BOX INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY FILES FORhttps://datacolada.org/133CITING THIS RESEARCHBOX
Simonsohn, U. (2026). ResearchBox 6145, 'DataColada 133 - Heterofriendly', https://ResearchBox.org/6145. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781564
LICENSE FOR USEAll content posted to ResearchBox is under a
CC By 4.0 License (all use is allowed as long as authorship of the content is attributed). When using content from ResearchBox please
cite the original work, and provide a link to the URL for this box (https://researchbox.org/6145).
BOX PUBLIC SINCE
February 26, 2026
BOX CREATORSUri Simonsohn (urisohn@gmail.com)
ABSTRACTWhen I taught my first PhD-level methods course, I invited students to submit questions about any topic in statistics or methodology. Six out of 10 students asked about the same topic: robust & clustered standard errors. It's clearly a topic they found both important and confusing.
Psychologists basically never use robust standard errors.
But they always should. If have never heard of robust SEs, this post is especially (rather than not) relevant for you.
Economists basically always use robust standard errors.
But I suspect intuitive understanding lags behind adoption. If you are robust SE user but don't have an intuition for why robust errors can be (much) smaller than classical ones, this post is still relevant for you.