American foreign policy wallows in paranoia. If Saddam lied and kept WMDs, and if he gave them to terrorists, and if those terrorists could somehow bring those WMDs to the US, then Iraq would be a threat. Twenty-three years later, it’s the same bizarre logic when it comes to Iran. Meanwhile, countries that really do hate us and really do have WMDs don’t use them against us.
If-Based Foreign Policy
Ted Rall
Ted Rall is a syndicated political cartoonist for Andrews McMeel Syndication and WhoWhatWhy.org and Counterpoint. He is a contributor to Centerclip and co-host of "The TMI Show" talk show. He is a graphic novelist and author of many books of art and prose, and an occasional war correspondent. He is, recently, the author of the graphic novel "2024: Revisited."
1 Comment. Leave new
“Iranian nuclear weapons” are a smokescreen for stopping Iran from selling oil for currencies other than the dollar and spending the proceeds on the people of Iran rather than giving them to the stockholders of Western oil companies, and also for cutting off China’s oil supply/making them dependent on the US for fossil fuels.