ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

@AlexWaygood I think this was missed for assignment.

Thanks for the ping. I just requested my review, but we're a bit focused on the upcoming 0.15 release this week, so I may not get to this until next week.

Totally understandable, thanks for the update and good luck with the 0.15 release! :)

Thanks for checking. I added a regression case that shows why parenthesized_range isn’t sufficient:

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    ["param"],
    [
        (((1,)),),
    ],
)
def test_single_element_grouped_tuple(param): ...

With parenthesized_range, this gets treated as already parenthesized (because of the extra grouping parens in source), so we skip wrapping. But the generator still outputs 1, for the tuple element, which produces invalid list syntax when inserted as a list element. This new test fails with the parenthesized_range change and passes with the current string-based is_parenthesized check. I updated the PT006 snapshots accordingly.

Thanks! I took another look at this today, and I think a better solution is just to avoid the generator entirely and use checker.locator().slice(expr) instead. This will preserve the input parentheses when they're available, and we can add parentheses if tuple.parenthesized is false. I also reverted the unrelated formatting changes in the tests.