Conversation
|
IMO the various checks (the new |
|
Tested on my docs - seems to be working fine |
|
Thanks @danielgafni, looking good. I'm OK with a refactor that splits apart each check into a dedicated function 🙂 Either as a second commit on this PR (but you'll have to follow our commit message guidelines), or as a second PR, thanks for suggesting! |
ae66b1c to
54609c6
Compare
|
Let's do another PR then. I fixed the commit title and body. The CI is failing on something that seems to be unrelated to my changes? |
|
Yeah don't pay attention to CI I'll fix it. Just make sure tests pass locally 🙂 |
|
Hey @pawamoy , pinging in case you've forgotten about this PR (also sorry if this is annoying and let me know if I shouldn't be doing it) to be clear, the tests were passing locally for me |
|
Pings are welcome, thanks for asking 😄 I'll get to it soon 🙂 |
54609c6 to
c8ae993
Compare
Filter out fields that are marked as `pydantic.PrivateAttr`
c8ae993 to
c93d1f0
Compare
For reviewers
Description of the change
Pydantic's
PrivateAttrare now removed from the public fields of the model.Relevant resources
Resolve #43