@TomasVotruba this rule isn't carrying the "name" from the prefix. This is resulting in broken route names.

In the example below, there is a route called "app_core.admin.organisation.index" prior to the rule running. After the rule runs, it becomes "index".

For example:

#[Route(path: '/organisation', name: 'app_core.admin.organisation.')]
class OrganisationController extends AbstractController
{
    #[Route(name: 'index')]
    public function indexAction(): Response
    {
        ...
    }

Is being modified to:

class OrganisationController extends AbstractController
{
    #[Route(path: '/organisation', name: 'index')]
    public function indexAction(): Response
    {
        ...
    }

But it should become:

class OrganisationController extends AbstractController
{
    #[Route(path: '/organisation', name: 'app_core.admin.organisation.index')]
    public function indexAction(): Response
    {
        ...
    }

Good point! Thanks

Could you add failing test fixture?

Unfortunately I'm a bit swamped so I won't be able to. I'm not sure if it's been considered either but requirements, method etc and everything else will also need to be merged

No wories 👍

cc @samsonasik Could you look into fix for this one?

I will try

@trsteel88 hm.., I can't reproduce it, I probably missing something or missing some dependency, could you create simple reproducible repository for it? without it, i am not sure I can try provide a fix for it, thank you.

@trsteel88 ok, I can reproduce on annotation usage, it seems concat string is needed if name is available.

I created PR for it :

• [CodeQuality] Concat name annotation/attribute on InlineClassRoutePrefixRector #704