Owning Your Experience [Reference Article]
How to Speak Inarguably
Note: “Reference Articles” are more technical and provide nuanced detail on concepts that would disrupt the flow if I had to explain them every time. They are also evolving documents and may include half-baked ideas or notes for future development.
Owning your experience is a way of speaking that trades “truth-claims about reality” for “truth-claims about what is happening inside me.”
It’s the difference between presenting an opinion as a fact (“This is disrespectful”) and presenting it as your lived experience (“When that happened, I felt dismissed, and I’m making a story that my input doesn’t matter”).
The best way to think about it is you’re speaking inarguably. That is, in a way that the other person literally cannot argue with. It’s tremendously powerful.
I learned this technique from my friend Michael Porcelli (here is his article on the topic) and I’ve found it reliably helpful.
Examples
This doesn’t even need to be particular obvious. It could be as simply as sprinkling in terms like:
“To me…
“I think…” or “I feel…”
“It seems like…”
“In my opinion…”
But they can also worked into the middle or end…
“…and I know this is MY thing…”
“…but that’s just how it lands for me.”
And here are some longer examples:
Project handoff
Not owned: “You’re dropping the ball.”
Owned: “When the handoff came in after the time we agreed, the story I make up is that I can’t rely on our agreements. Is there something I’m missing about what happened?”
Interruption in a meeting
Not owned: “Stop talking over me.”
Owned: “It seemed like you jumped in while I was mid-sentence. The meaning I’m making is that my point isn’t landing. Can I finish, then I want to hear your take?”
Mess at home
Not owned: “This place is a disaster.”
Owned: “Seeing the kitchen like this, I’m aware I’m craving order before I can relax. Would you be willing to reset it with me for ten minutes?”
The point is that the effect is somewhat cumulative. It’s not a magic formula. What actually matters most is the energy you convey, but—and this is the whole point of my structure-oriented approach—having some knowledge of the basic practices and structures will make inhabiting that stance much more likely.
Conclusion
Now, owning your experience stands on its own, but there are a few adjacent habits that tend to make the whole thing land more cleanly, so they’re worth a quick mention.
Don’t tell other people to “own their experience”; just model it, and if needed, check a guess with curiosity.
Don’t disguise assessments as feelings (for example, “I feel like you’re…”); name the story, and then name the actual emotion.
Don’t hint at requests; say the request directly, and leave room for a yes or a no.
Even if none of those supporting habits are perfect, I’ve found that returning to ownership language still changes the temperature. When the sentence ends with something like “but that’s just my experience,” or “that’s my thing showing up,” it becomes easier for someone to hear what’s true for me without feeling forced to agree with my framing.
And even when it doesn’t fully land, it’s good hygiene: it keeps attention anchored in what you actually know first-hand, which helps you stay confident and grounded about what you’re claiming.



