Fix regressions in logical operator handling in const exprs#8721
Merged
jimblandy merged 2 commits intogfx-rs:trunkfrom Dec 17, 2025
Merged
Fix regressions in logical operator handling in const exprs#8721jimblandy merged 2 commits intogfx-rs:trunkfrom
jimblandy merged 2 commits intogfx-rs:trunkfrom
Conversation
Fixes regressions introduced by gfx-rs#7339 Fixes gfx-rs#8711
1ddc918 to
137bc6e
Compare
Merged
jimblandy
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2025
Member
jimblandy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. Thanks for the fix!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #8711
After #7339, some valid const expressions would be rejected because the LHS does not resolve directly to an
ir::Literal. This fixes that by using proper expression "evaluation" machinery. (I put evaluation in quotes, because it seems more like a lookup to me -- it's just retrieving already-resolved constant values.)There is a bunch of duplication in the
eval_expr_to_{u32,bool}code, but I decided not to try and refactor that at the same time as fixing a regression.Testing
Enables some CTS tests and updates some snapshots tests.
Squash or Rebase? Squash
Checklist
cargo fmt.taplo format.cargo clippy --tests. If applicable, add:--target wasm32-unknown-unknowncargo xtask testto run tests.CHANGELOG.mdentry.