Just saw this question with the tags outdated and historical.
Both of these need to be killed with fire, in my opinion.
-
2Only requires 80 edits. :)Robert Harvey– Robert Harvey Mod2014-06-25 18:30:59 +00:00Commented Jun 25, 2014 at 18:30
-
4Sounds like a community challenge to make this post outdated and historical ;)Oded– Oded StaffMod2014-06-25 18:31:42 +00:00Commented Jun 25, 2014 at 18:31
-
7@Oded: I'll post my feature request to replace [status-completed] with [status-outdated] later.Wooble– Wooble2014-06-25 18:32:18 +00:00Commented Jun 25, 2014 at 18:32
-
80 edits or deletions.Bill the Lizard– Bill the Lizard Mod2014-06-25 19:43:51 +00:00Commented Jun 25, 2014 at 19:43
-
If they're historical, it seems like they'd be worth saving. Just because they are outdated doesn't mean they should be burninated. :PThe Guy with The Hat– The Guy with The Hat2014-06-25 20:47:03 +00:00Commented Jun 25, 2014 at 20:47
-
With mah toolkit, it only took ten minutes. Of course, that included combing through all the questions to VTC, downvote, and flag for extra crispy burnination.user1228– user12282014-06-25 21:10:44 +00:00Commented Jun 25, 2014 at 21:10
-
4You missed a perfect chance at a great title: "[historical] and [outdated] are historical and outdated."tckmn– tckmn2014-07-25 04:34:38 +00:00Commented Jul 25, 2014 at 4:34
Add a comment
|
