feat: implement PredicateBoxExt for ?Sized Items#180
Merged
epage merged 1 commit intoassert-rs:masterfrom Dec 19, 2024
Merged
Conversation
epage
reviewed
Dec 17, 2024
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12410765220Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Contributor
Author
|
(I've force-pushed this to fix the capitalization in the commit messages pointed out by the commits lint. Code should not have changed.) |
In particular, this makes `predicate::str::contains(...).boxed()` work.
takumi-earth
pushed a commit
to earthlings-dev/predicates-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
feat: implement `PredicateBoxExt` for `?Sized` `Item`s
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This looks like an oversight: the trait itself already had
Item: ?Sizedbut the genericimpldid not.I noticed this while trying to chain together a variable number of
predicate::str::contains(...)withand(). Callingpredicates::BoxPredicate::new()explicitly works, but is much wordier than.boxed(), which fails: