A few more dumb questions based on recent events

Just a few more dumb questions which should be asked of supporters of the incumbent president:

-what kind of person would think it is a good idea to criticize the Pope for a message of peace and cessation of violence?
-what kind of person would think it is a good idea to equate himself to Jesus and then give such a lame excuse to defend what he did?
-what kind of person would say he wanted to erase a country’s existence on one day, then want to be their business partner two days later?
-who would want to do business with someone who flip flops to that degree?

This is an incredibly thin-skinned person. He does not handle criticism well, but also feels the need to pat himself on the back in sometimes over-the-top offensive ways. There is not enough false bravado to paint over this weakness of character. It truly is that simple.

Note: Please check out the letter in Jill’s post written by five psychiatrists to the four leaders in Congress:

Foreign actors continue to get American roles

A few years ago, a movie about a major US Supreme Court ruling that allowed interracial marriage called “Loving” received a lot of fanfare. Yet, this quintessential American movie starred an Irish woman, Ruth Negga, and an Australian man, Joel Edgerton, as the Virginia couple. Around that same time, the movie “Selma” received a lot of accolades, but the actor who played MLK was a British man born to native Nigerians, David Oyelowo. The movie “Harriet” about Harriet Tubman starred a British actor Cynthia Erivo. Even a famous cable TV series about crime in Baltimore called “The Wire” co-starred a British actor named Dominic West as an American.


These castings are not unusual. Per an AI search summary “Actors, particularly from the UK, Australia, and Canada, frequently play American roles due to rigorous classical training, high-quality theater backgrounds that emphasize accent mastery, and often lower costs for US producers. Additionally, the sheer volume of American media allows for worldwide exposure, encouraging international talent to master American accents.

Key reasons for this trend, as discussed by experts and Reddit users, include:

Training and Versatility: Foreign actors, especially British ones, often have extensive theater training that emphasizes vocal versatility, making it easier for them to master American accents.

Cost Effectiveness: In many cases, foreign actors may be more cost-effective to hire than established U.S. stars, especially in television.

Depth and Authenticity: Some producers, such as on TV Guide, report that international actors sometimes seem better prepared or bring more depth to complex roles compared to American counterparts.

The ‘Hollywood’ Pull: As the biggest market, Hollywood is the primary destination, and foreign actors are willing to work hard to adapt to American roles to succeed on a global stage.

Accent Adaptability: The neutral, flat nature of many standard American accents can be easier for foreign actors to imitate compared to the complex regional nuances required in many British roles, as suggested by LAist.

Global Appeal: Casting diverse, international talent can help productions appeal to wider, global audiences.

While some debate that American actors are equally capable, the combination of training, cost, and industry competition keeps the demand for foreign actors high in American film and television.”

This is not new with many foreign actors playing Americans. Top of mind, Australians Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Eric Bana and Rachel MacAdams in several movies, Brits Vivien Leigh and Olivia de Havilland in a couple of movies, Scot Sean Connery and Irishman Liam Neeson in a several movies, German-Spaniard Daniel Bruhl in the TV show “The Alienist” and countless Canadians have played Americans.

The above offers a good summary as to the reasons. I think thr primary motivation is dialogue and money. There work back home included more dialogue than in American shows, on average. But, we should not lose sight of cost effectiveness in deploying skilled actors.

“What does the win mean for the EU?” per The Guardian

Many in Hungary and Europe are hopeful relationships between the European Union and Hungary will improve. But, it will take positive efforts to collaborate rather than the divisive efforts of the Orban regime. In a nutshell, collaboration is hard work. But, the following excerpt from The Guardian offers some encouragement.

“‘Orbán’s frequent efforts to undermine the EU’s attempts at collective action – not to mention his proud defence of the ‘illiberal democracy’ that Hungary became on his watch – exasperated and infuriated the European Commission. His vetoing of a massive EU loan to Ukraine and his strategy of delaying, and sometimes opposing, EU sanctions on Russia, left the bloc looking toothless and divided….

Magyar, on the other hand, has promised to repair Hungary’s strained relationship with the bloc and to address many of its concerns. In a speech on Monday afternoon, he struck a conciliatory note, saying that while the EU was ‘a complicated, bureaucratic, compromise-seeking’ organisation, he felt compromises could be made. ‘I am sure we will have debates,’ he added. ‘But we are not going there to fight for the sake of fighting so we can write on billboards that Brussels is evil and needs to be stopped.’

