{"ID":10,"title":"Home","altTitle":"Home","subtitle":null,"url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/","slug":"home","content":"<!-- wp:acf\/hero-home {\"name\":\"acf\/hero-home\",\"data\":{\"hero_home_headline\":\"RMI is working to create a world of abundant, clean energy. \",\"_hero_home_headline\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home_headline\",\"hero_home_copy\":\"We partner with businesses, policymakers, and communities around the world to scale renewable energy solutions, reduce energy waste, and boost access to affordable clean energy. \",\"_hero_home_copy\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home_copy\",\"hero_home_primary_button\":{\"title\":\"Explore Our Approach\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-approach\/\",\"target\":\"_blank\"},\"_hero_home_primary_button\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home_primary_button\",\"hero_home_background_image\":451,\"_hero_home_background_image\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home_background_image\",\"hero_home_layout\":\"featured\",\"_hero_home_layout\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home_layout\",\"hero_home_posts\":[\"34900\",\"34802\",\"34944\"],\"_hero_home_posts\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home_posts\",\"hero_home\":\"\",\"_hero_home\":\"field_hero_home_hero_home\"},\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc4e0\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"80px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc54d\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/card-row-large {\"name\":\"acf\/card-row-large\",\"data\":{\"card_row_large_title\":\"RMI is transforming the global energy system to secure a clean, prosperous, zero-carbon future for all.\",\"_card_row_large_title\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_title\",\"card_row_large_description\":\"\",\"_card_row_large_description\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_description\",\"card_row_large_cta\":{\"title\":\"Learn More About Our Mission\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/about\/\",\"target\":\"_blank\"},\"_card_row_large_cta\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cta\",\"card_row_large_cards_0_thumb\":14539,\"_card_row_large_cards_0_thumb\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb\",\"card_row_large_cards_0_title\":\"Scaling Clean Energy\",\"_card_row_large_cards_0_title\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title\",\"card_row_large_cards_0_legend\":\"Renewable energy can power our rising energy demand reliably and affordably.\",\"_card_row_large_cards_0_legend\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend\",\"card_row_large_cards_0_link\":{\"title\":\"Test Page\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-solutions\/scaling-clean-energy-and-efficiency\/\",\"target\":\"\"},\"_card_row_large_cards_0_link\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link\",\"card_row_large_cards_1_thumb\":21987,\"_card_row_large_cards_1_thumb\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb\",\"card_row_large_cards_1_title\":\"Driving Investment\",\"_card_row_large_cards_1_title\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title\",\"card_row_large_cards_1_legend\":\"RMI is driving the investment needed to build a clean energy economy.\",\"_card_row_large_cards_1_legend\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend\",\"card_row_large_cards_1_link\":{\"title\":\"Test Page\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-work\/driving-investment\/\",\"target\":\"\"},\"_card_row_large_cards_1_link\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link\",\"card_row_large_cards_2_thumb\":10919,\"_card_row_large_cards_2_thumb\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb\",\"card_row_large_cards_2_title\":\"Reducing Energy Waste\",\"_card_row_large_cards_2_title\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title\",\"card_row_large_cards_2_legend\":\"Deploying strategies and technologies that use less energy to power economies.\",\"_card_row_large_cards_2_legend\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend\",\"card_row_large_cards_2_link\":{\"title\":\"Test Page\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-work\/reducing-waste\/\",\"target\":\"\"},\"_card_row_large_cards_2_link\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link\",\"card_row_large_cards_3_thumb\":1049,\"_card_row_large_cards_3_thumb\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb\",\"card_row_large_cards_3_title\":\"Deploying Globally\",\"_card_row_large_cards_3_title\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title\",\"card_row_large_cards_3_legend\":\"Around the world,  clean energy can reduce costs, improve reliability, and support economic growth. \",\"_card_row_large_cards_3_legend\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend\",\"card_row_large_cards_3_link\":{\"title\":\"Test Page\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/deploying-globally\/\",\"target\":\"\"},\"_card_row_large_cards_3_link\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link\",\"card_row_large_cards\":4,\"_card_row_large_cards\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards\",\"card_row_large_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_card_row_large_bg_type\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_bg_type\",\"card_row_large_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_card_row_large_background_color\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_background_color\",\"card_row_large\":\"\",\"_card_row_large\":\"field_card_row_large_card_row_large\"},\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc5c8\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"64px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc5f4\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/newsletter-signup {\"name\":\"acf\/newsletter-signup\",\"data\":{\"newsletter_signup_variation\":\"large\",\"_newsletter_signup_variation\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_variation\",\"newsletter_signup_title\":\"Track the latest clean energy stories and insights, delivered weekly to your inbox.\",\"_newsletter_signup_title\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_title\",\"newsletter_signup_description\":\"\",\"_newsletter_signup_description\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_description\",\"newsletter_signup_cta\":{\"title\":\"Go to Newsletters\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/get-updates\/\",\"target\":\"\"},\"_newsletter_signup_cta\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_cta\",\"newsletter_signup_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_newsletter_signup_bg_type\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_bg_type\",\"newsletter_signup_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_newsletter_signup_background_color\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_background_color\",\"newsletter_signup\":\"\",\"_newsletter_signup\":\"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup\"},\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc626\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"64px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc646\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/feature-row {\"name\":\"acf\/feature-row\",\"data\":{\"feature_row_variant\":\"left\",\"_feature_row_variant\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_variant\",\"feature_row_use_multiple_items\":\"0\",\"_feature_row_use_multiple_items\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_use_multiple_items\",\"feature_row_image\":34110,\"_feature_row_image\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_image\",\"feature_row_eyebrow\":\"Partner Showcase\",\"_feature_row_eyebrow\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_eyebrow\",\"feature_row_headline\":\"Corporate leaders discuss their clean energy strategies\",\"_feature_row_headline\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_headline\",\"feature_row_body\":\"From Cisco\u2019s smart office tower in New York City to a fossil-free Netflix studio in Albuquerque, RMI explores how companies are embracing modern energy infrastructure and clean technologies that are transforming the way businesses operate. Leaders from CBRE, Schneider Electric, Netflix, and Cisco share their testimonies for why they are transforming their energy systems.\",\"_feature_row_body\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_body\",\"feature_row_context_button\":\"\",\"_feature_row_context_button\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_context_button\",\"feature_row_primary_button\":{\"title\":\"Watch Video\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=bDGNOLdzo_I\",\"target\":\"_blank\"},\"_feature_row_primary_button\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row_primary_button\",\"feature_row\":\"\",\"_feature_row\":\"field_feature_row_feature_row\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc664\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"64px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a513362bc67d\"} \/-->","description":"","objectType":"Page","author":"Editorial Team","date":"September 12, 2023","pubDate":"2023-09-12 20:49:48","attachment":{"ID":"25652","src":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rmi-placeholder.jpg","img":"<img width=\"640\" height=\"320\" src=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rmi-placeholder.jpg\" class=\"block w-full h-full object-cover object-center relative z-10\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rmi-placeholder.jpg 640w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rmi-placeholder-300x150.jpg 300w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rmi-placeholder-320x160.jpg 320w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>"},"meta":{"hero_home":{"headline":"RMI is transforming the global energy system to secure a clean, prosperous, zero-carbon future for all. ","copy":"","primary_button":{"title":"Learn about Our Mission","url":"http:\/\/localhost\/233-2\/","target":""},"background_image":451,"layout":"featured","posts":[{"ID":205,"title":"A Workable Solution for Implementing the European Methane Regulation","altTitle":"A Workable Solution for Implementing the European Methane Regulation","subtitle":null,"url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/news\/news\/","slug":"news","content":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In his newly published article&nbsp;<em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.philanthropy.com\/article\/trust-based-philanthropy-isnt-an-excuse-to-ignore-metrics-its-the-opposite\">Why Trust-Based Philanthropy Still Needs Metrics<\/a>&nbsp;<\/em>for The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Overbrook President Eric Weingartner shares a compelling perspective on the intersection between trust-based philanthropy and performance measurement. Eric insists that these two approaches are not mutually exclusive but can complement each other to drive greater impact; insisting that even small foundations can implement effective measurement processes without creating undue burdens on grantees. By developing simple, strategic metrics in collaboration with grantees, foundations can ensure accountability and foster stronger relationships.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","description":"","objectType":"News","author":"Editorial Team","date":"August 9, 2024","pubDate":"2024-08-09 17:59:00","attachment":{"ID":454,"src":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3.jpg","img":"<img width=\"960\" height=\"960\" src=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3.jpg\" class=\"block w-full h-full object-cover object-center relative z-10\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3.jpg 960w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3-320x320.jpg 320w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thumb3-640x640.jpg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/>"},"meta":[]}],"advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}},"spacing":{"mobile":"32px","tablet":"32px","desktop":"64px","bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"},"card_row_large":{"title":"We work to create a world of abundant, clean, safe energy for all. ","description":"RMI works with businesses, policymakers, and communities around the world to scale renewable energy solutions, reduce energy waste, and boost access to affordable clean energy. ","cta":{"title":"Learn More About Our Process","url":"http:\/\/localhost\/233-2\/","target":""},"cards":[{"thumb":14539,"title":"Scaling Clean Energy","legend":"Renewable energy can power our rising energy demand reliably and affordably.","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"http:\/\/localhost\/components\/form\/","target":"_blank"}},{"thumb":21987,"title":"Driving Investment","legend":"RMI is driving the investment needed to build a clean energy economy .","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/233-2\/","target":""}},{"thumb":10919,"title":"Reducing Energy Waste","legend":"~10 words Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam faucibus volutpat dolor id commodo. ","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/233-2\/","target":""}},{"thumb":1049,"title":"Deploying Globally","legend":"Around the world,  clean energy can reduce costs, improve reliability, and support economic growth. ","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/233-2\/","target":""}}],"bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"},"newsletter_signup":{"variation":"large","title":"Stay updated with the latest clean energy stories, insights, and developments, delivered weekly to your inbox.","description":"","cta":{"title":"Learn More","url":"http:\/\/localhost\/components\/form\/","target":""},"bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff","advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}},"feature_row":{"variant":"left","use_multiple_items":false,"image":1056,"eyebrow":"Partner Showcase","headline":"<p>Corporate leaders discuss their clean energy strategies<\/p>\n","body":"<p>From Cisco\u2019s smart office tower in New York City to a fossil-free Netflix studio in Albuquerque, RMI explores how companies are embracing modern energy infrastructure and clean technologies that are transforming the way businesses operate. Leaders from CBRE, Schneider Electric, Netflix, and Cisco share their testimonies for why they are transforming their energy systems.<\/p>\n","context_button":"","primary_button":{"title":"Watch Video","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=bDGNOLdzo_I","target":""},"items":false,"advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}},"donation_row":{"variant":"horizontal","headline":"Clean energy starts with you. <span class=\"highlight\">Donate<\/span> <span class=\"highlight\">today<\/span>.","body":"<p>RMI is a global, independent organization of over 700 diverse experts partnering with a wide range of collaborators to build a clean energy future. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit RMI generates the vast majority of its support from philanthropy. Make a gift today.<\/p>\n<p>For other ways to give to RMI, including checks or gifts of stock, please visit <a href=\"#\">Ways to Give<\/a>.