[pyflakes] Improve invalid-print-syntax documentation#11171
Merged
charliermarsh merged 1 commit intoastral-sh:mainfrom Apr 27, 2024
Merged
[pyflakes] Improve invalid-print-syntax documentation#11171charliermarsh merged 1 commit intoastral-sh:mainfrom
pyflakes] Improve invalid-print-syntax documentation#11171charliermarsh merged 1 commit intoastral-sh:mainfrom
Conversation
This syntax wasn't "deprecated" in Python 3; it was removed. I started looking at this rule because I was curious how Ruff could even detect this without a Python 2 parser. Then I realized that "print >> f, x" is actually valid Python 3 syntax: it creates a tuple containing a right-shifted version of the print function.
Contributor
|
pyflakes] Improve invalid-print-syntax documentation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This syntax wasn't "deprecated" in Python 3; it was removed.
I started looking at this rule because I was curious how Ruff could even
detect this without a Python 2 parser. Then I realized that
"print >> f, x" is actually valid Python 3 syntax: it creates a tuple
containing a right-shifted version of the print function.