Conversation
It's a C-based dependency for a dozen of lines of code. If there's interest, we can publish it as a separate package.
|
Why, that's quite a lot being deprecated in or after april 2024! How do you keep track? |
|
I don’t. :D Things get usually removed when you stumble over deprecated code while trying to do something else. I guess there’s not that much of a downside to remove deprecated code later. |
pganssle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems good to me. My main involvement with this was that we don't use it but it was annoying to package zope just to run the attrs tests. The current situation, where zope is an optional test dependency, works perfectly for our purposes, but I think that droping mainline support for zope and moving it to a third-party package if there's interest is a good, and probably more sustainable approach in the long term.
|
Tahoe-LAFS is using this, but I'm not sure it's worth your time to package this separately—we could just copy/paste the relevant code into the codebase with appropriate license/attribution? Or I guess since we're using |
It's a C-based dependency for a dozen of lines of code.
If there's interest, we can publish it as a separate package.