<\/p>\n","iframe_html":"<p class=\"text-center text-dark font-bold text-2xl\">{{iframe content}}<\/p>","info_title":"","info_content":"","card_thumb":false,"card_title":"","card_legend":"","card_link":null,"card_chip_link":null,"card_chip_color":"","advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}},"custom_body_class":"","has_custom_code":false,"admin_meta":{"older_than_two_years":false,"views_in_last_year":"","old_site_url":""},"custom_sidebar":{"mode":"none","shared_sidebar":false,"title":"","items":false},"page_metadata":{"hide_donation_row":false,"hide_donate_modal":false,"metadata_tab_tab":null,"audience_codes":[],"campaign_tags":[],"content_type_values":[],"content_subtype_values":[],"outcome_values":[],"program_codes":[],"initiative_codes":[]},"blocks":[{"blockName":"acf\/hero-home","attrs":{"name":"acf\/hero-home","data":{"hero_home_headline":"RMI is working to create a world of abundant, clean energy. ","_hero_home_headline":"field_hero_home_hero_home_headline","hero_home_copy":"We partner with businesses, policymakers, and communities around the world to scale renewable energy solutions, reduce energy waste, and boost access to affordable clean energy. ","_hero_home_copy":"field_hero_home_hero_home_copy","hero_home_primary_button":{"title":"Explore Our Approach","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-approach\/","target":"_blank"},"_hero_home_primary_button":"field_hero_home_hero_home_primary_button","hero_home_background_image":451,"_hero_home_background_image":"field_hero_home_hero_home_background_image","hero_home_layout":"featured","_hero_home_layout":"field_hero_home_hero_home_layout","hero_home_posts":["34900","34802","34944"],"_hero_home_posts":"field_hero_home_hero_home_posts","hero_home":"","_hero_home":"field_hero_home_hero_home"},"mode":"edit","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc4e0"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"hero-home","data":{"hero_home":{"headline":"RMI is working to create a world of abundant, clean energy. ","copy":"We partner with businesses, policymakers, and communities around the world to scale renewable energy solutions, reduce energy waste, and boost access to affordable clean energy. ","primary_button":{"title":"Explore Our Approach","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-approach\/","target":"_blank"},"background_image":451,"layout":"featured","posts":[{"ID":34900,"title":"Clean Energy 101: Energy System Resilience","altTitle":"Clean Energy 101: Energy System Resilience","subtitle":null,"url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/clean-energy-101-energy-system-resilience\/","slug":"clean-energy-101-energy-system-resilience","content":"<!-- wp:paragraph {\"anchor\":\"h-when-a-heatwave-triggers-widespread-power-outages-the-consequences-can-be-immediate-and-life-threatening-air-conditioners-fail-critical-at-home-medical-equipment-stops-functioning-and-vulnerable-residents-lose-access-to-safe-cool-spaces-as-extreme-weather-events-become-more-common-energy-resilience-is-no-longer-a-choice-it-is-a-necessity\"} -->\n<p id=\"h-when-a-heatwave-triggers-widespread-power-outages-the-consequences-can-be-immediate-and-life-threatening-air-conditioners-fail-critical-at-home-medical-equipment-stops-functioning-and-vulnerable-residents-lose-access-to-safe-cool-spaces-as-extreme-weather-events-become-more-common-energy-resilience-is-no-longer-a-choice-it-is-a-necessity\">When a heatwave triggers widespread power outages, the consequences can be immediate and life-threatening: air conditioners fail, critical at-home medical equipment stops functioning, and vulnerable residents lose access to safe, cool spaces. As extreme weather events become more common, energy resilience is no longer a choice, it is a necessity.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:quote -->\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>As extreme weather events become more common, energy resilience is no longer a choice, it is a necessity.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/blockquote>\n<!-- \/wp:quote -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"h-what-is-energy-system-resilience\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"h-what-is-energy-system-resilience\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is energy system resilience?<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Resilience is a community\u2019s ability to keep critical services \u2014 like hospitals, emergency response, water, and communications \u2014 operating during and after extreme weather. <em>Resilient systems <\/em>help limit damage, restore power quickly, and ensure that the most essential services continue to function, even if parts of the broader grid go down. It\u2019s about protecting safety and quality of life when conditions are at their worst.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><em>Reliability<\/em>, by contrast, is about the grid working smoothly day to day \u2014 delivering consistent electricity under normal conditions.&nbsp; In other words, resilience helps communities prepare for, withstand, and recover from disruptions; reliability keeps the lights on in normal times.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"h-why-does-energy-system-resilience-matter-now\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"h-why-does-energy-system-resilience-matter-now\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why does energy system resilience matter now?<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Our energy systems need to be able to anticipate, withstand, adapt to, and recover from major disruptions and failures caused by events like extreme weather. This is especially critical now for several reasons:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>We\u2019re experiencing more volatile weather as our climate warms.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Our infrastructure is aging and wasn\u2019t designed for the current extremes we\u2019re facing.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Power systems are more complex and interdependent (for example, electricity, gas, telecom, and water can all be reliant on each other to function).<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Increased demand from data centers and <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/the-path-to-power-connecting-large-loads\/\">electrification<\/a> further strain the grid.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>As risks escalate, <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/recalibrating-the-role-of-insurance-in-resilience\/\">both insured and uninsured losses are rising<\/a>, which can negatively impact a community\u2019s resilience.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Resilience matters because power outages can quickly lead to serious consequences, including health emergencies, water and sanitation failures, food insecurity, and loss of communications.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Recent disasters illustrate these risks. During Winter Storm Uri in Texas in 2021, widespread generation failures left more than 4.5 million customers without power, contributing to a public health crisis as residents resorted to dangerous methods to stay warm after outages knocked out most modern heating systems, including natural gas furnaces and heat pumps. Similarly, Hurricane Maria caused a near-total collapse of Puerto Rico\u2019s electric grid in 2017, leaving some communities without electricity for months and severely disrupting access to healthcare, clean water, and other essential services.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>These risks are not felt equally across communities: power outages hit vulnerable communities the hardest. Older adults, children, and people with disabilities face greater risks from extreme heat; they may rely on medications that need temperature control or have difficulty traveling to get care. On top of that, emergency response and recovery support aren\u2019t always distributed fairly. Low-income and predominantly Black neighborhoods are more likely to face unsafe housing conditions and receive fewer resources during and after disasters. And for Small Island Developing States (SIDS), these challenges are magnified: disasters cost SIDS an estimated <a href=\"https:\/\/gca.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/GCA-STA25-.pdf\">18% of GDP<\/a> on average, far above the 3% global average, and their geographic isolation makes resilient energy and infrastructure planning especially critical.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"h-how-do-we-enhance-energy-system-resilience\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"h-how-do-we-enhance-energy-system-resilience\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">How do we enhance energy system resilience?<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Key principles of resilient systems include:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Diversity and redundancy<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Simple, passive, and flexible<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>The use of locally available, renewable, or reclaimed resources<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>No single form of electricity generation can meet demand under all conditions. That\u2019s why power grids rely on a diverse mix of resources across different technologies and locations to provide reliable electricity and strengthen resilience during disruptions.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In emergencies, communities should also draw on multiple power options \u2014 especially those that are local, renewable, or reclaimed. Local and renewable sources, such as solar and wind, depend less on long supply chains, so they are often more resilient to disruptions from extreme weather, conflict, or policy changes. Reclaimed energy can come from sources like landfill gas or excess heat from factories, turning waste into useful power and supporting local energy systems.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:quote -->\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In emergencies, communities should draw on multiple power options \u2014 especially those that are local, renewable, or reclaimed.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/blockquote>\n<!-- \/wp:quote -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Resilience must be built at multiple scales, from regional energy systems to neighborhood-level community infrastructure. To strengthen regional resilience, utilities and grid operators can prepare critical infrastructure for extreme weather; protect substations and power lines from wildfires, floods, and hurricanes; and improve emergency response plans to restore service after major disruptions. These measures help energy systems withstand and recover from severe events.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"h-energy-system-resilience-through-resilience-hubs\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"h-energy-system-resilience-through-resilience-hubs\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Energy system resilience through resilience hubs<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>One popular way to address a community\u2019s resilience is to create resilience hubs, which serve as places where residents can access critical services before, during, and after a disaster, helping reduce community vulnerability. In non-crisis times, they function as spaces for community connection.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Hubs should be in trusted, accessible places like community centers, libraries, or churches, with transit and evacuation needs in mind so that everyone \u2014 including people without cars \u2014 can get there and receive help when it\u2019s needed most. During recovery, they can also act as centralized hubs for resource distribution and access to support services, including government services like FEMA and other insurance assistance.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The best-functioning resilience hubs have a few characteristics in common.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>They are powered by clean energy systems. For example, they can combine on-site solar with battery storage to create a self-sufficient <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/during-a-historic-hurricane-season-microgrids-kept-communities-running\/\">microgrid<\/a>, a localized energy system that can operate independently from the main grid during outages.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>They implement energy efficiency measures to minimize the building's overall energy usage and extend \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Hours-of-Safety-insight-brief.pdf\">hours of safety<\/a>\u201d for occupants even if the backup power system fails. Strategies could include utilizing weatherization, such as insulation and window upgrades; efficient electrical appliances, like heat pumps and induction stoves; and passive, nature-based designs including natural ventilation and daylighting or shade from tree coverage and water permeable concrete.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>They ensure access to potable water, emergency preparedness equipment, and uninterrupted communication.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>They are in a walkable and secure site that people already go to and trust.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"h-benefits-beyond-emergency-preparedness\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"h-benefits-beyond-emergency-preparedness\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Benefits beyond emergency preparedness<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Resilient systems \u2014 especially resilience hubs \u2014 deliver benefits beyond maintaining access to critical services during disruptions. They can:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Serve as trusted community gathering spaces that provide year-round benefits and services while offering immediate, localized support during disasters through access to power, communications, and emergency resources.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Help prevent cascading system failures, improve coordination of response efforts, and accelerate community recovery, reducing downtime for businesses, households, and essential services.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Lower energy costs by generating electricity locally and using batteries to reduce peak demand charges, which can account for 30%\u201370% of a commercial electricity bill.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Strengthen the broader energy system by reducing strain on the grid during periods of high demand and limiting exposure to fuel price volatility by using local and renewable energy resources.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"h-how-do-we-scale-and-invest-in-energy-system-resilience\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"h-how-do-we-scale-and-invest-in-energy-system-resilience\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">How do we scale and invest in energy system resilience?<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>For one, local governments, community-based organizations, and businesses can <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/weathering-climate-disasters-with-resilience-hubs\/\">develop and fund resilience hubs<\/a>. Resilience hubs work best when cities plan for them early and invest in them over time. That means updating local plans to account for climate risks like flooding and heat, setting aside ongoing funding, and starting small with the ability to expand.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Communities can tap into a mix of funding sources \u2014 such as state emergency funds, utility partnerships, green banks, and community investment models like bonds \u2014 while also offering technical assistance to support implementation. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/community-energy-resilience-initiative\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">RMI\u2019s Community Energy Resilience Initiative<\/a> in Puerto Rico has deployed solar and battery microgrids at critical facilities such as pharmacies and community service centers, creating a scalable model for resilient, community-based energy infrastructure. In Dominica, RMI and partners have applied a similar resilience-hub approach by supporting <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/news\/dominica-announces-solar-and-battery-storage-solutions-for-primary-schools-to-build-energy-resilience-and-hurricane-preparedness\/\">solar and battery storage systems<\/a> at primary schools that also serve as hurricane shelters, helping them provide safe, reliable community support during major disruptions. And in Aspen, Colorado, a new <a href=\"https:\/\/www.microgridknowledge.com\/microgrids\/utility\/news\/55387656\/aspens-new-microgrid-comes-online-just-in-time-for-wildfire-season\">solar and battery microgrid<\/a> will power critical public services during outages.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>While local governments often play a core role in developing and operating resilience hubs, they don\u2019t always have the capacity or funding to serve as the host or project manager for a project. Instead, their role is often as facilitator or collaborative partner, supporting CBOs and businesses in developing their own hubs or hub networks.