Conversation
Now you can see:
```
Error parsing bundle asset "/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/dist/public/index.mjs": Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'arguments') {
cause: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'arguments')
at getModulesLocations (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/webpack-bundle-analyzer/lib/parseUtils.js:254:24)
at Object.ExpressionStatement (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/webpack-bundle-analyzer/lib/parseUtils.js:44:35)
at c (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/acorn-walk/dist/walk.js:58:37)
at Object.skipThrough (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/acorn-walk/dist/walk.js:186:39)
at c (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/acorn-walk/dist/walk.js:58:37)
at base.Program.base.BlockStatement.base.StaticBlock (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/acorn-walk/dist/walk.js:198:7)
at c (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/acorn-walk/dist/walk.js:58:37)
at Object.recursive (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/acorn-walk/dist/walk.js:59:7)
at parseBundle (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/webpack-bundle-analyzer/lib/parseUtils.js:26:8)
at Object.getViewerData (/home/alexander-akait/IdeaProjects/webpack-bundle-analyzer-reproducer-409/node_modules/webpack-bundle-analyzer/lib/analyzer.js:87:22)
}
```
Useful for #409 (comment)
Member
|
This might cause a lot of extra output when multiple bundles have errors. But maybe the extra details are indeed worth it as debugging these cases would be tricky without this change. |
valscion
reviewed
Jul 30, 2025
Member
valscion
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me! I wonder if this change should still be mentioned in the changelog?
Member
Author
|
@valscion not sure, it is just DX, feel free to add if you want |
valscion
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now you can see:
Useful for #409 (comment)