Refactor attribute filtering to apply per-flag#345
Merged
KodrAus merged 2 commits intobitflags:mainfrom Apr 24, 2023
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #343
Closes #344
In blackbeam/rust_mysql_common#87, it was pointed out that the new attribute filtering added in #341 causes large flags declarations to hit the default 128-deep recursion limit. I've refactored that code now so that instead of filtering all attributes on all flags upfront, it filters attributes on each flag individually at the points we need them. This reduces the stack depth by the most complex individual flag, rather than the sum of all flags.