-27

Just a curiosity. I have often found users' profiles to be very helpful, or otherwise interesting. I also have often felt the need to +1 a person rather than a question/answer, just because they are particularly helpful.

Advantages/disadvantages to doing this? Would this make the reputation gap too high for "bigtime" users who get 10k+ profile views?

6
  • 6
    What's so helpful about seeing a pretty picture? Commented May 18, 2014 at 0:14
  • 7
    wow, -8 for a legitimate, honest question. I'll stay away from meta now Commented May 18, 2014 at 1:11
  • 16
    the votes are signalling agreement, not quality or comoposition Commented May 18, 2014 at 1:38
  • 8
    Perhaps I shouldn't take it personally. The answer seems a resounding no Commented May 18, 2014 at 1:57
  • 4
    Never, ever take something personally in here :-) sometimes this needs some ... "training". Commented Aug 3, 2014 at 13:02
  • @khaverim Wow, you got more beating that I did a few times. That's impressive. I believe it's a combination of bullying and biased voting. I've seen posts being upvoted just because they've been upvoted before, downvoted because someone already downvoted them and e.g. closed, because someone put a single close-vote. It's damaging the site but I think it's a human nature. Can't be changed. :) Commented Aug 4, 2014 at 13:52

2 Answers 2

29

No, there should not. Stack Overflow isn't about the people, it's about the content. Upvote the helpful answers, and that increases the user's rep. Being able to upvote a person independently of their content wouldn't be useful.

2
  • 3
    Profiles contain content, is all I mean, and often helpful content. There is already a badge for having a full profile if I remember correctly. It's a far cry from the usefulness of the q/a content, probably, but I thought it was worth a shot. Upvoting a profile is not completely independent of that person's content. Their content is right on the page! And besides, they also add their own there. Commented May 19, 2014 at 19:26
  • @khaverim: perhaps, you can make that content as proper Q/A on the site? Commented Sep 18, 2014 at 15:36
1

Apart from the discussion on people vs. content, the point here is, what will be the use of the +1 (or, -1)?

In an answer, the upvote (+1) is a sign of acceptance of the same which reflects the usefulness and realibility of a particular answer / approach. OTOH, the downvote (-1) denotes the low-quality or wrong answers.

What is the significance of voting on a profile, in that context? What is right or wrong in a profile? If there is a link to a very useful content, the right place of that content is into a self Q&A wiki-style post, IMHO.

Note: If it's about the popularity of a particular user, you always have the "IMPACT" and "Profile Views" tab.

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.