Add 'Change-By' field to Debian control lexer#2757
Merged
Anteru merged 1 commit intopygments:masterfrom Aug 9, 2024
sblondon:add-changed-by-in-debian-control
Merged
Add 'Change-By' field to Debian control lexer#2757Anteru merged 1 commit intopygments:masterfrom sblondon:add-changed-by-in-debian-control
Anteru merged 1 commit intopygments:masterfrom
sblondon:add-changed-by-in-debian-control
Conversation
The content of the 'Change-by' field has the 'Maintainer' field format: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#changed-by
Collaborator
|
Merged, thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The content of the 'Change-by' field has the 'Maintainer' field format: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#changed-by
so it should use it instead of the default parsing.
I added a test with a fake e-mail address ending with '.test' as top level domain instead of '.tld' previously because someone learn me the existence of the RFC 2606 (Reserved Top Level DNS Names). I can modify the other occurrences in the file but I'm sure it's really useful. What do you think on this point?