#5159 | ResearchBox

ResearchBox #5159 - 'DataColada[131] - The U in AI'


Bingo Table
  Show file names
  Show file IDs
  Show timestamps


  OSF Repo.zip



  Materials.pdf


  


  Goldilocks Effect_Survey Clean Data.sav



  Colada 131.R



  AsPredicted #157290.pdf


An AsCollected documenting results provenance for this project is available view it

AsCollected (7QW_DI4).pdf

Previewing files
Files can be previewed by clicking on blue font.
Codebooks can be previewed by clicking on


  

Tell us if something is wrong with this Box

'DEAR READER' MESSAGE FROM THE AUTHORS

Origin.
Data were were obtained from the OSF repository. 

Materials.
The original materials are embedded with the supplement PDF. I extracted the relevant pages for Study 3 and uploaded as stand-alone document.

Full OSF repo
Files are a bit difficult to find on the OSF (they are inside a "Data" folder that looks like a header rather than clickable object, and the folder contains things other than data as well).

R Code
All posted R Code I wrote from scratch for Colada[131]

 

This version: December 02, 2025
(may be edited at any time)


BOX INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY FILES FOR

https://datacolada.org/131

CITING THIS RESEARCHBOX
Simonsohn, U. (2025). ResearchBox 5159, 'DataColada[131] - The U in AI', https://ResearchBox.org/5159. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17804150

LICENSE FOR USE
All content posted to ResearchBox is under a CC By 4.0 License (all use is allowed as long as authorship of the content is attributed). When using content from ResearchBox please cite the original work, and provide a link to the URL for this box (https://researchbox.org/5159).

BOX PUBLIC SINCE
December 03, 2025   

BOX CREATORS
Uri Simonsohn (urisohn@gmail.com)

ABSTRACT
For a recent journal club in Barcelona, we read a just published article in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (JEP:G). The paper is on the impact of using gen-AI on creativity. The paper proposes an inverted U: people are most creative with moderate levels of AI use. The paper has three studies. Studies 1 & 2 are experiments. This post is about Study 3, which is described as a "field study".