Merged
Conversation
The previous attempt at a test didn't fail because it didn't actually exercise the inspector protocol. If it had, it would have encounterd a WebSocket error and failed. This commit removes the previous test, uncomments out the profiling test, factors it out into a separate function, then uses that function to implement two separate test cases, one to actually test profiling, and one to test repeated inspector connections.
My initial attempt at a fix made a subtle behavior change which I did not consider fully: instead of a new `incomingQueueNotifier` XThreadNotifier being constructed for every inspector connection, my fix caused all inspector connections to re-use one long-lived XThreadNotifier. This subsequently ran afoul of the fact that XThreadNotifier::awaitNotification() is not cancel-safe: if it is cancelled while awaiting its stored promise, calling awaitNotification() a second time tries to await a moved-from promise. This commit restores the previous behavior of creating a new `incomingQueueNotifier` XThreadNotifier for every inspector connection. However, instead of constructing it in the WebSocketIoHandler constructor as before, I moved the construction to the `messageLoop()` function implementation, which also spawns the dispatch loop. This narrows the scope of access to the notifier to only those functions which actually need it, keeps our usage of the dispatch kj::Executor localized in one place, and avoids synchronously blocking the inspector thread, as we would have had to do if we constructed it in the WebSocketIoHandler constructor. Fixes #2564.
This is no longer needed.
6d4211d to
a992145
Compare
danlapid
approved these changes
Aug 21, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My initial attempt at a fix made a subtle behavior change which I did not consider fully: instead of a new
incomingQueueNotifierXThreadNotifier being constructed for every inspector connection, my fix caused all inspector connections to re-use one long-lived XThreadNotifier. This subsequently ran afoul of the fact that XThreadNotifier::awaitNotification() is not cancel-safe: if it is cancelled while awaiting its stored promise, calling awaitNotification() a second time tries to await a moved-from promise.This PR restores the previous behavior of creating a new
incomingQueueNotifierXThreadNotifier for every inspector connection. However, instead of constructing it in the WebSocketIoHandler constructor as before, I moved the construction to themessageLoop()function implementation, which also spawns the dispatch loop. This narrows the scope of access to the notifier to only those functions which actually need it, keeps our usage of the dispatch kj::Executor localized in one place, and avoids synchronously blocking the inspector thread, as we would have had to do if we constructed it in the WebSocketIoHandler constructor.