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, made plain her relief at the election result – and her hopes for rebooted relations with Hungary – in a post on X. ‘Hungary has chosen Europe,’ she wrote. ‘Europe has always chosen Hungary. Together, we are stronger. A country returns to its European path. The Union grows stronger.’”

I am looking forward to the steps ahead needed to make collaboration work better.

Crushing defeat for autocratic Orban

In a sea of turmoil exacerbated by the mercurial incumbent US president, the world got some good news yesterday in the following headline from The Guardian: “Orbán’s 16-year rule over Hungary ends in crushing election defeat.” The article Max Griera and Jamie Dettmer had the following subheadline: “The Hungarian prime minister concedes to Péter Magyar, who is set to win a supermajority in the 199-seat parliament.”

Here is the gist of the article: “BUDAPEST — The 16-year reign of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán is at an end after a crushing election loss on Sunday that will send political shockwaves from Washington to Moscow.

The EU’s most autocratic leader — a close ally of both U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin — lost by a decisive margin in Sunday’s vote, amid the highest turnout in Hungary’s democratic history.


With almost all of the votes counted, his opponent Péter Magyar looked set to win 138 seats in the 199-seat parliament. Orbán’s Fidesz party was on track to win only 55.”

The sizable defeat made the news even better. He may have been destined to lose, but having an anchor like Trump/ Vance supporting him likely did not help. Note Trump has been getting heavier to carry and it has been showing in US votes dating back to last November. And, with the Iran fiasco and its repercussions, not to mention berating the Pope, he will only get heavier.



A brief and profound poem

A friend forwarded me the following prose-like poem. It is not long, but quite profound. It truly speaks for itself.

“A WHOLE CIVILIZATION
WILL DIE TONIGHT

My son needs lunch, and I have to put his backpack together, but a whole civilization will die tonight, so I’m wondering if they’ve closed their schools.


Like, a snow day, maybe, except instead of snow it’s
‘keep your children home so if you die, you die together’ — instead of ‘we’ll open back up once the plows have cleared’ it’s
‘we don’t know if we’ll be here tomorrow, hold your babies tight.’


It’s just ‘talk’ I’m told, which I’ve been told before.
‘It’s how the president makes his deals.’


But I’ve never heard anyone talk about other human beings this way, and I’m not certain I can look my son in the eyes if we all agree to stomach it one more time.


A civilization will die tonight, but as I zip up his backpack and kiss him off to school I think: if this is what we call leadership then I’m not entirely sure ours isn’t already dead.


Michael F. DuBois”

Three dozen baseballs

Picture a tired father coming home from work. But, instead of sitting down before dinner, he changes clothes, grabs his baseball glove and a paint bucket of eighteen baseballs. He would walk with me to the baseball field behind my house to pitch batting practice to me. After he threw the paint bucket quantity, I would collect the balls and he would pitch another eighteen. Three dozen baseballs in total.

By the time we finished it would be dusk and he would be sore. I used to refer to him as my 45 year old pitching machine, but he was a tired person before we began. Being a father who worked, I know how tired he was when he got home. It meant a great deal to take batting practice with my dad pitching.

If any of you remember the pivotal scene in “Field of Dreams,” the adult son (played by Kevin Costner) asks his father if he wants to have a game of catch. That scene never fails to choke me up. “If you build it, he will come” referred to Costner’s father, whose last conversation with his son involved the son declining an invitation to play catch with his dad. Dad, can you pitch batting practice to me? He always said yes.

Three dozen baseballs is a metaphor. Parents spend time with their kids in a variety of ways sharing their passions. It could be reading, doing puzzles, cooking, exercising, dancing, singing, playing an instrument, etc. Just take the time. It creates memories for both sides. Even when you are tired.

An anchor is sinking us

Just in case you had doubts about the Iran war, here is an excerpt from an editorial in The Guardian by Richard Stengel * called “I was the US soft power czar. Our reputation may never recover from this.” The subheading is even more concerning: “Trump’s venal persona and his war on Iran will do untold damage to America’s ability to make a positive difference in the world.”

This paragraph from the piece cuts to the chase: “But I believe because of Donald Trump and his war in Iran, American popularity will descend to depths it has not seen this century and may never recover to the median levels that we saw with Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Forget Barack Obama numbers – they’re out of reach. Confidence in Trump’s ability to navigate global affairs was already around 30-40% before the invasion of Iran. That will be the new ceiling. ‘The world is watching,’ Trump said in his White House address on Wednesday. Yes, it is.”

