Skip to content

🧹 chore: Improve ToLower/ToUpper performance#119

Merged
ReneWerner87 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
2025-06-22-19-32-16
Jun 22, 2025
Merged

🧹 chore: Improve ToLower/ToUpper performance#119
ReneWerner87 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
2025-06-22-19-32-16

Conversation

@gaby
Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby commented Jun 22, 2025

Summary

  • optimize ToLower to skip allocation when the input is already lowercase
  • optimize ToUpper to skip allocation when the input is already uppercase

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Performance Improvements

    • Optimized string case conversion for uppercase and lowercase functions, reducing unnecessary memory allocations when the input is already in the desired case.
  • Tests

    • Added new tests to verify that no allocations occur when converting strings already in the target case.
    • Introduced benchmarks to measure performance improvements for these scenarios.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The ToLower and ToUpper string functions were optimized to avoid unnecessary allocations when the input is already in the target case. The test suite was updated with new test cases and benchmarks to verify and measure the performance of these optimizations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
strings.go Optimized ToLower and ToUpper to return the original string without allocation if already in the target case; updated control flow for early exit.
strings_test.go Added tests and benchmarks to check zero-allocation behavior and performance when input is already in the target case.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant strings.go

    Caller->>strings.go: ToLower(input)
    strings.go->>strings.go: Iterate over input, compare with lower-case
    alt All chars already lower
        strings.go-->>Caller: Return original input (no allocation)
    else
        strings.go->>strings.go: Allocate new slice, convert remainder
        strings.go-->>Caller: Return new string
    end

    Caller->>strings.go: ToUpper(input)
    strings.go->>strings.go: Iterate over input, compare with upper-case
    alt All chars already upper
        strings.go-->>Caller: Return original input (no allocation)
    else
        strings.go->>strings.go: Allocate new slice, convert remainder
        strings.go-->>Caller: Return new string
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Improve utils performance #116: Also modifies ToLower and ToUpper for early returns on empty strings and changes iteration style, but does not implement allocation avoidance.

Suggested labels

🧹 Updates

Poem

A string hopped by, all upper or lower,
The code checked twice—no need to makeover!
No extra bytes, no needless fuss,
Just swift returns—so efficient for us.
With tests and benchmarks, the rabbits cheer,
For leaner strings are finally here! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf0ca76 and d48fbb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • strings.go (2 hunks)
  • strings_test.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
strings.go (2)

13-26: Excellent optimization for avoiding unnecessary allocations!

The scan-then-convert approach is well-implemented. By checking each character against the lookup table first and only allocating when a conversion is actually needed, this should significantly improve performance for strings that are already lowercase.

The logic correctly:

  • Scans character by character using the lookup table
  • Preserves already-processed characters when allocation becomes necessary
  • Returns the original string when no conversion is needed

35-49: Consistent and correct optimization matching ToLower approach.

The ToUpper function uses the same efficient scan-then-convert pattern as ToLower. The implementation correctly handles the early exit case and maintains consistency with the ToLower optimization strategy.

strings_test.go (4)

19-23: Good test coverage for the optimization path.

This test case effectively validates that strings already in uppercase are returned unchanged, which is the core behavior being optimized. The test helps ensure the early exit logic works correctly.


39-44: Essential benchmark for measuring optimization impact.

The "fiber-upper" benchmark will effectively demonstrate the performance improvement when processing strings that are already uppercase. This provides quantifiable evidence of the optimization's benefits.


79-82: Consistent test coverage for ToLower optimization.

This test case follows the same pattern as the ToUpper test and properly validates that strings already in lowercase are returned unchanged. The consistency across both functions is excellent.


93-98: Comprehensive benchmark coverage for ToLower optimization.

The "fiber-lower" benchmark complements the ToUpper benchmark and will provide valuable metrics on the performance improvement for strings that don't require case conversion.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch 2025-06-22-19-32-16

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on optimizing the ToLower and ToUpper string conversion functions. The primary goal is to enhance performance by reducing memory allocations, particularly for strings that are already in their desired case, thereby improving efficiency and reducing garbage collection pressure.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization: The ToLower and ToUpper functions have been refactored to significantly improve performance by avoiding unnecessary memory allocations. Previously, these functions would always allocate a new byte slice. Now, they first check if the input string is already in the target case (all lowercase or all uppercase, respectively). If no characters need changing, the original string is returned directly, eliminating allocation and copying overhead. A new byte slice is only allocated and populated if one or more characters require a case conversion.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively addresses the stated objective of improving the performance of ToLower and ToUpper functions by optimizing them to skip allocation when the input string is already in the desired case. The new implementation correctly identifies whether a conversion is needed and only allocates a new byte slice and performs the conversion if necessary. This is a significant improvement for common use cases where strings might already be lowercase or uppercase, reducing memory allocations and CPU cycles. The changes are well-implemented and align with common Go performance optimization patterns. The existing test suite, including benchmarks, appears to cover these changes adequately.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.13%. Comparing base (cf0ca76) to head (d48fbb2).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #119      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.03%   96.13%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         505      517      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits          485      497      +12     
  Misses         14       14              
  Partials        6        6              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.13% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gaby gaby changed the title Improve ToLower performance Improve ToLower/ToUpper performance Jun 22, 2025
@gaby gaby marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2025 20:17
@gaby gaby requested a review from a team as a code owner June 22, 2025 20:17
@gaby gaby requested review from ReneWerner87, efectn and sixcolors and removed request for a team June 22, 2025 20:17
@gaby gaby changed the title Improve ToLower/ToUpper performance 🧹 chore: Improve ToLower/ToUpper performance Jun 22, 2025
@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

Can you share the benchmark results for the existing cases
New vs old

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants