Skip to content

refactor: remove unnecessary type arguments in NewThrottle#773

Merged
samber merged 1 commit intosamber:masterfrom
d-enk:unnecessary-type-arguments
Jan 12, 2026
Merged

refactor: remove unnecessary type arguments in NewThrottle#773
samber merged 1 commit intosamber:masterfrom
d-enk:unnecessary-type-arguments

Conversation

@d-enk
Copy link
Contributor

@d-enk d-enk commented Jan 12, 2026

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.20%. Comparing base (a2553e5) to head (43dca27).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #773      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.23%   94.20%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        2880     2880              
==========================================
- Hits         2714     2713       -1     
- Misses        150      151       +1     
  Partials       16       16              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.20% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@d-enk d-enk force-pushed the unnecessary-type-arguments branch from 1d2713d to 89fe7b5 Compare January 12, 2026 16:53
@d-enk d-enk force-pushed the unnecessary-type-arguments branch from 89fe7b5 to 43dca27 Compare January 12, 2026 18:43
@d-enk d-enk changed the title refactor: remove unnecessary type arguments in refactor: remove unnecessary type arguments in NewThrottle Jan 12, 2026
@samber samber merged commit b39d0da into samber:master Jan 12, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants