AREA / A1
AI & technology
How frontier systems reshape judgment, authority, learning, and the human being.
MI / 2026 — BRIEFINGS · SEMINARS · RESEARCH MEMOS · STANDING COUNSEL
Briefings, seminars, and research on AI, technology, sovereignty, liberalism, and modern order — for people who need a deeper map than ordinary market, policy, or strategy analysis provides.
SCOPE: AI lab charters and policy documents · civilizational rhetoric in venture capital · sovereignty and political theology · the philosophical assumptions inside strategic decisions. ENGAGEMENTS FROM $7,500.
Investors, founders, and institutions already have access to market research, strategy decks, policy notes, and technical analysis. What they often lack is a deeper account of the forces underneath those materials: authority, technology, sovereignty, legitimacy, ideology, education, religion, and the assumptions about the human being embedded in modern systems.
AI has made this more urgent. The question is no longer only what new tools can do. The question is how they reshape judgment, authority, labor, learning, politics, public reason, and the meaning of human agency. Millerman Intelligence exists for clients who need to think below the headlines and beyond the dashboard — at the level where political philosophy, institutional strategy, and historical interpretation meet.
AREA / A1
How frontier systems reshape judgment, authority, learning, and the human being.
AREA / A2
Legitimacy, decision, state capacity, and the return of political form.
AREA / A3
Why inherited liberal vocabulary fails the world it created — and what replaces it.
AREA / A4
The conditions of public reasoning and the constitution of regimes.
Briefs that demonstrate the analytical method — close readings of the documents, charters, and policies shaping AI, technology, and political order.
MI-2026-007The binding constraint on frontier AI has migrated from chips to electrical capacity. The labs now negotiate gigawatt-scale power purchase agreements with utilities, FERC, and regional transmission organizations. The brief reads the shift through Harold Innis's staples thesis — an economy organized around a single extractive commodity produces characteristic institutions and asymmetries between periphery and metropole. The form generalizes.
READ THE BRIEF → MI-2026-006On May 6, 2026, Anthropic disclosed a deal granting it all of SpaceX's Colossus 1 compute and declared interest in developing gigawatt-scale compute in orbit. The same day, the vendor publicly reserved the right to reclaim that capacity if the AI it serves harms humanity. The brief reads the lease as a political form rather than a capacity update.
READ THE BRIEF → MI-2026-005Global AI capital expenditure passed $1 trillion in 2026 and is projected at $1.7 trillion by 2030. Every serious power is building sovereign compute, and the rules governing where chips, weights, and capacity can move have been rewritten three times in eighteen months. The brief reads the pattern as a recognizable form, and names what is being re-territorialized.
READ THE BRIEF → MI-2026-004On January 21, 2025, the United States announced a $500 billion AI infrastructure project. Fifteen months later, very little of that capital has been deployed. The brief reads the gap between announcement and financing as a recognizable economic form, and names what the form is.
READ THE BRIEF → MI-2026-003A class of American venture capital firms now operates under what is best described as a civilizational thesis. Andreessen 2011 vs. Andreessen 2023; Lonsdale, Boyle, Stephens, Aschenbrenner. The diagnoses are correct. The philosophical equipment has not yet caught up.
READ THE BRIEF → MI-2026-002Karp and Zamiska published a political manifesto in February 2025 that named Palantir a "broader political project." Twelve months later, the company posted 70% year-over-year revenue growth and a $448M Navy award. The brief reads the manifesto and the earnings call as one document.
READ THE BRIEF → MI-2026-001OpenAI rewrote its founding charter forty-eight hours before opening arguments in Musk v. Altman. Anthropic dropped the central pledge of its Responsible Scaling Policy a quarter earlier. The press covered both announcements. We read the documents.
READ THE BRIEF →Most engagements begin with a Private Briefing on a question your team is working on. The other formats — Institutional Seminar, Research Memo, Standing Counsel — follow from that conversation, once the right shape becomes clear.
FORMAT / F1PRIMARY OFFER
A concentrated briefing for investors, founders, executives, family offices, or leadership groups seeking a deeper map of AI, technology, politics, and modern order. The format most clients begin with.
FROM $7,500
FORMAT / F2
A private seminar for firms, salons, clubs, founder groups, investor circles, institutes, or serious local communities.
FROM $15,000 plus travel
FORMAT / F3
A written analysis for clients who need a conceptual map of an issue at the intersection of AI, politics, markets, ideology, and institutions.