*******

*Note: Per Wikipedia: “Richard Allen “Rick” Stengel (born May 2, 1955) is an American editor, author, and former government official. He was Time magazine’s 16th managing editor from 2006 to 2013. He was also chief executive of the National Constitution Center from 2004 to 2006, and served as President Obama’s Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs from 2014 to 2016. Stengel has written a number of books, including a collaboration with Nelson Mandela on Mandela’s autobiography, Long Walk to Freedom.”

Getting Untangled

https://www.readtangle.com/us-iran-ceasefire-april/?ref=tangle-newsletter

The above link is to a newsletter called “Tangle.” It offers a left leaning perspective, a right leaning perspective and then their opinions. Very good read. I have seen complaints about their opinions from both sides, which means they are onto to something. This one is on the Iran ceasefire.

I pulled one paragraph from their opinion which speaks volumes, in my view:

“Trump, for his part, seems to be improvising in real time. He suggested that Iran and the U.S. could enter a joint venture and control the Strait of Hormuz together, which is a rather shocking proposal when you pause to think about it for even a moment. ‘The terrorist regime we said we needed to wipe off the face of the earth on Monday will, on Wednesday, become our business partner for the future, and our ships will pay tolls that line their pockets!’”

If you find yourself pressed for time, just read their perspective. The benefit of reading all three is you can easily how far apart the reporting can get.

Welcome global commerce – it creates jobs and makes us safer

The best thing a leader of an economic region can do, be it a country, state, province or city/ county, is to seek investment, commerce, tourism and trade for his or her area. Just yesterday, Josh Stein, the governor of North Carolina was in Charlotte announcing a Japanese company expansion that will create 2,000 jobs.*

There have been a long line of NC governors from both parties who have actively pursued growth of commerce in the state. From a retired financial executive friend who was asked to abet these efforts in the 1990s, he notes: “Governor Jim Hunt was the foreign recruitment ‘maestro’ during his terms as governor  . Particularly in Japan . Our state has been fortunate to have had leaders adept at reaching out for foreign investment such as Stein’s Sumitomo announcement . A few of the more notable North Carolinians in this regard include Luther Hodges Sr. , Terry Sanford , Jim Holshouser , Jim Martin , and Jim Broyhill .”

Within 150 miles of Charlotte, I can name many top of mind foreign companies who have North America headquarters, distribution centers and/ or manufacturing plants who employ Americans – Michelin, BMW, Husqvarna, Doosan, eg.** Global commerce has been here in the US for decades, just as American companies invest abroad.

This global commerce helps lift all boats, but also makes us safer. Countries are more reluctant to upset commerce.



***********

*Per an AI Search Summary:

“ Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), a major Japanese bank, is opening its second U.S. headquarters in Uptown Charlotte, creating 2,000 jobs within six years. The project includes a $50 million investment and focuses on digital banking, with an average salary of over $165,000. The move aims to strengthen operations in a top financial hub.

**Per an AI Search Summary:

”Over 1,400 international companies operate in North Carolina, employing over 347,000 workers, with major hubs in the Carolinas for manufacturing, technology, and finance. Top investing nations include Germany (Daimler Truck, Bosch), the UK (Unilever), Japan (Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., Fujifilm), and France (Michelin).”

Strengthen allies economically


An article in The Guardian by Simon Goodley called “Jamie Dimon says US should strengthen allies economically, in veiled criticism of Trump,” provides a needed perspective. In short, thr world is safer and stronger if other countries have vibrant economies.

The subheadline reads “JP Morgan boss warns of risks of higher inflation and interest rates due to Iran war in annual letter to shareholders.” These risks are real, but heightened in countries that are less stable to begin with. Here are some select paragraphs.

“The head of the US’s largest bank has pressed the White House to strengthen Washington’s allies economically in order to ‘avoid truly adverse consequences’, in the latest intervention in an increasingly testy relationship with the Trump administration.

As the Middle East conflict sparked by US and Israeli attacks on Iran enters its sixth week, Jamie Dimon, the chair and chief executive of JP Morgan Chase, said in his annual letter to shareholders that good US foreign policy should put America first ‘though not alone’.

His remarks appear certain to be viewed as critical of Donald Trump, who in January announced he was suing the banker and the Wall Street institution for at least $5bn (£3.8bn) after accusing them of debanking him.”

One of Trump’s weaknesses is he views too many issues in a transactional way, where he must win and others lose. Some people call this a “zero sum game.” My wins equal your losses. The idea that all parties should be successful is a key theme of Nobel Prize Economist John Nash’s “Nash Equilibrium.” The latter is relationship building and is more beneficial long term.