My work engages with navigating life in a contemporary world fuelled by information overload. I focus on immediate issues surrounding our schizophrenic relationship between information and understanding. I rely on my own personal bias to guide my practice, opening up my thoughts and fears of living under surveillance and allowing those intuitions to guide my work. Because of this, my work explores concepts without barriers or answers through visual means. I explore questions without conclusions, in the hope of resonating and potentially generating new ideas or solutions to the problems through the viewer or myself. Perhaps this is where change can occur?

I tend to focus on visual analogies through the mediums I work with. This creates a tension between the natural or more organic materials such as paper and inks versus the harsh or sterile aspects of using digital mediums such as screens or autonomous or interactive elements. This tension, I believe, allows the viewer to understand that there is conflict taking place. This is also why words or symbols are important in my practice, because of their paradox. The intention is to communicate clearly, but in our modern online world, they become isolating and unclear – from advertising, influencing, politics, intentions, and more. In this way, my practice becomes both a reflection of and a response to the complexities of navigating a world where clarity is constantly obscured by the very tools we use to seek it.