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>This collaborative approach is reflected in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canarymedia.com\/articles\/solar\/rural-north-carolina-solar-battery-hubs?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">post-Hurricane Helene recovery efforts in western North Carolina<\/a>, where local leaders, nonprofits, regional organizations, and state agencies are working together to expand a network of solar- and battery-powered resilience hubs and microgrids designed to support communities during future outages and disasters.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Beyond scaling resilience hubs, there are a few strategies to increase community resilience.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Develop and implement storm-resilience building codes and standards:<\/strong> Governments can direct funding toward strengthening the resilience of <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/when-insurance-and-policy-align-resilience-scales\/\">homes and businesses by supporting upgrades to building standards<\/a>. They can also encourage the use of  rooftop solar and storage to keep the lights on during outages.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Explore opportunities for renewable energy generation and storage in municipal portfolios<\/strong>: Local municipalities can lead by example by evaluating their own municipal buildings. They can determine whether buildings can host systems like rooftop solar paired with battery storage to diversify power sources and enhance resilience.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Utilize electric vehicles as additional energy capacity<\/strong>: Another strategy to explore is utilizing EVs as mobile batteries. In homes and buildings equipped with bidirectional charging, compatible electric vehicles can supply electricity during outages, further enhancing resilience.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Establish durable local funding for resilience assets<\/strong>: Emergency funding resources have often ebbed and flowed, proving unreliable for local governments. Municipal governments can explore innovative financing mechanisms to support investment in these systems. For example, the City of Providence recently <a href=\"https:\/\/www.providenceri.gov\/mayor-brett-smiley-announces-citys-first-ever-climate-initiative-revolving-fund\/\">established a green revolving fund<\/a> to support efficiency and renewable energy projects in their city. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/recalibrating-the-role-of-insurance-in-resilience\/\"><\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/recalibrating-the-role-of-insurance-in-resilience\/\"><strong>Partner with insurers<\/strong><\/a><strong>, policymakers, regulators, academics, think tanks and other actors to identify risk and incentivize resilience against future disasters.<\/strong> Many insurers are taking resilience into account and exploring ways to incentivize more action within their spheres of influence, including offering premium reductions to more resilient properties, or tying payouts and future coverage to resilient rebuilding techniques after an event. In high-risk areas, insurers are also exploring offering direct incentives or partnerships with policymakers, standards setters, and other public and private organizations to support resilient construction standards and pre-disaster preparedness.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The tools and strategies to build more resilient communities already exist \u2014 we just need to put them into practice. By investing thoughtfully now and prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable, communities can better withstand disruptions and recover more quickly. In doing so, they can save lives and protect people\u2019s quality of life when it matters most.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","description":"With increasing risks, it\u2019s more important than ever to ensure that essential services continue to function and damage is limited during outages and disasters.","objectType":"Resource","resource-type":[{"name":"101","slug":"101","term_taxonomy_id":515,"taxonomy":"resource-type"}],"collection":[{"name":"Clean Energy 101","slug":"clean-energy-101","term_taxonomy_id":9,"taxonomy":"collection"},{"name":"Resilience","slug":"resilience","term_taxonomy_id":914,"taxonomy":"collection"}],"topics":[{"name":"energy-resilience","slug":"energy-resilience","term_taxonomy_id":222,"taxonomy":"topics"},{"name":"Minigrids","slug":"minigrids","term_taxonomy_id":775,"taxonomy":"topics"}],"post_tag":[{"name":"Resilience","slug":"resilience","term_taxonomy_id":946,"taxonomy":"post_tag"}],"focus-areas":[{"name":"US Policy","slug":"us-policy","term_taxonomy_id":547,"taxonomy":"focus-areas"}],"author":"Laurie Stone","date":"July 8, 2026","pubDate":"2026-07-08 18:19:57","attachment":{"ID":1433,"src":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Mayreau-microgrid.jpg","img":"<img width=\"1200\" height=\"556\" src=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Mayreau-microgrid.jpg\" class=\"block w-full h-full object-cover object-center relative z-10\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" \/>"},"meta":[]},{"ID":34802,"title":"Accelerating Industrial Clean Heat with a Production Tax Credit","altTitle":"Accelerating Industrial Clean Heat with a Production Tax Credit","subtitle":null,"url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/accelerating-industrial-clean-heat-with-a-production-tax-credit\/","slug":"accelerating-industrial-clean-heat-with-a-production-tax-credit","content":"<!-- wp:acf\/sidebar-start {\"name\":\"acf\/sidebar-start\",\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f3e0\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/callout-box {\"name\":\"acf\/callout-box\",\"data\":{\"callout_box_content\":\"\\u003ch4\\u003eClean Heat Memo Series\\u003c\/h4\\u003e\\r\\nThis is the first in a series of RMI memos examining state policy tools to accelerate the deployment of industrial clean heat. Each memo takes a closer look at a different mechanism policymakers can use to close the cost gap and spur adoption of clean heating technologies.\\r\\n\\r\\n\\u003cstrong\\u003eAlso in this series:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e Accelerating Industrial Clean Heat through Clean Heat Standards.\",\"_callout_box_content\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_content\",\"callout_box_background_color\":\"teal-100\",\"_callout_box_background_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_background_color\",\"callout_box_text_color\":\"zinc-500\",\"_callout_box_text_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_text_color\",\"callout_box_accent_color\":\"teal-200\",\"_callout_box_accent_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_accent_color\",\"callout_box\":\"\",\"_callout_box\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box\"},\"align\":\"\",\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f4ac\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"executive-summary\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"executive-summary\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Executive Summary<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Industrial clean heat provides the heat for an industrial facility using technologies like electricity, renewable energy, thermal energy storage, geothermal energy, or clean fuels. This reduces <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osti.gov\/servlets\/purl\/1820704\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">overall energy use<\/a>, improves air quality (especially around fenceline communities), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ox.ac.uk\/news\/2026-04-22-industrial-electrification-is-now-a-security-imperative-finds-oxford-analysis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">hedges against price spikes<\/a>, increases global competitiveness, and <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20220907210307\/https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/2022-09\/Industrial%20Decarbonization%20Roadmap.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reduces greenhouse gas emissions<\/a>. Additionally, states that take an active role creating a market for new technologies like industrial clean heat will be <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/grease-lightning-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">best positioned to capture economic benefits<\/a> from industrial transition.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Many clean heat technologies are mature but are not being adopted at scale due to market barriers, including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/outlooks\/aeo\/data\/browser\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">cost disparities between using electricity and natural gas<\/a> for heating. State policies such as a <a href=\"https:\/\/energyinnovation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/A-Production-Tax-Credit-for-Clean-Industrial-Heat.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">clean heat production tax credit<\/a> (PTC) can reduce costs and spur deployment of clean heat technologies. A clean heat PTC works by awarding a tax credit for each unit of eligible clean heat delivered, lowering operating costs as facilities switch from fossil fuel heating to cleaner heating technologies.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>We assessed the design, costs, and impact of a state-level PTC to provide guidance to states on how to achieve cost parity when switching from incumbent heating technologies. Key takeaways included:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>The modeled average credit value needed to reach cost parity between clean heat technologies and incumbent gas boilers is $13.57 per million Btu<\/strong> (MMBtu) in the baseline scenario, which assumed medium gas price and medium electricity price trajectories. This average credit value is roughly 3 times the 2025 US average natural gas price; for context, this is similar to the full $3\/kg 45V hydrogen PTC, which is ~2.5 times the estimated cost of hydrogen from fossil fuels (grey hydrogen).<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>The required credit values vary widely by state because of differences in the \u201cspark gap,\u201d<\/strong> or the relative cost of electricity compared with natural gas. In the baseline scenario, modeled parity values range from $3.80\/MMBtu in Washington to $43.05\/MMBtu in Alaska (see Exhibit ES1).<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/Dw42X\/16\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/Dw42X\/16\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f4d9\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Higher gas prices have a larger effect on improving clean heat economics than lower electricity prices.<\/strong> A scenario using a high gas price and medium electricity price reduces the average required PTC value by 42% relative to the baseline, while a scenario using a medium gas price and low electricity price reduces the required PTC value by 10%.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Modeled state costs (measured in foregone revenue) vary substantially depending on the size of each state\u2019s industrial sector.<\/strong> These costs range from roughly $1 billion to $170 billion cumulatively by 2045, assuming uncapped tax credits and therefore maximum technically feasible participation. The average marginal cost of abatement by 2045 is $150 per ton of CO<sub>2<\/sub>e abated, well below the 2022 US estimated social cost of carbon at $190\/ton.<sup id=\"fnref-1\"><a href=\"#fn-1\">1<\/a><\/sup><\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Clean heat PTCs can meaningfully reduce annual industrial greenhouse gas emissions by 29% and achieve $27\u2013$49 billion in annual health benefits from reduced criteria air pollutants.<\/strong> By 2035, clean heat PTCs can reduce annual Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions by 273 million tons. In addition, adopting clean heat technologies can result in significant reductions in harmful criteria air pollutants (CAPs) like nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>However, state incentives need to be fiscally prudent and well designed. While we think there is significant upside to a clean heat PTC, we adopted a conservative approach to modeling assumptions. Specifically, the model uses long-term energy price trajectories and does not account for short-term price spikes or volatility. For this reason, the modeled PTC values show cost parity under smoothed price assumptions, not the full resilience value clean heat may provide during fuel price shocks. Both gas and electricity prices can spike, but gas prices are particularly volatile because natural gas is traded in global commodity markets. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ox.ac.uk\/news\/2026-04-22-industrial-electrification-is-now-a-security-imperative-finds-oxford-analysis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Industrial electrification is thus a strategy to hedge against those risks<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>We also explored design considerations that policymakers can consider when designing PTC policies including how to structure the credit, what value is appropriate to offer, and what clean heat activities could be eligible to earn a credit.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:table {\"hasFixedLayout\":false,\"className\":\"rmi-table actors-roles-table\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table rmi-table actors-roles-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>PTC Design Considerations<\/th><th><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Credit structure<\/strong><\/td><td><p><strong>Refundable:<\/strong> A refundable credit is more valuable and accessible to smaller firms.<\/p><p><strong>Adaptable:<\/strong> A credit that changes to reflect market conditions will provide the appropriate level of support to firms, without over-subsidizing technologies.<\/p><p><strong>Bankable:<\/strong> States can improve credit value to private lenders and help crowd-in private capital by insulating the credit from policy swings.<\/p><p><strong>Timebound:<\/strong> A credit that is timebound and offered for a fixed number of years starting when facilities install qualifying equipment will align best with facility investment cycles while only offering support as the clean heat market matures.<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Credit value<\/strong><\/td><td><p><strong>Value:<\/strong> Appropriate credit value varies by state and depends on the spark gap.<\/p><p><strong>Budget:<\/strong> Defining an annual budget will be key for many states, and therefore designing qualification criteria is key to capturing highest-value projects.<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Credit eligibility<\/strong><\/td><td><p><strong>Industrial:<\/strong> To ensure offtakers can benefit from the credit, the credit can be structured so that both manufacturers and third-party industrial heat providers can claim it.<\/p><p><strong>Low-emitting:<\/strong> Eligible activities to receive credit will depend on state goals, and can be determined by technology type or emissions intensity limits.<\/p><p><strong>Additional:<\/strong> To avoid subsidizing normal business practices, the credit could be structured to only reward clean heat above a facility\u2019s clean heat share baseline.<\/p><p><strong>Verifiable:<\/strong> Verification can ensure productive use of taxpayer dollars, while balancing the cost of administrative burden.<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:table -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f4f5\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"introduction\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Introduction<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Industrial heat is needed to manufacture everyday products that people rely on \u2014 from food and medicine to steel and cement. Traditionally, industrial heat has been provided from fossil fuels like natural gas, oil, and coal. But new technologies can provide the same industrial heating benefits, more efficiently, and with fewer air and climate pollutants. Using \u201cclean heat\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ox.ac.uk\/news\/2026-04-22-industrial-electrification-is-now-a-security-imperative-finds-oxford-analysis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">can also protect against price shocks from turbulent global energy markets<\/a> and supports global competitiveness for manufacturers who export their goods internationally, particularly to European markets with a <a href=\"https:\/\/taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu\/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">carbon border adjustment mechanism<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Industrial heat is responsible for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/articles\/doe-launches-new-energy-earthshot-cut-industrial-heating-emissions-85-percent\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">about 9% of all US greenhouse gas emissions<\/a>, making clean heat technologies a near-term, high-impact opportunity for industrial decarbonization. This is particularly true for facilities that operate predominantly at low to medium temperature ranges (below 400\u00b0C), such as food and beverage, pulp and paper, consumer goods, and some chemical manufacturing.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Industrial heating technologies like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aceee.org\/industrial-heat-pumps\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">industrial heat pumps<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/5877e86f9de4bb8bce72105c\/t\/62fb89dfb827c92c3340eed9\/1660652049933\/Boiler+Electrification-final+Rev2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">e-boilers<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.renewablethermal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/2023-10-04-RTC-Thermal-Battery-Report-Final-1-2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">thermal batteries<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S0360544220311907?via%3Dihub\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">solar thermal<\/a> are technologically mature and readily deployable. Other technologies such as enhanced and advanced geothermal are still maturing technologically and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.2035initiative.com\/unlocking-next-generation-geothermal-heat-for-industry\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">can also benefit from early offtake support from large industrial customers<\/a>. However, these technologies are not being adopted at scale because of increased operating costs <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/outlooks\/aeo\/data\/browser\/#\/?id=6-AEO2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">driven by the higher cost of using electricity instead of natural gas<\/a> for heating processes. This is often called the \u201cspark gap.\u201d<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Coordinated action and state support are needed to reduce costs and accelerate deployment, ultimately spurring these nascent markets to scale. <a href=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/grease-lightning-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">States that take an active role in creating a market for new technologies will be best positioned to capture economic benefits from industrial transition<\/a>. Recent analysis suggests a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.renewablethermal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Powering-American-Industry.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">growing industrial electrification market could support $471 billion in economic growth<\/a>, including $252.3 billion in deployment-related growth and $257.6 billion in manufacturing-related growth. In some cases, places that support the deployment of these technologies by providing incentives like a PTC <a href=\"https:\/\/www.renewablethermal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Executive-Summary_Powering-American-Industry.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">may also have an edge in attracting the manufacturing of these technologies<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A well-designed tax credit program can kickstart deployment of clean heat technologies that improve industrial efficiency, reduce energy use, and emit fewer pollutants, but are currently uneconomic due to the spark gap. A clean heat production tax credit (PTC) is one option states could consider to improve early market conditions for local firms seeking to modernize their facilities.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"policy-overview\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"policy-overview\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Policy Overview<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A clean heat PTC addresses the cost differential of electricity and natural gas by providing a \u201cclean heat credit\u201d for every unit (MMBtu) of industrial heat delivered by clean heating technology. By subsidizing operating costs, a PTC improves the business case by de-risking the investment for facilities to modernize their heating equipment and helps states lower greenhouse gas emissions and criteria air pollutants from their industrial sector. A clean heat PTC can catalyze first movers and accelerate clean heat market maturity.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>This policy can be used as a stand-alone incentive or stacked with other complementary policies, such as electricity rate reform for manufacturers using electrified heat, up-front grants for capital expenditures, or regulatory mechanisms like a clean heat standard or facility emissions reduction mandates.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>While a clean heat PTC could also support adoption in residential and commercial sectors, here we focus on a PTC for clean <em>industrial<\/em> heat. Industry requires higher temperature and higher-powered heat than commercial and residential customers, making industrial heat supply harder to decarbonize. This policy can be considered best suited for lower temperature industries where the cost gap is smaller and the state can provide meaningful operational cost support, as in most industries operating below 400\u00b0C.<sup id=\"fnref-2\"><a href=\"#fn-2\">2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>For industrial facilities facing higher energy costs when switching from fossil fuels to clean technologies, a PTC can help close the cost gap during the early stages of deployment. Because the credit is time-limited, it serves as a temporary boon to competitiveness, supporting technologies until they achieve sufficient scale and cost reductions to compete without additional state support.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"key-takeaways\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"key-takeaways\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>To assess the potential design, cost, and impact of a clean heat PTC, RMI developed a state-level model of industrial clean heat adoption from 2026 through 2045, for technology installed by 2035. The model provides directional guidance on the credit value needed to help manufacturers maintain cost competitiveness while switching from incumbent fossil fuel heating technologies to clean heating technologies, as well as policy benefits and costs to states in foregone tax revenue. Because the central policy question is whether clean heat can deliver the same useful heat without increasing a manufacturer\u2019s cost of heat, the model compares technologies using levelized cost of heat (LCOH). Key findings include the following:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"style\":{\"elements\":{\"link\":{\"color\":{\"text\":\"var:preset|color|teal-300\"}}}},\"textColor\":\"teal-300\",\"anchor\":\"h-clean-heat-ptc-value-varies-widely-and-is-impacted-by-gas-and-electricity-costs-as-well-as-complementary-policies\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-clean-heat-ptc-value-varies-widely-and-is-impacted-by-gas-and-electricity-costs-as-well-as-complementary-policies\" class=\"wp-block-heading has-teal-300-color has-text-color has-link-color\">Clean heat PTC value varies widely and is impacted by gas and electricity costs, as well as complementary policies.<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Across the United States, <strong>the clean heat PTC value to reach LCOH parity (with no other policy intervention) was modeled at an average rate of $13.57\/MMBtu<\/strong> and the median state price was $12.09\/MMBtu.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>States with larger spark gaps, or high cost of electricity compared to natural gas, see higher PTC values to reach LCOH parity between electrified and gas-powered technology (see Exhibit 1). In the baseline medium gas, medium electricity price scenario, within the continental United States, Rhode Island has the highest cost to reach parity at $31.77\/MMBtu, and Washington State has the lowest at $3.80\/MMBtu. The model derives state price trajectories from EIA\u2019s <em>Annual Energy Outlook 2026<\/em> industrial energy price projections and EIA State Energy Data System price data, as described in the Appendix. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bea.gov\/data\/gdp\/gdp-state\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Thirty states representing $1.76 trillion in manufacturing value<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/catalog.data.gov\/dataset\/2012-2022-state-level-greenhouse-gas-emission-totals-by-industry\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">76% of US industrial emissions<\/a> see PTC values below the $13.57\/MMBtu average PTC rate.<\/strong> The PTC values modeled in Hawaii and Alaska were substantially higher, rising above $40\/MMBtu.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 3<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/X7arO\/7\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/X7arO\/7\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f518\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In addition, modeling shows that stacking a clean heat PTC with an up-front grant for capital costs reduces the average required credit value by 4.7%, <strong>suggesting that complementary capital support can improve project economics<\/strong> but does not eliminate the need for operating-cost support.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Further, modeling indicates that <strong>the economics of clean heat adoption improve more in a high gas price scenario as compared to a low electricity price scenario<\/strong>, as shown in Exhibit 2. Specifically, a scenario assuming high gas prices and medium electricity prices reduces credit value substantially, averaging a 42% reduction in credit value compared to the baseline medium gas, medium electricity scenario, whereas a scenario that models medium gas prices with low electricity prices averages a 10% PTC reduction compared to the baseline.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 4<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/F87l2\/2\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/F87l2\/2\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f52d\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>This difference is driven by the increased efficiency of clean heating technologies compared to gas equipment \u2014 a $1\/MMBtu increase in gas price increases gas boiler operational costs more than a $1\/MMBtu lower electricity price decreases clean heat technology operational cost. In the modeled scenarios this electricity to gas fuel ratio is 1:1.7, assuming 70% of clean heat is supplied by heat pumps with coefficients of performance of 2.5.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"style\":{\"elements\":{\"link\":{\"color\":{\"text\":\"var:preset|color|teal-300\"}}}},\"textColor\":\"teal-300\",\"anchor\":\"h-the-impact-of-tax-credits-as-foregone-state-revenue-varies-in-accordance-with-states-industrial-profiles\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-the-impact-of-tax-credits-as-foregone-state-revenue-varies-in-accordance-with-states-industrial-profiles\" class=\"wp-block-heading has-teal-300-color has-text-color has-link-color\">The impact of tax credits as foregone state revenue varies in accordance with states\u2019 industrial profiles.<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Modeled state costs (measured in foregone revenue) <strong>vary substantially depending on the size of each state\u2019s industrial sector, ranging from roughly $1 billion to $170 billion cumulatively by 2045.<\/strong> This assumes uncapped tax credits and therefore maximum technically feasible participation for technology installed by 2035, without restraint for state budgets.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In addition, because clean heating technologies are assumed to have a 20-year lifespan, the model found cost parity with gas equipment throughout the full 20-year financial life, even though the credit only lasts 10 years. This essentially generously provides 20 years of value within the 10-year period a facility can claim the credit and functionally over-subsidizes facilities in the early years to account for increased operating costs in the latter years.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Without an annual budget cap, the cumulative cost to states by 2045 heavily depends on the size of industry in the state, as the model presumes that fossil fuel-fired heating equipment in each state will transition to clean technologies on a schedule consistent with a standard stock rollover timeline until 2035 when PTC eligibility for technology installation is modeled to end. Texas, California, and Louisiana therefore see the highest spends, consistent with the size of their respective industrial bases. The total US spend, 2026 through 2045, exceeds $650 billion in the medium gas and medium electricity price scenarios.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>These foregone revenue estimates should be read as a fiscal cost analysis, not a full economic development analysis. The model does not quantify potential additional benefits or risks such as exposure to energy price volatility, productivity or enabled performance improvements from modernized equipment, attraction of industrial electrification supply chains, energy security impacts, or other local economic effects.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 5<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/gN92T\/8\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/gN92T\/8\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f545\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Maintaining the assumption of an uncapped tax credit, <strong>the average marginal cost of abatement by 2045 is $150\/ton<\/strong>, and ranges from $47.40\/ton in Washington to $486\/ton in Alaska. In 39 states, the cost of abatement is below $190\/ton, the 2022 US estimated social cost of carbon (Exhibit 4).<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 6<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/2Kbdu\/2\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/2Kbdu\/2\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f559\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>As seen in Exhibit 5, industry sees net savings throughout the lifespan of the PTC credit. Tax credit uptake peaks in 2038 and eventually declines as the PTC expires. Notably, the model conservatively doesn\u2019t assume any change to markets or rate reform in the later years, thus reflecting the slow return of increased costs. However, a PTC would best be considered as part of a strategy of policy and market changes to spur market reforms, thereby giving manufacturers a temporary boost to accelerate their transition to clean technologies while the market adapts.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 7<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/nP4lk\/7\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/nP4lk\/7\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f56d\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The goal is that through supporting early applications of clean heat technologies, technology providers can develop more competitively priced equipment, and utilities can support rates that encourage flexible and grid-optimized industrial electrification, making the business case clearer to facilities and investors and easing the need for long-term state fiscal support.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"style\":{\"elements\":{\"link\":{\"color\":{\"text\":\"var:preset|color|teal-300\"}}}},\"textColor\":\"teal-300\",\"anchor\":\"h-clean-heat-ptcs-can-meaningfully-reduce-annual-industrial-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-29-and-realize-27-49-billion-in-annual-health-benefits-from-reduced-criteria-air-pollutants\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-clean-heat-ptcs-can-meaningfully-reduce-annual-industrial-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-29-and-realize-27-49-billion-in-annual-health-benefits-from-reduced-criteria-air-pollutants\" class=\"wp-block-heading has-teal-300-color has-text-color has-link-color\">Clean heat PTCs can meaningfully reduce annual industrial greenhouse gas emissions by 29% and realize $27\u2013$49 billion in annual health benefits from reduced criteria air pollutants.<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>By 2035, <strong>modeled annual Scope 1 greenhouse gas reductions reach 273 million tons of CO<sub>2<\/sub>e (reflecting a reduction of 29% against business as usual)<\/strong>, equivalent to taking approximately 59 million passenger vehicles \u2014 one in four passenger vehicles in the United States \u2014 off the road. Because clean heat technologies continue to avoid the greenhouse gas emissions that would have otherwise been emitted from traditional technologies under business-as-usual conditions, <strong>the benefits of avoided greenhouse gas reductions continue to increase long after the credit expires<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 8<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/v7Wj0\/4\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/v7Wj0\/4\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f583\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In addition, a clean heat PTC has the potential to make significant reductions in harmful criteria air pollutants (CAPs) like nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds and particulate matter. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/cobra.epa.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">US Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s COBRA tool<\/a>, starting in 2035 the reduction potential in criteria air pollutants modeled below in Exhibit 7 would result in $27\u2013$49 billion per year in health savings from avoided adverse health outcomes. The modeled CAPs reductions would result in an estimated 1,900\u20133,200 avoided premature deaths per year and 480,000 fewer school loss days per year.<sup id=\"fnref-3\"><a href=\"#fn-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>  The leveling out of CAP reduction potential in 2035 reflects the final year of accepted clean heat technology installations.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 9<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/6PpRN\/3\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/6PpRN\/3\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930f596\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"policy-design-considerations\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"policy-design-considerations\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Policy Design Considerations<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>As evidenced above by the wide range of PTC values and potential economic and environmental impact across all 50 states, the design and implementation of a PTC for clean industrial heat will vary by each state\u2019s manufacturing profile, budget, and target deployment goals. However, there are some universal design features and roles for state agencies to consider when developing the policy.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>There are three major design features of a PTC for industrial clean heat: <strong>credit structure, credit value, and credit eligibility<\/strong>. Policymakers will have to make additional design choices beyond these features and can do so in conjunction with these features, including whether and how to tailor a tax credit structure to meet the unique needs of their state and its major emitting industrial sectors.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>This section describes the most relevant decisions and considerations for each design feature.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"anchor\":\"h-credit-structure\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-credit-structure\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Credit structure<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A credit can be structured on a dollar per unit of heat basis, expressed as $\/MMBtu. This credit rewards recipients for every unit of clean heat produced additional to a baseline, which can be determined by facility average clean heat use or by subsector averages.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Other elements to consider when structuring a credit include refundability, adaptability, budgeting and annual caps, designing for bankability, and phase-in and phase-out timelines.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/callout-box {\"name\":\"acf\/callout-box\",\"data\":{\"callout_box_content\":\"\\u003ch4\\u003eAlternative credit structure\\u003c\/h4\\u003e\\r\\nNew Mexico\u2019s \\u003ca href=\\u0022https:\/\/www.nmlegis.gov\/Sessions\/26%20Regular\/final\/HB0153.pdf\\u0022 target=\\u0022_blank\\u0022 rel=\\u0022noreferrer noopener\\u0022\\u003eHB 0153\\u003c\/a\\u003e offers an alternative example of how a clean heat PTC can be structured. Instead of setting a flat rate per unit of heat delivered across all industrial sectors, the state can instead offer production tax credits per ton of commodities like glass, aluminum, steel, and concrete manufactured cleanly in the state.\\r\\n\\r\\nThe \u201cclean\u201d threshold can vary, but the New Mexico bill required a 40% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for the material to be eligible for a per-ton subsidy. In this case, the credit value would be calculated to address overall production cost differential for legacy materials production versus low-emissions materials. This credit structure might be appropriate if a state\u2019s industrial emissions are predominantly from commodity industries but would not work as well to provide incentive to states whose industrial sectors includes large amounts of light manufacturing, such as food and beverage, consumer goods, or power electronics facilities, whose products are hard to subsidize by weight. For the sake of widespread applicability, our model covers a PTC that is awarded per unit of heat, rather than by weight of product.\",\"_callout_box_content\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_content\",\"callout_box_background_color\":\"neutral-100\",\"_callout_box_background_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_background_color\",\"callout_box_text_color\":\"zinc-500\",\"_callout_box_text_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_text_color\",\"callout_box_accent_color\":\"teal-200\",\"_callout_box_accent_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_accent_color\",\"callout_box\":\"\",\"_callout_box\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box\"},\"align\":\"\",\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930fe23\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930fe77\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-refundability\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-refundability\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Refundability<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Tax credits are commonly used policy incentives for energy projects, but depending on design can require complex tax equity structures or other administrative workarounds with high transaction costs. To avoid this challenge, a clean heat PTC could be designed to be refundable, meaning an applicant can receive the full value of the credit, even if it exceeds their tax liability. This allows all firms to access the incentive, including firms with small tax liabilities or firms in states that levy low corporate income taxes.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>If a tax credit is not refundable, but is still transferable, smaller firms can partner with larger firms to apply their tax credit and receive a portion of the credit. However, these pass-through firms often take a cut, so the value of the state\u2019s dollar is essentially diminished every time a recipient needs to transfer its credits.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-adaptability\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-adaptability\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Adaptability<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A PTC is a policy tool to support emerging markets in reaching economies of scale, so it follows that a successful PTC would help solutions providers produce equipment and services at more competitive prices and improve the economics of clean industrial heat. States can therefore consider designing for adaptability, where the value of the credit changes to reflect market conditions.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>This can be done by allowing for periodic updated rulemaking during the credit\u2019s lifetime and could help a state avoid over-subsidizing a technology where economics improve over a credit\u2019s lifetime. This adaptability element would need to be balanced with the private sector\u2019s need for policy certainty, where companies and their lenders are unlikely to make long-term investment decisions if a credit is perceived as uncertain. This could be mitigated by signing fixed credit value agreements with early adopters, so that companies and private lenders can trust the state to provide stable cashflows to a project.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/callout-box {\"name\":\"acf\/callout-box\",\"data\":{\"callout_box_content\":\"\\u003ch4\\u003e\/Designing a credit that is bankable\\u003c\/h4\\u003e\\r\\nProduction tax credits are, more often than not, a boon to project economics. In some cases, they can also play a critical role in crowding in private capital and unlocking investment at scale. The value of a state dollar increases when it provides \u201cbankable\u201d support \u2014 that is, when it enables stable, quantifiable cashflows that lenders are willing to underwrite. Structuring a bankable PTC requires careful design; policymakers must balance lender preferences for up-front cashflow certainty with the need for strict eligibility requirements and verification to ensure public accountability.\\r\\n\\r\\nThe following design considerations improve a credit\u2019s bankability and help state dollars go farther:\\r\\n\\u003col\\u003e\\r\\n \\t\\u003cli class=\\u0022mb-4\\u0022\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eInsulate projects from policy uncertainty:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e The possibility of legislative overhaul undermines PTC bankability. A credit that relies on annual appropriations, which can be reduced each year, or that can be eliminated entirely following an administration change is typically not stable enough to secure debt repayment.\\r\\n\\u003cstrong class=\\u0022inline-block mt-3 italic\\u0022\\u003eWhat can be done:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e Allocating credit funds from an annual revenue source directly to a trust would avoid the uncertainty of annual budget appropriations, as it does for the US Highway Trust Fund. Grandfathering clauses that allow projects to claim production tax credits that were in place when they began construction despite subsequent legislative changes would eliminate the binary policy risk.\\u003c\/li\\u003e\\r\\n \\t\\u003cli class=\\u0022mb-4\\u0022\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eEnable direct monetization:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e Producers with limited tax liability often rely on tax equity markets to monetize credits. These markets can be difficult to access for smaller producers, and they often have high transaction costs. They may also shrink or disappear during economic downturns, when tax liability is low. Additionally, use of tax equity may result in incomplete monetization, with some of the value of the subsidy being claimed by financial intermediaries or other third parties.\\r\\n\\u003cstrong class=\\u0022inline-block mt-3 italic\\u0022\\u003eWhat can be done:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e Make the tax credit refundable or transferable. Enabling producers to elect cash payment rather than tax credits can provide a straightforward path for startups and other small producers to take advantage of tax credits. Allowing transferability \u2014 or direct business-to-business exchange of tax credits for up-front cash payment \u2014 provides a similar benefit.\\u003c\/li\\u003e\\r\\n \\t\\u003cli class=\\u0022mb-4\\u0022\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eMinimize qualification complexity:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e Eligibility uncertainty created a major barrier to uptake for many of the IRA tax credits. Shifting qualification guidance and the possibility that post-hoc verification would disqualify large volumes of product made the credits unappealing to lenders. As a result, some projects that had promising economics on paper were unable to get over the hurdle of final investment decision.\\r\\n\\u003cstrong class=\\u0022inline-block mt-3 italic\\u0022\\u003eWhat can be done:\\u003c\/strong\\u003e Provide clear, simple eligibility rules and minimize reliance on post-production verification or qualification criteria. Where possible, enable projects to pre-qualify by meeting certain conditions. These conditions will likely have to be technology and\/or location specific, to balance the need for accountability.\\u003c\/li\\u003e\\r\\n\\u003c\/ol\\u003e\",\"_callout_box_content\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_content\",\"callout_box_background_color\":\"teal-100\",\"_callout_box_background_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_background_color\",\"callout_box_text_color\":\"zinc-500\",\"_callout_box_text_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_text_color\",\"callout_box_accent_color\":\"teal-200\",\"_callout_box_accent_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_accent_color\",\"callout_box\":\"\",\"_callout_box\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box\"},\"align\":\"\",\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930ff56\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930ff9e\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-phase-in-and-phase-out-timelines\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-phase-in-and-phase-out-timelines\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Phase-in and phase-out timelines<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Facility investment planning cycles are long, and heating technologies are long-lasting; credit phase-in and phase-out would ideally reflect this in policy design. For example, a PTC in effect for a fixed amount of time but that could generate 10 years of credits tied to the first year of project installation will encourage more clean heat technology uptake than a PTC in effect for a total of 10 years, as industrial firms whose investment cycles align with the latter end of the PTC applicability would likely be disincentivized to choose technologies benefiting from an expiring credit.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"anchor\":\"h-credit-value\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-credit-value\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Credit value<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The policy aim of a clean heat production tax credit is to accelerate deployment of modern industrial heating equipment by closing the cost gap between the levelized cost of heat (LCOH) from incumbent heating systems and eligible clean heating technology. LCOH is a measure of the average cost to deliver a unit of heat over an equipment\u2019s lifetime and is inclusive of capital costs and operational expenditures on fuel and maintenance. This measure helps to compare the economic competitiveness of delivering heat across technologies, often expressed on a $\/MMBtu or $\/MWh basis. The model assumes a 20-year equipment life cycle for all technologies to calculate LCOH.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Because clean heat can describe a set of different resources rather than a single technology, states should define eligibility carefully. The term can include electrified technologies such as industrial heat pumps, e-boilers, and thermal batteries; renewable thermal energy such as solar thermal systems and geothermal heat; and thermal efficiency measures, such as recovered waste heat. Depending on state policy choices, low-carbon fuels may also be considered. These options differ in technology readiness, emissions accounting, heat temperature, duty cycle, fuel or grid availability, and ease of verification. In this case, the model considers the commercially mature low- and medium-temperature applications most likely to respond to operating cost support, rather than all industrial heat applications.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-calculating-an-appropriate-credit-value\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-calculating-an-appropriate-credit-value\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Calculating an appropriate credit value<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>While the average national price of a clean heat PTC assuming medium gas and electricity prices is $13.57\/MMBtu, the exact value of a modeled PTC will vary by state depending on electricity prices, gas prices, and whether there are any grant programs to address the up-front costs to purchase new heating equipment. Further, even within states, there are certain project efficiencies based on the industrial subsector, technology deployed, and specific facility profile that will impact how well a given state clean heat PTC can contribute to a facility\u2019s capital stack.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>As noted in the Key Takeaways section, high gas prices significantly reduce the PTC value, whereas low electricity prices moderately reduce PTC values. Deploying a PTC in conjunction with a grant also reduces total PTC value moderately. Exhibit 8 shows the range of PTC values in each state and Washington, D.C.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 10<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/f2vAr\/3\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/f2vAr\/3\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Credit value should also consider assumed willingness to pay by industry for cleaner heat; export-oriented industries, companies subject to state regulations, or companies with sustainability goals may have a higher willingness to pay for clean heat because of dependence on global markets, regulations, or internal goals. The model currently assumes zero willingness to pay, but states can and should adjust that based on their knowledge of their companies and manufacturing base.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-budgeting-and-annual-caps\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-budgeting-and-annual-caps\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Budgeting and annual caps<\/strong><\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>States can choose between uncapped and capped PTC designs. An uncapped credit is simplest and most bankable for manufacturing because every eligible unit of clean heat receives the promised value. However, it also creates the largest and least predictable exposure for state budgets. A capped credit gives lawmakers more control over annual revenue impacts, but the cap should be understood as a deployment constraint: once the allocation is exhausted, additional otherwise eligible projects must wait, receive a smaller credit, or move forward without support.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>As noted above, uncapped credits costs per state could vary substantially, with a range from roughly $1 billion to $170 billion cumulatively by 2045, and with the total US spend exceeding $650 billion in the medium gas and medium electricity price scenarios from 2026 to 2045.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>If a state opts for a capped PTC to balance competing budget priorities, the state could consider a discretionary competitive tax credit. A competitive approach would require applications and award credits based on the highest and best use of the state\u2019s dollar. This approach would require additional up-front work by applicants and the state but would ensure state funding is allocated to high-quality projects. A competitive program could include criteria that reflects state objectives, such as economic development, public health, equity, climate, or environmental goals. Potential examples of evaluation criteria include:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Percent of facility emissions reduced<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Total emissions reduced<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Total criteria air pollutants reduced<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>First-of-a-kind or Nth-of-a-kind technology being deployed<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Quality jobs supported<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li>Location in a non-attainment zone or low to moderate income census tract<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Annual credit allocations can be established with target deployment goals in mind. As a stand-alone policy without additional, complementary support, the PTC credit value would be most effective if it is valued at a rate that produces cost parity between the LCOH of incumbent technology, such as gas boilers, and the LCOH of clean heating technologies. Alternatively, a lower PTC value targeted at resolving the cost disparity of operating costs only could be used as well, though would likely be most effective if used with complementary policies.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"anchor\":\"h-credit-eligibility\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-credit-eligibility\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Credit eligibility<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>To ensure prudent use of taxpayer funds, there are three criteria to consider regarding how the value of the credit could be applied most efficiently per unit of clean heat:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Used productively:<\/strong> reward heat that is used in an industrial process, not for HVAC, ensuring waste heat is captured and reused to avoid heat losses.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Delivered to a heating process:<\/strong> reward based on unit of heat delivered to a process, rather than generated, so efficient heating technologies that recycle heat aren\u2019t inadvertently penalized.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Additional to a facility\u2019s clean heat baseline:<\/strong> reward new clean heat, not what a facility already uses to avoid subsidizing previous business decisions.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-eligible-entities\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-eligible-entities\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Eligible entities<\/strong><\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The credit is targeted for industrial heat emissions abatement and therefore can be most effective if claimed by manufacturing facilities. Additionally, many facilities, rather than directly investing in new clean heat technologies, are turning to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wbcsd.org\/news\/heat-as-a-service-in-action-insights-from-early-renewable-heat-projects\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">heat-as-a-service providers<\/a>, which offer third-party ownership models. These companies are like an energy service company for heat, owning and operating the equipment and selling heat at a set price to industrial offtakers. When designing eligibility clauses, it is important to consider allowing third-party heat providers, in addition to industrial facilities, to access this credit.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>While clean heat PTCs can inherently apply to any end use of clean heat, this modeling assumes the credit will be used solely for process heating activities in manufacturing firms such material drying and curing, food and beverage cooking and pasteurization, and process steam generation. This distinction in end-use eligibility is to maintain state dollars for harder-to-abate industrial process heating emissions and thereby omits residential, commercial, and industrial space, or \u201ccomfort\u201d heating.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-eligible-technologies\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-eligible-technologies\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Eligible technologies<\/strong><\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>State air regulators or a similar entity will need to determine how to define \u201cclean heat,\u201d as there is no national definition. Some states take a technology-neutral approach, favoring options that reduce the most emissions on a life-cycle basis, and designing declining emissions intensity requirements to reflect innovation gains. Others favor certain low-carbon technologies. Clean heat may be defined as that which is produced through an electrified technology, like heat pumps, electric boilers, or thermal batteries, or other low or no-emissions energy sources such as geothermal energy and solar thermal energy, instead of combusted fossil fuels.<sup id=\"fnref-4\"><a href=\"#fn-4\">4<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Some states may also choose to include low carbon-intensity fuels such as biomethane. Since many industries like pulp and paper already use biomass in their typical production processes, biogenic and biomass sources of heat are excluded from eligibility in the model to avoid subsidizing already economic business operations, although some states may choose to include them.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-designing-for-additionality\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-designing-for-additionality\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Designing for additionality<\/strong><\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A well thought out tax credit program can kickstart deployment of clean heat technologies that are mature but uneconomic today due to current market and policy conditions. This means that there would be minimal state spending on facility investments or activities that already would have taken place without the incentive.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>It is therefore important for a credit to establish a baseline clean heat share for its recipients and only award credits for the units of heat above that clean heat share. A baseline can be established by requiring recipients to provide documentation from prior years, showing the share of heat produced at a facility before receiving the credit. For newer facilities, or to simplify administration, states can consider using subsector-wide average clean heat share from US EIA Manufacturing and Energy Consumption Survey <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/consumption\/manufacturing\/data\/2022\/xls\/Table5_2.xlsx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">data<\/a> and only award credits for facilities with a clean heat share considerably higher than the average clean heat share in that same subsector.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"anchor\":\"h-verifying-clean-heat-production\"} -->\n<h4 id=\"h-verifying-clean-heat-production\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Verifying clean heat production<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>When designing a clean heat PTC, a state must consider tradeoffs between administrative costs and the cost of wasting credits to lower-value activities. The former can balloon costs with complex rulemaking, independent verifications, and meticulous auditing. The latter means that states are rewarding lower-value activities that may have taken place without the credit.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>One way to verify clean heat production is to require recipients to provide documentation of energy consumption for every year they receive a credit, as well as three to five years prior to receiving a credit to prove additional clean heat activity. This would establish a \u201cbaseline clean heat share\u201d for facilities, and credits would only be provided for clean heat share above a baseline. This will require staff time and expertise to review. Another way to verify is through independent verification or audits, as is done in <a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/lcfs-verification\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">California\u2019s Low Carbon Fuel Standard program<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"anchor\":\"h-implementing-entities\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"h-implementing-entities\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Implementing Entities<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>To enact and implement a clean heat production tax credit, various state entities need to be involved, either directly or in complementary actions. Exhibit 9 outlines important actors and potential roles needed to administer a clean heat PTC.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 11<\/strong><br>Actors and potential roles needed to administer a clean heat PTC<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:table {\"hasFixedLayout\":false,\"className\":\"rmi-table actors-roles-table\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table rmi-table actors-roles-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Venue<\/th><th>Role<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Legislature<\/td><td><ul><li>Pass legislation amending the tax code to include a PTC for clean heat<\/li><li>Incorporate best practice design elements<\/li><li>Define budget and annual cap<\/li><li>Delegate rulemaking and timeline<\/li><li>Allow for revised rulemakings to incorporate new technology innovations or for ratcheting carbon intensity requirements<\/li><\/ul><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Department of Revenue\/Taxation<\/td><td><ul><li>Lead rulemaking process<\/li><li>Administer tax credits<\/li><li>Define application evaluation criteria, if applicable<\/li><li>Review and select applications, if applicable<\/li><li>Direct monitoring and verifying of tax credit recipients<\/li><li>Conduct facility audits<\/li><\/ul><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>State Energy Office<\/td><td><ul><li>Advise on rulemaking and industrial energy policy<\/li><li>Advise on and as appropriate develop a suite of complementary policies that could further the impact of the PTC<\/li><\/ul><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Public Utility Commission<\/td><td><ul><li>Study the potential price and\/or grid impacts of offering a PTC for clean heat<\/li><li>Spearhead performance-based regulation reforms to encourage clean heat adoption<\/li><li>Direct utilities to study setting electrification targets in their integrated resource plans and\/or through Future of Gas proceedings<\/li><li>Expand the definition of energy savings to encompass energy savings from efficient fuel-switching<\/li><li>Revise cost-effectiveness tests to account for the full value of electrification, including fuel savings and greenhouse gas emissions reductions<\/li><\/ul><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>State Environmental Regulator<\/td><td><ul><li>Revise cost-effectiveness tests to account for the full value of electrification, including fuel savings and greenhouse gas emissions reductions<\/li><\/ul><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:table -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/spacing {\"name\":\"acf\/spacing\",\"data\":{\"spacing_mobile\":\"16px\",\"_spacing_mobile\":\"field_spacing_spacing_mobile\",\"spacing_tablet\":\"32px\",\"_spacing_tablet\":\"field_spacing_spacing_tablet\",\"spacing_desktop\":\"48px\",\"_spacing_desktop\":\"field_spacing_spacing_desktop\",\"spacing_bg_type\":\"color\",\"_spacing_bg_type\":\"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type\",\"spacing_background_color\":\"#ffffff\",\"_spacing_background_color\":\"field_spacing_spacing_background_color\",\"spacing\":\"\",\"_spacing\":\"field_spacing_spacing\"},\"mode\":\"preview\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4930fffc\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"conclusion\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"conclusion\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A clean heat production tax credit is a practical, market-friendly tool for helping manufacturers modernize their facilities without putting their competitiveness at risk. By tying support to each unit of clean heat produced, the credit rewards performance, lowers operating costs, and gives firms a clearer business case for investing in efficient, lower-emissions equipment.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The goal is to bridge today\u2019s cost gap while clean heat technologies mature. Designed well, a clean heat PTC can help states strengthen local manufacturing while also reducing industrial emissions and improving air quality. It gives early movers a temporary boost, protects manufacturers from energy price volatility, and helps position domestic industries to compete in markets that increasingly value cleaner production.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The modeling presented in this report suggests that a time-limited clean heat PTC could accelerate industrial clean heat adoption while delivering substantial emissions reductions. While the credit value needed to achieve cost parity varies across states, the results indicate that targeted operating-cost support can help overcome one of the primary barriers to industrial electrification: the cost gap between electricity and fossil fuels. By helping manufacturers invest in cleaner technologies without sacrificing competitiveness, a clean heat PTC can support both industrial modernization and long-term emissions reductions.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"anchor\":\"appendix\"} -->\n<h2 id=\"appendix\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Appendix: Modeling Policy Methodology<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>RMI built a model to estimate the energy, emissions, and cost impacts of industrial clean heat policies, 2026 through 2045. The model uses data from the Energy Information Administration\u2019s (EIA) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/state\/seds\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">State Energy Data System<\/a>, EIA\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/consumption\/manufacturing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey<\/a>, industrial energy price projections from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/outlooks\/aeo\/assumptions\/case_descriptions.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">EIA\u2019s <em>Annual Energy Outlook 2026<\/em><\/a>, industrial heating equipment information from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.caelp.org\/heatset\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Center for Applied Environmental Law and Policy\u2019s HEATset<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/system\/files\/other-files\/2025-01\/ghg-emission-factors-hub-2025.xlsx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">EPA data on emission factors and co-pollutants<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/ghgdata.epa.gov\/flight\/?viewType=map\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">EPA FLIGHT data on facilities<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.nrel.gov\/docs\/fy23osti\/84560.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">NREL techno-economic estimates of heat pumps and e-boilers<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aceee.org\/sites\/default\/files\/pdfs\/ie2201.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ACEEE studies on industrial heat pumps<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The model calculates a state-specific value for the clean heat production tax credit \u2014 based upon the technical specifications of natural gas boilers versus industrial heat pumps and e-boilers, and projections of future industrial natural gas and electricity prices \u2014 that can reduce the \u201cspark gap\u201d between equivalent gas and electric prices. As existing low- and medium-temperature industrial heating equipment reaches its end of life, the value of the PTC encourages industrial facilities to adopt clean heat technologies rather than installing new natural gas-based heating equipment.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Based upon downscaled projections of future industrial natural gas and industrial electricity prices from AEO2026, the model can be run using high, medium, or low future energy prices. Beliefs about future energy prices impact the per MMBtu value needed from the PTC to make up the \u201cspark gap\u201d between equipment fueled by electricity versus equipment fueled by natural gas. For example, with high natural gas prices and medium electricity prices the credit value per MMBtu needed to encourage industrial heat electrification would be lower than under medium natural gas prices and medium electricity prices.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><strong>Exhibit 12<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/GZhnA\/4\/\",\"type\":\"rich\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"datawrapper\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/GZhnA\/4\/\n<\/div><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:embed -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>To mirror existing federal production tax credits like those for renewable energy, the model has been set up so that facilities are eligible to receive the clean heat production tax credit for 10 years as long as the clean heat equipment is installed by 2035. For example, if a facility installs clean heat equipment in 2029, they would be eligible to receive the tax credits until 2039. If a facility installs clean heat equipment in 2037, they would not be eligible to receive the tax credit.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The model can be run with annual caps on tax credit expenditure by the state. Capping the annual expenditure the state makes on tax credits slows down the transition to electrified industrial heat. The results shown in this paper reflect an uncapped PTC.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Model results should be considered conservative for several reasons. The model does not presume any wider market catalyzation from the PTC that leads to additional emissions reductions without the incentive. Relatedly, once the tax credit expires, the transition to clean heat technology plateaus; due to lack of incentives in the 2040s we see a halt to new deployments of clean heat equipment.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The model does not presume any economies of scale for the price of the e-boilers and heat pumps due to increased deployment, so the prices for clean heat equipment do not decrease with scale. Also, existing natural gas boilers are not replaced with e-boilers and heat pumps until the end of the existing equipment\u2019s useful life, regardless of how generous the PTC for clean heat may be. Although policy may be structured to allow for high-heat applications to receive the production tax credit, due to limited technology options today for clean high heat application, the model does not estimate high-heat applications switching to clean heat equipment.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"anchor\":\"endnotes\"} -->\n<h3 id=\"endnotes\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Endnotes<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:html -->\n<ol class=\"rmi-footnotes\"><li id=\"fn-1\">The social cost of carbon (SCC) is an estimate used by the US federal government to quantify the economic damages that result from emitting an additional ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Rennet et al.&rsquo;s analysis &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-022-05224-9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO<sub>2<\/sub><\/a>,&rdquo; published in <em>Nature<\/em>, underpinned the US EPA&rsquo;s usage of a $190 per ton estimate for cost-benefit analysis in its proposal to reduce methane from new and existing oil and natural gas facilities. <a href=\"#fnref-1\">&#8617;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"fn-2\">Given today&rsquo;s technologies, for higher temperature industries, other cost supports like investment tax credits, grants, and procurement support may provide more meaningful support than a PTC. <a href=\"#fnref-2\">&#8617;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"fn-3\">Based on reductions of NOx, SO<sub>2<\/sub>, VOCs, and PM 2.5. EPA&rsquo;s COBRA tool does not include CO or PM10 in its health endpoint calculations. <a href=\"#fnref-3\">&#8617;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"fn-4\">Notably, for clean heat technologies that rely on electricity, clean heating solutions will become increasingly effective in reducing both climate and air pollutants and improving public health outcomes as the US electrical grid becomes cleaner in the coming years, producing fewer Scope 2 emissions. <a href=\"#fnref-4\">&#8617;<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:html -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","description":"An industrial clean heat production tax credit can reduce costs and spur deployment of clean heat technologies.","objectType":"Resource","post_tag":[{"name":"Advocates &amp; Community Organizations","slug":"advocates-community-organizations","term_taxonomy_id":605,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"All States","slug":"all-states","term_taxonomy_id":631,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Economic Analysis","slug":"economic-analysis","term_taxonomy_id":628,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Funding","slug":"funding","term_taxonomy_id":640,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Governors' Offices","slug":"governors-offices","term_taxonomy_id":608,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Policy","slug":"policy","term_taxonomy_id":609,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Policymakers","slug":"policymakers","term_taxonomy_id":610,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Regulation","slug":"regulation","term_taxonomy_id":634,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"State Agencies &amp; Energy Offices","slug":"state-agencies-energy-offices","term_taxonomy_id":611,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"State Policy","slug":"state-policy","term_taxonomy_id":942,"taxonomy":"post_tag"},{"name":"Technology","slug":"technology","term_taxonomy_id":612,"taxonomy":"post_tag"}],"resource-type":[{"name":"Brief","slug":"brief","term_taxonomy_id":474,"taxonomy":"resource-type"}],"focus-areas":[{"name":"Heavy Industry","slug":"heavy-industry","term_taxonomy_id":539,"taxonomy":"focus-areas"},{"name":"US Policy","slug":"us-policy","term_taxonomy_id":547,"taxonomy":"focus-areas"}],"author":"dslanger","date":"July 2, 2026","pubDate":"2026-07-02 20:43:38","attachment":{"ID":34837,"src":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-1280x853.jpg","img":"<img width=\"1280\" height=\"853\" src=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-1280x853.jpg\" class=\"block w-full h-full object-cover object-center relative z-10\" alt=\"paper production machine in wastepaper recycling factory\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-1280x853.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-320x213.jpg 320w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226-640x427.jpg 640w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/06\/paper-production-machine-istock-1409958226.jpg 1800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/>"},"meta":[]},{"ID":34944,"title":"Tracking the US Utility Transition with Data","altTitle":"Tracking the US Utility Transition with Data","subtitle":null,"url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/resources\/tracking-the-us-utility-transition-with-data\/","slug":"tracking-the-us-utility-transition-with-data","content":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/IqWlD\/3\/<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>RMI\u2019s Utility Transition Hub has been tracking the US energy transition since 2021. It tracks utilities\u2019 emissions, plant additions, and plant retirements. However, it also tracks the less visible forces that really matter for future emissions, such as customer and community impacts, utility investments, state and federal policies, and more. <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The finances tab on the Utility Transition Hub Data Portal visualizes assets, investments, earnings, and revenue by technology; and aggregates data with an option to filter utility type. It covers all major regulated utilities that report to FERC Form 1 \u2014 the annual financial and operating report required of regulated utilities. This tab has just been updated with data through reporting year 2024.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Here is what the data tells us:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Distribution assets dominate, followed by transmission, then generation<\/strong>: The distribution system, in aggregate, has always represented the largest asset value of the grid at around 40%. Since 2010, the transmission system has slowly increased its share, from 17% in 2010, to 27% in 2024. In doing so, transmission has overtaken generation, which the Utility Transition Hub breaks down into renewables (like wind and solar), hydro, nuclear, other fossil (primarily gas), and steam (primarily coal). Generation assets now make up less than 25% of the grid asset value stack.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>For the first time, carbon-free generation investments have surpassed fossil fuel-based generation investments<\/strong>: In 2024, carbon-free power generation (primarily wind, solar, hydro and nuclear) investments reached $14.5 billion while fossil fuel-related investments for power generation were $13.9 billion, marking the first time ever that carbon-free investments surpassed fossil-based investments for major regulated utilities that report to FERC Form 1.<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item -->\n\n<!-- wp:list-item -->\n<li><strong>Not all resources contribute the same amount to the utility bottom line<\/strong>: Utility profit margins (i.e., earnings fraction of revenue) vary by technology type. In 2024, renewables had the highest profit margin, with earnings making up 58% of utility revenue from non-hydro renewables. This was followed by hydro at 20%, nuclear at 18%, \u201cother fossil\u201d (primarily natural gas) at 14%, and steam (primarily coal) at 10%. This is because a significant portion of revenue from fuel-based resources goes to fuel costs, which utilities don\u2019t earn a profit on. &nbsp;<\/li>\n<!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/ol>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:acf\/callout-box {\"name\":\"acf\/callout-box\",\"data\":{\"callout_box_content\":\"\\u003c!\\u002d\\u002d wp:paragraph \\u002d\\u002d\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eThe Utility Transition Hub\\u003c\/strong\\u003e\\r\\n\\r\\n\\u003c!\\u002d\\u002d \/wp:paragraph \\u002d\\u002d\\u003e\\u003c!\\u002d\\u002d wp:paragraph \\u002d\\u002d\\u003eRMI\u2019s Utility Transition Hub is made possible thanks to Catalyst Cooperative, which compiles data from EIA, FERC Form 1, and other sources via the \\u003ca href=\\u0022https:\/\/docs.catalyst.coop\/pudl\/en\/latest\/index.html\\u0022\\u003ePublic Utilities Database Liberation project (PUDL).\\u003c\/a\\u003e RMI starts with PUDL data, adds a level of technology detail using FERC plant-level data, and connects to rate case data to calculate a complete view of utility earnings and revenues.\\r\\n\\r\\nOn RMI\u2019s Utility Transition Hub website, users can interact with data visualizations and zoom in to look at specific utility types, individual parent or operating companies, and technologies in detail.\",\"_callout_box_content\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_content\",\"callout_box_background_color\":\"teal-100\",\"_callout_box_background_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_background_color\",\"callout_box_text_color\":\"zinc-500\",\"_callout_box_text_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_text_color\",\"callout_box_accent_color\":\"teal-200\",\"_callout_box_accent_color\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box_accent_color\",\"callout_box\":\"\",\"_callout_box\":\"field_callout_box_callout_box\"},\"align\":\"\",\"mode\":\"edit\",\"id\":\"acf-block-6a4ec4ae9f5aa\"} \/-->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Interested in learning more? Investigate and download the data yourself at <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.catalyst.coop\/pudl\/en\/latest\/index.html\">https:\/\/utilitytransitionhub.rmi.org\/finances\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","description":"Utilities in the United States are investing more in carbon-free generation than fossil-fueled facilities, according to the latest update of RMI's Utility Transition Hub.","objectType":"Resource","collection":[{"name":"Affordability","slug":"affordability","term_taxonomy_id":913,"taxonomy":"collection"},{"name":"State Resources","slug":"state-resources","term_taxonomy_id":953,"taxonomy":"collection"}],"focus-areas":[{"name":"Electricity","slug":"electricity","term_taxonomy_id":536,"taxonomy":"focus-areas"}],"resource-type":[{"name":"Spark Chart","slug":"spark-chart","term_taxonomy_id":520,"taxonomy":"resource-type"}],"topics":[{"name":"utilities","slug":"utilities","term_taxonomy_id":339,"taxonomy":"topics"}],"author":"Laurie Stone","date":"July 8, 2026","pubDate":"2026-07-08 18:11:42","attachment":{"ID":34948,"src":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-1280x773.png","img":"<img width=\"1280\" height=\"773\" src=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-1280x773.png\" class=\"block w-full h-full object-cover object-center relative z-10\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-1280x773.png 1280w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-300x181.png 300w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-1024x618.png 1024w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-768x464.png 768w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-1536x928.png 1536w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-320x193.png 320w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2-640x387.png 640w, https:\/\/rmi.org\/app\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IqWlD-utility-investments-by-technology-type-from-2005-to-2024-2.png 1732w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/>"},"meta":[]}],"advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}}}},{"blockName":"acf\/spacing","attrs":{"name":"acf\/spacing","data":{"spacing_mobile":"32px","_spacing_mobile":"field_spacing_spacing_mobile","spacing_tablet":"32px","_spacing_tablet":"field_spacing_spacing_tablet","spacing_desktop":"80px","_spacing_desktop":"field_spacing_spacing_desktop","spacing_bg_type":"color","_spacing_bg_type":"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type","spacing_background_color":"#ffffff","_spacing_background_color":"field_spacing_spacing_background_color","spacing":"","_spacing":"field_spacing_spacing"},"mode":"preview","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc54d"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"spacing","data":{"mobile":"32px","tablet":"32px","desktop":"80px","bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"}},{"blockName":"acf\/card-row-large","attrs":{"name":"acf\/card-row-large","data":{"card_row_large_title":"RMI is transforming the global energy system to secure a clean, prosperous, zero-carbon future for all.","_card_row_large_title":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_title","card_row_large_description":"","_card_row_large_description":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_description","card_row_large_cta":{"title":"Learn More About Our Mission","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/about\/","target":"_blank"},"_card_row_large_cta":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cta","card_row_large_cards_0_thumb":14539,"_card_row_large_cards_0_thumb":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb","card_row_large_cards_0_title":"Scaling Clean Energy","_card_row_large_cards_0_title":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title","card_row_large_cards_0_legend":"Renewable energy can power our rising energy demand reliably and affordably.","_card_row_large_cards_0_legend":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend","card_row_large_cards_0_link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-solutions\/scaling-clean-energy-and-efficiency\/","target":""},"_card_row_large_cards_0_link":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link","card_row_large_cards_1_thumb":21987,"_card_row_large_cards_1_thumb":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb","card_row_large_cards_1_title":"Driving Investment","_card_row_large_cards_1_title":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title","card_row_large_cards_1_legend":"RMI is driving the investment needed to build a clean energy economy.","_card_row_large_cards_1_legend":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend","card_row_large_cards_1_link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-work\/driving-investment\/","target":""},"_card_row_large_cards_1_link":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link","card_row_large_cards_2_thumb":10919,"_card_row_large_cards_2_thumb":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb","card_row_large_cards_2_title":"Reducing Energy Waste","_card_row_large_cards_2_title":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title","card_row_large_cards_2_legend":"Deploying strategies and technologies that use less energy to power economies.","_card_row_large_cards_2_legend":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend","card_row_large_cards_2_link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-work\/reducing-waste\/","target":""},"_card_row_large_cards_2_link":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link","card_row_large_cards_3_thumb":1049,"_card_row_large_cards_3_thumb":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_thumb","card_row_large_cards_3_title":"Deploying Globally","_card_row_large_cards_3_title":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_title","card_row_large_cards_3_legend":"Around the world,  clean energy can reduce costs, improve reliability, and support economic growth. ","_card_row_large_cards_3_legend":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_legend","card_row_large_cards_3_link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/deploying-globally\/","target":""},"_card_row_large_cards_3_link":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards_link","card_row_large_cards":4,"_card_row_large_cards":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_cards","card_row_large_bg_type":"color","_card_row_large_bg_type":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_bg_type","card_row_large_background_color":"#ffffff","_card_row_large_background_color":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large_background_color","card_row_large":"","_card_row_large":"field_card_row_large_card_row_large"},"mode":"edit","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc5c8"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"card-row-large","data":{"card_row_large":{"title":"RMI is transforming the global energy system to secure a clean, prosperous, zero-carbon future for all.","description":"","cta":{"title":"Learn More About Our Mission","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/about\/","target":"_blank"},"cards":[{"thumb":14539,"title":"Scaling Clean Energy","legend":"Renewable energy can power our rising energy demand reliably and affordably.","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-solutions\/scaling-clean-energy-and-efficiency\/","target":""}},{"thumb":21987,"title":"Driving Investment","legend":"RMI is driving the investment needed to build a clean energy economy.","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-work\/driving-investment\/","target":""}},{"thumb":10919,"title":"Reducing Energy Waste","legend":"Deploying strategies and technologies that use less energy to power economies.","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/our-work\/reducing-waste\/","target":""}},{"thumb":1049,"title":"Deploying Globally","legend":"Around the world,  clean energy can reduce costs, improve reliability, and support economic growth. ","link":{"title":"Test Page","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/deploying-globally\/","target":""}}],"bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"}}},{"blockName":"acf\/spacing","attrs":{"name":"acf\/spacing","data":{"spacing_mobile":"32px","_spacing_mobile":"field_spacing_spacing_mobile","spacing_tablet":"32px","_spacing_tablet":"field_spacing_spacing_tablet","spacing_desktop":"64px","_spacing_desktop":"field_spacing_spacing_desktop","spacing_bg_type":"color","_spacing_bg_type":"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type","spacing_background_color":"#ffffff","_spacing_background_color":"field_spacing_spacing_background_color","spacing":"","_spacing":"field_spacing_spacing"},"mode":"preview","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc5f4"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"spacing","data":{"mobile":"32px","tablet":"32px","desktop":"64px","bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"}},{"blockName":"acf\/newsletter-signup","attrs":{"name":"acf\/newsletter-signup","data":{"newsletter_signup_variation":"large","_newsletter_signup_variation":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_variation","newsletter_signup_title":"Track the latest clean energy stories and insights, delivered weekly to your inbox.","_newsletter_signup_title":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_title","newsletter_signup_description":"","_newsletter_signup_description":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_description","newsletter_signup_cta":{"title":"Go to Newsletters","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/get-updates\/","target":""},"_newsletter_signup_cta":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_cta","newsletter_signup_bg_type":"color","_newsletter_signup_bg_type":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_bg_type","newsletter_signup_background_color":"#ffffff","_newsletter_signup_background_color":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup_background_color","newsletter_signup":"","_newsletter_signup":"field_newsletter_signup_newsletter_signup"},"mode":"edit","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc626"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"newsletter-signup","data":{"newsletter_signup":{"variation":"large","title":"Track the latest clean energy stories and insights, delivered weekly to your inbox.","description":"","cta":{"title":"Go to Newsletters","url":"https:\/\/rmi.org\/get-updates\/","target":""},"bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff","advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}}}},{"blockName":"acf\/spacing","attrs":{"name":"acf\/spacing","data":{"spacing_mobile":"32px","_spacing_mobile":"field_spacing_spacing_mobile","spacing_tablet":"32px","_spacing_tablet":"field_spacing_spacing_tablet","spacing_desktop":"64px","_spacing_desktop":"field_spacing_spacing_desktop","spacing_bg_type":"color","_spacing_bg_type":"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type","spacing_background_color":"#ffffff","_spacing_background_color":"field_spacing_spacing_background_color","spacing":"","_spacing":"field_spacing_spacing"},"mode":"preview","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc646"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"spacing","data":{"mobile":"32px","tablet":"32px","desktop":"64px","bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"}},{"blockName":"acf\/feature-row","attrs":{"name":"acf\/feature-row","data":{"feature_row_variant":"left","_feature_row_variant":"field_feature_row_feature_row_variant","feature_row_use_multiple_items":"0","_feature_row_use_multiple_items":"field_feature_row_feature_row_use_multiple_items","feature_row_image":34110,"_feature_row_image":"field_feature_row_feature_row_image","feature_row_eyebrow":"Partner Showcase","_feature_row_eyebrow":"field_feature_row_feature_row_eyebrow","feature_row_headline":"Corporate leaders discuss their clean energy strategies","_feature_row_headline":"field_feature_row_feature_row_headline","feature_row_body":"From Cisco\u2019s smart office tower in New York City to a fossil-free Netflix studio in Albuquerque, RMI explores how companies are embracing modern energy infrastructure and clean technologies that are transforming the way businesses operate. Leaders from CBRE, Schneider Electric, Netflix, and Cisco share their testimonies for why they are transforming their energy systems.","_feature_row_body":"field_feature_row_feature_row_body","feature_row_context_button":"","_feature_row_context_button":"field_feature_row_feature_row_context_button","feature_row_primary_button":{"title":"Watch Video","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=bDGNOLdzo_I","target":"_blank"},"_feature_row_primary_button":"field_feature_row_feature_row_primary_button","feature_row":"","_feature_row":"field_feature_row_feature_row"},"mode":"preview","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc664"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"feature-row","data":{"feature_row":{"variant":"left","use_multiple_items":false,"image":34110,"eyebrow":"Partner Showcase","headline":"<p>Corporate leaders discuss their clean energy strategies<\/p>\n","body":"<p>From Cisco\u2019s smart office tower in New York City to a fossil-free Netflix studio in Albuquerque, RMI explores how companies are embracing modern energy infrastructure and clean technologies that are transforming the way businesses operate. Leaders from CBRE, Schneider Electric, Netflix, and Cisco share their testimonies for why they are transforming their energy systems.<\/p>\n","context_button":"","primary_button":{"title":"Watch Video","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=bDGNOLdzo_I","target":"_blank"},"items":false,"advanced_accordion":null,"advanced_block_options":{"message_field_message":null}}}},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p><\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p><\/p>\n"],"name":"paragraph","data":{"render":"<div data-type='core\/paragraph'><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/div>"}},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p><\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p><\/p>\n"],"name":"paragraph","data":{"render":"<div data-type='core\/paragraph'><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/div>"}},{"blockName":"acf\/spacing","attrs":{"name":"acf\/spacing","data":{"spacing_mobile":"32px","_spacing_mobile":"field_spacing_spacing_mobile","spacing_tablet":"32px","_spacing_tablet":"field_spacing_spacing_tablet","spacing_desktop":"64px","_spacing_desktop":"field_spacing_spacing_desktop","spacing_bg_type":"color","_spacing_bg_type":"field_spacing_spacing_bg_type","spacing_background_color":"#ffffff","_spacing_background_color":"field_spacing_spacing_background_color","spacing":"","_spacing":"field_spacing_spacing"},"mode":"preview","id":"acf-block-6a513362bc67d"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[],"name":"spacing","data":{"mobile":"32px","tablet":"32px","desktop":"64px","bg_type":"color","background_image":false,"background_color":"#ffffff"}}]}}