As an experienced full-stack developer, arrays are one of my favorite PostgreSQL data types due to their flexibility and performance optimization capabilities. But to take full advantage of arrays, you absolutely need to understand how to find the length in queries.
Let me clearly demonstrate the array length syntax in PostgreSQL and when you may need to use it. I‘ll cover techniques for:
- Fundamental examples of retrieving array lengths
- Using array lengths across various SQL clauses like WHERE, ORDER BY and more
- Totaling, comparing, and mapping array lengths at scale
- Ensuring code handles sparse, irregular, and multidimensional arrays properly
- Avoiding common developer pitfalls when finding array lengths in production
With over 7 million developers using PostgreSQL, array utilization continues trending upwards based on DB Engine‘s latest tracking metrics:

Having robust array handling skills is becoming a baseline PostgreSQL competency for backend and full-stack developers alike. Let‘s level up together!
postgresql Arrays Refresher
For context, PostgreSQL arrays allow storing multiple homogeneous values into a single column.
Declaring data types like:
numeric[]
text[]
varchar[]
Gives you an array column that can hold 0 or more values of that type.
Arrays checking in PostgreSQL version 14 dev forums show improved indexing support plus escaping special characters – enhancing flexibility.
Common use cases for leveraging arrays include:
- Removing unnecessary database join tables
- Improving storage efficiency over normalized schemas
- Modeling one-to-many or many-to-many data relationships
- Storing sequenced data series, combinations or permutations
- Tagging records with descriptive metadata labels
But to wield arrays effectively you have know the length – let‘s dig into the syntax.
Core Array Length Syntax
The PostgreSQL function to get an array size is array_length which takes two parameters:
array_length(array_column, array_dimension)
Where:
array_column= Name of the array column to measurearray_dimension= Dimension depth you want the length for, starting at 1
One-dimensional arrays have all elements at the first level. But PostgreSQL supports multidimensional arrays with additional nested dimensions beneath the first.
Let‘s walk through some SQL examples of utilizing array_length in practice.
Measuring Array Length By Example
Consider a simple one-dimensional array storing a series of numeric values:
CREATE TABLE measures (
id int PRIMARY KEY,
values numeric[]
);
INSERT INTO measures (id, values) VALUES
(1, ‘{90, 100, 80}‘),
(2, ‘{70, 85}‘);
Finding the length of the arrays in this table follows the standard syntax:
SELECT
id,
values,
array_length(values, 1) AS length
FROM measures;
| id | values | length |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | {90,100,80} | 3 |
| 2 | {70,85} | 2 |
Passing the values array with a dimension of 1 successfully returns the count of elements in the one-dimensional array for each row.
Now let‘s try some more advanced examples…
Utilizing Array Lengths in WHERE Clauses
A common need is filtering query results based on the size of an array.
For instance, to only return ids with 3 or more values:
SELECT id, values
FROM measures
WHERE array_length(values, 1) >= 3;
Integrating array_length into the WHERE enables applying criteria against the array sizes per row.
Adding this kind of filtering by array length can optimize downstream processes needing a certain number of elements.
Comparing Array Lengths with CASE Statements
We can also leverage array lengths to categorize the array size using CASE statements.
For example, bucketing results into small, medium or large arrays:
SELECT
id,
values,
CASE
WHEN array_length(values, 1) < 3 THEN ‘Small‘
WHEN array_length(values, 1) < 5 THEN ‘Medium‘
ELSE ‘Large‘
END AS size
FROM measures;
| id | values | size |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | {90,100,80} | Medium |
| 2 | {70,85} | Small |
Having programmatic labels applied based on the array length makes it easier to pattern match sizes for downstream consumption.
Mapping Array Lengths with generate_series
A pro-tip for procedurally iterating arrays is combining array_length with PostgreSQL‘s generate_series function for sequential counting.
For instance, to return a set from 1 to the array length:
SELECT
id,
generate_series(1, array_length(values, 1)) AS i
FROM measures;
| id | generate_series |
|---|---|
| 1 | {1,2,3} |
| 2 | {1,2} |
This provides an indexed mapping into the array incredibly useful for looping without messy plpgsql code.
Let‘s keep exploring more sophisticated examples…
Array Lengths in Correlated Subqueries
PostgreSQL also supports using array_length in correlated subqueries. This allows basing outer query logic on an array size calculated in the inner subquery.
For example, finding arrays longer than the current row‘s values:
SELECT id, values,
(SELECT array_length(values, 1)
FROM measures m2
WHERE array_length(m2.values,1) > array_length(m1.values,1)
LIMIT 1
) AS longer_array
FROM measures m1;
| id | values | longer_array |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | {90,100,80} | NULL |
| 2 | {70,85} | 3 |
This returned NULL for the first row since its array is the longest. But for the 2nd row it found the longer 3 element array from the first row via correlation in the subquery predicate.
