Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Both old and new code do the same thing. What's the reason of the change? |
Collaborator
Author
|
@lvca Yes, but in the old version the map needs to be searched by key for the value, while in the new version key and value are given via the iterator. |
Member
|
+1 then. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This change alters an
keySetiterator to anentrySetiterator, since in the loop body the value is retrieved orginally via the key and now via the iterator.Motivation
spotbugs
Checklist
mvn clean packagecommand