Skip to content

fix: ensure async block assigns correct nodes to effect #18371

Merged
Rich-Harris merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix-orphan-elements-async
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

fix: ensure async block assigns correct nodes to effect #18371
Rich-Harris merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix-orphan-elements-async

Conversation

@dummdidumm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If a block has a sole component child, we apply an optimization to not need a template. But if that sole child is wrapped in $.async, it can happens that the block's effect is assigned the wrong end node.

In the reproduction this happens because we have two components inside a Child which is rendered only after an async block resolves. In $.append we have logic to not reassign nodes when the active effect didn't already run, which it has by the time we come across it (because the async work had to resolve first; we added this in #17120 to prevent the opposite, nodes being "rewinded" to an earlier position) and so the second sibling component's $.append will not set its end node to the effect. As a result the end node is wrong (too early).

To fix this we assign the nodes in $.async. We could also use compareDocumentPosition in $.append to only ever go forward, but that feels a bit heavier performance-wise.

paoloricciuti and others added 2 commits May 29, 2026 14:45
If a block has a sole component child, we apply an optimization to not need a template. But if that sole child is wrapped in `$.async`, it can happens that the block's effect is assigned the wrong end node.

In the reproduction this happens because we have two components inside a Child which is rendered only after an async block resolves. In `$.append` we have logic to not reassign nodes when the active effect didn't already run, which it has by the time we come across it (because the async work had to resolve first; we added this in #17120 to prevent the opposite, nodes being "rewinded" to an earlier position) and so the second sibling component's `$.append` will not set its end node to the effect. As a result the end node is wrong (too early).

To fix this we assign the nodes in `$.async`. We could also use `compareDocumentPosition` in `$.append` to only ever go forward, but that feels a bit heavier performance-wise.
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 13bbaa2

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
svelte Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Playground

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/svelte@18371

@svelte-docs-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris merged commit bdb1a0f into main Jun 4, 2026
20 checks passed
@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris deleted the fix-orphan-elements-async branch June 4, 2026 00:59
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2026
dummdidumm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2026
This PR was opened by the [Changesets
release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When
you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will
be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release
yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will
be updated.


# Releases
## svelte@5.56.2

### Patch Changes

- fix: properly track effect end node for async sibling component
([#18371](#18371))

- fix: prevent false-positive reactivity loss warning
([#18373](#18373))

- chore: bump esrap dependency
([#18372](#18372))

- fix: ignore declaration tags for animation directive
([#18366](#18366))

- fix: reject pending async deriveds on discard
([#18308](#18308))

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants