Conversation
|
Are there any implications for Beam's compatibility with the new versions ? |
I'm not sure yet. Our hugging face tests are only exercising up to 4.31, so its definitely possible. My goal is just getting us green with this PR, which is why I'm leaving the issue open |
|
I'm looking at this now though |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #28106 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.30% 72.29% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 678 678
Lines 99771 99771
==========================================
- Hits 72140 72131 -9
- Misses 26068 26077 +9
Partials 1563 1563
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 6 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @jrmccluskey for label python. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
The upgraded version is causing docs precommit to fail.
Part of #28104
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.