Bad Vlad Rising

by Bullright

Okay all you Climate Change loons out there, here’s a message for you.

Is there no black hole out there powerful enough to suck “Vlad the Bad” into it? I thought science and climate change had the answers to all problems?

But the only thing the climatologist Leftists prove successful at is inflating The Bad’s ego, or appeasing him. And then using Putin as a punch line to blame all their policy failures on.

What happened to the supremacy of science?

So your god of science is powerless to save you from evil. It doesn’t seem like science can even save itself… from science.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

The Putin Price Hike

by Bullright

I refuse to sit this one out. I can’t “resist” it. Mama didn’t raise no fools. It’s like fried chicken, it’s just so good.

On Tuesday, Biden and Jen Psaki did what we expected after Joe made his announcement to ban Russian oil. They spun it like tops.

Psaki said it was a Putin price hike. Biden said blame Putin for the prices. Tennessee “fried chicken” propagandist, Steve Cohen went out to tell people that every time they fill their tank in sticker shock, they should think of sticking it to Putin – as if redirecting the blame will help assuage it.

In other words, people should proudly feel the pinch knowing they are getting even with Putin. Right, they’ll show him while running up the old credit card to gas up. “Take that, Puty!” (what a feel good moment it is)

 

So I’ll take them up on that. Okay, I will blame him:

Putin has raised the price tag of electing Joe Biden President significantly.

He raised the real cost exponentially, which will be felt by every American up and down the economic ladder. I hope they are happy.

And now we have Joe Biden blaming Vladimir Putin for one of his own biggest problems, since gas lighting us evidently did not work.

More fossil fuels not fossil fools. And more chicken, please!

**One for the tank: “70% Favor Increased U.S. Oil and Gas Production” – Rasmussen

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

War On The Enemies’ Terms

by Bullright

When we look at Ukraine, we may see events but I see a psychological campaign. That could be narrowed down to a propaganda campaign. The West has to do much better in the propaganda arena. We cannot be failing at the essentials.

I don’t mean lies but if it is one thing you can count on, it is that Russia is lying about almost everything. Of course we have a better narrative so why don’t we use and take advantage of that? Instead we get a lot of “what we won’t do” from our leaders.

That is not the stuff to win a battle or war with. That is only defining your limitations to the enemy. On the other side, Putin makes every attempt not to be defined. He only forfeits any mystery about himself by his actions. That part is something like a political campaign. You define your political opponent early and often.

Now I am not saying it is the same as politics. However, many in this country have gotten so addicted to making everything into politics. Imagine if we broke down WWII into a political debate. It wouldn’t have helped anything. But that is what the new Left has become, a religion of politics. We have had that discussion here before.

At some point people have to realize there is something more than politics in the world. That is a dangerous view. We saw ideology was the great problem with Obama.

So Fiona Hill had an elaborate interview with Politico. Yes, she is of Trump impeachment fame but she does offer some insight other than disliking Trump now. It is a miniature historical lesson. (not a revision) It does not say Putin is a great student of history either.

 

Why is it that the West should suffer from a predictability crisis? The Left believes we must be predictable in every way and form,. Here is where that is the problem.

What have you if there is no war you are willing to fight, and that is your position, but your enemy sees no war it is unwilling to wage? Or in other words, there is nothing you would go to war for but your enemy will go to war for anything and everything. See what a predicament that is? It does leave self-defense but even that is determined by will.

So then everything you do is dependent on will or public perception – what people, by polls or other measure, are willing to do. Everything becomes a debate or public poll.

Russia doesn’t seem to have that problem. It has a man at the helm, be it a madman or monger, who is not weighed down by the will of the people. In fact that is irrelevant to him or his goals. We now see what happens when people don’t like what he does. So what?

So I am not arguing in favor of their system, but it is just the way it is. They are not saddled by popular perception. A similar thing works with China.

 

We say there is an ethical rule you cannot even talk about killing the leader of a country. Russia announces its main intention is to take out President Zelenskyy, even deploying assassins to kill him and members of government. His removal is the chief objective.

If we lay down all these lines, it is only a matter of time before the enemy challenges those lines. Then what? However, you have forfeited your element of unpredictability. You have only given your enemy a road map of what you will do, so that they can plan around your lines or use them to their advantage. What you ‘will not do’ is not a defense plan. Those are only your own limitations, not your enemy’s. They freely do anything, raising villages, bombing civilians, threaten nuclear facilities committing genocide.

As much as maybe the world has changed over the last fifty years, we have only grown more predictable. We have to stop putting ourselves into a box. And once in a while, if not frequently, we have to look at things from the enemies’ perspective.

There is a school of thought that thinks there can be an advantage to being predictable That is when your enemy does not expect your non-conventional means. Then you could throw them off with the element of surprise. Maybe but would it be better not to have strapped limitations on yourself first, like a suicide bomber?

So this is the way the debate is playing out over the no fly zones. Can’t do this, can’t do that. It is impossible.

Then we have to factor in that we have a General like Milley. We saw what he did with China and making strategic promises to them. What good is that, what did we gain?

The same people, maybe it was Milley himself, shared our intelligence assets with China about what Vlad the bad was up to. Then China shared it with Russia. This is how they conduct operations?

The other step here in this process is we must know who our friends are or who are not friends. You would think we would know that. Why act as if your enemy is your friend? What does that get you?

We have to stop playing these games, which are only like running psy-ops on ourselves. The enemy doesn’t care. They laugh incredulously at you as you bang your head.

But America is now awake to its threats, it was asleep for too long.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

The Big Green Funny Farm

by Bullright

As to the US energy thing with the green agenda, there is a way to look at it. Here is the analogy:

Suppose you are going on vacation, just say, or any destination you wish. You go part way down the road and decide you no longer like or want to use the car anymore. Then what?

So you abandon the car right there without having a valid alternative. The only thing you know for certain is that you now hate the car. Of course the passer-bys would be laughing at you.

At that point it doesn’t even matter where you were going, your odds of getting there have just severely decreased, if they still exist. But no, your passion about it is so deep you have to make sure the car is destroyed so it can’t be used again by anyone.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Biden Unity Junk Bonds

by Bullright

Just when you think the unity of the world — crossing all political and geographical divides – looks authentically encouraging, the skunk enters the room and pisses all over the place.

On Monday Senator Schumer, from the crime-ridden NYC area, spoke on the floor of the Capitol praising the great coming-together unity, claiming it has been “much to the credit of President Biden.”

Did you ever hear such useless nonsense?

Pardon me, but what unified people was staring at the face of evil and one man who caused every bit of what we see. Along with the evil regime he runs that condoned it.

Further, it is the idea of many that this evil on the march is headed elsewhere as soon as it gets a foothold in Ukraine. That Putin’s war of hybrid evil is capable of and committing war crimes, humanitarian, environmental and ecological disasters across the region which will not stop.

Schumer can try selling that Biden credit message but it is preposterous. The only thing worse will be Biden’s State of the Union Speech in a fenced up, half-attended Capitol on Tuesday night. Never underestimate Joe’s ability to F*** that up either.

 “Biden unity junk bonds, get them while they’re hot!”

Absolutely as worthless as the man they are named after. A refugee in his own mind; surviving only on alternate reality fumes and a sycophant press.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Shuck And Jive Tucker

by Bullright

I have held off for some time saying anything negative about Tucker. He does a great job on a lot of things. Yes, he is popular though that has less to do with it.

But I finally decided it was time. I watched how he dishes out criticism to everyone else. A lesson I learned over years has been a pretty good marker of ‘who is who’ is to  take note of what a critic does not criticize — not lust what he/she attacks.

And Tucker has certainly been a critic, politically and on media. So when he refrains from criticizing something, it is also important. Omission.

In this case, he has always been anti-war. I accept that…. or like who is for war? That postures many of his stands. I get it. But then in the face of a tyrant like Putin he has little to say personally about him. Is he somehow beyond criticism? What gives? Well, I don’t know his motives but I don’t like it.

I have always been an anti-Russia critic and always will. Particularly anti-Putin as well. But there are times when I gave a little credit for what he was doing as a leader in his country, verses how a leader acted in our country. But those are only his political positions. What is more important is what he does and how he uses/abuses power.

Now Putin is demonstrating for the world the evil he is capable of and willingly engaged in. No I don’t ignore that. And I won’t rationalize it or make comparisons to our government leaders. I don’t think that gets us anywhere. I can’t revert to US policy instead.

However, I don’t see the same boundaries on Tucker. If people are convicted about being anti-war, that is fine. But it does not make war go away. What Putin has done here is totally all of his doing. There is no way to blame it in any way on the US. (this is more convenient for some people)

But it sounds great in echo chambers, “look at me, I’m faulting our government or leaders for causing it.” It was caused by one man, who I prefer to think of as evil personified.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Putin’s March Of Pain

by Bullright

Any doubts people may have had about the evil nature of Putin vanished into the sunset fast as the ‘war on Ukraine’ began. Not just a ruthless thug, as some called him, but he is capable of the same evils we’ve seen in history. He is now unleashed and on his way.

But what is the future of Putin and Russia, yet to be determined? So it will become a slave state for China and little more. Power will do that. Who cares how the Russian people, or Putin himself, feels that die is already cast. Russia will not operate on its own.

People thinking he has some senses yet to be awakened? Nope. What has been awakened is the evil that was always there, in plain sight. Just that some refused to see it.

One of the weapons Russians have in their arsenal is a thermal-type flamethrower. It literally lights the air on fire and then sucks the oxygen from people’s lungs. That weapon is on its way into Ukraine. God be with the people of Ukraine.

The Bible says judge them by their fruits. The real test is to ask one simple question: what great good has Russia ever done for the world? The answer is the answer. On the contrary, how much damage has it wrought on the world? (Irreparable harm)

Of course the same will be said for China one day, hopefully. Dictators and sinister regimes do not just fade away, but their fruits become obvious.

The old Russian maxim is “probe with bayonets; if you encounter mush proceed, if you encounter steel withdraw.”

This is Putin’s War — entirely of his provocation and making.

Earlier, Putin referred to people of Ukraine as neo-Nazis and drug addicts, claiming they(Ukranians) are committing genocide. (he has been quite the student of the current political rhetoric, hasn’t he?)

Then he was publicly called out by Jewish organizations representing the Holocaust. However, it is hard to attribute any rationality to Putin’s words, though loaded with symbolism. It is pure propaganda.

And like the demeaning words he uses, this is what you call people when you are preparing to slaughter them. But it is hard to have a literal response to Putin’s statements. Yet it is only a hint as to his plans. So it is he who is stopping a genocide while he commits it.

It is he who is prepared and determined to commit genocide and human atrocities. That is his plan. War crimes or war criminals have no limits, while testing ours.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

People Lie And Democracy Dies

by Bullright

And now a message for our liberal friends, and I use the term loosely. What happened in Ukraine was not an act of democracy, in case you wondered. No one voted for this. It was pushed by force. I know that does not fit into your kaleidoscope glasses. It is very real.

War is not diplomacy. And radicalism is not just another hybrid form of justice.

But if you empower tyrants this is what you will get – whether they be Trudeau, Biden, Putin, Xi Jinping, or Chavez, etc. If that is who they are, in the end this is what you get in return. That is why you don’t put tyrants in positions of power, and why you take care whom you elect to positions of authority. Of course, that is when you have a choice.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

The Other 9/11

by Bullright

I was just looking at my calendar and noticed that this September 11th will be the 10th anniversary of Benghazi. My, how time flies when the crooks are running the asylum.

Yes, it is hard to believe since for many of us Benghazi will never go away. It is a stain on the corrupt Obama-Biden administration forever. And it is a permanent blot on the remaining legacy of Hillary Rotten Clinton, for most Americans honoring history.

But actually it was never even a speed bump on her road to be president. She never treated it as a serious event. Beghazi was always dismissed by her, even though she once claimed to take full responsibility for it. She never did. Nor was that ever her intent.

Her life was to go on, rosily in elite political circles. while the events of Benghazi were to disappear like the spring snow. Justice was never an option for Benghazi or HRC.

But patriots like Charlie Daniels would almost daily repeat “Benghazi isn’t going away.” Right, we lost Charlie but it seems like Hillary got her wish. Like everything else she was involved in, Benghazi faded into Hillary’s aura as a nothing — not a blip on her radar.

Hillary, it turned out, was more interested in her future coup d’état than giving survivors of Benghazi or a dead ambassador the time of day. That’s because it was always time for the star of Hillary Clinton to shine — and everything else to take a backseat to that.

The name Benghazi was meant to be as obsolete to history as the horse-drawn carriage is to the car. Only the carriage served a purpose where Benghazi never did for Democrats or Hillary the Rotten’s legacy.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

 

 

Russia Remaking Reality

by Bullright

If you listen to Putin – not sure who does – we are all just living in a world according to Russia’s whims. It feels as though we are only passengers in Vladimir Putin’s reality.

Did anyone in the administration think of just telling Putin to “knock it off?” Obama swears by that method, it worked so well for him.

So in 2022, as the world rolls toward the future, Putin scrambles back to the past ignoring every reason the world exists as it does – denying all of reality. Ignoring historic realities even of his own country.

Yet no matter what he does, his major problem is he will never have legitimacy for what he is about to do. No matter what legalistic case he tries to concoct, he still has no legitimacy for his actions. But that does not stop an old school KGB guy from pretending he does. Nor from screaming to the world that he has complete justification; nor from rewriting the past to facilitate his future fantasy.

His historical revisions don’t have to make sense, they just are. He denies all the valid history and reasons for the world being in the shape it is.

But as I reread that comment about Putin, it cannot escape me the stunning similarities that mindset has to someone else. Care to guess who? Of course it is parallel to the way Hillary Clinton thinks and operates, which is why it is so hard in the US to deal with her. She refuses to accept any basis of fact and reason. She incessantly argues to the contrary. Fortunately, for us, we do not live in a country molded in her image. Or do we?

So it now appears, after his exhaustive lesson in revision,  Vladimir Putin will use his own pen to issue a decree — by his authority as dictator — to create an illusion of legitimacy for him taking Ukraine. It sounds familiar — “We came, we saw, he died,” on Qaddafi.

The playbook is the same: first, destabilize the target area, by any means, then stand up to announce the solution to fix it. And then criticize anyone who questions your motives.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

US And Them: Unordinary Times

by Bullright

I think the whole country has come to realize that we only living in a world of the Left’s evolving truth. (their euphemism for BS) I know they keep labeling everything truth or facts but that does not make it so.

I mean they regularly spew out this stuff and the rest of us have to just live with it until enough people finally say “enough, we don’t accept or believe this bullshit.” But by then the Left has usually moved on to its next thing, like sexuality or climate change hysteria.

So like you cannot discriminate against trans(men) athletes competing in women’s sports. When it proves out this agenda discriminates against women athletes, they get angry. Who cares about fairness, as long as you’re saving transgender athletes?

The list goes on and on, but so happens sexuality is one of their favorite whipping posts. We all see it is ridiculous on it’s face but we play along as if it were a real thing.

You can literally make something up and then accuse other people of having a bias against it. (the more outrageous the better.) Meanwhile, they have no tolerance for reality. (which Is to be destroyed or distorted)

In almost every absurd story you see today, the deeper you look the more absurdities there are in it. You could say the same for most of the Left’s political positions too.

Keep on looking at them and it will drive you crazy trying to make any rational sense of it. This is because common sense has been removed leaving a big black hole into which everything gets sucked. Trying to apply rational arguments to it is foolish. The Left looks at you like you have two heads or something.

Why should you try to apply common sense where there is none? Be it crime, open borders, Democrats’ plans, destruction of the economy, not to forget foreign policy.

So whatever you personally want to believe is okay until it crosses with their political orthodoxy. Then it must be abolished. The favorite tool to destroy opposing arguments is to claim it has been debunked — apparently a place opponents go to die.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Palin And Clinton Sing From Same Hymnal

by Bullright

It appears that Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton are both on the same page making accusations of malice against major media.

This week Palin lost her case in court against NYT for defamation. The court claimed because there was no obvious malicious “intent” behind their lies that NYT was not liable. That is my shorthand description. So it is all in the intent, is it?

But a day later, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech to NY Democrat Convention where she accused Fox news of bordering on malice in reports about her. She virtually claimed all this information was lies or political attacks against her – concocted and pushed by Fox. Get ready for her case, publicly anyway, against Fox News.

So her speech set off Hillary minions to defend her case across the Internet. All these claims about spying and her cooked up false flag operation to ignite a federal investigation were only lies. We made it all up.

