Add few missing compatible licenses for dependency check#198
Merged
kezhenxu94 merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom Mar 31, 2025
Merged
Add few missing compatible licenses for dependency check#198kezhenxu94 merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
kezhenxu94 merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
wu-sheng
reviewed
Mar 31, 2025
| - BSD-2-Clause | ||
| - BSD-2-Clause-Views | ||
| - PostgreSQL | ||
| - EPL-1.0 |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@wu-sheng EPL-1.0(Eclipse Public License) is actually a weak-compatible license in Category B and we have already added to that list, but it also appears in the compatible list, so I think maybe it's a typo for EDL-1.0 (Eclipse Distribution License 1.0)
kezhenxu94
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found that EPL-1.0 appears in both the "compatible" and "weak-compatible" lists. Perhaps what we intended to write in the "compatible" list was EDL-1.0 (Eclipse Distribution License 1.0)?
Also, add MIT-0 (MIT No Attribution) and 0BSD (Zero-Clause BSD) to the "compatible" list.