Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 97.54% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (804c310) 98.33% compared to head (d00e9ed) 98.32%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2508      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.33%   98.32%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         130      131       +1     
  Lines       12978    13140     +162     
==========================================
+ Hits        12762    12920     +158     
- Misses        216      220       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Can we write inline type annotation instead of seprated pyi for new file?

#2481

Can we write inline type annotation instead of seprated pyi for new file?

#2481

@trim21 This ended up being a bit more difficult trying to bridge the gap from existing .pyi structure. I believe I was able to get this implemented correctly, but had to make some updates to other .pyi file dependancies to pass linting across all python versions. Apologies if folks were getting emailed about all the CI builds while testing, I eventually realized I was getting the same mypy linting errors locally and was able to continue validation without triggering the CI

@EnricoMi Added assertions for all attributes in Organization and Repository as well as adding the same replay/test workflow to Github_.py to test MainClass directly

@jmgreg31 sorry for the delay. We have reworked some related code, which broke your pull request. I have resolved the issues and changed delivered_at into a datetime attribute.

Thanks for the reviews and merge! @EnricoMi @trim21