This library recently switched to non-CSPRNGs (see #141 and #162), which are inherently predictable based on observations of their output. Doesn't this make the library vulnerable to attacks listed here, because the generated filenames can be predicted?
This library recently switched to non-CSPRNGs (see #141 and #162), which are inherently predictable based on observations of their output. Doesn't this make the library vulnerable to attacks listed here, because the generated filenames can be predicted?