Funny how no one ever asks Hillary that if these things took place, was it wrong? But she would never acknowledge what happened was wrong. She couldn’t.

Now this sets up the next scenario involving the defense of Hillary Clinton from the media. Of course they have already ignored the new Durham information. They have a need, or a vested interest, to fact-check and defend her anyway possible. (more lies)

The important question is when will they make the case for Hillary against media on defamation of her? You know its coming.

Hypocrites that they are, they’ll have no trouble blaming Fox news or right wing media for making unsubstantiated claims against her. Then the mob will yell: “Get Fox, hold them accountable.” (for telling the truth) This will get interesting as she tries to establish media defamation and malice. They will go full out accusing Fox of being responsible for defamation, while hailing a NYT victory over Palin.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Biden Resurrects “Life of Julia” as Life Of Linda

by Bullright

One thing great about Democrats is they are forever rebooting old ideas. That brings us back to Obama’s famous “Life of Julia”.

Oh remember Jill Biden’s friend and the inflation conversation? Apparently Joe overheard her talk about the price of ground beef @ over 5.00 a pound.

Well, team Biden came up with the idea to roll out a new version of the old cartoon called Life of Linda. A brand new composite, something Biden is probably good at.

Breitbart  – Joel Pollack

Biden’s Husband-less, Father-less ‘Life of Linda’ Recalls 2012’s ‘Life of Julia’

President Joe Biden promoted his “Build Back Better” spending proposal on Thursday by releasing a slideshow that shows the life of a pregnant woman named Linda who receives government assistance without any mention of her child’s father.

(See the story on slide show at link here)

The slideshow is a throwback to the “Life of Julia” slideshow during the 2012 campaign, when then-President Barack Obama and Vice President Biden illustrated their idea of government with a hypothetical father-less, husband-less woman who made it through life thanks to government programs.

That slideshow was mocked as an example of Democrats’ refusal to consider the possibility Americans might succeed without government aid, or that women might choose to have families with men.

“Obama is setting forward a vision contrary to the American tradition of self-sufficiency–a welfare state that runs from cradle to grave. And it’s a dishonest vision, because it presents all of these benefits as “free,” never acknowledging that they are paid for through coercive taxation,” James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal argued in a at the time.

“The most shocking bit of the Obama story is that Julia apparently never marries. She simply ‘decides’ to have a baby, and Obama uses other people’s money to help her take care of it,” he added, noting that Julia was portrayed as a relatively well-off woman.

“In 1999 Lionel Tiger coined the word ‘bureaugamy’ to refer to the relationship between officially impoverished mothers of illegitimate children and the government. ‘The Life of Julia’ is an insidious attack on the institution of the family, an endorsement of bureaugamy even for middle-class women,” he concluded.

And https://www.westernjournal.com/remember-obamas-twisted-julia-cartoon-2012-biden-just-released-one-10x-worse/

 

But oh, what fun it is to revisit highlights of the Obama days. Nothing like the oldies!

The Old Swamp Story

by Bullright

At least once a week I find myself thinking about politics 25 or 30 years ago. It is a hell of a reality check. Despite what some say that was still pretty ugly. Then you think how much worse it is today.

I know, every generation has probably complained about how nasty politics are and likely claimed it was the worst. I can safely vouch for that having witnessed a few of my elders complain about politics in the 60’s. Get you some of that. Come back for more!

Only one from that whole elder generation survives. She is indeed a treasure bordering on 100. But yes, she tells me, as if it needed confirmation, that politics and civil affairs in general are worse now than anytime in her past. That opinion is either a ‘music to your ears’ validation or a blanket condemnation proof, depending which way one sees it.

Maybe a lot of people also catch themselves comparing current events or issues. We are a competitive society and we like to know the score; we want to know how we are doing? Is it good or is it bad? (not much between the two)

But at this stage, it is hard to find anyone saying we are still doing good overall. Even the scoreboards have to be fact-checked today, too. Fortunately, I don’t have to try to defend any rosy claims about the present.

So here we are in Swampville where one thinks the swamp in DC is bad enough. How long did it take to establish that name? But a better analogy would be: as bad as the swamp is, beneath it are 3 layers of quicksand stacked on top of each other. (at unknown depths)

The swamp covers that base and the habitat only deals with the environment at the surface level. And, as swamp creatures do, many of them contribute to the swampy environment. So in that sense, draining it only presents a few more problems. I hate to be overly negative. But no one really contemplated what happens when you drain the swamp?

As if draining it was some complete cure. Could we sell that fix? But it isn’t. Nature is tough and so is human nature. How many Jason movies do we need to know that it only comes back in time? Hollywood is not the only source of duplication in the country.

What a noble idea it is to think about though. Then what are the maintenance levels and proper PH level necessary to cohabitate? Anyone written that report yet because I haven’t seen it? Hell, we couldn’t even get an environmental study on that today.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Hillarygate To The Septic Swamp

by Bullright

What a tangled web she weaves. If this is not evil personified, then I don’t know what is.

Strange how the hypocrite Hillary Clinton goes from under investigation to running an investigation; and from hiding a server — “you mean like wiping it with a cloth?” — to hacking servers, all within a few months time. It’s almost like magic. Dark deception.

You just can’t make this stuff up. But if you can, then you probably ought to work for Hillary Clinton — or maybe the deep state.

My proverbial thought for the day is: Straight To The Top.

Hillary knew one thing for sure: once you get an investigation started, it takes on a life of its own and is very hard to stop. It’s sort of like perpetual motion. Except if it is a democrat where, by laws of physics, it cannot go anywhere.

What is it with these people, they think government is only a tool for their own personal use? Of course they do. To think Hillary is not even done yet. She’s reloading her server.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Conspiracy Network And Surveillance

by Bullright

The latest story in the meat grinder is the revelation in a court filing about spygate on Trump, from the Durham special counsel investigation. Read it here. Surprise, it is all connected back to Hillary, which is interesting for a smoking gun.

To think Mueller didn’t come across this in his 2-year fake investigation. Meaning even the Mueller special counsel was part of the massive coverup for what happened.

And then to imagine a world in which impeachment is only a part of the coverup. Crazy. And in the end, nothing we didn’t already know. Stuff that would never have seen the light of day if Hillary had swindled her way into office. (think of that until your head explodes)

Yet in all of the commentary about it that I hear, no one seems to do justice to what all took place here. It is almost too bad for description. Oh this is 100 times worse than Watergate.

So let me try, without over simplifying, to break this down into basics.

We had what they call a pretext to their initial investigation. Fake and phony as a side show. But they used that to start and continue an investigation. Then they would parlay said investigation (ha ha) into a full-blown impeachment and a coup d’état.

I know that may miss a few important highlights. Then even the people directly involved in this plot end up as media analysts and contributors – about the very case they were up to their eyeballs in. Too many of them to list, all of them converted to experts.

But eventually the impeachment they pursued was only part of the coverup for their massive coup conspiracy. For more dramatic effects in the media, bring in Carl Bernstein and John Dean to explain the process to us in stark terms. (which Dems still repeat)

 

Get this quote

“They are way bigger than that. They are looking at the entire conspiracy to overthrow the results of a lawful election.” (cue destroying democracy gasp)

It is interesting that FBI flunky, Andrew McCabe, said this in January 2022 related to the Jan 6th investigation. But what irony when compared to the events they were involved in with Trump early on. It would fit better there.

 

Now here’s another quote from the same Don Lemon show in 2022:

“And there’s no question that [it] happens that the federal laws have been violated. So, I think this is a massive conspiracy. It probably [is] multiple conspiracies —

LEMON: What are the consequences for that? What are the consequences?

JD:  Well, it could be very — it could be very serious. We’re talking serious felonies here. There– I’ve heard as many as six or seven different statutes involved in this activity. So, it could be very serious felony crime that we’re looking at, and I think it’s going to grow.

This reminds me of Watergate where it really started getting serious. We’re in the very serious stage now, Don.”

 

That one came from John Dean who was out to make a case against Trump over the January 6th investigation regarding electors. But it sounds like it describes the seriousness of what they did to

These people have no scruples. The fact is that they had a deep surveillance operation on a candidate and then sitting president that led into a full on coup involving a whole lot of people.  A massive conspiracy orchestrated at the highest levels within our government, all of it foisted on the American public, with assistance from the media/press.

Then you have these two media stars now pontificating about Jan 6th like some historical conspiracy? They even had their cast complete with people like Carl Bernstein and John Dean to assist in the narrative. CNN had almost the entire circle of actors enlisted in media by the end of Trump’s term.

Of course now Hillary is even running out into media mulling over another run after her failed coup d’état. No, you cannot make this stuff up. They had already accused Trump of stealing the election in 2016. But if they had their way, all this information and investigation would have been forbidden. We would have never known any of this — about their whole damn conspiracy and network. History buried without taps.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Down With Protest – Up With Conformity

by Bullright

Just let grown ups take the stage, we hear. Watch, young ones, and we’ll show you how the game is played. There are still resounding echoes of “the adults in the room” from the last elections. We will show you real leadership – even if it is from behind, or copied from European failures.

But you can’t correct them because they think they are going to tell all of us now what is proper. They know it all. And their minions of brownshirts and stasi are everywhere on social media reinforcing it. (in case we didn’t get the message) Media lob softball questions to no-zone Joe leading him on a string. Ah, that is leadership?

So even if it all rings hollow, enshrined in hypocrisy, the Left’s latest stands against protest are hilarious. Especially as it unfolds against any inkling of dissent with their administration. It’s a lesson to behold.

Okay, kids, today we’re going to learn how to protest against free speech. Remember, democracy dies when you do not effectively shut down the opposition — by any means necessary. …Class dismissed.

That’s what we get today.

Truckers Unite Despite The Defamation

Canadian truckers are showing us how vicious the Left is. Even if this isn’t a political movement, the Left turns it into one. Call them racists and violent. In other words, turn truckers into a caricature of themselves. No one is supposed to see the hypocrisy.

Then threaten truckers with everything from revoking their license, to confiscating their rigs, to taking away their jobs, even taking away their children. Government told them “everything is on the table.”  Enact any government agency against them. Trudeau sounds a lot like Joe Biden and this administration. Use brute force against their enemies.

Why don’t we see the transcript of what Joe told Trudeau? Justin has now threatened truckers with everything. He’s called them any name he could think of. Branding them insurrectionists was cute. He’s lied and called out his goons on them. When did the radical Left ever treat teachers or their protests like this? But they protest all the time.

Back in March 2020, the Teamsters of Canada said:

“Truck drivers are showing courage by working during these tough times and keeping our society running. They must become an immediate priority for employers, job providers, clients and governments.”

In other worlds, show some respect for these truckers and what they do. But they seem to reverse all that adoration for their own members in 2022. Now Teamsters of Canada issues another statement, Feb. 7th,. on the Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa etc.

“The so-called “freedom convoy” and the despicable display of hate lead by the political Right and shamefully encouraged by elected conservative politicians does not reflect the values of Teamsters Canada, nor the vast majority of our members, and in fact has served to delegitimize the real concerns of most truck drivers today. ///

We firmly believe in the right to protest government policies and voice a wide array of opinions, but what is happening in Ottawa has done more harm to Teamsters members, be they Truck Drivers who were trying to deliver their loads, or hotel, restaurant and healthcare workers who were intimidated, abused or prevented from accessing their workplaces, by several protesters.”

So why aren’t they standing with drivers and truckers? “Hate lead by the political Right”? What are they talking about? The political Left has jumped all over truckers calling them the most vile names, threatening them in every way possible. That’s fair? Where is the union defending truckers? It has done more harm? A long way from appreciation.

In every protest we have seen, from the Left (they usually are), the unions at least support their members. What’s up with this defamation? Instead, the president of Teamsters Canada urges them to just go home and express their concerns to local officials. I don’t get that reasoning. The mandates are a national issue. Who are Teamsters representing?

Waning Credible Fallacies Ticking

by Bullright

I have about the same level of confidence in legacy media today as I have in Vladamir Putin, or Russia for that matter. And I’m not so sure lately that those two are not merged in a few strategic places of operational planning.

Look, I know it is not a popular idea to have some of these views on Russia (things have changed) but I accept that. It seems antiquated. Just as some of my views on media may seem obsessive or overblown. I don’t think so on either.

My secondary hunches tell me that we —  or the intel/military apparatus in Washington — already know what Putin’s basic war plans are. Why is it there are never leaks from Moscow? We know with probability what he is going to do. But maybe that doesn’t matter so much.

We also know foreign affairs right now are a mess, from the US perspective. You don’t have to go any further than Afghanistan. Problems, problems are almost a new normal. All screwed up.

So why then was foreign policy conveniently and deliberately kept off the campaign table in 2020? The only debate where foreign policy was included fell apart. It was virtually kept off the radar. No probing. Strange for a guy who claimed to have decades of foreign policy expertise, even his only claim for many supporters. It was sanitized like Hillary Clinton’s server. (along with Joey’s sealed, hidden records)

Now we have this clusterbuck of events, on top of a pandemic, with no practical way to weigh our leadership, nothing to base it on – other than the dominant radicalism that prevails in this regime. And these are high-stakes situations. You would think we need to know if government is up to it. But we don’t.

However, foreign policy was kept out of the vetting process in 2020. That was no accident. Back to my trust deficit in media which grows by the day.

Stories are ramping up on Ukraine. Media told us they had no appetite for talking about Hunter or the grifting of Biden Inc. Did they know enough about where the bodies were buried before the election to whisk it all away from the public’s prying eye? Compromised Joe cannot be exposed. That subject has never mattered more in our country than now. Joe has a dismal record on policy and corruption.

Putin saw this guy coming as opportunity; the way dictators, thugs, and criminals look at things. (Joe panders to all of them) Jackpot.

So now I am left in my mind with comparisons of Poland in 1939. I see rogue regimes operating on an axis with common tenants. I see the mischievous evil in what they design. And then I see a fumbling connoisseur of radicalism straining to play down our real threats.

But then I hear wild claims from media, 24/7, about misinformation. They tell us that threat of it, and the damage caused, is everywhere. It is the big problem. Yet we have this mumbling relic of mass misinformation roosting in his feathered nest at the White House, undisturbed. Too dramatic for you? I’m sorry.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Nation of Narratives

by Bullright

It’s obvious we have become a narrative nation, the most popular at the time is the Jan 6th and the insurrection mantra. With all the assets at the left’s disposal, it is hard not to hear the narrative. That’s what they want you to hear.

But the people have become plenty tired of the narratives and the pattern. They’ve become older than Kentucky bourbon. It is not believed but that doesn’t matter to Leftists.

I never thought I would see the Left become militantly anti-protest but that is what they are. You would think after five years, a coup and all their practice, they would at least have some respect remaining for the institution of dissent. Nope.

Ever notice the one giant thing that stands between the US and dictator regimes is that free speech thing? You know we are finally coming to the end when the left goes totally anti-speech. If you were in China or Russia, you would not see a lot of demonstrations around. That is not accepted, no matter who you are. What opposition?

All the pleasantries we hear about China, no one can spin 1989 Tiananmen Square. It is also never to be repeated. Then there was Hong Kong. Oh, that’s just the way China is, they say, a proud country. Yeah national pride does that. People in Hong Kong knew what it was all about.

So now you have the Left in this country going fever pitched against free speech. They demand it be shut down when it doesn’t line up with their Marxist ideology. Silence offenders on whatever platform(s) they use. Only if it is pro-Mao can it be a good old-fashioned “peaceful demonstration.”

Joe Rogan is just the latest target, but there are plenty of other lesser-known victims of their Marxist wrath. Now that Marxism has become the new national dialogue, it can only get much worse. So they can shut down money the same way they shut down speech. The same force is applied.

So Neil Young is only fertilizer for commie agitprop now, nothing more.

It is the way of brutal dictators. It used to be America was different. We respected speech, dialogue and ideas. Now there is room for nothing but the Marxist line. Check your freedom at the door. And they don’t even try to hide it.

Leftists have become transparent about shutting down opposing ideas. Anti-capitalism is all the rage. Now there is not a dime’s difference between them and Beijing or Moscow. They cannot criticize Putin because they strategize the same way. They would just as soon get rid of any opposition, in the most effective way. Whatever works.

China throws its propaganda back in our faces and the pro-Mao left eats it up. If China doesn’t write the narrative itself, then the Left writes it for them.

End the narrative nation, it’s time for a Constitutional Convoy and a Bill of Rights caboose.
Melt away that January 6th fog. The real insurrection has occurred. That’s the problem.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022