Skip to main content
Log in

Increased confidence of radiomics facilitating pretherapeutic differentiation of BRAF-altered pediatric low-grade glioma

  • Oncology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Currently, the BRAF status of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) patients is determined through a biopsy. We established a nomogram to predict BRAF status non-invasively using clinical and radiomic factors. Additionally, we assessed an advanced thresholding method to provide only high-confidence predictions for the molecular subtype. Finally, we tested whether radiomic features provide additional predictive information for this classification task, beyond that which is embedded in the location of the tumor.

Methods

Random forest (RF) models were trained on radiomic and clinical features both separately and together, to evaluate the utility of each feature set. Instead of using the traditional single threshold technique to convert the model outputs to class predictions, we implemented a double threshold mechanism that accounted for uncertainty. Additionally, a linear model was trained and depicted graphically as a nomogram.

Results

The combined RF (AUC: 0.925) outperformed the RFs trained on radiomic (AUC: 0.863) or clinical (AUC: 0.889) features alone. The linear model had a comparable AUC (0.916), despite its lower complexity. Traditional thresholding produced an accuracy of 84.5%, while the double threshold approach yielded 92.2% accuracy on the 80.7% of patients with the highest confidence predictions.

Conclusion

Models that included radiomic features outperformed, underscoring their importance for the prediction of BRAF status. A linear model performed similarly to RF but with the added benefit that it can be visualized as a nomogram, improving the explainability of the model. The double threshold technique was able to identify uncertain predictions, enhancing the clinical utility of the model.

Clinical relevance statement

Radiomic features and tumor location are both predictive of BRAF status in pLGG patients. We show that they contain complementary information and depict the optimal model as a nomogram, which can be used as a non-invasive alternative to biopsy.

Key Points

• Radiomic features provide additional predictive information for the determination of the molecular subtype of pediatric low-grade gliomas patients, beyond what is embedded in the location of the tumor, which has an established relationship with genetic status.

• An advanced thresholding method can help to distinguish cases where machine learning models have a high chance of being (in)correct, improving the utility of these models.

• A simple linear model performs similarly to a more powerful random forest model at classifying the molecular subtype of pediatric low-grade gliomas but has the added benefit that it can be converted into a nomogram, which may facilitate clinical implementation by improving the explainability of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

BRAF mutation:

BRAF V600E point mutation

CI:

Confidence interval

ML:

Machine learning

pLGG:

Pediatric low-grade gliomas

RF:

Random forest

ROI:

Region of interest

FLAIR:

T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Patil N, Cioffi G et al (2020) CBTRUS Statistical Report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2013–2017. Neuro Oncol 22 (Supplement_1):iv1–iv96

  2. Sievert AJ, Fisher MJ (2009) Pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Child Neurol 24:1397–1408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sturm D, Pfister SM, Jones DTW (2017) Pediatric gliomas: current concepts on diagnosis, biology, and clinical management. J Clin Oncol 35:2370–2377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryall S, Tabori U, Hawkins C (2020) Pediatric low-grade glioma in the era of molecular diagnostics. Acta Neuropathol Commun 8:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner MW, Hainc N, Khalvati F et al (2021) Radiomics of pediatric low-grade gliomas: toward a pretherapeutic differentiation of BRAF-mutated and BRAF-fused tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42:759–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lassaletta A, Zapotocky M, Mistry M et al (2017) Therapeutic and prognostic implications of BRAF V600E in pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 35:2934–2941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryall S, Zapotocky M, Fukuoka K et al (2020) Integrated molecular and clinical analysis of 1,000 pediatric low-grade gliomas. Cancer Cell 37:569-583.e5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalvati, F, Zhang Y, Wong A et al (2019) Radiomics. Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering:597–603

  9. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Breiman L (2001) Random Forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner MW, Namdar K, Alqabbani A et al (2022) Dataset size sensitivity analysis of machine learning classifiers to differentiate molecular markers of paediatric low-grade gliomas based on MRI. Oncology and Radiotherapy 16:01–06

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS (2008) How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 26:1364–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart WE, Laird CD, Watson J-P et al (2017) Pyomo — optimization modeling in Python. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been made possible with the financial support of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Funding Reference Number: 184015).

Funding

This research has been made possible with the financial support of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Funding Reference Number: 184015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Khalvati.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Farzad Khalvati.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California).

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in two previous papers. The first, “Radiomics of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas: Toward a Pretherapeutic Differentiation of BRAF-Mutated and BRAF-Fused Tumors,” https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6998, was an exploratory study that relied on 115 of our 253 patients. The second, “Dataset size sensitivity analysis of machine learning classifiers to differentiate molecular markers of pediatric low-grade gliomas based on MRI,” Oncology and Radiotherapy 16 (S1) 2022: 01–06, relied on 251 of our 253 patients. These previous studies aimed to establish a relationship between radiomics features and BRAF status, and to determine the best machine learning model on this classification task.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Diagnostic or prognostic study

• Multicenter study

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Birgit B. Ertl-Wagner and Farzad Khalvati are co-senior authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kudus, K., Wagner, M.W., Namdar, K. et al. Increased confidence of radiomics facilitating pretherapeutic differentiation of BRAF-altered pediatric low-grade glioma. Eur Radiol 34, 2772–2781 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10267-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10267-1

Keywords