CUSTOM
FORMAT / F4
A continuing advisory relationship for principals, partners, and small leadership groups who want recurring access to philosophical and strategic counsel rather than discrete engagements.
FROM $6,500 / MONTH
The point is not to produce another trend report. It is to expose the deeper assumptions, conflicts, and historical directions underneath the present.
THEME / T1
How artificial intelligence changes authority, human agency, learning, institutional trust, and the meaning of judgment.
THEME / T2
Heidegger, automation, intelligence, labor, productivity, and the hidden anthropology inside technical systems.
THEME / T3
Why inherited liberal vocabulary often fails to explain the world it helped create — and what replaces it.
THEME / T4
Power, law, emergency, legitimacy, state capacity, institutional authority, and the return of political decision.
THEME / T5
How ideas train elites, justify institutions, structure incentives, and create or destroy confidence in regimes.
THEME / T6
Geopolitics, Russia, Dugin, Eurasianism, civilizational pluralism, political theology, and the metaphysics of world order.
PROFILE / P1
For groups trying to interpret AI, political order, technology, sovereignty, and long-horizon shifts beyond ordinary market commentary.
PROFILE / P2
For builders who want to understand the human, political, and institutional assumptions embedded in what they are building.
PROFILE / P3
For teams working on model behavior, education, public reasoning, safety, adoption, governance, or institutional trust.
PROFILE / P4
For organizations funding or convening serious work on AI, politics, education, democracy, public reason, or cultural change.
PROFILE / P5
For hosts who want a serious intellectual event for members, guests, or a curated high-trust audience.
PROFILE / P6
For executives or institutions that need language for problems that are not merely technical, legal, or operational.
PROPOSED PROJECT / SR-01
A possible sponsored project for AI organizations, institutes, foundations, or public-benefit teams working on model behavior, governance, education, and institutional trust. The core question: how do frontier AI systems shape political judgment, public reasoning, user freedom, authority, disagreement, ideology, education, and the human good?
Michael Millerman is the founder of Millerman School, where he teaches political philosophy to serious readers, professionals, founders, investors, executives, and private clients.
He is the author of Beginning with Heidegger: Strauss, Rorty, Derrida, Dugin, and the Philosophical Constitution of the Political, the leading English-language translator of Alexander Dugin (seven major works), and the creator of more than twenty courses on Plato, Aristotle, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Strauss, Schmitt, Dugin, and others.
His work focuses on political theory, continental philosophy, technology, liberalism, sovereignty, ideology, Jewish thought, and the philosophical foundations of modern order. His translations of Dugin's major works are scholarly, not advocational. Serious thinking about sovereignty, multipolarity, and the contemporary international order requires direct engagement with the thinkers shaping those debates rather than reliance on secondhand accounts — a principle that applies equally to his work on Heidegger, Schmitt, Strauss, and other consequential thinkers whose ideas remain relevant whether or not one shares their commitments.
PHD, POLITICAL SCIENCE (POLITICAL THEORY & IR), UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · COLLABORATIVE DEGREE IN JEWISH STUDIES · AUTHOR, BEGINNING WITH HEIDEGGER · TRANSLATOR OF SEVEN WORKS BY ALEXANDER DUGIN · PUBLISHED IN TELOS, THE AMERICAN MIND, FIRST THINGS, INTERPRETATION
SELECTED ENGAGEMENTS
"I rarely do this, but I highly recommend a couple of hours with Michael Millerman. He brings unusual depth and range to questions about the political and economic order, and our conversations have already made me a better investor and a sharper thinker."
TYLER NEVILLE · MACRO TRADER · HOST, GENERATIONAL ARBITRAGE
"Millerman gets it."
AMJAD MASAD · FOUNDER & CEO, REPLIT · MARCH 2023
Palantir is one of the few major technology companies that publishes its political philosophy. The lecture below works through that text, point by point — what it argues, what it gets right, what it leaves out, and what its assumptions reveal about the kind of company reshaping the relationship between technology, the state, and the political.
REF: LECTURE / PALANTIR-01 · FROM THE MILLERMAN SCHOOL LECTURE SERIES WATCH ON YOUTUBE →
Michael responds personally when the inquiry appears suitable. Most engagements begin with a Private Briefing on a specific question your team is working on; other formats follow from that conversation.
YOUR INQUIRY IS PRIVATE. THIS INFORMATION IS USED ONLY TO RESPOND AND IS NOT SHARED.