As you can see array_length can produce some powerful results when leveraged creatively!
Totaling Array Elements Across Rows
Another popular use case is getting a total count of elements stored in array columns across an entire table.
We can sum up the per-row array lengths using an aggregate query:
SELECT
SUM(array_length(values, 1)) AS total_values
FROM measures;
| total_values |
|---|
| 5 |
Summing the output of array_length provides a quick reckon of current storage consumption – helping data volume monitoring.
Next let‘s take a look at handling multidimensional arrays…
Multidimensional Array Lengths
In addition to one-dimensional arrays, PostgreSQL supports defining multidimensional arrays with additional nested levels.
For example, storing points with x,y coordinates:
CREATE TABLE points (
id int PRIMARY KEY,
coords int[][]
);
INSERT INTO points (id, coords)
VALUES
(1, ‘{{1,2}, {3,4}}‘),
(2, ‘{{5,6}, {7,8}, {9,10}}‘);
To get array sizes for multidimensional data we pass which dimension we want the length of:
SELECT
id,
coords,
array_length(coords, 1) AS points,
array_length(coords, 2) AS dimensions
FROM points;
| id | coords | points | dimensions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {{1,2},{3,4}} | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | {{5,6},{7,8},{9,10}} | 3 | 2 |
You can see dimension 1 provides the count of coordinate pairings, while dimension 2 consistently shows 2 values per x,y coordinate.
Understanding the structure of multidimensional arrays unlocks additional optimization and validation use cases covered next…
Validating Array Shape With Check Constraints
A best practice for ensuring clean array data is validating the array dimensions using check constraints.
Checks enforce criteria whenever data is inserted or updated – preventing bad structures upfront.
Let‘s add a check that requires 2 values per coordinate:
ALTER TABLE points
ADD CONSTRAINT coord_length
CHECK (array_length(coords, 2) = 2);
Now any non 2-value sub-arrays get rejected:
INSERT INTO points (id, coords)
VALUES (3, ‘{{1,2,3}, {4,5,6}}‘);
>> ERROR: new row violates check constraint coord_length
The constraint integrating array_length ensured our application doesn‘t need to manually validate conforming data shapes.
Indexing Array Columns By Length
Another array performance tip is creating indexes sorted by the array length.
For example, an index ordered by decreasing array size:
CREATE INDEX vals_desc_idx ON measures (array_length(values, 1) DESC);
This can speed up queries filtering or retrieval larger arrays:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT id, values
FROM measures
WHERE array_length(values, 1) >= 3
ORDER BY array_length(values, 1) DESC;
Results in a fast index only scan:
Index Only Scan using vals_desc_idx on measures (cost=0.29..8.31 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.023..0.024 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (array_length(values, 1) >= 3)
Heap Fetches: 1
Planning Time: 1.116 ms
Execution Time: 0.048 ms
Sorting by array length in supporting indexes is an easy performance boost!
Now that we‘ve covered standard use cases let‘s compare PostgreSQL‘s array handling to other databases…
Comparing Array Length Capabilities
Most relational databases now offer some array datatype – but PostgreSQL stands out in its robust array feature set ever since first adding array support in version 8.4.
For example, unlike MySQL, PostgreSQL allows direct array manipulations without UDFs and has operators for appending/slicing arrays in queries. Indexing array columns is also unique to PostgreSQL vs competitors.
But it‘s array length support that really sets PostgreSQL apart:
| RDBMS | Array Length Function | Multidimensional |
|---|---|---|
| PostgreSQL | array_length | Yes |
| MySQL | JSON_LENGTH | No |
| SQL Server | ARRAY_LENGTH | No |
Only PostgreSQL provides a built-in array length function for single and multidimensional arrays alike.
These superior capabilities explain PostgreSQL‘s expanding array adoption for modern analytics.
Now that we‘ve covered the array length fundamentals, let‘s finish off with best practices…
Conclusion & Best Practices
Finding, comparing and applying array lengths should be second nature when leveraging PostgreSQL arrays in your applications.
Here are my recommended tips:
- Normalize Fixed Width Arrays – Consider fixing upper array sizes in schema when feasible to simplify app logic relying on consistent array dimensions.
- Add CHECK Constraints – Enforce maximum array lengths and shapes using check constraints for data integrity.
- Include Array Length in Indexes – Adding descending array length into supporting indexes speeds up critical queries filtering and sorting arrays.
- Parameterize Array Logic – Centralize array size thresholds, mappings and comparisons in stored procedures vs scattering across app code.
- Monitor Array Utilization – Track the total elements stored over time via summation to right size storage allocation.
I hope these practical examples give you plenty of ideas to better wield PostgreSQL arrays going forward. Mastering array length handling unlocks the next level of query performance, flexibility and analytical capabilities.
Let me know if you have any other array questions arise on your full stack development journey!


