31

I found a post that I suspect to be generated by ChatGPT or another LLM service.

The available guidance about what to do in such cases suggests to raise a "looked at by a moderator" flag.

May I raise a "deleted as plagiarized content" flag instead, on the grounds that uncited content, no matter where it comes from, is considered plagiarism on Stack Overflow?

Return to FAQ index

0

1 Answer 1

32

tl;dr

Yes, you can. And your flag should be marked "helpful"1. However, "looked at by a moderator" is still a better flag choice.


Any content which is not authored by the post owner and not properly referenced is considered plagiarism. The flag is technically correct.

Furthermore, if the post you flag is otherwise eligible to retain the reputation accrued so far upon deletion, only deleting it "as plagiarized content" will undo the illegitimate reputation gain.

However, this could result in your flag being delayed much more than it could have.

Since the introduction of the plagiarism flag, the moderators UI now has a separate bucket for the "deleted as plagiarized content" flag. Flagging suspected AI-generated posts as plagiarized content results in a categorization that, in practice, is sub-optimal. Plagiarism cases are slow and cumbersome to handle. As a consequence, the "deleted as plagiarized content" flag bucket is simply looked at less often. If you want your flag to be handled sooner, use a "looked at by a moderator" flag.

Moderators don't lose anything valuable here because both flags allow for custom flag text where you can explain why you are flagging the post, and in the rare cases where the post reputation needs to be invalidated, the moderator can raise a "deleted as plagiarized content" flag themselves2 and delete the post as such; and the "chatgpt.com" that you'd input as "Link(s) to original content" doesn't really matter at all. We don't care which LLM produced the output.

We look forward to a future — which is still shrouded in the mists of Stack Exchange, Inc.'s staffing shortages — where a dedicated AI flag will be implemented.


1: if it's determined that the flag has merit
2: there are user scripts which make this quick and effortless

2
  • 2
    The full post leads me to the opposite conclusion as your tl;dr. I would rather see the content removed quickly, than worry about "illegitimate reputation gain" - since such posts often get downvoted anyway, and suspension etc. is more interesting to me from the "justice" perspective. Commented May 29, 2024 at 23:06
  • 5
    @KarlKnechtel note that the tl;dr says that you can flag, not must flag. Which flag to use is up to the flagger. The purpose of this post is to say that "In need of moderator intervention" is preferred. Commented May 30, 2024 at 8:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.