piece of paper, back-to-back, three heads appearing on one side with another more complete figure on the reverse.
Immediately, the anxiety of which side to choose hit us. If these were to be exhibited, how could we display both sketches at once? One solution – albeit off-the-cuff – which would involve cutting the paper and separating the sketches met with my most vehement disapproval and resistance!
You see, the paper on which these drawings are sketched must date to the time of Fall’s inception, and therefore must be 185 years old if they’re a day! These were also undoubtedly held by Forde and bore the weight and pressure of his hand – an exciting thought in its own right! This particular page, however, has a crease down its centre suggesting that it had for some time been folded in half. To my mind, and given that the fold separates the page evenly, the most obvious reason for such a crease is that it comes from a sketchbook, Forde’s sketchbook. The realisation of this was absolutely thrilling for us both! To think that not only were the sketches made by his hand, his talent and his intellect, but that these pages constituted what was left of Forde’s own sketchbook was both elating and deeply moving. For me this was akin to finding Forde’s diary and made my increasing connection to him palpable.
Of course, in light of this, there could and would be no suggestion of separating this page into two leaves – a fact later confirmed by one of the Gallery’s curators. Instead, it should either be displayed so that each side is visible on an alternating basis or in such a way as to make both sides visible at once. Nonetheless, while it is most likely an everyday problem for professional gallery staff, this raised provocative questions of art conservation and exhibition which had never occurred to me.
The integrity of Forde’s sketches as works of art in their own right, in addition to this particular piece being a fragment of a now lost, or rather splintered whole, is of considerable value in helping us understand and appreciate how he worked. So not only did our viewing of these sketches turn up evidence of the artist’s hand (sketched and printed) as Shane has already noted, but it has also given us a poignant insight into a living, breathing person of limited means who created and struggled with his creativity until his death.
~
Read about our most recent Samuel Forde discovery.
~
Learn more about how the Project began!
~
Images © Crawford Art Gallery, Cork. Photos: Dara McGrath.




