Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Gorman's avatar

I love these insights but they read like they are all written by AI. For example “aren’t becoming obsolete; they’re becoming force multipliers.”

Do you label content written with AI and is there any way for us to tell what is Peter’s voice and what is just Peter prompted?

Don Frerichs, CFA's avatar

Wow! Quite an expansive future you paint! However, the piece exemplifies what Ken Wilber would call the disaster of flatland applied to transformative technology: exterior metrics (compute, speed, valuation) are treated as the whole story, while interiority, meaning, ethics, and culture are invisible. And it exemplifies what eco-economists would call the growth fallacy: the assumption that exponential expansion of throughput is unambiguously good, with biophysical limits treated as engineering problems to overcome rather than as real constraints.

The most important question the article never asks is also the most important question of the decade: What is all this for, and at what cost to what?

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?